Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.9%

  • Total voters
    336
I was just catching up on everything via MATI, so I'm sure this is late as fuck. But holy smokes is baby Nicky boy fucking cooked. Lot of life changes going on for me right now so I can't keep track of my favorite pathetic, cuck retard currently and probably won't for the foreseeable future but JFC! This nigger is still cheating on his wife, takes no responsibility for fuck all and just thinks it's business as usual?

Look, I partied hard back when I was a teen/20s. That said, didn't have a flock of kids and a wife. I guess my only mistake was not being a faggot ass trust fund baby with shit taste in cars and women. BTW, Nick, you're a fucking faggot with no tolerance and a crippling addiction. You're not having fun, you're a fucking crack head. Niggers in the deepest parts of Detroit look upon you with pity and shame.

My honest opinion, double check that life insurance policy and fucking kill yourself.
 
Wasn’t this already “confirmed” by Rekieta himself?
View attachment 7279973
( X | A )
In this tweet from February 9th, he basically tells us that one of his "inkaws" got too close to Aaron, started believing his "lies," and then convinced the rest of the in-laws to talk to the pastor about Rekieta.

Also, from what I gathered from Rekieta’s copestream, Aaron specifically started talking to the in-laws about April—and that’s what triggered them.


I'm glad you're doing your gold star sleuthing with excellent autism and incredible edits. And, yes. It's not exactly new information.

What's interesting is that Aaron was leaning into revealing information about what the "ink-laws" knew from the children. That's what triggered Aaron's remarks.

My theory: One of the older Rekieta kids (probably the eldest son or eldest daughter) knew exactly what was happening (drugs, polycule). The kid then alerted the in-laws, who contacted Aaron (probably JaymeLee Wright but possibly Sletta). They already knew shit was going south due to weight loss, erratic behavior in church, whatever. In-laws started talking to Paula Holmen, who verified concerns due to the hungry child. Cue Pastor Melin.

Pure speculation and, yes, it's countered by legal docs that say the kids did not know about drugs.

So, perhaps, a kid was more concerned about the polycule - unable to make out the drugs - but the adults could do so.
 
Yeah, but if one is working 40 hours a week and at least minimum wage, could they really do anything?

I don't think judge would be able to order someone like that to pay $5000 a week since that would be impossible on that wage.

If you're working 40 hours a week at minimum wage I don't see how the judge could honestly do anything about it without it being easily overruled on appeal.
Preface: different area of law, so it's at most a potential analogy, not a descriptor of probation expectations: In some places (mn being one of them), when it comes time to determine parental income for purposes of determining base child support, there is an analysis of what each earns, and (at least the possibility of) an imputed value for a parent's earnings. If you've not worked before or had always had min wage jobs, the Court is likely to impute to you the minimum wage for 30 hours/ week - so not a lot but not zero. But let's say you had been a doctor making $500k, married to someone who had never worked after your marriage 8 or 12 years ago - but when divorce loomed, you quit. And you're not the person who will be with the kids most of the time - or even half-time, so ordinarily you'd be paying the max child support (a paltry $17xx/ mo/ child, last time I checked in this thread about a year ago).

If you and stb ex can't be normal humans and come up with a reasonable agreed amount, the Court may well impute to you an earning capacity and determine child support due with reference to what you had been making (assuming you're not completely unemployable for some reason). They may give you time to ramp up to some portion of what you had previously been making, but that imputed amount isn't going to be that min wage x 30 hours amount, so you may well be ordered to pay based on the assessment of what you can reasonably be expected to earn.

There's a lot of wiggle room there, and it's not actually particularly strict in enforcement, but in theory, you're not supposed to be able to make strategic decisions to gyp your kids out of what their higher-earning parent could afford absent being a twit.

This carries out to alimony: it changes based on length of marriage, but the most typical alimony - if any - in MN is transitional alimony - a year or couple for the non-paying ex-spouse to go get some qualification or some kind of job, after which point there is no more alimony.

It's more art/ subjective than science, due to the many variables (are the kids 2 or 16? Are they healthy or do they require extra care? What are the relative potential earnings of each spouse? What are their educations? Work experiences?. Are they both young (40 isn't 50 or 60)/ healthy/ able? ...and on.). But though mn courts can be somewhat averse to throwing moneyed white people in prison, (except for egregious white collar crimes, which, if offensive enough, they will do (more, if you're curious, and yes, he taught at William Mitchell, lol, though he was put away before Nick enrolled there)), they do tend to have at least a semi-egalitarian view of men & women and shared parental responsibilities, including financial responsibilities, on the whole.

Tl; dr: there are situations in which you will be told to stop being a dick or a lazy fuck and to go get the kind of job your education and experience would suggest you can get.

Which, in Nick's case, appears to be about $100/ day - so thank God for that free money pouring in.
 
I'm glad you're doing your gold star sleuthing with excellent autism and incredible edits. And, yes. It's not exactly new information.

