Furry Fandom and Drama General

I remember hearing about that on TV Tropes. Needless to say, one guy said "We sold out the Soviet Union for this?" or something like that. Needless to say, it wouldn't be surprising if any of them were furries.

On the flip side, I have to wonder (and I believe Doug Walker asked it first): why did the animators of Space Jam give Lola bunny boobies, if it wasn't for the sex appeal?
Trying to figure that out, I'm guessing they wanted to make a female character that was tough or something. I don't know because all I can say is that she ended up being liked by furries, I'm sure of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xalver

This is actually kind of funny to me, there was actually an episode of Rescue Rangers centered around Gadget joining a cult, and she ends up rejecting it in the end. I wonder if these cultists actually know about this, and if they do, how do they square the fact that their object of worship was once part of an anti-cult message?
 
On the flip side, I have to wonder (and I believe Doug Walker asked it first): why did the animators of Space Jam give Lola bunny boobies, if it wasn't for the sex appeal?
I've never seen Space Jam, but I suspect it was probably just to give the character a uniquely identifiable model. There's a rule about character design that a good character model should be immediately recognizable as a silhouette. Without breasts the character would probably have been too similar to Bugs. They want their characters to be immediately recognizable, especially by children, so they can market toys and cereal and soft drinks and happy meals and whatnot to them, because that's where the big money is (at least before the brony phenomenon). Making the character model appealing to sexual deviants was just an unfortunate side effect, though one they'll happily go along with if those deviants also buy toys and cereal etc.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Sidechain
Most of the Looney Tunes rule 34 is actually of Lola Bunny(some new Character), Lunatics Unleashed(one of the many spinoffs), and Tiny Toons(oh god why).

Without Lola, all the rule 34 of the main series would be shock art(which is good), but can't say the same for the spinoffs.

The worst rule 34 offender is Tiny Toons(eye raping cub porn, most of it legit).

your childhood has just been raped (oh god why)
 
Most of the Looney Tunes rule 34 is actually of Lola Bunny(some new Character), lunatics unleashed(one of the many spinoffs), and Tiny Toons(oh god why).

Why are you looking up nudes of Looney Tunes characters if you don't have the hots for Bugs Bunny and his friends?

without Lola, all the rule 34 of the main series would be shock art(which is good), but can't say the same for the spinoffs.

So you are saying you frequent the site "Rule 34", a place generally known to be a godforsaken shithole filled with the worst types of drawn depravity?

The worst rule 34 offender is Tiny Toons(eye raping cub porn, most of it legit).

When is it legit, and when isn't it? Drawing sexy pictures of naked cartoon animals is gross no matter what way you twist or turn it. There's really no excuse for anyone to make it, much less for anyone to look it up. So... why?

your childhood has just been raped (oh god why)

Why do you go to those websites in the first place? Do you like it? Enjoy it?
 
Why are you looking up nudes of Looney Tunes characters if you don't have the hots for Bugs Bunny and his friends?



So you are saying you frequent the site "Rule 34", a place generally known to be a godforsaken shithole filled with the worst types of drawn depravity?



When is it legit, and when isn't it? Drawing sexy pictures of naked cartoon animals is gross no matter what way you twist or turn it. There's really no excuse for anyone to make it, much less for anyone to look it up. So... why?



Why do you go to those websites in the first place? Do you like it? Enjoy it?

I do not find it erotic, and by legit I meant the artist intended it for erotic proposes (even if sick fucks like him only like it).

rule 34 is also not a site, it's a subject related to the rules of the internet. (Though I browse Paheal out of non sexual curiosity)

I also have nothing against shock art
 
I do not find it erotic, and by legit I meant the artist intended it for erotic proposes (even if sick fucks like him only like it).

How does one define a sick fuck? Is not anyone who gets any sort of enjoyment out of looking at depraved and sick stuff somewhat of a sick fuck by default?

rule 34 is also not a site, it's a subject related to the rules of the internet.

How then do you come across these "rule 34" drawings, and where exactly? What's the appeal of these sites to you?

I also have nothing against shock art

What is the difference between shock art and furry babby porn when both depict naked drawings of cartoon characters? And why do you enjoy this type of art?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foulmouth
How does one define a sick fuck? Is not anyone who gets any sort of enjoyment out of looking at depraved and sick stuff somewhat of a sick fuck by default?



How then do you come across these "rule 34" drawings, and where exactly? What's the appeal of these sites to you?



What is the difference between shock art and furry babby porn when both depict naked drawings of cartoon characters? And why do you enjoy this type of art?
Might I try and answer your questions?
1) By definition I think it would mean someone getting some sort of pleasure out of something deprived or just plain wrong. One example is A-Log liking an image of Bart and his mother.

2)Perhaps Xalver has some sort of curiosity that is akin to "watching a train wreck". You know it is wrong but you just can't look away.

