Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 130 38.0%

  • Total voters
    342
So can anyone tell me what Aaron has supposedly "lied about" and what we've "gotten wrong" now that nick has admitted to literally everything everyone has been saying for 2+ year?
aaron lied about eating cum and being in a homosexual relationship with Nick where they pretended it was about banging each other's wives. that's why nick is so hurt if you want to know the truth about it.
 
I'd would be really funny if he went through the trouble to get it back, and (if) the cyber crimes stuff would prove he violated attorney client privileges, got fucked over and suspended anyway.
I mean, I wouldn't want to hire a lawyer if he had hacked into another person's email and read their private attorney-client communications. I don't feel like that attorney would represent me well and not get into trouble while I was paying him. Seems like something a state bar association would take far more seriously than just being a drug felon. If people start thinking lawyers like that were practicing in a state with a small bar of practicing attorneys (much less practicing trial attorneys) like Minnesota, then the state bar would not be very happy. Law is a business, after all.

So it's far more likely that the state bar takes action upon complaints of violating others' attorney-client communications, especially while adverse to them legally, than for the FBI to do anything about it being a crime.
 
aaron lied about eating cum and being in a homosexual relationship with Nick where they pretended it was about banging each other's wives. that's why nick is so hurt if you want to know the truth about it.
But don't you understand, he ate my GOO, that makes him a total homo!
 
Inappropriate behavior that made one of my children uncomfortable, in ways that would infuriate people if I disclosed the details—and at some point, I may.

I wonder how inappropriate this behavior towards a little girl was, on a scale of 1 to Melton.

Just kidding! He doesn't give a shit about kids, unless he can use them as an excuse or as deflection.
 
Now Nick is claiming that one of his kids claimed their foster family (probably nick's parents/siblings/inlaws) "made them uncomfortable", while clearly nudging the audience to believe they were sexually assaulted or exposed to hard drug use.
I'm guessing Nick never had much of a childhood. While it's been a good while, I understand why kids may be apprehensive about staying at other places and not others. You have a sleep-over with a friend, hell yeah, you're with a friend, maybe pizza and videogames or whatever you like are involved, hell yeah this is awesome. Compared to being ripped from your home that you're familiar with and being told, you're gonna sleep/stay in this new place; maybe you're familiar with them, maybe you're not, but it's against your will, and it's not gonna be pizza, and videogames, and cool shit like it would be when staying at a friend's house. It also doesn't help that you watched your parents get led away by police, and the police also undoubtedly supervised and put you through weird tests for some reason; even if you don't understand all what's going on, you know shit isn't right, and now you're at a different house with different people, and for some reason, the adults are saying their parents love them and hope you'll be back with your parents and at your house in a short amount of time.

Now tell me why a kid may be uncomfortable, and why it's specifically the fault of the people they're staying with and not related to the events that landed them there.
 
I wonder how inappropriate this behavior towards a little girl was, on a scale of 1 to Melton.

Just kidding! He doesn't give a shit about kids, unless he can use them as an excuse or as deflection.
In nicks fucked up mind the "inappropriate behavior" was probably They saw the 9 year old eating cocaine like it's a pixy-stix and tried to stop her.
 
Last edited:
So can anyone tell me what Aaron has supposedly "lied about" and what we've "gotten wrong" now that nick has admitted to literally everything everyone has been saying for 2+ year?
nickrage.gif Aaron ate my gooooOOOOooOOooo
In nicks fucked up mind the the "inappropriate behavior" was probably They probably saw the 9 year old eating cocaine like it's a pixy-stix and tried to stop her.
hE pOPpeD mY bAbY gIrl oN tHe hEaD wHEn shE wAS snoRtiN hEr coCaiNE!!!!! What kind of a monster does that to a child?!! Wouldn't even give back to her, but I showed him the ole one two and he folded like a plum at dennys! :really:
 
Last edited:
"The guardian ad litem did not like the fact that one of the children was reporting inappropriate behavior by someone who was around and associated with the county. Inappropriate behavior that made one of my children uncomfortable, in ways that would infuriate people if I disclosed the details—and at some point, I may. When my child reported that, the guardian ad litem said my child was lying and threatened to remove all of our children to out of a family foster care."
Wayment.
The children were being fostered by family members.
One of the kids reports inappropriate behaviour *wink* *wink*
The GAL says if they wanna take this seriously he'll have to remove the kids to an out of family foster care.
They choose not to take it seriously and ignore it

What's the point of disclosing this? To make the state look bad, but its one of Rackets' own family members that's being accused here. Removing the kids to an out of family foster care would be the only reasonable response if you wanted to take a report like that as the truth.
 
