US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The main reason I'm looking into PhDs is to get funding, since most Masters programs are unfunded in the social sciences (cue posters saying I should've just done mech e like everyone else)
Again it's not that I'm opposed to working in the private sector or getting a fellowship etc., it's that it's so hard and rare it might as well not be an option. I'll still try but I'm not optimistic
I thought you were british.
I've got Trump converting to Catholicism on my Bingo card.
Britannia Crusade when?
 
Poll: A sizeable chunk of Americans think neither party 'fights for people like you'
NBC News (archive.ph)
By Bridget Bowman and Ben Kamisar
2025-04-25 16:00:40GMT
Both political parties have significant work to do to convince Americans that they are fighting for them, according to the new NBC News Stay Tuned Poll powered by SurveyMonkey, with Democrats struggling to rally their own base of supporters.

The poll finds a plurality of adults (38%) say neither political party fights for people like them, while 24% say the Republican Party fights for them, 23% say the same of the Democratic Party, and 15% say both parties. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points.

The pessimism about the major parties comes after a 2024 election that saw a third-party hopeful, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., hit double-digits in some national polling before fading and eventually endorsing Donald Trump. And some big upcoming elections are set to have notable independent contenders, including the governor's race in Michigan, where Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan is running as an independent.

The survey also finds some angst among the Democratic Party’s more liberal supporters. Among those who say they consider themselves progressives first (as opposed to considering themselves Democrats first), 38% agree that neither party fights for them, while just half say they think their party fights for people like them.

By contrast, among the adults who say they align more with the Make America Great Again movement than the Republican Party itself, only 23% say neither party fights for them, compared to 67% who say the Republican Party fights for them.

Negative feelings about the Democratic Party and the GOP are driven largely by younger Americans, with 45% of adults ages 30-44 and 41% of adults ages 18-29 saying neither party fights for them — slightly higher shares than the older adults surveyed.

A sizable majority of those who voted for a third-party candidate in 2024 (69%) and a large plurality of those who did not vote (47%) also picked neither party when asked which one fights for people like them.

Months after a presidential election that was supposed to feature the two oldest nominees in American history (before then-President Joe Biden ended his bid), an overwhelming majority of adults (77%) also agree with the statement that “nothing will change in this country until we elect a new generation of leaders in Washington.”

The desire for a new generation of leaders is consistent across age groups, with more than 75% of adults in each generation agreeing with the statement.

That view is most prevalent among Democrats, with 89% agreeing with that statement, compared to 65% of Republicans. Both factions of the Democratic Party are also in agreement, with 90% of progressives saying Washington needs a new generation of leaders, and 89% of those who align more with the Democratic Party staying the same.

The push among these progressive Democrats is fueling some new primary challenges against longtime Democratic incumbents.

Down on both parties
It all colors the dim view that Americans have of their nation’s two political parties. But while majorities hold unfavorable views of both parties, Democrats are in worse shape with their own base.

Overall, both parties are viewed similarly among American adults: 40% view the Democratic Party favorably while 60% view it unfavorably, while the Republican Party is viewed favorably by 44% and unfavorably by 55%.

While the GOP has slightly better ratings overall, the bad news for Republicans is that political independents are actually lower on the party than they are the Democrats. (30% of independents view the GOP favorably, and 36% view the Democratic Party favorably.)

But for Democrats, their woes come in part from issues within their coalition, as 22% of Democrats view their party unfavorably, compared to just 13% of Republicans who feel that way about the GOP.

Those who identify with the progressive movement are far more likely to view their party unfavorably — as 30% of those progressives share that negative view of the Democratic Party. By comparison, just 10% of supporters of the MAGA movement view the GOP unfavorably.

The poll continues to underscore the gender gap that shapes this moment in American politics: 45% of women view the Democratic Party favorably, compared to 35% of men, while 49% of men view the Republican Party favorably, compared to 40% of women.

