ARealLifeSoyjak
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2024
This is the most unintentionally hilarious thumbnail he's ever posted. He looks like he's busting a nut.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
View attachment 7123052
This is the most unintentionally hilarious thumbnail he's ever posted. He looks like he's busting a nut.
This dude does not own his own home lmao. Why lie about something like that. "I couldnt pay my parents rent so i got a mortage !"Going through some of Cody's Twitter posts.
View attachment 7149580
If this is true, he likely must've gotten fired from Cook Medical.
View attachment 7149591
Brief mention of his mother. I wonder if any info about the Inman family can be found.
View attachment 7149597
A little bit of irony from the Nintendo Vegan.
View attachment 7149602
View attachment 7149603
Cody lying about his living conditions.
View attachment 7149608
"How dare women be anything other than tradcath and fertile."
View attachment 7149609
View attachment 7149611
View attachment 7149614
Another reminder that Cody not only participates in the culture war, but is squarely tunnel visioned on Nintendo being "conservative-core" gaming and reminding us that he's got no love for homo thugs.
Oh boy, how's he gonna spin Mario Kart World costing $90 for a physical copy? Is he gonna call everyone who complains poor, despite struggling to afford the game himself? (yes he will)Nintendo's doing its Switch 2 presentation right now. Expect some kind of smug salt content to follow for the next year and a half.
Also a reminder that Cody is certainly gay/bisexual and is very ashamed of it.View attachment 7149609
View attachment 7149611
View attachment 7149614
Another reminder that Cody not only participates in the culture war, but is squarely tunnel visioned on Nintendo being "conservative-core" gaming and reminding us that he's got no love for homo thugs.
That could explain why he lives in a separate shack, but still at his parents' address. It could explain why he rarely ever cites religion as the backing behind his moral compass, but still reposts religious people on Twitter, why he hates women so much(except for the ones in anime), why his hatred of the LGBT is almost exclusively focused on lesbians, why his favorite franchise and specific game is centered around a twink who has canonically crossdressed, etc., etc.Also a reminder that Cody is certainly gay/bisexual and is very ashamed of it.
That is exactly why I find it so fascinating when he says "nintendo bad"You guys are way overthinking this when it comes to Cody. He has the mind of a child, literally. Everything is good or bad, black and white. If he likes nintendo, nintendo can do no wrong. He will defend nintendo no matter what. There is no need to psycho-analyze. He has chnaged his postion about 8 times in the last three months due to his only principle being "nintendo good". When you see him talk about nintendo imagine a 5 year old talking, because thats where his mental capability is.
That is exactly why I find it so fascinating when he says "nintendo bad"
Everything really is childish about him. I'd like to see him test his ego debating youtubers or other people again, but he knows he's too wrong and a coward to actually debate anyone outside of a text box.You guys are way overthinking this when it comes to Cody. He has the mind of a child, literally. Everything is good or bad, black and white. If he likes nintendo, nintendo can do no wrong. He will defend nintendo no matter what. There is no need to psycho-analyze. He has chnaged his postion about 8 times in the last three months due to his only principle being "nintendo good". When you see him talk about nintendo imagine a 5 year old talking, because thats where his mental capability is.
He's not ever going to acknowledge it. Cody will talk about emulation only in the context of PC gamers emulating console exclusives. Nothing is coercing him to actually address the fact that Nintendo technically does use emulation, especially when in truth his issue isn't the concept of emulation itself but people being able to enjoy Nintendo products on their own terms instead of Nintendo's. Emulation as a word is easily interchangeable with anything else, and the actual details of emulation are too much for him to do ad-libbed commentary about. Why learn to make a comepelling argument when you can instead learn to be selective with your engagement in the first place? IT'S ALSO WHY HE NEVER RESPONDS TO ANYONE MAKING FUN OF HIM ABOUT THE LACK OF ATTENTION HIS NOVELS GET.I want to know how hard he's going to backpedal on his "emulation is illegal" stance when it has been confirmed that Switch 2's backwards compatibility with its predecessor is achieved through emulation.
Either that or "it is OK when Nintendo does it" sort of mental gymnastics.
The logic is that at least on a subconscious level, as spite-oriented people obsessed with presenting others with a fake consensus and narrative, your inability to purchase and play the same products as they do is a positive part of their own experience as consumers and Nintendo fans, even if it means actively investing in the continued awareness of your budget. People who take longer to buy Nintendo products no matter the circumstances are to be seen as people who *refuse* to give Nintendo money.I don't get the whole emulation should be illegal thing, there's only so many ways you can charge people to play the NES Mario Bros. when the whole game can be played on a browser. Sure, i can understand games on sale that need income for employees that worked on it, but people that don't grasp at the concept of "Games that don't sell anymore don't give the company money" are just kinda pathetic. I remembered talking to some chatters and Harman about getting a copy of a physical Earthbound game reasonably, and even he knows that they are expensive. If you know the games are unattainable, then why should I care a scalper is trying to make a profit off of me for a game that was $50 back then?