What's interesting is that Aaron was leaning into revealing information about what the "ink-laws" knew from the children. That's what triggered Aaron's remarks.

My theory: One of the older Rekieta kids (probably the eldest son or eldest daughter) knew exactly what was happening (drugs, polycule). The kid then alerted the in-laws, who contacted Aaron (probably JaymeLee Wright but possibly Sletta). They already knew shit was going south due to weight loss, erratic behavior in church, whatever. In-laws started talking to Paula Holmen, who verified concerns due to the hungry child. Cue Pastor Melin.

Pure speculation and, yes, it's countered by legal docs that say the kids did not know about drugs.

So, perhaps, a kid was more concerned about the polycule - unable to make out the drugs - but the adults could do so.

What makes me slightly MATI, is that if the children *did* see something, there were ill-equipped to deal with it due to their 1) age and immaturity and 2) their dependence on Nick and Kayla for their food and general welfare or 3) both. The thought of them knowing something was 'wrong' (or totally broken) but being unable to express it (out of innocence or fear) is a horrifying thought. This is further compounded by Nick's insistence that 'everything is fine' and touting their 'great relationship'.
 
Wasn’t this already “confirmed” by Rekieta himself?
View attachment 7279973
( X | A )
In this tweet from February 9th, he basically tells us that one of his "inkaws" got too close to Aaron, started believing his "lies," and then convinced the rest of the in-laws to talk to the pastor about Rekieta.

Also, from what I gathered from Rekieta’s copestream, Aaron specifically started talking to the in-laws about April—and that’s what triggered them.

Rekieta: "I was drinking heavily, did a mountain of cocaine, did the cokestream, but those in-laws didn't really see what they say they saw. It's just a coincidence the time I was totally having fun and blacking out is the time they decided to invent thinks about my life and then the government assfucked me"

So, the 80 IQ mongloid somehow, in cahoots with Aaron, managed to trick several relatives, a school teacher and the former nanny to confide in a pastor knowing the pastor was obligated to report it? They could've just reported it directly, numbnuts. They went to the pastor obviously in the hopes of an intervention.

They saw what they saw because they fucking saw it. Anyone who watched the cokestream and streams prior has no problem at all believing those in laws and former nanny, cos it makes total fucking sense. Nick wants people to think they were prudes who went onto invent allegations.
 
Rekieta: "I was drinking heavily, did a mountain of cocaine, did the cokestream, but those in-laws didn't really see what they say they saw. It's just a coincidence the time I was totally having fun and blacking out is the time they decided to invent thinks about my life and then the government assfucked me"

So, the 80 IQ mongloid somehow, in cahoots with Aaron, managed to trick several relatives, a school teacher and the former nanny to confide in a pastor knowing the pastor was obligated to report it? They could've just reported it directly, numbnuts. They went to the pastor obviously in the hopes of an intervention.

They saw what they saw because they fucking saw it. Anyone who watched the cokestream and streams prior has no problem at all believing those in laws and former nanny, cos it makes total fucking sense. Nick wants people to think they were prudes who went onto invent allegations.
It's another round of everyone's favorite social media game, "Sociopath resents the slightest boundary normal people expect."
Rekieta seethes at the mere suggestion of being a normal functional adult. Manchild horrorcow.
 
I love that Nick keeps messaging Null, hoping he won't tell on MATI that this fucker was more concerned with his KF thread on Easter than spending time with family, asking for deletion of stuff, proving once again that he's lying liar who lies. Also his wife "consenting each time" feel like Cuckstiny cope. He really is *the* ultimate lolcow.
It also proves without a shadow of a doubt that Nick's fucking retarded (if you needed nore evidence) if he thinks, after all this time, asking Null nicely to take his shit down will actually work for once.
 
Rekieta: "I was drinking heavily, did a mountain of cocaine, did the cokestream, but those in-laws didn't really see what they say they saw. It's just a coincidence the time I was totally having fun and blacking out is the time they decided to invent thinks about my life and then the government assfucked me"
That's the kind of twisted logic of an addict. He still thinks he was in the right and they were wrong. They correctly guessed he was a drug addict and falling apart, but they guessed for the "wrong reasons" and he thinks he was really good at hiding it. He's still deflecting blame at Aaron, the government, the pastor, his inlaws, etc.

This is a bad sign that he'll probably either have a full relapse or find a new addiction.
 
That's the kind of twisted logic of an addict. He still thinks he was in the right and they were wrong. They correctly guessed he was a drug addict and falling apart, but they guessed for the "wrong reasons" and he thinks he was really good at hiding it. He's still deflecting blame at Aaron, the government, the pastor, his inlaws, etc.

This is a bad sign that he'll probably either have a full relapse or find a new addiction.
Yup. Actually the smelly children and complaining of being hungry wasn't even needed. A mandatory reporter is obligated to report if they suspect a parent is under the influence of drugs and alcohol while caring for children. Obviously Nick was, as the video shows, but also by his own admissions since that he was drinking heavily and doing a mountain of cocaine.