And that gap is more pronounced among younger voters between the ages of 18 and 29. Just 27% of these women view the Republican Party favorably, but 44% of these men do. On the flip side, 38% of young men view the Democratic Party favorably, compared to 54% of young women.

Party loyalty in flux
The survey also sheds new light on the composition of both parties and the degree of loyalty members feel (or don't feel) toward them as institutions.

Of the Republicans surveyed, a majority (56%) say they consider themselves to be more a supporter of the MAGA movement, while 44% say they are more a supporter of the Republican Party.

Those self-described MAGA Republicans are more likely to be white, male, and those without college degrees.

But even as President Donald Trump made gains among young men in November, a higher share of men ages 18-29 align more with the GOP than the MAGA movement. The same is true for all Republicans under 30.

An identical majority of Democrats (56%) say they align more with progressive causes and the progressive movement, while 44% say they align more with the Democratic Party.

Younger women and women with college educations are more likely to say they support the progressive movement, as are white Democrats. Among Black Democrats, about twice as many identify themselves as supporters of the Democratic Party first, as opposed to supporters of the progressive movement first.

This NBC News Stay Tuned poll was powered by SurveyMonkey, the fast, intuitive feedback management platform where 20 million questions are answered daily. It was conducted online April 11-20 among a national sample of 19,682 adults aged 18 and over, including 2,230 adults ages 18-29. Reported percentages exclude item nonresponse and round to the nearest percentage point. The estimated margin of error for this survey among all adults is plus or minus 2.2 percentage points. The estimated margin of error for this survey among 18-29-year-olds, or Gen Z, is plus or minus 2.7 percentage points.
 
That’s not because of theological disagreements but rather because of immigration from Catholic (Hispanic) countries.
Oh, theological disagreements definitely are involved I assure you. This isn't really an issue for evangelicals and southern Baptists. But its big time for the Methodists, Lutherans and Episcopalians.
 
A Simple Funeral for Pope Francis Becomes Conduit to See Trump
Bloomberg (archive.ph)
By Catherine Lucey and Donato Paolo Mancini
2025-04-25 16:18:25GMT
The funeral for Pope Francis was intended to be a stripped down affair to honor the simplicity of the man. Instead the attendance of US President Donald Trump has turned it into a high-profile stage for international diplomacy at a moment of geopolitical turmoil.

With the world in the throes of a trade war, markets gyrating wildly and a truce between Ukraine and Russia hanging in the balance, everyone from Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskiy to Britain’s Keir Starmer and France’s Emmanuel Macron is seeking a quick audience with the mercurial American leader on his first trip abroad since the inauguration.

The brief sojourn, with its blend of religious ceremony and political deal-making, recalls the setting for the reopening of Notre Dame cathedral back in December. Trump’s appearance at that too was a reason for many to rush to Paris for some fly-by negotiating. In Rome, Trump joins 50 heads of state who along with paying their respects to Francis are hoping to cross paths with the president in St. Peter’s Basilica or on the sidelines.

Before heading to Rome, Trump indicated he was up for it though he is on the ground briefly, so the window to conduct any business is narrow.

“I’d like to meet them all,” Trump said Thursday. “That would be nice. I’d like to take care of all of them, but we have many of them there, and they all want to meet, and they want to meet about trade, and we are making some great inroads and great deals.”

For Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni it’s an opportunity to firmly establish herself as one of main conduits to Trump, perhaps by orchestrating a three-way chat on trade with Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president who Trump hasn’t yet spoken to since coming to power.

Meloni visited him just over a week ago in Washington — where he heaped praise on her — and she later hosted Vice President JD Vance, a fellow Catholic and recent convert, who also saw Pope Francis a day before he died.

It’s not always clear what you get in return even when Trump likes you or if you flatter him — in the end almost no one was spared from being slapped with tariffs. In the case of Trump-friendly Javier Milei, it’s yielded some dividends for Argentina with the approval of an IMF loan, in spite of the red flags raised inside the lender of last resort.

