Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Scramble]

It's seriously so frustrating I have friends who follow these people and I just don't understand it. Every time they mention one of their opinions at i feel like i need a shot just to keep quiet. I mean honestly have they even looked into what these people actually believe in because it's completely embarrassing.

I agree. When I first heard Barnes say "treason is in their blood" that I realized that he clearly has no idea what "treason" is. Treason is actually quite a serious crime, punishable by death, and it's apparently so serious that it's the only crime specified in The United States Constitution.

Specifically, Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 states, "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

The crime of treason (in addition to the currently applicable punishment for treason) was subsequently codified by The United States Congress, and it can be found in The United States Code (Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115, Section 2381, available at https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim). This statute states:

"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)"

Barnes disappoints me. In addition to apparently not having read The United States Constitution (Article III, Section 3, Clause 1) or The United States Code (18 U.S.C. 2381) Barnes also apparently never heard of a quote that's often attributed to President Abraham Lincoln:

“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.”​

 

[N1bbaN3rd]

Branca and Nick are going to be co-streaming the Karen Read Trial Round 2: This Time It's for Real starting tomorrow, April 22, at 9 AM ET. Branca specifically stated he is going to stream the entirety of Round 2. He even included a parenthetical stating the first trial lasted two months.

No way Nick makes it past Friday.

The only question is whether it will be because Nick quits out of boredom, or Branca boots him for being an annoying faggot.

 

[Zaryiu2]

Meme Copium refused to reveal his source, but his chat seemed to believe it was the Nanny.

The same Nanny whose name Nick just sullied on his comeback stream.

I thought that the nanny left (was driven off in horror) before the foursome stuff started.
Do we know how much overlap there was?



I wouldn't have thought that an extended family member would be over often enough to clock this pattern of behavior, but maybe their family just visits more often than I would've thought.

I also can't imagine an extended family member knowing about your swinging at all, let alone knowing enough about it to be able to correlate it with other occurrences. But I'm sure that's just my naïveté at this point.

I have a theory but if i am right i am not writing it in the thread since Nick isnknow to read it.

 

[N1bbaN3rd]

I have a theory but if i am right i am not writing it in the thread since Nick isnknow to read it.

My pet theory is that Nick tried to invite the nanny into bed, but she noped the fuck out.
And we all know how well Nick handles rejection...

 

[Stiffy]

My pet theory is that Nick tried to invite the nanny into bed, but she noped the fuck out.
And we all know how well Nick handles rejection...

I forgot the name of the nanny, her name started with an L I think. She's not bad looking, so I can totally see the degenerate Nick hitting on her, perhaps with Kayla too. I'm sure she has stories to tell too about the horrors she witnessed working there.

 

[CoomerTine]

Nick is basically advocating for a living constitution holy shit

Spewing leftist talking points

 

[Vernon Dozier]

I forgot the name of the nanny, her name started with an L I think. She's not bad looking, so I can totally see the degenerate Nick hitting on her, perhaps with Kayla too. I'm sure she has stories to tell too about the horrors she witnessed working there.

Chaney Bitzan.

 

[AltisticRight]

I'm not sure if I'm imagining it but I swear he's brought up this letter several times already

I feel pathetic for keeping a letters I had with a crush until early university years (when we started dating) but this guy is on an entirely new plane of existence. A man with 5 KEEEEEDZ and married holding onto a letter written by his ex-boyfriend. What a flaming fag.

Nick claims the KiwiFarms had people calling him "worse than Charles Manson".


"I do not read my KF thread!"

Charles Manson's two children never tested positive for cocaine/metabolites at above 10 times the cut-off.

Nick does not believe in 'marriage' as idolised by people based on a bad reading of Jesus' words. It leads to a place that ignores the people involved and their mental health.

Is blasphemy during holy holidays a fetish of his now? Similar to gross porn depicting church scenes and so called "art" where portraits of Christ was made from condoms and piss? I have never met a single Christian that holds such content for his own faith. Even the most militant anti-theists are less of a fedora-tipping smug fag. That's not even his first or tenth time, last time he wore a kippah as a "joke". I hope he draws Muhammad at a Gazan mosque next.
Wouldn't it make more sense for wife and husband to open up on metal issues and work on it instead of trying to "spice up the marriage" with novelty? If he wants to play with various freak sex paraphernalia in his own bedroom, fine. We're talking about spices that would put an authentic Sichuan hotpot place to shame. He's letting other men fuck his wife and prances around naked in their studios for topless trollop snaps. What a blasphemous slatternly faggot skeleton.

