UK U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act - The UK Supreme Court says YWNBAW! (although the trans identity is still a protected characteristic)

Article | Archive
The New York Times. Published: 16 April 2025

U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act​

Britain’s Supreme Court was asked to rule on whether trans women can be defined as female under a British law that aims to protect against discrimination.

The Supreme Court in Britain ruled on Wednesday that trans women do not fall within the legal definition of women under the country’s equality legislation.

The deputy president of the court, Lord Hodge, said in a summary of the decision: “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex.”

However, he added: “We counsel against reading this judgment as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another, it is not.” He said the ruling “does not cause disadvantage to trans people” because they have protections under anti-discrimination and equality laws.

The landmark judgment follows a yearslong legal battle over whether trans women can be regarded as female under the 2010 law, which aims to prevent discrimination on the basis of gender, sexuality, race and other protected characteristics.

The decision was highly anticipated because it could have potentially far-reaching consequences for how the law is applied to single sex spaces, equal pay claims and maternity policies as well as to some of the rights available to transgender people in Britain.



BBC live reporting; https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t
0.webp
1.webp 2.webp 3.webp 4.webp

Also, sex is binary:
5.webp 6.webp

👀
single-sex-spaces.webp



Related:
JK Rowling, the Queen of TERF Island who helped fund this lawsuit, is celebrating.
Queen-of-TERF-Island.webp GosUamSXUAAWcMW.webp
And the troons are melting down even more than usual over her. See:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21120381
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21129887
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21135630
a.webp b.webp c.webp d.webp e.webp
 
Last edited:
The only thing more insufferable than a rich white woman is a rich white woman who's right. Love to see our drunk wine aunt JK Rowling taking victory laps on these 41%ers.
Btw, all these (literal) faggots threatening to kill JK Rowling wouldn't even be able to handle the recoil of a gun. Let alone "wrap their hands around her neck and ?twist?" whatever that means lol.
 
The only thing more insufferable than a rich white woman is a rich white woman who's right. Love to see our drunk wine aunt JK Rowling taking victory laps on these 41%ers.
Btw, all these (literal) faggots threatening to kill JK Rowling wouldn't even be able to handle the recoil of a gun. Let alone "wrap their hands around her neck and ?twist?" whatever that means lol.
It's the "I am going to punch a Nazi" thing. All those troons and leftists daydream about this constantly. Because to invoke some actual change in their own lives impossible for them, so they keep writing this shit on reddit and X to virtue signal.
 
You are retarded for cheering J. K. Rowling on, she is literally your average ultra-leftist if you don't consider her views on trans people. She would push for this forum getting banned if trannies didn't exist.
This is a perfect example of a retarded leftist or a very young child.
Everything is black and white and no nuance exist.
If you disagree on one point you must disagree on all points.
If you dislike a person then all that persons opinions must be bad and you must disagree with all of them.
There can never be partial agreement on some, but not all, points and compromises are impossible.

This is the mindset of either a very young child or someone with emotional and/or intellectual retardation.

People can agree with JKR on some things, such as trannies are dangerous sex offenders that should be locked up and also at the same time disagree with JKR on other issues.

Why are these people so retarded?
 
What does he do when he sees a wounded fox stuck in the chicken wiring he put up? He does the only thing any sane person would do:

He uses a cricket bat to beat the fox to death in his garden, and then posts about it on Twitter (the day after Christmas
Son if you ever become part of the productive class you'll learn that foxes are to chickens as middle eastern immigrants are to white women and beating one to death is one of the more admirable things a man can do.
Unless you're bitching that he used a bat and not his bare hands in which case, based and please accept my apologies for holding you in contempt
.
 
Since I haven't seen her own followup to posts like this, here it is.
View attachment 7236213
Smoking hot while enjoying a cigar and being perfectly blunt. I now forgive the Brits for all unrepresented taxation. I know she's a libby, but I'll give her a pass for this.

There's nothing incidental about it. Trannies are singled out and given the full protection of the law.
Yeah, we really dug our own graves on that one. Maybe we can pretend to be vaguely british enough to say to the next litigious gendersplaining tranny "I'm so terribly sorry, I'm afraid we have different laws about that where I come from. Fancy a fag?"
 
This is a perfect example of a retarded leftist or a very young child.
Everything is black and white and no nuance exist.
If you disagree on one point you must disagree on all points.
If you dislike a person then all that persons opinions must be bad and you must disagree with all of them.
There can never be partial agreement on some, but not all, points and compromises are impossible.

This is the mindset of either a very young child or someone with emotional and/or intellectual retardation.

People can agree with JKR on some things, such as trannies are dangerous sex offenders that should be locked up and also at the same time disagree with JKR on other issues.

Why are these people so retarded?
It would probably take a bit of lube these days but I can fix here.
 
