Opinion When Must We Kill Them? - Evil has come to America.

Edit 04/18/2025: Well didn’t that get quite a reception! The response has been far greater than I anticipated; I was certainly impressed by the inventiveness and facility of my interlocutors. I wish to make a few points clear. Violence is a last resort, not a first resort. It must come after the exhaustion of all possible remedy. It is not, moreover, appropriate for decisions which are merely unwise or disastrous. It is to be employed only in defense of our Constitution, and of democracy. If it is resorted to, it must be narrowly targeted, and aimed only at extirpating those who have power, and are unjustly resisting giving it up.

Evil has come to America. The present administration is engaged in barbarism; it has arbitrarily imprisoned its opponents, revoked the visas of thousands of students, imposed taxes upon us without our consent, and seeks to destroy the institutions which oppose it. Its leader has threatened those who produce unfavorable coverage, and suggested that their licenses be revoked. It has deprived us, in many cases, of trial by jury; it has subjected us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and has transported us beyond seas to be imprisoned for pretended offenses. It has scorned the orders of our courts, and threatens to alter fundamentally our form of government. It has pardoned its thugs, and extorted the lawyers who defended its opponents.

If these actions become normal, the government could arrest anyone and deport them to prison in a foreign land, without hope of redress, for no reason. It is nothing less than the total abdication of rule of law in this country. There is no guard or protection against it. If this theory prevails, then it is the end of America as a free nation.

I do not wish for this essay to be a mere catalogue of outrages. The conduct of the present administration is as well known to you as it is to myself, and can be understood by any sensible person. On it, no further comment is ventured.

What remains for us to decide is when we fight. If the present administration wills it, it could sweep away the courts, it could sweep away democracy, and it could sweep away freedom. Protest is useful only insofar as it can effect action. Our words might sway the hearts of men, but not of beasts.

If the present administration chooses this course, then the questions of the day can be settled not with legislation, but with blood and iron. In short, we must decide when we must kill them. None of us wish for war, but if the present administration wishes to destroy the nation I would accept war rather than see it perish. I hope that you would choose the same.

But what to do? The rot of the present administration runs deeper than one man. The sacrifice of a hero is insufficient to save our nation, and a gust of wind on a summer day would not have saved us. For let us make no mistake; the problem is not one man, but a whole class of people. If one head is cut off, another would take its place.

Violence only makes sense as part of coordinated strategy. This is why protests are important – not as a way of changing the present administration’s actions, but as a way to coordinate a group. There may come a time when we shall have no guarantee of freedom but the one which we make for ourselves. If it comes, I tell you that there is no greater honor than he who lays down his life for his friends. Until then, we must wait.

And when is that time? Your threshold may differ from mine, but you must have one. If the present administration should cancel elections; if it should engage in fraud in the electoral process; if it should suppress the speech of its opponents, and jail its political adversaries; if it ignores the will of Congress; if it should directly spurn the orders of the court; all these are reasons for revolution. It may be best to stave off, and wait for elections to throw out this scourge; but if it should threaten the ability to remove it, we shall have no choice. We will have to do the right thing. We will have to prepare ourselves to die. I hope that we should conduct ourselves with such courage that it will be our finest hour; I expect that we shall do our duty.

While we wait, we must not be like sheep to the slaughter. We cannot cooperate. We must hide those who are persecuted; we must foil the aims of their agents. The state and local governments which we control can litigate the actions of the present administration. Their police can refuse to share information or be deputized to do the work of the evil ones. If war is politics by other means, then politics is war by other means. There can be no surrender, for surrender means the oppression of all of us.

These are exceptional times! We have not faced such a threat in many years. I wish that it had not come. It is the sorrow of the world that these times have come, and it is we who shall have to bring woe unto those through whom it came.

The future is not certain. It may be that the present administration should flinch, and turn back in face of lighter action. I fondly hope that that may be the case. But if it comes, we must awaken from this ignorant dream. This evil will not pass without blood, sweat, toil, and tears. So harden your hearts, and be prepared to die.