Nick: SEAN IS FAT! FAT FAT FAT FAT FAT!! HE EATS.... SANDWICHES!! HAAHAHAHAHAHAH IMAGINE SLICED TURKEY ON WHOLE WHEAT BREAD WITH LETTUCE, TOMATO, A NICE CHEESE AND SOME MUSTARD.. HAHAAHAHA TOTAL FATTY FOOD FOR FATS LIKE SEAN!! HAVE I MENTIONED SEAN IS FAT??? THAT'S WHY HE EATS UNHEALTHY SANDWICHES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Also Nick:
View attachment 7257474


Someone make it make sense.

He and Juju made fat jokes unfunny.

I would be lying if I said I didn't still have some libertarian leanings myself, but Rekieta is far too retarded to make any libertarian ideology look compelling.

Hot take:

Spoiler: Sperging

libertarianism is no different to communism. Well, indeed communist libertarians exist. Both ideologies assume the kindness in humans that does not exist. Libertarianism requires everyone to be a bugman midwits IQ (95-105) drone that goes on with normie lives. If there's violent low IQ apes or very high intelligence manipulators, the entire ideology folds. Communism beats everyone down to the dumbest common denominator. There's no practical difference. At least most implementations of communism have been conservative and nationalist. Libertarianism is closer to communism than any implementation of communism, socially. Economically it's also retarded.

 

[Vibralldo]

Nick is claiming that his lawyer in a judge's conference with CPS and the guardian Ad Litum stated that they just didn't like what Nick said on his stream.

I think Nick is downplaying all of the incredibly disturbing things Nick stated on Stream that made everyone think that Nick might not be the best of parents for his children at that time.

It's almost as if literally everyone warned him this would happen if he kept talking about how he wasn't sorry and did nothing wrong on his streams, but he didn't listen and did it anyways

At least there's a good chance they're watching his new streams and can see how unrepentant he still is

Nick gets what he fucking deserves.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Nick is claiming that his lawyer in a judge's conference with CPS and the guardian Ad Litum stated that they just didn't like what Nick said on his stream.

I think Nick is downplaying all of the incredibly disturbing things Nick stated on Stream that made everyone think that Nick might not be the best of parents for his children at that time.

Of course they didn't like what he was saying. He was saying he didn't do drugs and he had no idea where the drugs came from and the government planted drugs in his house and on his children. Nothing to do with the 1st amendment. He was more interested in reputation than the safety of his kids.

They wanted the kids to be safe and that meant Nick had to stop lying about drugs. He's such a two-faced lying piece of shit. He won't even repeat the shit he said online because it would contradict his guilty plea.

 

[Something Awful]

Chaney Bitzan.

Kind of unfortunate choice of an icon for "special needs".

 

[Watching Rekieta]

My pet theory is that Nick tried to invite the nanny into bed, but she noped the fuck out.
And we all know how well Nick handles rejection...

Nah. Kayla fucked the nanny's SO. Nick was stressed out at losing the nanny over that and got mad when she couldn't be convinced to stay.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

I fucking hate the term "littles" so much.
Also you can see why Nick picked her.

 

[Vibralldo]

Nah. Kayla fucked the nanny's SO. Nick was stressed out at losing the nanny over that and got mad when she couldn't be convinced to stay.

Is this confirmed or a joke?
Their lives are so fucked I can't tell

 

[asipasip]

These people are unemployed wtf do they need a nanny for?

 

[Captain Manning]

Treason is actually quite a serious crime, punishable by death, and it's apparently so serious that it's the only crime specified in The United States Constitution.

They limited the scope of treason in the Constitution because this...




...would be considered treason under ye olde Britbong law. It's ripe for abuse.

Like Johnny here, I am figuratively farting on Rekieta. Eat my farts, Rekieta!

Barnes is arguing for a pre-US English law definition of treason.

He is the worst Constitutionalist ever. I am surprised he didn't try to argue that the cops entering into Nick's home was them "quartering." The 3A was about the only one he didn't bloviate about. Because nobody does.

 

[Vibralldo]

These people are unemployed wtf do they need a nanny for?

Kayla is zonked out on pills 24/7 watching star trek in her room and nick is apparently driving his kids to and from activities every waking hour

 

[John Andrews Stan]

These people are unemployed wtf do they need a nanny for?

The kids are always an afterthought to Nick and seemingly also to Kayla. Hiring a nanny was the only solid parenting choice they ever made.

 

[Dr Naomi Hunter]

These people are unemployed wtf do they need a nanny for?

Don’t you understand how much driving there is to do? How many upside down piano recitals at 1:00am there are to attend?

 

[Sneed Force One]

I love Nick's cope about the cocaine on his nose. He's forced to admit he was high on the Cokestream but doesn't want to admit there was visual evidence because he spent thousands of dollars trying to get it thrown out as evidence and got D E N I E D