- Joined
- May 17, 2021
I strongly doubt that the kids didn’t know.
Kids lie though, and with parents like the Rekieta’s, kids learn to lie often and well.
CPS is making a legal document for the court though, so they can’t really write “But I’m pretty sure he’s lying because his dad told him to”, so we will get half the story. “I asked C about drug use, he denied knowing about any drug use”.
I would think that they could write something like, 'Child's denies observation or direct knowledge of drug use, but their testimony shows signs of the external influence of a third party'.
I agree that 'not wanting to get mummy or daddy in trouble' could be a motivator as well as the usual tendency that children have to internalise blame and think that *they* were the reason this thing they cannot control is happening--something they should NEVER be blamed for.
I'm confused.
Which forum rule did MNPublicRecords violate?
Why is this faggot skelly trying to pick up MY BROOM?
So it was fine when this faggot had people acquire largely confidential records through local console printouts during the Amber Heard/Depp/Ron whatever cases, but it wasn't okay when someone did the same to him? Am I getting this right? Nicky, you're not special. You're a child doser, you're worse than all of them combined. Oh, I guess that means you are special in a way.
Reality: The rule against hurting Nick's feelings.
Nick is just upset he cannot prove for certain who they are and he is seething a whomever he can. Nick abusively lashes out at whomever is in reach when he is hurt. We have so many stories of him being angry with Kayla and April from the Qover and immediate post-Qover days. We see his pattern of excuses on the show with 'driving muk KEEDS!', 'unexpected date night', and the like. He lashed out at @elb and Cynthia when they became critical of him. Need we mention 'Dear John?' The Eric July stream, his multiple attempts to censor the thread with shower texts to Josh... It is clear a pattern as day.
MNPR has not violated a site rule. They have unusual access to information which they post for discussion (and I am sure they probably lurk or discuss it on an alt), but they do NOT make direct calls to action or address Nick directly. They are simply a dedicated alog. In many ways, they subvert the typical alog role, but they do so successfully: Their segmented release of the CPS transcript was definitely non-attention whoring or annoying and navigated a very tight rope to do so. They also do not engage in the discussion openly to collect cachet among us. They are clearly invested, but know their place (at least to-date) and do not step beyond it. I do not know their ultimate goal, but I suspect it is a nobler one than 'just laughing', and I hope that they continue on the path of wisdom they have started.