Article Link

Archive
 
I was going to write a whole thing here.

Like, I was going to do this thing where I was going to rhetorically ask him (because lord knows someone who asks a question like this and puts it out publicly isn't going to read that shit if I send it directly, however hilarious that would, in fact, be), and ask him very straightforward but poignant questions about how he got to this point. Why does he feel like this call for violence is his only recourse when people can point out ways that he's openly misinformed on - and not little misinformed, like "oh, I believed X was Y, or I believed that something was this percentage and not that percentage" - anyone can make some mistakes there, I'm talking the kind of "literally not on the same page as reality" shit that lets one make claims like he has on Twitter like that Trump was going to deport people just for being hispanic.

I was going to ask that. But then it came out that he turned out to have previously advocated for lowering ages of consent and suddenly so much made more sense to me.
 
It's mindblowing how much you can get away with if you are having an Antifa or an LGBTQ+ patch.
How its mindblowing? we been seeing this for over a decade now. The far-left has a massive network of influence in most western institutions. The soros funding is a drop in the bucket, that fury at the cuts of USAID and other schemes is precisely because state-funded orgs like those are where they get most of their money and thus influence from. They got friends and contacts everywhere, the courts, the feds, congress, meanwhile the right has no such equivalent. Tons of leftists lawyers who will defend a corporation's right to inject lead into newborn babies will turn on a dime and defend a pregnant woman stabber who burned a public library to the ground because he was "protesting racism" or some shit. The right has no equivalent to this, its meagre networks are there solely to protect corpo donor interests and the greatest ally, not you.
But some rando who makes a blatant fedpost, oh yeah, they're gonna get HAMMERED
Some right-wing rando, if a left-wing one does supports shows up from everywhere.
 
Last edited:
How its mindblowing? we been seeing this for over a decade now.
It's something you only understand as an adult and with some experince. Being an adult for barely a decade makes you unaware of certain stuff, if you see it very young you might not understand what is going on.

For me, I thought that FED posting would result in jail no matter what since it is "muh by law illegal". To see the law being bent infront of you IRL is much different from just reading about it behind a screen, through the news or /pol/. It's something that cracks you when it's right infront of you. That takes some time to process.
The right has no equivalent to this, its meagre networks are there solely to protect corpo donor interests and the greatest ally, not you.
That's correct.
 
I mean, a lot of people mocking this dude, which is great, but this person is serious. And a lot of leftists, like him, agree with him and really want to be the next Lenin. These people do want mass murder and revolution. The problem is, at the moment, they don't have the discipline or skill set to do it at the mass scale they wish or need for it to be sucussful. This guy is not some idiot. A lot of intellectual leftists, especially graduate students in the DSA/PSL/CPUSA, lionize Leninist mass destruction. He's just saying the quiet part out loud.
 
Explain why the capitalist US inflicted faggotry and troonism on the remains of Communist Russia, where both were against the law. Or get raped, solzhenitsyn.
Capitalism hasn't existed in the US since the creation of the Federal Reserve system, so I really have no idea what you're even asking.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Super Guido
Looks like he got evicted
media_Go9UeZcbgAAGER-.webp
This is an interesting comment chain though. Also, this just adds on to my previous post. Now they want to murder his landlord. Again, this is just the evolution of leftoid politics from decolonization, Luigi Mangione, and the radicalization of closed platforms such as Bluesky and Mastedon.
 
Looks like he got evicted
View attachment 7254176
This is an interesting comment chain though. Also, this just adds on to my previous post. Now they want to murder his landlord. Again, this is just the evolution of leftoid politics from decolonization, Luigi Mangione, and the radicalization of closed platforms such as Bluesky and Mastedon.
Sounds like the tranny on the bottom can't differentiate between corporate landlords and ones that own maybe one or two total units, sometimes one they themselves live in.
 