It absolutely was retarded, as anyone who ever read and dealt with a warrant/Franks argument said at the time. But Nick can't admit it was retarded. Even if he did, it would be couched as him saying that you have to do everything possible in legal proceedings even if they have a low chance of success. Or that they were good arguments but his counsel was bad. We'll never hear Nick say "yeah, my Fourth Amendment rights weren't actually violated and the warrant was completely good." Part of his cope is that he doesn't have to take responsibility for the crime if he can contest the basis for the search and seizure.

Of course, Nick is totally free to prove me wrong and admit that he was flailing at the time. But I think everyone knows that will never happen.
It's better than that - he'll say the Franks argument was sound and would have won but his lawyer sucks and fucked it up. He's alluded to this multiple times already. Which is funny since his lawyer was a hand-picked Barnes walker
 
SCHOOL ANTI DRUG PROGRAMS UNDER THE CAPTAIN MANNING ADMINISTRATION:

960x0.webp
Okay class, today we're gonna learn about drugs.

classroomrug.webp
Awwwwwww!

960x0.webp
I know, I know. But the school board says there is a very important video you all need to watch. Now please look at the screen.

rekieta-has-a-dsp-moment-on-stream-v0-tnB6mqTh3raYHRuoTE3zDjfF0Esaa52TGN2puGGgj3s.webp
Anime sucks... cope... and sneed says...

m3tbn.webp

960x0.webp
Now, do you little shits understand why you should say no to drugs? You'll end up like Nick Rekieta here, reading the same superchat 11 times about a farting dragon in a car eating pizza!

crying.webp
We get it! We get it! We'll never do drugs! Turn it off! PLEASE MAKE IT STOP!

---


Parents, can I count on your vote?
 
Just to put a point on this, whether he was referring to a County employee or Dan Sletta (who is broadly a county employee, having fostered numerous kids) ...

- Nick claims that one of his children reported behaviour on the part of someone connected to the county' government that made them 'uncomfortable' and would infuriate people if they knew what it was. The GAL in their got mad at that and threatened to have all the children taken from family foster care if they did not stop.
It wasn't clear. Could have been aimed at a government worker.
"The guardian ad litem did not like the fact that one of the children was reporting inappropriate behavior by someone who was around and associated with the county. Inappropriate behavior that made one of my children uncomfortable, in ways that would infuriate people if I disclosed the details—and at some point, I may. When my child reported that, the guardian ad litem said my child was lying and threatened to remove all of our children to out of a family foster care."
Nick said his daughter told them something that made them uncomfortable at the in-laws house. The GAL offered to move the children to a different foster home. But they couldn't go back with Nick and Kayla. The GAL would have reported any malfeasance to police and would never have said his daughter was lying.

... ANY allegations of this sort to anyone are inflammatory and possibly defamatory. Pics/statements/proof or it didn't happen.

One possibility: If CPS was doing their job (this is easily googled), protocol generally dictates that CPS may have inspected their bodies to ensure no harm was done because drug possession with kids in the house is highly correlated with harm to children. If this report from the child/ren occurred AFTER the positive drug result (likely), they would have every reason to do this.

(In some states, this can involve inspection of intimate areas, but that is unlikely in this case because there was nothing to indicate that kind of abuse.)

Would a basic body inspection by a stranger make any child feel uncomfortable? Of course it would.

IF that's what he's talking about, Nick brought this situation on himself. As for Dan Sletta, I feel like the context of Nick's words highly implicates him. I could be wrong.

Regardless, choose your words carefully, Rekieta. Holy shit.
 
Last edited:
if you want to know the truth about it.
Bish. :diddler:
SCHOOL ANTI DRUG PROGRAMS UNDER THE CAPTAIN MANNING ADMINISTRATION:
One counterpoint: how do we get to use Nick's likeness without giving him infinite gooberment money? to use the cokestream in all classrooms across America would mean making this man rich beyond measure and that doesn't sit right with me.
 
Kurt streamed from Denny's - LMAO!
1745072938977.webp
I know that Kurt has struggled with loneliness and with trying to make himself more attractive.
Bold Kurt, going-in-for-the-kill Kurt, doesn't-give-a-shit Kurt, "fuck you I know I'm right" Kurt, Kurt with balls, is definitely the most-attractive version of Kurt. (The beard is an improvement, too.)

The age of "occasional podcast sidekick" Kurt is over. The age of "being his own man" Kurt has begun.

They can detect Galaxy Gas use through a vitamin B12 deficiency in blood tests.
Like everything causes a B12 deficiency though, it's hardly conclusive.
That's not specific enough for use as a drug test.
I get that you couldn't declare a parole violation just from Nick having a B12 deficiency—but if the deficiency is severe enough, I wonder if it could be used as grounds for his PO to demand extra surveillance of Nick.
Like if his B12 levels are in the gutter for weeks in a row, then the PO (or an underling) is going to literally just sit with Nick all day like a goddamned shadow to see what he's doing during the day, watching him like he's an elementary schooler with a behavioral problem.
 
Back