Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 19.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 89 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 121 36.7%

  • Total voters
    330
I strongly doubt that the kids didn’t know.
Kids lie though, and with parents like the Rekieta’s, kids learn to lie often and well.

CPS is making a legal document for the court though, so they can’t really write “But I’m pretty sure he’s lying because his dad told him to”, so we will get half the story. “I asked C about drug use, he denied knowing about any drug use”.

I would think that they could write something like, 'Child's denies observation or direct knowledge of drug use, but their testimony shows signs of the external influence of a third party'.

I agree that 'not wanting to get mummy or daddy in trouble' could be a motivator as well as the usual tendency that children have to internalise blame and think that *they* were the reason this thing they cannot control is happening--something they should NEVER be blamed for.

I'm confused.
Which forum rule did MNPublicRecords violate?
Why is this faggot skelly trying to pick up MY BROOM?
So it was fine when this faggot had people acquire largely confidential records through local console printouts during the Amber Heard/Depp/Ron whatever cases, but it wasn't okay when someone did the same to him? Am I getting this right? Nicky, you're not special. You're a child doser, you're worse than all of them combined. Oh, I guess that means you are special in a way.

Reality: The rule against hurting Nick's feelings.

Nick is just upset he cannot prove for certain who they are and he is seething a whomever he can. Nick abusively lashes out at whomever is in reach when he is hurt. We have so many stories of him being angry with Kayla and April from the Qover and immediate post-Qover days. We see his pattern of excuses on the show with 'driving muk KEEDS!', 'unexpected date night', and the like. He lashed out at @elb and Cynthia when they became critical of him. Need we mention 'Dear John?' The Eric July stream, his multiple attempts to censor the thread with shower texts to Josh... It is clear a pattern as day.

MNPR has not violated a site rule. They have unusual access to information which they post for discussion (and I am sure they probably lurk or discuss it on an alt), but they do NOT make direct calls to action or address Nick directly. They are simply a dedicated alog. In many ways, they subvert the typical alog role, but they do so successfully: Their segmented release of the CPS transcript was definitely non-attention whoring or annoying and navigated a very tight rope to do so. They also do not engage in the discussion openly to collect cachet among us. They are clearly invested, but know their place (at least to-date) and do not step beyond it. I do not know their ultimate goal, but I suspect it is a nobler one than 'just laughing', and I hope that they continue on the path of wisdom they have started.
 
Big shoutout to Pastor Melin btw. Dude is a hero and saved those kids from a hellish existence. He saved their lives, and might have even saved Nick's life too. That's a good pastor.
Not only that, his report also generated plenty of absolute Kino Kontent for us on the Farms.
:semperfidelis:
 
I would think that they could write something like, 'Child's denies observation or direct knowledge of drug use, but their testimony shows signs of the external influence of a third party'.

I agree that 'not wanting to get mummy or daddy in trouble' could be a motivator as well as the usual tendency that children have to internalise blame and think that *they* were the reason this thing they cannot control is happening--something they should NEVER be blamed for.
And normally they do not really go hard on kids with questions, unless the situation is much much worse.
The goal isn't to traumatize them.

If Daddy Nick properly prepared them in advance to not spill info, there isn't anything they can do about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAroXX
It occurs to me some frens may not understand the deep culture behaviors in a small, rural US community, Nick sure doesn't.

The entire town knows everything his entire family does, it's a level of social surveillance the CCP can only dream of. Children are being direct to make friends, Nick's kids are being taught how many safe homes there are, and their locations. There at least 3 SM groups breaking up the monitoring tasks, and a town council of mothers to decide, when the town must act to protect the children.

One such town decided to murder a dude and then covered it up for 30 years, until the statute of limitations ran out.
 
One such town decided to murder a dude and then covered it up for 30 years, until the statute of limitations ran out.
One could say it was done in the name of the greater good.

hot-fuzz-greater-good.gif
 
MNPR just living rent free in Nick’s head is just the funniest shit ever, and the commitment to dropping this information only when Nick Streams it’s an added bonus. Everything that has happened Nick is your fault, brought on by your actions. I can’t imagine being so egotistical that during a hearing for felony possession where my kid tested positive for heavy use of cocaine to say “Your honor I’ve been called smart my whole life”. Nick might go to jail before my man BMJ at this rate.
 