One mourner at the funeral who might not be seeking out Trump is Joe Biden. A devout Catholic who met with Francis a number of times — including when Meloni made the unprecedented gesture of bringing the pope to the Group of Seven by the Adriatic Sea — the former president is often blamed by Trump for everything from wars to economic woes.

With so many in Rome, one conspicuous absence is Russia’s Vladimir Putin — who did evade tariff punishment and will host Brazil’s Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and China’s Xi Jinping in Moscow for the Victory Day Parade on May 9. Back in 2019, Trump was flattered to have been asked to attend what amounts to a flashy celebration of Russian military might on the anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.

This time, the circumstances aren’t quite aligning. The US president is in a hurry to declare a diplomatic win by brokering the end of the war in Ukraine and in recent days has vented rare criticism of Russia with the 100-day milestone of his second presidency fast approaching.

Leftist Lula will be in Rome — carefully avoiding his libertarian arch foe Milei as he’s been doing now in various gatherings. It’s unlikely Xi will make a last-minute decision to attend. The two economic giants are talking past each other, with Trump insisting there are talks ongoing on trade while Beijing denies it. The tension has rattled investors.

A meeting on the Vatican sidelines would be of huge consequence — and also awkward. The Holy See doesn’t have formal relations with China even if it does with Taiwan. There has been some rapprochement with Beijing and Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te won’t be attending, though former Vice President Chen Chien-Jen will be there to represent the island.

One open question is if Trump will use the moment to offer any suggestion on who should next lead the world’s 1.4 billion Catholics.

A conclave – a gathering of Cardinals to select the next pope – will meet in the coming weeks and the secretive process is famously hard to predict.

Father James Martin, editor at large at America Magazine, a Jesuit publication, said that it is normal for those gatherings to consider the global politics of the times as they make their choice.

“It’s natural for the college of cardinals to consider the signs of the times, that is what is going on in the world,” he said. “So broadly speaking they will be considering the geopolitical situation.”

The relationship between Trump and Francis was never easy, punctuated by clashes over issues like immigration and climate change that underlined the deep fissures between conservative and liberal Catholics in the US. Earlier this year, Francis criticized the Trump administration’s migration policies, which include forced deportations.

So far, Trump has not weighed in on who should be next. At the White House this week, he said of Francis: “He loved the world, and he especially loved people that were having a hard time — and that’s good with me.”

Michael Moreland, a professor of law and religion at Villanova University, is of the view that any attempt to influence the conclave with “any campaigning or lobbying from the outside would risk backfiring.”

Trump, who heavily wooed the religious right, won a majority of Catholic voters in the 2024 presidential election. He was supported by conservative Catholics and has a number of Catholics serving in his administration, including Vance.

Vance himself was asked about the direction he’d like the next pope to take the church but declined to answer: “I won’t pretend to give guidance to the cardinals on who they should select as the next pope. We’ve got plenty of issues to focus on in the United States.”

It remains to be seen if Trump will weigh in. Francis himself was known for going off script from time to time, and not without consequences. His defense of the Palestinian cause, criticism of Israel and his daily calls to a church in Gaza compelled Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to order ambassadors to delete social media posts expressing their condolences.

The ceremony will start at 10 a.m. on Saturday, attracting some 250,000 people. And despite all the high-profile guests and the significance of the occasion, it was Francis’s firm desire to do away with all the pomp and grandeur that usually comes with the passing of a pope.

His final request, left in a will compiled in 2022, was simple: to be buried in naked soil in a single wooden coffin engraved with one Latin word: “Franciscus.”
 
