This is arguing over semantics now. Purity spiral is used as a pejorative term by X people whining about not being included in Y circle over X belief/worldview.
Lenin and Menshiviks believed in the same end-goal, the difference was what methods they used.
And the Spanish system did crap itself... just not with a bang but a whimper instead. Franco made stupid mistakes, yet the biggest one was his choice of successor, you and me both know we would get in a time travel machine and warn him on Juan Carlos I.
And they're already here If KF is to be a inclusive big-tent forum, you just don't see them openly admitting themselves here because the most prevailing and socially acceptable tenet here which is shared by all people is that pedos must go behind bars or to the grave, and most of them certainly don't have the balls to sign up and start arguing themselves against anyone here.
And my nigga, he was NOT for coalitions. How was it a coalition when the Nazis pretty much said "yeah fuck off we rule now" to their "coalition partners"?
Why? Because he devoted entire chapters on why this is a bad idea.
The future of a movement depends on the devotion, or more correctly, the intolerance for other beliefs that its followers exhibit in defense of it as the only true cause. They must be convinced and enforce the belief that their own cause, as opposed to other similar causes, is the only just cause. It is a huge mistake to believe that the strength of a movement can be increased by uniting with another similar movement. Growth by merger means an immediate increase in numbers which appears to outside observers that the organization has increased in power and resources. In truth, the organization has simply absorbed germs which will be a source of inner weakness and this will cause suffering later on. No matter what anyone says about the similarity of two movements, such closeness never really exists. If they were truly so similar, there would be only one movement and not two. It doesn’t matter where the differences are. Even if the difference is in the inconsistent abilities of the leadership alone, then we have found the difference.
The natural law of all development never accepts the joining of two unequal beings. True joining only occurs when the stronger gains victory over the weaker. When this natural selection happens, the strength and energy of the victor is increased by the struggle itself. Uniting two similar political party structures may produce momentary advantages, but in the long run, any success gained in this way will cause inner weaknesses to appear later. The greatness of a movement is only guaranteed by the unhampered development of its inner strength, the protection of that strength, and the constant increase of that strength until it achieves final victory over all rivals. More than that, we may say that a movement’s strength and its right to exist increases only when it recognizes that adherence to the principle that struggle is necessary for growth and that it will only reach the peak of its strength when complete victory is finally achieved. The movement can never attempt to accomplish this victory through instant or short term gains, but only through perseverance and absolute intolerance of any opposition. Only in this way will the movement enjoy a long stretch of growth.
Movements which have expanded from the union of similar organizations, where each made compromises to achieve the joining, are like plants grown in a hot-house. They shoot up quickly, but they lack internal strength and are not substantial enough to stand the test of time or to resist violent storms. The greatness of any powerful organization, which embodies an idea in this world, depends on the absolutely religious fanaticism with which it establishes itself when compared to others. It must be fanatically convinced that it is right and just, and it must be absolutely intolerant of any idea or organization that is counter to its own teaching. If an idea is right and it takes up the sword of battle with this mind-set, it is invincible and any persecution only strengthens it.
No, it's egoism and vanity. Most people in politics were theater kids, and political groups do not usually claim to be the sole path to salvation and eternal life.
But, again, what else can you expect from people who want to ape the aesthetics of a boogeyman without actually being one.
Political groups operating in your everyday politics sure, but Nazism is the exception to that rule because it extends beyond mere politics. Hitler
did imply to be sole path to 'salvation and eternal life'
And these are Hitler's words, man, not mine. Straight from the Boogeyman's mouth.
The moment the plan’s creator attempts to consider so-called “convenience” and “reality” instead of absolute truth, his work will no longer be a star seeking humanity and will become
nothing more than an everyday procedure.
Man must never be so misguided that he believes he has ascended to the position of lord and master over Nature. The conceit of half-education has made men think this illusion is possible. He must understand the fundamental law of necessity rules in Nature’s domain, and realize how completely his existence is subject to these laws of eternal battle and the struggle for dominance.
The greatness of any powerful organization, which embodies an idea in this world, depends on the absolutely religious fanaticism with which it establishes itself when compared to others. It must be fanatically convinced that it is right and just, and it must be absolutely intolerant of any idea or organization that is counter to its own teaching. If an idea is right and it takes up the sword of battle with this mind-set, it is invincible and any persecution only strengthens it. The greatness of Christianity was not established through compromise. They had no reason to engage in negotiations of appeasement with those who had roughly similar, ancient philosophical opinions. It was created through unyielding and fanatical declaration and defense of its own teachings.
