UK U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act - The UK Supreme Court says YWNBAW! (although the trans identity is still a protected characteristic)

Article | Archive
The New York Times. Published: 16 April 2025

U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act​

Britain’s Supreme Court was asked to rule on whether trans women can be defined as female under a British law that aims to protect against discrimination.

The Supreme Court in Britain ruled on Wednesday that trans women do not fall within the legal definition of women under the country’s equality legislation.

The deputy president of the court, Lord Hodge, said in a summary of the decision: “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex.”

However, he added: “We counsel against reading this judgment as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another, it is not.” He said the ruling “does not cause disadvantage to trans people” because they have protections under anti-discrimination and equality laws.

The landmark judgment follows a yearslong legal battle over whether trans women can be regarded as female under the 2010 law, which aims to prevent discrimination on the basis of gender, sexuality, race and other protected characteristics.

The decision was highly anticipated because it could have potentially far-reaching consequences for how the law is applied to single sex spaces, equal pay claims and maternity policies as well as to some of the rights available to transgender people in Britain.



BBC live reporting; https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t
0.webp
1.webp 2.webp 3.webp 4.webp

Also, sex is binary:
5.webp 6.webp

👀
single-sex-spaces.webp



Related:
JK Rowling, the Queen of TERF Island who helped fund this lawsuit, is celebrating.
Queen-of-TERF-Island.webp GosUamSXUAAWcMW.webp
And the troons are melting down even more than usual over her. See:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21120381
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21129887
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21135630
a.webp b.webp c.webp d.webp e.webp
 
Last edited:
I guess the British Supreme Court hasn't been corrupted to the point of claiming 2 + 2 = 5 (yet), and the eunuchoid seethe is quite funny. But don't forget that the British government is still attempting to replace the native white British population via mass immigration and is still legally discriminating against white people, especially white men.
 

Attachments

  • Graphs.webp
    Graphs.webp
    169.9 KB · Views: 17
Dummy, I get that she's celebrating. She just happens to introduce some real awful rot into her body as she celebrates and for some reason it bothers me, which I expressed.
There are better ways to celebrate.
Listen to this fucken soft cunt complaining about someone else drinking and smoking. What's wrong buddy don't produce enough testosterone to handle a smoke?
 
There's nothing incidental about it. Trannies are singled out and given the full protection of the law.
It's a decision about a troon case. How else would it be phrased?

Troons do have the full protection of the law. But again, not because they're troons but because they're male.

From the part you quoted:
Again, the individual employee's sex plays an unmistakable and impermissible role in the discharge decision.
Edit: Essentially this decision doesn't make it a requirement for jobs to permit trannies to wear skirts; it makes it a requirement for jobs to permit men to wear skirts, and it says that includes trannies. The distinction is important.
 
So now men will have to deal with perverted transvestites who have been given too much in way of coddling in their toilets and spaces. This has been foisted on women for too long.

I hope this will further push people to despise troons all the more.

Himdia Willyby is a man and will always remain so. He will never be a woman.
 
Troons do have the full protection of the law. But again, not because they're troons but because they're male.

From the part you quoted:
The difference between a troon and a woman is that the troon is male. Saying that an employer cannot consider that difference is the same as saying that they cannot discriminate against troons.
 
Back