Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

Because socialist-prog - leftists are not motivated by bettering all, but, by making sure those who they judge as insufficiently evolved pay for holding back Utopia.

If you offered the kind of person who inhabits r/fuckcars with the ability to either uplift 3,000 poor people to the middle-class, or, cause 3 people they don't like to die of a horrible prion disease? They'd pick killing the 3 enemies every time. Their primary motivation in life is that those who are not like them need to be made to SUFFER for their "failure" to live up.
Well achtually, by killing Drumpf, Putin, and that cunt Justin who used to piss on my bike in 8th grade, the world would be made better than giving 3k possible trump supporters money
Checkmate, chud
 
In the comments they say that people should park in garages:
1745582027248.webp
but I’ve also sent them complaining when the outer borough council members only approve a new apartment building after the developer agrees to build a garage because it “raises the cost of housing” despite them never requiring enough spots for every resident to have one. They're extreme NIMBYs whenever someone proposes building any form of car infrastructure.

All of their "reasoning" will eventually lead to to a ban of private cars anyway. Can't have street parking, that has to be developers' responsibility instead on their own lots. Oh, but there are too many parking lots in the city, those have to be converted to residential high-rises instead.

Urban freeways are bad, you have to remove them for boulevards and more "pedestrian friendly" options. Oh, but those are too wide. You can't have major thoroughfares in cities if they can't be labeled as "streets" so we'll just call them "stroads" to marginalize them and shrink them down to nothing.

Well now there's too many streets. Let's limit them to bicycle and pedestrian traffic, and punish everyone else who drives. Oh, you want to move to the suburbs where those problems don't exist? Screw you, we'll figure out a way to tax you so you can pay your "fair share" whatever that means. In fact, you shouldn't even have single-family homes in your neighborhood, we need to BAN zoning altogether. In fact, I read a great book on how to "repair" suburbia. Yes, of course there's something wrong with it.

...it goes on and on. There is no end. There is no compromise.
 
People: Cyclists should slow down

Cyclists: WAHH!!!

... and cyclists wonder why they are hated more than drivers.

1745673336977.webp

1745673434934.webp

1745673563164.webp

1745673887244.webp

1745673983319.webp
 
...it goes on and on. There is no end. There is no compromise.
Pretty much. They want to continually constrict rules and regulations until it becomes a logical impossibility to actually conform to any of the arbitrary rules they set. The thing is that whether or not creating this legal impossibility is actually deliberate malicious intent or just their own shortsightedness I could honestly see both.

Similar to how if you want to stop a pizza party say that you can order pizza, but only under the conditions that you are both lactose and gluten intolerant and also vegan. Making it impossible that whatever you end up ordering even resembles a pizza.

This could go the other direction if someone created a law where it is illegal to ride a bike on the road, illegal to ride on the sidewalk and bike lanes are banned. But did not explicitly state its illegal to own a bike. Just that there's no legal way to actually use it.
 
... and cyclists wonder why they are hated more than drivers.
They always ride in the middle of the fucking road in the summer, or get dangerously close to a point I have to be on a constant lookout for one darting out of nowhere. Also that faggot getting mad at those walking by him being upset that he nearly knocks them over symbolizes everything I dislike about cyclists. You have to follow his rules, but he doesn't have to follow every other rule.
 
People: Cyclists should slow down

Cyclists: WAHH!!!

... and cyclists wonder why they are hated more than drivers.

London had one of the few cases of a cyclist killing a pedestrian, for which despite the cyclist looking exactly how you'd expect, blamed the victim for the death, and served 18 months.

Where were the cyclists crying over how he should be charged with murder?
 
Nothing is going to change until pedestrians rise up and start fighting back against the pedaled menace. Knock them over and then beat them with sticks, then relocate their two wheeled instrument of terror to the bottom of the nearest river or beneath the tires of the nearest motor vehicle so it may not be used for this awful purpose again.

Slash bicycle tires wherever you see them parked, remove the seats and force them to ride without, do what you can to make their day as miserable as possible and then keep in mind this is exactly what they want to do to cars and peds.
 
Pretty much. They want to continually constrict rules and regulations until it becomes a logical impossibility to actually conform to any of the arbitrary rules they set. The thing is that whether or not creating this legal impossibility is actually deliberate malicious intent or just their own shortsightedness I could honestly see both.

Similar to how if you want to stop a pizza party say that you can order pizza, but only under the conditions that you are both lactose and gluten intolerant and also vegan. Making it impossible that whatever you end up ordering even resembles a pizza.

This could go the other direction if someone created a law where it is illegal to ride a bike on the road, illegal to ride on the sidewalk and bike lanes are banned. But did not explicitly state its illegal to own a bike. Just that there's no legal way to actually use it.
They're following the gun control playbook, but with cars and freedom of movement. It shouldn't be a surprise though.
 
Similar to how if you want to stop a pizza party say that you can order pizza, but only under the conditions that you are both lactose and gluten intolerant and also vegan. Making it impossible that whatever you end up ordering even resembles a pizza.
Just for shits and giggles:
1000004556.webp
Vegan Cauliflower Crust Pizza
 
London had one of the few cases of a cyclist killing a pedestrian, for which despite the cyclist looking exactly how you'd expect, blamed the victim for the death, and served 18 months.