There really is no getting around the fact that the center of gravity for Christianity is shifting back towards Rome.
And Constantinople. The Eastern Church is also growing rapidly in the U.S. The youngest Millennials and Zoomers are becoming increasingly attracted to Orthodoxy (A young Millennial relative of mine and his wife converted and were recently chrismated and they had their baby boy baptised, via immersion (3×), into the Church.) I could deeper into that, but I'm phone-fagging currently.
As an Episcopalian myself, I can confirm I am at looking at ground zero of the Apostasy crisis in American Protestantism.
You're where I was 30 years ago. I couldn't stand all the faggotry and the compliant pew-warmers who wouldn't say anything because that might be impolite. So I took my family out of that den of heretics, and literally shook the dust off my feet as I walked out of those red doors for the final time. I didn't go to the Roman church, though (I also have issues with them).
The final 25% became Roman Catholics. Starting to think I might end up in that camp sooner rather then later.
If you've got the patience and discipline, at least check out your local Orthodox parish. Couldn't hurt, eh.
 
That’s not because of theological disagreements but rather because of immigration from Catholic (Hispanic) countries.
This is one of those things where I like to check people. We, America, are the people with low levels of religious participation and cultural conservatism. Latin America is chock full of women who act like women without being resentful of it, and even Paco the illegal pool boy will break with the democrats over trans and gay shit.

The idea that they’d make permanent democrat voters from illegal immigration made sense BEFORE they went batshit for trannies. It’s not going to work. The very idea of letting a public school teach your son it’s ok to suck dick… tsk tsk

So we should still deport maximum on principle, because fuck line cutters and the criminals most definitely need to gtfo, but either way it won’t result in progressivism proceeding
 
This is a bit of derail but I just read/listened to a dude talk about the "long house" and women subverted church leadership starting with having women speak to women.

Do you think thats a factor or is the decline something else?

I grew up with a fucking cult.
I think women taking leadership roles within the Church (the Protestant branches) have definitely played a role in the decline. Mouthy wimmin ruin everything.
 
This is one of those things where I like to check people. We, America, are the people with low levels of religious participation and cultural conservatism. Latin America is chock full of women who act like women without being resentful of it, and even Paco the illegal pool boy will break with the democrats over trans and gay shit.

The idea that they’d make permanent democrat voters from illegal immigration made sense BEFORE they went batshit for trannies. It’s not going to work. The very idea of letting a public school teach your son it’s ok to suck dick… tsk tsk

So we should still deport maximum on principle, because fuck line cutters and the criminals most definitely need to gtfo, but either way it won’t result in progressivism proceeding
Nah, it does. Economics trumps all, including troonshit.

If you directly get money and socioeconomic benefits from installing Democrats, which Hispanics view as so, very little else matters.
 
Nah, it does. Economics trumps all, including troonshit.

If you directly get money and socioeconomic benefits from installing Democrats, which Hispanics view as so, very little else matters.
All kinds of people will take free money, a lot less will let you cut their kids dick off for money

also, democrats can NEVER give them what they actually want. Converting them to citizens removes all the emergency part of giving them cash cards and hotel rooms and shit, and they lose the residency leverage
 
I dont know why you are lying or being a boomer about this. Medical school slots are tightly constrained via a refusal to accredit more slots/schools. Those slots are tightly DEI pozzed to hate on white men.

Once you pass that hurdle. There are people who graduate medical school but cant find a residency. I have met them. Residency slots also have DEI standards.

Then we have residency itself. Which if you asked me a worse way to actually train or teach someone something I would struggle to think of it. Its a giant hazing ritual. DEI once again, you can haze the white man you cant haze Shaniqua.

Meanwhile Doctor Jeet or Doctor Chong dont deal with any of that and get on a visa because we have a "shortage of doctors".
Notice how I said in my post that "I'm hearing," not "I know for goddamn sure." I'll be more imperious next time to rustle your jimmies.
 
If you've got the patience and discipline, at least check out your local Orthodox parish. Couldn't hurt, eh.
My problem with Orthodoxy is they are explicitly ethnic. The nearest Orthodox church to me is Serbian. And I am not Serbian. I'm an American. If ever there is an American Orthodox Patriarchate, then maybe I would consider it. But I simply do not see that in the cards. Orthodox Churches have much to commend to them. Being ecumenical and open to outsiders are not those things.
 
Back