Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

[The Judean People's Front]

Nothing about this is funny, but I admit I'm amused that she thinks AI image generators are good enough at this point to be able to recreate sex acts its never reviewed reference images of.

AI can't even do fingers and toes correctly yet. Has she seen those videos of AI trying to show humans eating spaghetti? ANY porn that's created without references would be fucking Lovecraftian. She starts the entire "essay" with a completely bullshit premise.

Too bad exactly 0% of the time spent on it was dedicated to any sort of coherent rational thought.

Exactly. She just needed attention. The orgy posts weren't getting the traction she hoped.

Probably one of the most irritating things about her "paper" is that she's trying to present herself as some kind of researcher or academic but the post is so poorly written

/Thread

 

[keke]

Again she's too retarded to realize pedophilia at its heart is sadism.

She 100% knows. Remember, she is pro-‘kink’ to the extreme. So sadism isn’t a bad thing, getting off to something technically non-sexual (someone being scared) is in her worldview, entirely normal and healthy. She doesn’t think this due to confusion, she is around these people, interacts with them constantly, doesn’t judge them, etc etc, because she is holds that opinion strongly.

Not to be gay, but she’s a bad person.

 

[74164978231]

Not to be gay, but she’s a bad person.

Anyone who is out and open about their sexual life is a bad person.

Think of it as a more evolved marshmallow test. Its what separates a civilized functional person from a primal animal. You want to be consumed and driven entirely by your base impulses? Fine well treat you like an animal. Its a big part of why gays where so rightfully reviled for so long.

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

Nothing about this is funny, but I admit I'm amused that she thinks AI image generators are good enough at this point to be able to recreate sex acts its never reviewed reference images of.

AI can't even do fingers and toes correctly yet. Has she seen those videos of AI trying to show humans eating spaghetti? ANY porn that's created without references would be fucking Lovecraftian. She starts the entire "essay" with a completely bullshit premise.

you're forgetting that most porn is erotica. "i put my cock into @The Judean People's Front 's asshole" and it would be very easy to get an AI to write that.

 

[Octopi]

you're forgetting that most porn is erotica. "i put my cock into @The Judean People's Front 's asshole" and it would be very easy to get an AI to write that.

Only because it's able to scrape shit like that from the Internet and its training data. If you trained an LLM exclusively on plumbing installation manuals, it wouldn't be able to spit out erotica.

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

Only because it's able to scrape shit like that from the Internet and its training data. If you trained an LLM exclusively on plumbing installation manuals, it wouldn't be able to spit out erotica.

"my erection snaked into @Octopi 's drain pipe until he overflowed with liquid"

 

[Rajah Brooke's Ghost]

Another thing that has occurred to me is so there are several things aella seems to want in a relationship that strike me as mutually incompatible, where I suddenly realized at least one horrifying way they might not be.

1. She's "rarely attracted to compatible people," but thinks's she'll find one who's also a wealthy simp?
2. She expects a self-made multimillionaire to pick her from his many options but still be OK with her sleeping around?
3. The future Mr. Aella needs to want kids, but that implicitly means that he must also be OK with the mother of his kids being a promiscuous prostitute who advocates giving porn to children and helping predators create "ethical" child sex-abuse material?

I really want to believe that this all is simply her having the self-awareness of a toddler herself, and if the monkey's paw gives her a child-molester husband even aella would protect her own children.

But I've read/heard stories of women who Ghislained their own kids, and it seems like pretty consistently what happens is that they live off in their own world and their husband is an important thing that gives their fantasy world structural integrity and so they will either consciously support their husband's behavior, or else be impervious to evidence that it's happening that they will punish their kids for "lying" if they come to them or to other community members who then come to the mother.

I can't imagine of the crypto-Epsteins still in our midst would want to draw the kind of attention having kids with aella would draw, and therefore either way, she's going to continue not finding find her knight in blockchain armor. But if aella does somehow find a husband to have kids with? Then for the love of god, child protective services had better send an agent to live with her family full-time, or better still a whole damn team of them.

 

[0gh]

I'm prefacing this because, as with video games, this is fictional content, and we have argued for decades that video games aren't bad.

I might be dumb and retarded but I think that for sexual stuff it's really different than violent & whatnot. Everyone has violent desires sure, and you can "let them out" in a video game, call your buddies niggers and say how you'll rail their mom hard. But in a video game it's not the violence that gets you off, it's the competition, winning over your buddies or random people or just NPCs.

You play some gory RPG and bash every part of someone's body into mush, then you go into their cave and find some cool item. You're excited for the item not for the horrible violence you just committed. You probably forget about the violence itself.

But for sexual stuff I think it just further perpetuates the issues, desensitizes people and makes them more likely to act on the desire or whatever. An ex addict constantly watching people use the drugs, or watching the media, w/e is more likely to relapse. I don't know the biology on this, maybe some autist can confirm/debunk my claims, but I'm pretty sure that sex and violence trigger very different systems in the brain.

When you play call of duty or some super gory game you're in it for the competition, achievement, progress, fear, etc. But when you watch even "regular" porn you get a much bigger high and your reward is from the sexual actions rather than from progressing. When you watch a movie you do it for the journey story blabla, but y'know the adage that "nobody watches porn for the story"

Can this be banned? Probably not, prohibition just brings black markets and more degenerate things. Though this is the sort of shit a normal person would call the cops on their brother for. I think most of society can agree this is horrible and should not be allowed, so maybe a ban would work. Yes, imagination is a strong tool, but if you never see the actual imagery I believe you will be far less likely to do horrible shit, so it would be highly beneficial to society to ban(as much as reasonably possible) anything sexual involving children, fictional or not.

