Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 103 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 73 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 164 40.1%

  • Total voters
    409
I really question how true that FDA chart is, like they make something like Coq Au Vin, but did they reduce everything at once to a liquid and examine the chemicals in the solution. Or sample random portions of the prepared dish over a reasonable amount of time? Simulating someone eating the meal.
Since in the real world, you portion the meal out, it steams, it fills the room with flavour, it's magic, but the boiling point of alcohol is lower than water, so I suspect there will be almost no ethanol remaining by the time CockAuVin/French Onion Soup/Marinated Leg of lamb etc, goes from kitchen, to plate, to fork, to mouth.

The amount of ethanol remaining depends on the starting amount of ethanol in the mixture and the time spent at the minimum temperature for boiling ethanol. If it is held at that temperature long enough, all the ethanol will be removed. So, at a minimum, how much ethanol remains is dependent on the interplay of 3 variables, the amount of ethanol in the solution at the start, the minimum temperature for boiling of alcohol, and the time spent at that temperature.
 
They're gonna both stream snipe each other
For some reason I originally read that as "steam pipe" each other, and I was like "Oh, they kissed and made up?"
Well, there's IS way to "steam pipe" Nick that he wouldn't like:


Let off some steam, Rekieta.

And yes, that IS the same character, from the same movie, that gave us "John? I'll be ready John."


Commando, 1986.

Forgive me I don't follow the trial but isn't there that one female streamer who's killing it with the Read trial, I don't know her name.
Andrea Burkhart?

I know she's been covering it.
 
If you or anyone else has absolute proof that Nick was being drug tested by the family court in June or July, then present it.
Do Nick's statements count? June 21, 2024 stream at 7:32
I can clear up some common misconceptions here right now. Anyone who suggests that I ever ever have refused an ordered drug test from the government is incorrect. I've complied with every ordered drug test from the government and yes that means I have actually taken drug test and submitted them to the government. I know it's wild to consider, but that has happened. So any reports that I'm not doing that are flat out false. I don't care what insider sources people have. I don't care what uh other suggestions there are but any suggestion that I am not doing that, like I'm adamantly refusing a court-ordered drug test are completely incorrect and shockingly they're all clean.
He goes on to repeat versions of this throughout his streams or other's streams in June and July, and more recently while talking about the timeline retrospectively. (At one point, he showed the arm drug monitor, but I'd have to find the date on that.)

I mean, it makes sense. He got the kids back within 5 months. Whether he was using while being monitored - there are ways to game the system - is another question.
 
Last edited:
Do Nick's statements count? June 22, 2024 stream at 7:32

He goes on to repeat versions of this throughout his streams or other's streams in June and July, and more recently while talking about the timeline retrospectively. (At one point, he showed the arm drug monitor, but I'd have to find the date on that.)

I mean, it makes sense. He got the kids back within 5 months. Whether he was using while being monitored - there are ways to game the system - is another question.
I believe the court ordered a drug test after they revoked their consent to the results of the voluntary one being shared with police and court.
So unless Nick actively refused to be tested then, he would have taken one pretty soon-ish and then go tested frequently, as per his bitching about a guy looking at his dick when he peed in a cup.
 
Geno directly claims that April lied about Aaron hitting her, and that Nick forced her to tell it.
The abuse allegation was made way before any of the sperg out... it was on Ashley´s RO, I doubt Nick had anything to do with it...

Just another example of these people knowing fuck all about what they talk about.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: USAroXX
Karen Reed trial....
Boss Baby Bitch Barnes Briefly opined on that trial, likening it to bad gubment LIKE WITH REKIETA per barnestormer

No way does junkie do the Karen Read trial alone: any bets on loser lawyers who join junkie jerk off jurisprudence jocular jowl jockeys?
Barnes
V for Barnes Va-Jay-Jay
Rumy-eyed Branca
TokenNate
DUIghey
LawLumberjack
FaudsterShylockGoofLawgic
Chalices don't come much more poisoned than that
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAroXX
Iirc, some ITT also thought his deteriorating skin was from picking, which is common for heavy stimulant abuse. Tweeker’s pick at their skin. There were maybe a few people wondering about IV drug use, but it was never a dominant narrative here.

It’s true that those ITT who claimed it was coke were shut down often enough, I remember because I was one of maybe 10-15 people who were in the no holds barred, Nick’s on cocaine, group. After any of us would post saying, “it’s cocaine, clearly,” a thread majority would have a 20 page discussion on how it was Modafinil aka Provigil, which had been Rx’d for Nicks (debatable) alleged narcolepsy.

After Nicks Coke Stream, everyone was sure it was coke, too. The Schadenfreude was beautiful, but I’m pretty sure it was anyone’s guess, it could have been meth, or Rx drugs, so many different things. But it looked like coke, & when Nick came back from one of his ridiculously long bathroom breaks, that was all she wrote, coke on the nose:
View attachment 7259361
I have to admit that though I always knew the narcolepsy was bullshit (heavy drinkers have a tendency to keep shit hours for sleep and, due to lack of sleep + more drinking, feel overcome by sleep in daytime) [THAT'S NOT NARCOLEPSY, NICK.]; and though I also knew that modafinil, even with alcohol, didn't account for his behavior, I just thought it was alcohol + his terrible personality/disorder; I didn't recognize the behaviors as coke-based specifically.

And to that end, I do still think that 98% of his problem is personality & all that entails, not inebriation nor being high. Yes, I think the coke had him racing and rash and fiending all the time, but he's not once said, "wow, yeah, still love coke, but that stuff is bad for me and I made some really stupid choices that sober me wouldn't, so I'm done."