Nick's version just makes no logical sense.
 
Nick's version just makes no logical sense.
To be fair, he was high off his mind when it all happened, so of course it makes no sense. He wasn't mentally present for any of it, and what we're hearing is the warped distortion of events his brain produced while drowned in Jim Bean and coke.
 
Null talked about it on MATI for April 25th. Nick wanted @MNPublicRecords banned and those pictures of April's truck taken down,
JFC. That clip just came out today, so I hadn't seen it yet.

That's fucking ridiculous. The absolute audacity of him demanding that @MNPublicRecords be banned. He probably hates them more than anybody on this site now. Not hard to figure out why considering that's how we found out about the kid testing positive

I wonder who he wanted banned before MNPR turned up. Remember he vaguely told Null about people in this thread, but he wouldn't name names? Me? @Balldo's Gate? @Himedall All-seeing Waifu? One of Cynthia's many socks?

I suppose it doesn't matter, but I've been curious about it this whole time.

This is your cow thread, Nick. The only sorta control you have over it is you can fuck off, and then it would be starved for content. Otherwise, eat shit.
 
Pure speculation and, yes, it's countered by legal docs that say the kids did not know about drugs.
It's very likely that an older kid would privately share their concerns about their parents' drug use with a family member and also would not rat them out to law enforcement or other authority figures. Even children in far worse circumstances than the Rekietas tend to be loyal to their parents.
 
I'm ecstatic that Nick is struggling to fulfill his court obligation of him (pretending) to have a form of gainful employment. I'm cheered on that he's tired, bored and beyond miserable.

Fuck you Nick. Your 8 year old child was dosed by you with Coke. The Internet never forgets.

Sufffffahhhhhh meme (4).gif
 
Height isn't that much correlated with parents' heights. My parents are short but I turned out to be very tall. It was inconvenient since I worked a lot in Asia where notices like "don't bang your head on the overhang you moron" aren't common. I believe I read it was about 40% or so, it's unnecessary to check.

akin to a good whipping.
:really: can you tie me to the sex cross first?
 
Josh, “a good person,” received a message from Rekieta around noon on Easter Sunday, telling him he had to delete the MN Public Records post because it was a site violation.
This, more than anything, confirms to me that Nick learnt absolutely nothing. He tried to pull the same stunt with Null before, once when they were on better terms with the Monty comments and once with the document claiming his daughter tested positive for cocaine. It hasn't worked before, the retard keeps banging his head against the Null wall until it gives and it only served to confirm that the posts were accurate. He would have better odds of getting it removed by making an account and reporting it.
 
Last edited:
This, more than anything, confirms to me that Nick learnt absolutely nothing. He tried to pull the same stunt with Null before, once when they were on better terms with the Monty comments and once with the document claiming his daughter tested positive for cocaine. It hasn't worked before, the retard keeps banging his head against the Null wall until it gives and it only served to confirm that the posts were accurate. He would have better odds of getting it removed by making an account and reporting it.
The hypocrisy is kinda making me wish for Nick’s PO to have a really fucking bad week.

If Nick REALLY was bothered by April getting unwanted attention, there’s a very easy solution to that. Wave goodbye to her as she packs up all her stuff and drives home to her dad, or to go live in another state.

But nah… He wants easy access to the throat goat, her privacy be damned. Nick isn’t upset about April being inconvenienced. He’s not worried about humiliating his kids. He’s upset that he can’t get to fuck her without everyone knowing.

Why must NERDS always try and prevent Nick from having a little FUN?

So, perhaps, a kid was more concerned about the polycule - unable to make out the drugs - but the adults could do so.
I strongly doubt that the kids didn’t know.
Kids lie though, and with parents like the Rekieta’s, kids learn to lie often and well.

CPS is making a legal document for the court though, so they can’t really write “But I’m pretty sure he’s lying because his dad told him to”, so we will get half the story. “I asked C about drug use, he denied knowing about any drug use”.
 
Last edited:
The hypocrisy is kinda making me wish for Nick’s PO to have a really fucking bad week.

If Nick REALLY was bothered by April getting unwanted attention, there’s a very easy solution to that. Wave goodbye to her as she packs up all her stuff and drives home to her dad, or to go live in another state.

But nah… He wants easy access to the throat goat, her privacy be damned. Nick isn’t upset about April being inconvenienced. He’s not worried about humiliating his kids. He’s upset that he can’t get to fuck her without everyone knowing.

Why must NERDS always try and prevent Nick from having a little FUN?


I strongly doubt that the kids didn’t know.
Kids lie though, and with parents like the Rekieta’s, kids learn to lie often and well.

CPS is making a legal document for the court though, so they can’t really write “But I’m pretty sure he’s lying because his dad told him to”, so we will get half the story. “I asked C about drug use, he denied knowing about any drug use”.
It's not like Nick could've kept the secret anyway. It's in his nature to leave breadcrumbs so that some people suspect, but Nick thinks not know, that he fucks April still.
 
Back