- Joined
- Jan 24, 2020
This is a bad analogy. Discord isn’t just passively providing a service to people who are incidentally undesirable, as you have described, but are actively working to prevent such undesirable actors from being apprehended by law enforcement or oatents. In your analogy, it would have to be as if the bar were facilitating the pedos by allowing them to bring in minors while also not IDinv anyone before serving them alcohol, while also barring police and parents from coming in to recover said minors.I don't think Discord would be doing themselves any favours if they decided to defend this decision by saying "we came to the conclusion that it was better to expose hundreds of thousands of children to sexual abuse than miss out on revenue."
If a large group of known paedos and chomos were drinking in your bar, your bar would rightly become known as a paedo bar and it probably wouldn't be long either being shut down by the law or burnt to the ground by local fathers. Sorry, but "it was in our financial interest" is not an excuse to expose kids to people who want to rape them. In fact, it actively means society has a duty to destroy your company.