Culture Hollywood Is Cranking Out Original Movies. Audiences Aren’t Showing Up. - New movies based on fresh ideas are fizzling at the box office

By Ben Fritz
April 13, 2025 2:17 pm ET

1744720148344.webp
Director Christopher Landon with Meghann Fahy, who stars in the thriller ‘Drop.’ Photo: Bernard Walsh/Associated Press

LOS ANGELES—When director Christopher Landon introduced his new thriller, “Drop,” before its premiere at the Chinese Theater on Hollywood’s Walk of Fame, he had a warning for the packed auditorium.

“It’s really hard out there for an original movie,” he said, urging everyone who liked the Universal Pictures release to “scream it from the rooftops” and on social media.

“Drop” opened this weekend to an estimated $7.5 million domestically, one of two new movies based on fresh ideas that fizzled at the box office. The other was Disney’s “The Amateur,” a spy thriller adapted from a little-known 1981 book, which opened to an estimated $15 million.

After years of gripes from average moviegoers and Hollywood insiders alike about the seemingly nonstop barrage of sequels, spin offs and adaptations of comic books and toys, the film industry placed more bets on original ideas.

The results have been ugly.

Nearly every movie released by a major studio in the past year based on an original script or a little-known book has been a box-office disappointment. Before this weekend’s flops were Warner Bros. Discovery’s“Mickey 17” and “The Alto Knights,” Paramount’s “Novocaine,” Apple’s “Fly Me to the Moon,” Amazon’s “Red One,” and the independently financed “Horizon: An American Saga Chapter 1” and “Megalopolis.”

1744720153948.webp
Jack Quaid in ‘Novocaine.’ Photo: Paramount/Everett Collection

Jason Blum, who produced “Drop” and built his company Blumhouse largely on original horror franchises, said audiences’ preference for known properties has made it harder to release original movies in theaters, “even though that’s where some of the most exciting and risky storytelling still lives.”

Need for advertising​

Getting people into theaters more frequently is a priority for a movie industry still recovering from the pandemic. Box-office revenue in the first three months of this year in the U.S. and Canada was the lowest it has been, excluding the pandemic, since 1996.

1744720215915.webp

t the CinemaCon industry convention in early April, theater owners said they welcome more original films, but only if they are backed by robust advertising campaigns. Building buzz for a new film in a media environment fractured between YouTube, TikTok, streaming and sports is tough, particularly when it is an unknown title.

“We’re opening films that have almost zero awareness,” said Bill Barstow, president of Main Street Theatres, a small Nebraska-based chain.

Many consumers are content to wait until an original motion picture is available to rent online a few weeks after its theatrical release or to stream on a service like Netflix in a few months.

‘Creating new franchises’​

The only films succeeding in the current environment are those with built-in audiences, like “A Minecraft Movie,” which was released in early April and has grossed more than $280 million domestically. And these days, even franchises can be far from a sure thing. Long-running series such as Marvel and DC superheroes and live-action remakes of Disney animated classics are showing their age and proving unreliable at the box office.

Studios say they have little choice but to make more original movies they hope will buck the odds.

1744720252960.webp
‘A Minecraft Movie’ has grossed more than $280 million domestically. Photo: Warner Bros/Everett Collection

“Telling original stories and taking risks is the only path toward creating new global franchises,” Bill Damaschke, Warner Bros.’ head of animation, said at CinemaCon.

Some of the increase in original film releases is attributable to Amazon and Apple, which are building film businesses with few well-established franchises. One of the biggest bets on an original film from any company this year is Apple’s “F1,” a June release starring Brad Pitt as a race-car driver.

Amazon hyped 11 coming movies to exhibitors at CinemaCon, of which six were originals. Among traditional studios, Warner Bros. is taking the most risks on originals, with big budget films from directors Paul Thomas Anderson and Maggie Gyllenhaal.

Hollywood’s next original release comes Friday with Warner’s “Sinners,” a horror movie starring Michael B. Jordan. Next month even Marvel, home to Hollywood’s biggest franchises, is taking a gamble with “Thunderbolts,” about a super team brand new to all but the most devoted comic-book readers.

Source (Archive)
 
The theater experience is not what it used to be. Those days are over. Nobody wants to be lectured by smarmy black bitches, faggots, or post-wall roasties about (insert imaginary grievance). But more than that, it's all just derivative of past work. It's all been done before. "Cranking out" is the problem here. They just slap this dogshit together in a couple months with zero passion or feeling. Great, you know how to frame a shot. Now try creating characters and stories people would become invested in.
 
