Zipperhead. Not because I say it often or have a reason to say it but because it's objectively the meanest racial slur. Kike? It's just saying the jew word for Circle wrong. Nigger? Just a variant of the spanish word for black. Chink, Jap, Spic? Just shortened versions of the actual names for the ethnicity. Meanwhile Zipperhead has actual malice and history behind it.
Someone needs to audit the donations his 'church' has gotten and if any of his family got new jobs in ukrainian companies.
Your perception of him being a "moron" clearly doesn't matter if he's close enough to Trump to be called a "spiritual advisor."
You'll need to elaborate. Not providing enough information in this post.
When you rapidly change opinions on something you likely have been incentivized to do such. Likely he was paid from the $100 billion sent to ukraine already.
They go out of their way to say "sexual harassment" in the first paragraph to prime the reader to view the migrant in a certain way. It was attempted rape.
He tricked you into actually saying Pe, get fuckin tricked
It wouldnt surprise me.
If they used $100 billion to retool one plant then the corruption is worse than anything we have ever experienced. Maybe that is why the refused to audit any of the funds.
I think the only thing holding Trump back from going full Jackson is if he does the SC will see their authority in danger and will rule against Trump in every case and basically declare everything his Administration does as Unconstitutional. And the Dems will side with them hard for a chance to nullify his entire Presidency.
I'm being hyperbolic in my post. Do you believe they used $100bn to retool one plant? They used that money for other things, too. My point is that most of the "money sent to Ukraine" was directed to domestic arms manufacturers - Colt, Lockheed, Boeing, and RTX, among others.
Why would he cuck out?
We could also cut the Slavic middleman out and use all the money to support domestic production.
What middlemen are involved? All the products sent over are completed arms products from the US or NATO forces given to Ukraine at the westernmost border. You'll have to explain your point more thoroughly.
I honestly lean towards continuing to mostly support Ukraine but keeping consistently underperforming companies like Colt (that would absolutely not survive if they had to actually compete with other US arms companies, much less a lot of the foreign ones) on the military industrial teat is probably not a good idea, no. Trump himself fucked that concept up by giving those utter failures at Boeing another plane to design. That's putting aside the fact that tons of people don't believe sending weapons to Ukraine benefits a soft power perspective and want something in return for helping them. They do not give a shit that taxpayer dollars are going towards arm companies.
I strongly agree that help should come with something in return. The problem is that Ukraine cannot offer anything as 'repayment' or 'in return' until the war ends and peace is secured for the future, be that in NATO as a member or something like the NATO partnership for peace in the 1990s.
Ukraine has a very high Christian/Orthodox population so I think it makes sense that he'd want to support a country that's still 80% God-fearing currently being attacked by a nation of secularists that historically torture and murder Christians for fun