Yes wow japan will lose their lolis. Good, maybe they'll start having actual sex again and their blood won't die out or be replaced by niggers

I don't think states will be so wise, but public shaming always works, just not sure if it's actually legal to have a public "list of pedos", is that defamation? Would it even work?

I have a friend who was abused as a kid in very horrible ways, I think shit like this would be avoided if we had no porn in general. My blood just boils seeing people say this shit.

 

[DumbDude43]

But for sexual stuff I think it just further perpetuates the issues, desensitizes people and makes them more likely to act on the desire or whatever. An ex addict constantly watching people use the drugs, or watching the media, w/e is more likely to relapse. I don't know the biology on this, maybe some autist can confirm/debunk my claims, but I'm pretty sure that sex and violence trigger very different systems in the brain.

the porn equivalent for violence isn't video games, it's snuff films and gore videos.

 

[Chapalapachapa]

i'm not pro-CP, i just know that every time there's a fucking "think of the children"

Kill yourself

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

Kill yourself

I love this site too much to let it be destroyed by busy bodies who are siding with keffals

 

[karz]

I love this site too much to let it be destroyed by busy bodies who are siding with keffals

 

[Markass the Worst]

I love this site too much to let it be destroyed by busy bodies who are siding with keffals

When have laws against child pornography ever been bad for the farms?

Before you say false allegations, consider that false allegations can be made about anything. If CP was legal tomorrow, it would not help us in any way. Trannies would switch to the lie that we are responsible for 3 suicides, or something equally retarded to take us down.

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

edit: i would marry Aella if asked. i still find her attractive, i would not let her around the kids unsupervised for obvious reasons and yes she would have to have kids.

Before you say

the fact you needed to include this means you know i'm not just creating some "what if..." scenario, like considering how it fucked over the farms and how Null can't have a bank account because of "anti-terrorism laws" i think its fine i'm firmly in the "no more laws" camp . also it doesn't matter what i think, thankfully the laws have already been decided on AICP or AI voices or AI actors, so none of it matters, the laws were smart enough to not have to worry about that shit. its just that you know the bad faith actors will use this to their advantage the exact same way these anti-porn laws in places like texas and florida somehow allow if not incentivize kids using wattpad or deviant art or twitch and don't do a damn thing to actually keep minors from seeing the most horrific images possible.

like as i said in the original comment that caused people to want me and kiwifarms dead, every new law seems to do the opposite and magically makes shit worse. porn laws that allow fetish sites but not playboy, 2nd example, and 3rd example

 

[ghjoigcbn]

edit: i would marry Aella if asked. i still find her attractive, i would not let her around the kids unsupervised for obvious reasons and yes she would have to have kids.

You’re a retard and it’s time to log off

 

[Destiny's Child]

More cope from her

 

[Pious&Platonic]

It should be a global rule that if you say you want to marry one of the lolcows, instant ban. let this be the precedent

More cope from her

View attachment 7260258View attachment 7260259

do ya think she reads the thread and this is a hint?

 

[Rajah Brooke's Ghost]

It should be a global rule that if you say you want to marry one of the lolcows, instant ban. let this be the precedent

My impression is that it takes quite a lot to get yourself banned here, and it looks like he was banned while being mad MATI in a personal call-out thread on whether anti-CSAM laws will shut down the farms.

I feel like don't even read that many threads here and yet somehow this is the third time I've seen basically this exact story play out. (Now, it's true I can't resist looking at the last posts of a crossed-out red username, but they still have to show up in the threads I'm reading.) I will admit I'm no expert internet understander, but I feel like maybe if you get a personal call-out thread on KiwiFarms accusing you of defending pedo shit, maybe angrily doubling down on defending said pedo shit in said thread is ... not the best course of action?

do ya think she reads the thread and this is a hint?

Ooh, ooh... I have a nominee!

Aella, if you are reading this, please allow me to introduce to you fellow Austinite sperg and drug enthusiast Rudyard William Lynch, who is also lamentably and inexplicably single despite being by his all own accounts quite a catch.

He might be a little bit younger than you were hoping, he is 6'4", marriage-minded, and he is friends with both Odin (in the Spirit Realm) and Elon Musk (on Twitter). His numerous life accomplishments include starting a social club for influencers in Los Angeles, hiking part of the Appalachian Trail, running a YouTube channel that brought in six figures one year, and killing the False God of Liberalism by trapping its circle in his triangle. When he is not prophesying the collapse of Western Civilization or singlehandedly appreciating paintings of white women in art museums, he is trying to start a religion and/or army where he makes men out of teenage incels.

I don't want to dox myself and/or catch something by taking your bounty, and I know you rationalist types love effective altruism ... so when I inevitably win, please use the money to help the homeless population of Austin attend SXSW.

 

[Pious&Platonic]

I feel like don't even read that many threads here and yet somehow this is the third time I've seen basically this exact story play out. (Now, it's true I can't resist looking at the last posts of a crossed-out red username, but they still have to show up in the threads I'm reading.) I will admit I'm no expert internet understander, but I feel like maybe if you get a personal call-out thread on KiwiFarms accusing you of defending pedo shit, maybe angrily doubling down on defending said pedo shit in said thread is ... not the best course of action?

Honestly, I'm just stunned people keep doubling down. I've spent enough time obsessing over British culture to know the UK basically created the concept of free speech and they certainly wouldn't start censoring things now, especially using a fear of CP or EPI to do it. I feel like if this was actually happening, some kiwifarmer besides the coomer would have brought it up before.

 

[Trombonista]

More cope from her

View attachment 7260258View attachment 7260259

"They're shouldn't already on my radar"

I guess proofreading is also for conservatives.