I guarantee he still speeds recklessly; still is a lazy fuck at home; still has no taste; still thinks hard drugs are COOL; still thinks he's the shit; and - but for any imposed guardrails that make the choices for him - still has no better sense about money, raising children, being a good person, judgment (legal or otherwise), nor anything else.

The call is coming from inside the house.
 
These'll come in handy:

Neediness and Codependence:
People with poor boundaries may have a high level of neediness, leading them to seek validation and approval from others, which can create unhealthy dependencies.

Oversharing personal information with strangers:
Feeling compelled to reveal too much personal information to individuals they barely know.

Disrespecting others' boundaries:
Not acknowledging or respecting others' limits or requests.
 
No one involved with this drama is normal

Back in the day, they used to be categorized as subnormal. Mentally subnormal.

But yes, as I was reading that precis of Geno/Keanu's show, I just found the whole thing so fucking depressing. If you were 'normal' you'd be putting as much space between yourself and all these losers as you possibly could. You'd want them out of your life completely. You wouldn't want to give them any room in your thoughts at all.

But these are all desperate grifters. Drama means clicks. Clicks mean money. Money means you don't have to work. Because these incompetent, subnormal cunts would all starve if they had to work a real job.

So they show us their arses and fling poo like the monkeys at the local safari park. Stay in your car and keep the windows wound up hard. If you let them get close, these monkeys can bite. Even if you don't get bitten, you'll probably end up smeared in their shit.
Chalices don't come much more poisoned than that

It's good for asthma and flu!

 
Last edited:
I just remembered a Nick Rekeita quote from a few years ago. It was during the Kino Casino “Fuck Ralph Festival”, and Nick was giving Ralph some advice on parenting.

“When things get tough, and the baby won’t stop crying, just put the baby down and walk away.”

In hindsight, it makes me wonder about Nick’s parenting skills. Don’t get me wrong, it’s good advice. But now there’s something sinister about it. Was there ever a time when Nick didn’t put the baby down and walk away?
 
I genuinely wonder what Montegraph thinks of Nick openly holding active relationships with multiple men who are open pedophiles?

Screenshot 2025-04-21 164211.webp

Unfortunately that tweet was just about some music video that Monty's channel is premiering at 8:00 Nick's time, which will probably start sooner than Nick's 6:30 stream:

MontyPremiere.webp
[L]
 
The amount of ethanol remaining depends on the starting amount of ethanol in the mixture and the time spent at the minimum temperature for boiling ethanol. If it is held at that temperature long enough, all the ethanol will be removed. So, at a minimum, how much ethanol remains is dependent on the interplay of 3 variables, the amount of ethanol in the solution at the start, the minimum temperature for boiling of alcohol, and the time spent at that temperature.
Please, Professor, show mercy. Differential equations kick my ass.
 
I've been on and off keeping up with this thread, but I've been seeing this galaxy gas thing quite a bit. Do we have confirmation he's been huffing galaxy gas or is it rumor or reasoned speculation?
People have speculated that he might be huffing galaxy gas/whippets because it would allow him to get *some* sort of a high without failing a drug test, and it's reasonably accessible. Keanu Thompson also chimed in claiming that he was for certain doing it, however the only reasons that woman opens her mouth are to suck dick and lie, so I sincerely doubt she has any kind of special knowledge on whether or not he's actually doing it.

I really question how true that FDA chart is, like they make something like Coq Au Vin, but did they reduce everything at once to a liquid and examine the chemicals in the solution. Or sample random portions of the prepared dish over a reasonable amount of time? Simulating someone eating the meal.
Since in the real world, you portion the meal out, it steams, it fills the room with flavour, it's magic, but the boiling point of alcohol is lower than water, so I suspect there will be almost no ethanol remaining by the time CockAuVin/French Onion Soup/Marinated Leg of lamb etc, goes from kitchen, to plate, to fork, to mouth.
When alcohol and water get mixed together, their chemical properties become somewhat intertwined. When you're distilling alcohol out of water, there's a certain point (usually ~95% alc.) past which boiling will not work and other methods must be used to separate the two liquids. I'd imagine it works similarly in reverse, and that past a certain point boiling is ineffective at removing alcohol from water.
 
Branca and Nick are going to be co-streaming the Karen Read Trial Round 2: This Time It's for Real starting tomorrow, April 22, at 9 AM ET. Branca specifically stated he is going to stream the entirety of Round 2. He even included a parenthetical stating the first trial lasted two months.

No way Nick makes it past Friday.
It'll be interesting if trial streaming can actually work outside of people like Emily Baker. Seems like there will be a way smaller audience this time and with everyone streaming on their own less chance for crossover. I expect the Branca/Nick streams to be some of the worst. Boomer humor with no real insight.
 
People have speculated that he might be huffing galaxy gas/whippets because it would allow him to get *some* sort of a high without failing a drug test, and it's reasonably accessible.
It's also reasonably short-lived so you can at least pretend to be normal within a few minutes.
 
Branca and Nick are going to be co-streaming the Karen Read Trial Round 2: This Time It's for Real starting tomorrow, April 22, at 9 AM ET. Branca specifically stated he is going to stream the entirety of Round 2. He even included a parenthetical stating the first trial lasted two months.

No way Nick makes it past Friday.
“Hey Branca did you know his guy named Aaron ate my goo?”
 
Back