All Nick Rekieta has to do is post documentation that proves everything he is claiming about his eight year old daughter testing positive for cocaine.

Nick hasn’t done that because the documentation proves he’s lying.

Nick will not do so in the future because the documentation proves he’s lying.

He will keep trying to complicate matters, but it’s just that simple.
If everything Nick has said about the CPS investigation is true, then everything after the June 6th hearing is good for him; he cooperated, tested clean, everybody loved him and admired his tidy, spacious house, and his daughter didn't test positive a second time. It would be beneficial to Nick to release the whole file, and beneficial to the children, too, because it would show they have a normal life and counteract the narrative that they must be deeply traumatized and in need of therapy. Why Nick doesn't move to have it unsealed is a mystery.

This, more than anything, confirms to me that Nick learnt absolutely nothing. He tried to pull the same stunt with Null before, once when they were on better terms with the Monty comments and once with the document claiming his daughter tested positive for cocaine. It hasn't worked before, the retard keeps banging his head against the Null wall until it gives and it only served to confirm that the posts were accurate. He would have better odds of getting it removed by making an account and reporting it.
I think it's the NPD thing where he thinks he did everything right, and the outcome he wanted was on the right side of history. He can't understand why his efforts failed, and figures that if he tweaks his approach with just the right argument, then Josh will have to fall in line. I'm sure he has plenty of experience arguing his parents and his wife and children into compliance, and he's had it work with people on the internet as well. The fact it failed must be infuriating and I imagine he's trying it again in part as a way to relitigate his previous losses and finally get Josh to admit he was right all along.
 
I'm confused.
Which forum rule did MNPublicRecords violate?
None.

The entire site has committed high treason (lol, Barnes) against Rekieta Law by no longer unconditionally sucking his dick as of two and a half years ago.

Nick has still not gotten over it, and since he still thinks of himself as a social media expert, he really thinks he can browbeat Null into doing whatever he wants. He's insane now.

So it was fine when this faggot had people acquire largely confidential records through local console printouts during the Amber Heard/Depp/Ron whatever cases, but it wasn't okay when someone did the same to him? Am I getting this right?
It happened during Weebwars, to his benefit.

Here's a refresher:


There is little functional difference between what JosephTX did with Ron's divorce, and what MNPR did with those CHIPS case files. Yet Nick wants a different standard applied for MNPR.

EDIT TO ADD: Yes, JospehTX would later get banned, but not for getting and sharing Ron's divorce docket. It's possible Nick's damaged brain doesn't comprehend or remember what happened there.
 
Last edited:
None.

The entire site has committed high treason (lol, Barnes) against Rekieta Law by no longer unconditionally sucking his dick as of two and a half years ago.

Nick has still not gotten over it, and since he still thinks of himself as a social media expert, he really thinks he can browbeat Null into doing whatever he wants. He's insane now.


It happened during Weebwars, to his benefit.

Here's a refresher:


There is little functional difference between what JosephTX did with Ron's divorce, and what MNPR did with those CHIPS case files. Yet Nick wants a different standard applied for MNPR.
I'm fascinated with that handwriting.

We have so many stories of him being angry with Kayla and April from the Qover and immediate post-Qover days.
Anf this is another way it is 100% those children were aware and were affected. Drunk and high people argue like barbarians - vicious and aggressive. And kids see this and know that mom & dad, or dad & girlfriend, are out of control. And they know why.
 
Branca is gonna cut him. He's going to realize very quickly that its costing him views and nick just comes off as so fuckin sleazy.
Nick is for sure hurting him. This has to be embarassing as fuck. Especially since Branca has been really pushing into the MAGA arena and now they're seeing this weird retard hanging around.

He won't cut Nick. It will be easier to let Nick lose his interest in about a week or so and let things taper off.
 
Josh replied: "Stop cheating on your wife."
Rekieta responded: "I have never cheated on my wife. She always consented."

Skelly leaves out the rest of the conversation that likely happened on the worst day of his life with star trek fans.

Nick: "Kayla, I can't believe you're cheating on me."
Kayla: "I don't care what you think."
N: "Who else have you cheated with??"
K: "Let's see: the theater people, church people, star trek people. Lots."
N: "How would you feel if I cheated on you?!?"
K: "I don't care who you fuck as long as it's not me."

Fast Forward:
Nick: : "I have never cheated on my wife. She always consented."
 
Back