I always have to chuckle and roll my eyes when modern American Leftards start acting all Billy Badass about kicking off a civil war. Most Lefties these days are soft, weak, scrawny/morbidly obese, effeminate city slickers. Most have never even been camping, let alone living rough in a combat zone. Most have never even fired a firearm, let alone understand that they require cleaning and lubrication to function properly. They may have fantasized about taking the life of "evil Nazi chuds", but they've never considered the mental preparation it takes to not freeze up in life and death situations, or the toll it can take on ones psyche to take the life of another human being. And they have never considered that the fact that most of them live in cities makes them all incredibly vulnerable. It wouldn't take a lot to bring their urban centers to their knees. Cut off their electricity and water, block off the major highways so no one can enter or exit, turn back any trucks bringing in food shipments...it wouldn't take much to turn even the most civilized city into a den of pure savagery and chaos in short order. Cities are entirely dependent on rural areas for much of their comfortable, soft lives. Especially food and energy production. It would not go well for them if they decide on civil war.
 
I always have to chuckle and roll my eyes when modern American Leftards start acting all Billy Badass about kicking off a civil war. Most Lefties these days are soft, weak, scrawny/morbidly obese, effeminate city slickers. Most have never even been camping, let alone living rough in a combat zone. Most have never even fired a firearm, let alone understand that they require cleaning and lubrication to function properly. They may have fantasized about taking the life of "evil Nazi chuds", but they've never considered the mental preparation it takes to not freeze up in life and death situations, or the toll it can take on ones psyche to take the life of another human being. And they have never considered that the fact that most of them live in cities makes them all incredibly vulnerable. It wouldn't take a lot to bring their urban centers to their knees. Cut off their electricity and water, block off the major highways so no one can enter or exit, turn back any trucks bringing in food shipments...it wouldn't take much to turn even the most civilized city into a den of pure savagery and chaos in short order. Cities are entirely dependent on rural areas for much of their comfortable, soft lives. Especially food and energy production. It would not go well for them if they decide on civil war.
The right is always quite enthusiastic about its grass-fed beef boys from deep Appalachia running roughshod over the skinnyfat city slickers due to greater camping experience. But in fact, most of the deaths under communism were the direct result of spectacled bureaucrats, dictating deaths by the pen-stroke, basically like this article writer. Given power, he'd casually order your whole family sent to camps and never second-guess himself. Nerds like that have the highest kill counts. Not trigger pulling bodybuilders from the countryside
 
Explain why the capitalist US inflicted faggotry and troonism on the remains of Communist Russia, where both were against the law. Or get raped, solzhenitsyn.
Deserves a sperging thread of it's own. But the organized push for faggotry, troonery, nigger worship, etc... Was originally started by western marxists to destroy the existing (capitalist or traditional or whatever) social order. So that a communist (as in classic marxist-leninist) revolution can finally occur. There's libraries worth of such "theory" produced by lefty academia.

The means (niggerfaggotry) became the end over time, so by now we have the tranny worshipping, corpo cock sucking, latte liberals shitting on the left's erstwhile base (normal, sane wagies).
 
I always have to chuckle and roll my eyes when modern American Leftards start acting all Billy Badass about kicking off a civil war. Most Lefties these days are soft, weak, scrawny/morbidly obese, effeminate city slickers.
While true, it's the ones in militaries, law enforcement, three letter agencies, and govt bureaucracies to watch out for. Like @deleuzeon said, they're the ones who're the real threats. While they may not have the numbers, they do know how to get their non-leftist brethren to "just following orders" everyone they don't like.
 
Is this faggot seriously calling for open violent revolt because the law is being upheld?

What is wrong with leftoids?
Deep down they realize they've doomed themselves and want to be murdered because they're too cowardly to ride a rope.
 
Something like the Summer of Love, only worse, way worse, because the cognitive dissonance of everyone rejecting them when they "know" they're on the "right side of history" will drive them absolutely fucking batshit.
We just have to say YWNBAW/M and around half of the would-be militia turns their guns on themselves.
Deep down they realize they've doomed themselves and want to be murdered because they're too cowardly to ride a rope.
I've heard of suicide by cop, but suicide by chud?
 
Back