Breaking: Random Internet dweller Pretendasaur is fuming at this news
View attachment 7227717
View attachment 7227716
NB people thrive

Sorry what? Thrive at what exactly? Being attention whores desperate for relevancy when they're pretty much dead last in the troonery idgaf brigade? Nonbinary is not a thing and if Rosalind Franklin were alive today, she'd have a fatal heart attack upon seeing how the degenerate scum have taken binary, helix, and DNA and twisted it horrifically to suit their agendas.

I just had a thought. Those intersex ppl are gonna have to just pick one of the 2 genders then right?
 
Last edited:
wonder why Pooners aren't just OUTRAGED at this?
Because they're mostly self-loathing women, as opposed to troons, who are aggressive narcissistic men.

I mean, conservative rule for 10 years where all these problems happened and boiled over.

No, the problem is neither the Left or Right actually goes through with what they say.
There was no conservative rule, because here's nothing conservative about the British "Conservative Party". They're welfare liberals.
 
Because they're mostly self-loathing women, as opposed to troons, who are aggressive narcissistic men.


There was no conservative rule, because here's nothing conservative about the British "Conservative Party". They're welfare liberals.
That or,like trans identifying men,people who have suffered sexual abuse at some point. While I loathe enbies and TIFs I feel a bit of pity for them, just a smidge, that I cannot muster for TIMs.
 
Typical SJW lying. If and when Rowling passes away, there'll be people who'll miss her.

And didn't the SJWs used to look up to Rowling, just like they used to look up to Musk?
Yeah, she was a "champion" for women's rights and LGBT rights. She was one the few outspoken successful authors, who didn't sleep their way to the top and had achieved something. She also ran a charity. That resonated very well with the old school leftist/progressive crowd.
Most younger people during that era were liberals, left-leaning or even further down that side. That's when her novels were ubiquitous. A lot of them grew up reading HP and watching the movies with friends.

Now these people have grown up, and they've found other reasons to still like her because these people either turned right wing or settled in the middle. She's strong and independent, she won't bow down to the tranny menace. I assume a lot of people are fine with troons existing but most of us draws the line at the encroachment of women's civil liberties and rights to not be around freaky crossdressing porn-sick moids.

HP merchandise still sell. Easter is coming and I've bought a few Lego sets for family. Each set contributes to TTD. Call me a redditor and a consoomer, I'm happy.

Obviously there's many valid criticisms of her activism. She claims Hermoine was Black when we know it's just not true. She had heavy involvements in the movie adaptation. Why didn't she make her a sassy Black qween then?
She also claimed that Great Britain should accept refugees and backed out when someone said they'll pay for tickets if she provides housing. Even she knew a lot (not ALL) are violent brown misogynists.
I'm a one-issue voter. She's right about troons so I like her. Reduxx is pretty far left, I can care less. They're also right about troons. So is the CPC. TTD now.

Elon Musk is entirely different. He called himself a socialist and pretended that he cares about the environment with those electric vehicles. This went very well with the ADULT left-leaning crowd ordinarily (you know, they're the ones driving, not a 10-year-old). Now he's flipped, he supports someone that's in favour of maximum extraction, so his past supporters who were typically left/right leaning or progressive tree huggers now hate him. I'm kind of a tree hugger but I never liked him, I saw through him when he pretended to be "left" and I saw through him when he grifted the right. He's just a psychopath who's aligned to power. He doesn't care about left or right wing concerns. He wants his ego fed. He's a fat bald faggot that's a nigger with pale skin. He pops out kids and abandons them like one too.
 
A lil’ pooner got OUTRAGED about the court ruling and has some thoughts…

View attachment 7239765
Dressing up as something you’re not to get access to women’s bathrooms… Why don’t you think this over for just a second lil dood?
The things pooners don't understand is no man cares about them in our spaces as pooners are only a danger to themselves or schoolchildren if they are heavily armed.

I've related the story of the terrified looking pooner I saw once in my gym changing room in another thread. Only one person was in any sort of danger in there and, as she buggered off into one of the few enclosed dressing rooms whilst the rest of got changed as normal, she knew it too.
 
All this whining about whether JK aligns perfectly with le based and muh redpilled views, missing the point that she was a single mother on food stamps who became a self-made billionaire and is now using her wealth and celebrity to defend women against the invasion of trannies into female spaces. She may not be chud hero #1 but she is an objectively very impressive woman who people are trying to diminish to the level of an unmentionable. I'm tired of 1488 kekestanis trying to besmirch her the same as everyone else just because she's not posting swastikas on her twitter. Does your own grandma? Be realistic.

And just to say in general: People are never going to have fully sympatico political views, the constant purity spiralling is so low IQ. So she's not Richard Spencer, so sorry, she is the most famous terf in the world though, and the right people are going to go ahead and love her for that.
 
People are fucking retards and think just because the cunt doesn't like troons that she's on their "side". As if she isn't still a fag hag who loves nigger washing and destroying her own culture for diversity points.
People can be right about some things and wrong about other things.

They're planning a march in central London, topless.
"Not a fetish".
 
Back