Last edited:
I've never heard of any of the movies mentioned here besides the Minecraft one. I think part of the dynamic is that marketing has been a black hole for money for a long time. Studios throw money into marketing, and there is no way to gauge the relationship between what they put in and what they got out, so nobody who works in marketing is ever held accountable for a flop. Even when the problem is you never heard of half this shit
the problem is major marketing isn't seen by most people anymore. TV ads, newspaper/magazine ads, billboards, and webpage ads. Nobody except boomers and niggers on welfare sit in front of the tv anymore, save for sportsball fans, but they only watch the games which are going to be sponsored by big corpos or ads for blockbuster movies, not these smaller titles. nobody but boomers and people too stupid to use the internet beyond facebook and youtube reads print newspapers or magainzes anymore. nobody pays attention to billboards unless they're stuck in traffic and then that adds a negative connotation to it so you're even less likely to care about it. And everybody younger than 35 knows what an adblocker is. The way to market nowadays is digital word of mouth, getting people to share it voluntarily (or paying people to share it), and have it spread that way. But this is hard to get right, and these marketing companies often fail and people notice the forced memes and react negatively, even if the movie/show/product was something they otherwise may have liked, cause people don't like being duped.
 
Hollywood just needs to have the creativity of the 1920's to mid-2000's.

Most films and talents past 2010 have been mediocre.

Clark Gable is still more talented and entertaining than the majority of modern Hollywood.

I tried liking Zendaya and Tom Holland, utterly mediocre.
You won't get that again from modern Hollywood. If anything, waiting for AI to take off so people can make their own AI movies. Seen some stuff already as trailers and clips for what can be actual movies or shows. No longer will the jews be the gatekeepers of what someone can make.
 
There is also the problem of having soooo many movies that are too expensive as well.

Say, back in the old 90s, there were movies that were full events, THE event of the season: Jurassic Park, ID4, Armageddon, etc. And some small movies for people who watched them already or didn't like big blockbusters that were 1h and a half at most. So, we spent the weekend wandering around, went to the movies, watched those movies because we already watched the big on, ate a burger, and went back home.

Now, every movie is a 3 hours blockbuster.
 
The theater experience is not what it used to be.
I went to theater to see the 3rd Star Wars prequel in 2005. The theater was crowded and it was pretty much like going to a movie in the 1990s IIRC. Last one seen for awhile.

The next movie I saw was that new Mario movie, almost 20 years later. Compared to 2005, it seemed there were a lot more ads before the trailers even started. And those "pre-ad ads" felt "smartphone"-ish or "social media"-like. Then those trailers finally began. One of the trailers was for this "diverse" Spider-Man movie, with a "BLM" thing seen in the background in one of the scenes. The movie itself was OK though. And during the movie there weren't many people in the theater. Like maybe a handful to a dozen or so?
 
Can't imagine why people don't want to see one of the 3 varities of goyslop avalible at the movies:

-Capeshit about niggers and women being Mary Sues.
-Degen shit about nihilism where the goal is to be the most depraved.
-"Romance" where a 50 year old married white woman is blacked by a 20 year old.

Honesty with these 3 original flavors of slop, the goys not coming out is honestly antisemitic at this point. Soros paid a lot of money to get his fetishes in the media, how can you reject him like this?
Didn't read the article award
 
I think the last original IP I saw in theaters, or the last mainstream original IP at least, was Knives Out. It was full of subtle anti White shit, great replacement type stuff. The fact that every movie has some level of propaganda / brain reprogramming in it now is why I’ve largely given up on movies.
This is exactly why my consumption of media let alone enjoying media made in the past 10 years or so has dropped off a cliff. Everything is absolutely tainted with the rot of globohomo retardation. Be it retarded girl power, white people evil, random shots of nude men with zero nude women, faggot relationships etc. No, I will not eat around the pieces of shit you put on my steak.

Looking back in at least the last 5 years theres exactly one movie that I didnt have to roll my eyes at some point in; The Northman. Beyond that even the "good" movies have blatant globohomo retardation that knocks them down and takes you out of the experience of watching a movie, Dune being the best example of this.
 
Novocaine has a decent premise for an action flick but no one really likes Jack Quaid. I think he's a decent actor but he has that soy look plus he's a nepobaby.
I will never understand this. I've thought he was a really good, likeable actor since I saw him for the first time in HBO's Vinyl.
 
Just because it's original doesn't mean it's good.

Mickey 17 seemed like a somewhat unique idea for a sci-fi/dark comedy. But then they had to go and cast Mark Ruffalo as the bad guy and make a film that, as Critical Drinker put it, "Has the biggest case of TDS outside Mark Hamill's livingroom."

We don't want woke crap. We don't want "thinly-veiled Adolf Trumpfler allegory." We don't want capeshit. And we sure as hell don't want random slop, either. Hollywood is dead, and Hollywood jews killed it.
 
Back