3) With shock, I guess it was made with the thought of trolling people. With furry babby's however, that was made to arouse someone.

These are my guesses and if I'm wrong, I'm wrong.
 
You know, half the threads like this are people reflecting in part to their own nature. It's why any social welfare thread ends badly.
Indeed. By reflecting into one's own nature, they can pretty much see what kind of spergy lies within it. A furry looking into his own nature as a furry would question himself as to why he has babby furry images. A brony reflecting on his nature would wonder why he is attracted a pastel colored horse whose coat is like a vomited rainbow. The way a thread like this can end badly is if someone tries to respond why they look up creepy images of Tiny Toons even if said someone doesn't have the hots for Bugs Bunny.
 
Indeed. By reflecting into one's own nature, they can pretty much see what kind of spergy lies within it. A furry looking into his own nature as a furry would question himself as to why he has babby furry images. A brony reflecting on his nature would wonder why he is attracted a pastel colored horse whose coat is like a vomited rainbow. The way a thread like this can end badly is if someone tries to respond why they look up creepy images of Tiny Toons even if said someone doesn't have the hots for Bugs Bunny.

I'm scared to reply for the sake of this thread…

This may be more like a weird fetish, but the characters are furry, sooo...

1385174219.clericilis_cockvorekittyinked.png

(Fixed broken image via repost)
What the fuck!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How then do you come across these "rule 34" drawings, and where exactly? What's the appeal of these sites to you?
Gonna play a little devils advocate here. Given the tendency for some furries and bronies and their ilk to shit up forums that are completely unrelated to anything furry (like gaming forums) with their shitty "art", I can only imagine how awful the more extreme members of furry fandom might make sites that are somehow furry related. Add in the possibility that those sites might have lazy moderators and no spoiler implementation, and I can well see how a Chuck Jones fan might have seen furry shit they never wanted to see (and why they are really pissed off about it).

Just imagine how awful the CWCki forums would be without constant moderation and spoiler tags. We would all have seen things we never wanted to.
 
Gonna play a little devils advocate here. Given the tendency for some furries and bronies and their ilk to shit up forums that are completely unrelated to anything furry (like gaming forums) with their shitty "art", I can only imagine how awful the more extreme members of furry fandom might make sites that are somehow furry related.
Distantly related and a pet peeve of mine: Google images has taught me that MLP fans will find a way to shoehorn cartoon ponies into any meme, fandom or fetish.

Nightmare Before Christmas? Jack Skellington pony. LOTR? Emo Frodo pony. German uniforms? Nazi pony. Meatspin pony. Dig deep enough and you'll find Adolf Hitler pony. (He is blue, by the way.) It's a fucking parade.
 
Distantly related and a pet peeve of mine: Google images has taught me that MLP fans will find a way to shoehorn cartoon ponies into any meme, fandom or fetish.

Nightmare Before Christmas? Jack Skellington pony. LOTR? Emo Frodo pony. German uniforms? Nazi pony. Meatspin pony. Dig deep enough and you'll find Adolf Hitler pony. (He is blue, by the way.) It's a fucking parade.
"If it exists, it has been ponified..."
 
Distantly related and a pet peeve of mine: Google images has taught me that MLP fans will find a way to shoehorn cartoon ponies into any meme, fandom or fetish.

Nightmare Before Christmas? Jack Skellington pony. LOTR? Emo Frodo pony. German uniforms? Nazi pony. Meatspin pony. Dig deep enough and you'll find Adolf Hitler pony. (He is blue, by the way.) It's a fucking parade.
Yeah, I understand since there are some things you can't look up without getting porn (ex: Renamon (thankfully kids don't look her up))

Yeah, I understand since there are some things you can't look up without getting porn (ex: Renamon (thankfully kids don't look her up))
You can also type in random letters and digits in search and get images with similar id's. (some of it porn)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Distantly related and a pet peeve of mine: Google images has taught me that MLP fans will find a way to shoehorn cartoon ponies into any meme, fandom or fetish.

Nightmare Before Christmas? Jack Skellington pony. LOTR? Emo Frodo pony. German uniforms? Nazi pony. Meatspin pony. Dig deep enough and you'll find Adolf Hitler pony. (He is blue, by the way.) It's a fucking parade.
Go even deeper and you'll find a Jesus Pony, you'll find a CWC pony. Wonder if someone made a ponified human centipede well congratulations, it is out there. In fact, it wouldn't be surprising if someone made a ponified version of Null or Saney. As much as how some bronies are fans of other memes, shows, and games, there are some things that do not deserve ponify, especially if they have the mentality that "it's better because it has ponies". Then there are comments that would literally show sperging just because of ponify (both for and against). Funny thing with MLP being shoehorned, Valve had a TF2 hat that was a sort of MLP reference. Needless to say, some people flat-out sperged in rage about it.

"If it exists, it has been ponified..."
Yeah, some internet rule someone made up.
 
Back