Canada is a failed state

I hate Jews as much as the next red blooded European but if the Gazans didn't want to witness any atrocities they probably shouldn't have provoked the Juden on October 7th. You cannot smack someone and then claim to be violated by the response. Furthermore, Muslims protesting in the West should either be deported or sent to the showers of Dachau.
Brown hands typed this
 
Man. Look Carney's body language. He can't even look at Poilievre.
This geriatric faggot unironically lifted his understanding of the security clearance issue straight from a CBC hotstove panel, plus he threw the door wide open for bringing up how he's a Chinese puppet after the media went out of its way to cut it as a debate topic.

What an incredible self-own.
 
This geriatric faggot unironically lifted his understanding of the security clearance issue straight from a CBC hotstove panel, plus he threw the door wide open for bringing up how he's a Chinese puppet after the media went out of its way to cut it as a debate topic.

What an incredible self-own.
Never underestimate the hubris of your garden variety Liberal. Carney spent his entire professional life believing that he was the smartest man in the room and this election was merely supposed to be a formality for his rise to the premiership.
 
This geriatric faggot unironically lifted his understanding of the security clearance issue straight from a CBC hotstove panel, plus he threw the door wide open for bringing up how he's a Chinese puppet after the media went out of its way to cut it as a debate topic.

What an incredible self-own.
I'm a retard but I'm not sure who is getting owned how here. Everyone and their mother has a clearance, and having a clearance doesn't preclude you from reporting things known through other means. And presumably if you're PM you can just like declassify stuff either way. I have a low view of politics and haven't been following, what's the tl;dr on this clearance scandal thing?
 
I'm a retard but I'm not sure who is getting owned how here. Everyone and their mother has a clearance, and having a clearance doesn't preclude you from reporting things known through other means. And presumably if you're PM you can just like declassify stuff either way. I have a low view of politics and haven't been following, what's the tl;dr on this clearance scandal thing?
You're correct about all of these things for a general security clearance. However the media has been relentlessly misdirecting people by conflating an overall clearance that you'd get as part of being a member of cabinet (which Pierre immediately clarified he absolutely has) with the one specifically related to the foreign interference scandal. Agreeing to that specific clearance DOES preclude you from reporting on what you've learned since it has a permanent gag order attached to it and it would be a prosecutable offense to do so. The government could have just never made that contingency a part of the conditions in the first place, but since it's practically guaranteed that the overwhelming majority of the compromised individuals are Liberal, they want everyone to sign a gag order so that the story can be permanently buried. If Pierre agreed to it he'd never be able to declassify it even as PM and he's resisting an obvious trap that would allow the Liberals to whitewash their status as Chinese monkeys.

The debates are pretty much the only time in the campaign where the MSM can't manipulate Pierre's words to a national audience and he was gifted an unedited opportunity to clarify the situation, cite Tom Mulcair's vociferous defense of his decision so he has non-partisan legitimacy, and call out Carney as a total hypocrite. Carney outed himself on live TV as someone who understands even the basics of the issue as poorly as the average CBC boomer when he's trying to pitch himself as some kind of diplomatic super-genius. And again, it made his CCP ties a topic when the debate structure was manipulated to insulate him from that specific issue. His response was awful too, he meandered too much with his rebuttal and he ran himself out of time before he could get half his thought out.
 
Last edited:
Is it just me or has Tim Hortons mocha gotten really, really shitty? It used to be decent even with the shit coffee but now it's just plain awful.
It's been that way since Tim's was sold off to Burger King. If you want old Timmie's coffee you need to get McDonald's coffee as they now use the beans that Tim's used before.
 
English debate happened. Actually refreshing to see Poilievre and Carney be civil with eachother, discuss policy and even exchange jokes after experiencing a decade of US trashy reality TV debates. What's depressing is that the options are;

Libs: jeetflood, infinite war, nothingburger housing plan, "we'll deal with Trump!" (they won't), dull bureaucrat leader

Cons: jeetflood, infinite war, nothingburger housing plan, "we'll deal with Trump!" (they won't), dull bureaucrat leader trying to be hip

NDP: throw away your vote

Bloq: throw away your vote (secret Quebec only DLC)
 
It's been that way since Tim's was sold off to Burger King. If you want old Timmie's coffee you need to get McDonald's coffee as they now use the beans that Tim's used before.
It got worse really quickly. Like four to six months ago I got a mocha and it wasn't great but it was fine but I got one the other day and it was downright undrinkable
 
It got worse really quickly. Like four to six months ago I got a mocha and it wasn't great but it was fine but I got one the other day and it was downright undrinkable
Yeah no clue then, sorry. Haven't had Tim's coffee since it switched. If I had to guess though just part of the 2025 hellscape that we live in. I think I heard something about a frost and effecting coffee, but it might have been chocolate. But in general coffee prices (along with everything else) have gone up. They are probably buying a new, shittier and cheaper bean.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PhoBingas
I hate Jews as much as the next red blooded European but if the Gazans didn't want to witness any atrocities they probably shouldn't have provoked the Juden on October 7th. You cannot smack someone and then claim to be violated by the response. Furthermore, Muslims protesting in the West should either be deported or sent to the showers of Dachau.
I really think Israel went to far on this one;

but yeah- I agree with you entirely. The Gazans aren't total victims either, and had their own autonomy in this.

When they dislike Hamas, its also not because they attacked the jews, but because their tactics were so batshit stupid, it blew back on them immediately. If not Hamas, they'd enthusiastically support whatever organization was sending kids over as suicide bombers, like the PLO, etc.

When Oct 7th happened, I immediately thought it was going to be like 9/11 and the war on terror, and was right. It gave Israel a clear mandate to take out Hamas and prevent such an attack from happening again-

but like 9/11, the path they took, the level of destruction, the lack of planning, and the hijacking by the extreme right in Israel to use this as a settler project, it has so many parallels to Iraq that history basically is repeating itself once more.

Overnight, Hamas ironically destroyed and disabled the left wing in Israel (emboldening the right), which would probably have more restraint on how the war was fought. You see this thing repeating itself a few times in history, even with 9/11 or the assassination of the Tsar by nihilists in Russia. Its such a braindead tactic and I don't understand why so many terrorists do it and think anything good will happen after. 'If we kill a bunch of peace activists and rape them, surely the rest of the country will come to the negotiation table'

Carney outed himself on live TV as someone who understands even the basics of the issue as poorly as the average CBC boomer when he's trying to pitch himself as some kind of diplomatic super-genius.

I might consider a banker to be a good prime minister during times of economic crisis- but for Carney in particular, theres three major points I dislike.

A) Hes from the old liberal elite. He is and had a leading role in the same regime that basically damned this country over the past decade, green lit key decisions, towed the line, and if he 'wants to solve a problem', he was there when it was caused

B) Hes a neoliberal banker, when it comes to the UKs economy not working- I don't believe his economic planning has anything potentially good for the middle or lower classes. I'm sure that all he has is refinancializing the economy and things like trying to invest in big tech, lowered banking tariffs, etc. Great for GDP- does shit all for the average person

C) For diplomacy, hes not a diplomat. Hes a banker. He has some connections, I'm sure- but hes not the guy to actually do diplomacy with Trump, or any serious big global player now- frankly. Hes more of an administrator, than anything else. This is government by the 'deepstate', just with a more naked face, plain and simple

To be fair, I don't think Pierre is that good of a diplomat either, but with these key things, even he's a bit better potentially, to be honest.
 
At this point there should be a test where each potential leader has to go negotiate a preliminary trade agreement with America or something, somehow in a way that isn't explointed.
 
Back