Where were the cyclists crying over how he should be charged with murder?
They just changed the laws because of that case and even the Labour Transport Secretary supported the change (as they’ve never met anything that they don’t want to regulate…something for the cyclists to think about when they brag about how bikes are “freer” than cars because they’re unregulated):
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Source (Archive)

Also in British news, London is fining ambulances for driving through their car-free zones:
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Source (Archive)
A&N Thread
 
Also in British news, London is fining ambulances for driving through their car-free zones:
Haha, even "we will let ambulances and emergency vehicles have roads" is a fig leaf. Although anybody with a brain already knew that. Just look at the derangement of car-hating retards towards the fire department.
 
Also in British news, London is fining ambulances for driving through their car-free zones
When you consider how (any) transportation is important for a country to be functional, willing to die on this hill is even weirder.
I almost never see them really talking about improvement, optimization or smoother car/bus/train travel. It's always prohibit, forbid and ban cars, you'll take the broken public transportation and you'll like it, Total Bike Freedom and fuck the dumb pedestrians.
Again cars aren't perfect and cycling can be nice but who the fuck can be angry at life workers for savings lives?
 
London had one of the few cases of a cyclist killing a pedestrian, for which despite the cyclist looking exactly how you'd expect, blamed the victim for the death, and served 18 months.
18 months?
He should have been in San Francisco(2013)
2025-04-26_18-00.webp
2025-04-26_18-03.webp
https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/local-news?ftag=CNM-16-10abg0d

Cyclist Gets Probation In Death Of San Francisco Pedestrian​

August 15, 2013 / 11:59 PM PDT / CBS San Francisco

SAN FRANCISCO (KCBS) — A Marin County man who pleaded guilty to striking and killing a 71-year-old pedestrian with his bicycle in San Francisco last year was sentenced Thursday to probation and community service.

37-year-old Chris Bucchere was sentenced to three years probation and 1,000 hours of community service for the death of Sutchi Hui. Last month, Bucchere accepted a plea bargain and pleaded guilty to one count of felony vehicular manslaughter.

According to prosecutors, Bucchere ran a stop sign and several traffic lights while riding his bicycle along Castro Street on the morning of March 29, 2012. Hui was hit by Bucchere in a crosswalk at the intersection of Castro and Market and died several days later.

His family said they did not want Bucchere to serve jail time. The felony conviction was the first of its kind in the nation involving a bicyclist.
"family said they did not want Bucchere to serve jail time" Sounds like the same fucking shit as the nigger who dragged a woman to death in Oakland also got her friends to say the guy shouldn't get prison. At least he got prison, but only 7 years.
 
Because socialist-prog - leftists are not motivated by bettering all, but, by making sure those who they judge as insufficiently evolved pay for holding back Utopia.

If you offered the kind of person who inhabits r/fuckcars with the ability to either uplift 3,000 poor people to the middle-class, or, cause 3 people they don't like to die of a horrible prion disease? They'd pick killing the 3 enemies every time. Their primary motivation in life is that those who are not like them need to be made to SUFFER for their "failure" to live up.
They don't love the poor they just hate the rich.
 
Also in British news, London is fining ambulances for driving through their car-free zones:
Wait until one of them gets a concussion from hitting their head on a mailbox at the wrong angle and happens to be in the ambulance free zone at the time.

I almost never see them really talking about improvement, optimization or smoother car/bus/train travel. It's always prohibit, forbid and ban cars, you'll take the broken public transportation and you'll like it
It goes with the saying evil cannot create it can only destroy. In this case it can only ban and complain. They don't offer any solutions because they have no actual ideas for optimization or improvement. Their whole shtick is that if they start banning things that already work it will force... someone... out there to do something about it on their behalf.

Whenever they do have a thought. They usually vaguely gesture that things should be better but don't exactly explain how. And if all else fails they just point to another country and complain why can't we be more like them.
 
Haha, even "we will let ambulances and emergency vehicles have roads" is a fig leaf. Although anybody with a brain already knew that. Just look at the derangement of car-hating retards towards the fire department.
And even with the "smaller trucks" they'll still argue against it. Just look at the videos complaining about UPS cargo bikes in the bike lane.
 
It goes with the saying evil cannot create it can only destroy. In this case it can only ban and complain. They don't offer any solutions because they have no actual ideas for optimization or improvement. Their whole shtick is that if they start banning things that already work it will force... someone... out there to do something about it on their behalf.
The main solution for fixing public transportation is to ban Niggers (violent disturbances) and Jeets (who stink the bus or train up). Which are both problems they are determined to never solve.
 
All of their "reasoning" will eventually lead to to a ban of private cars anyway. Can't have street parking, that has to be developers' responsibility instead on their own lots. Oh, but there are too many parking lots in the city, those have to be converted to residential high-rises instead.

Urban freeways are bad, you have to remove them for boulevards and more "pedestrian friendly" options. Oh, but those are too wide. You can't have major thoroughfares in cities if they can't be labeled as "streets" so we'll just call them "stroads" to marginalize them and shrink them down to nothing.

Well now there's too many streets. Let's limit them to bicycle and pedestrian traffic, and punish everyone else who drives. Oh, you want to move to the suburbs where those problems don't exist? Screw you, we'll figure out a way to tax you so you can pay your "fair share" whatever that means. In fact, you shouldn't even have single-family homes in your neighborhood, we need to BAN zoning altogether. In fact, I read a great book on how to "repair" suburbia. Yes, of course there's something wrong with it.

...it goes on and on. There is no end. There is no compromise.
If the reasoning doesn't work by itself, an enforced switch to electric cars will do the rest. Just continuously limit charging infrastructure and prices and you'll automatically get cars being only for the rich. The EU is currently planning on making inspections mandatory every year for cars older than 10 years. That affects half the cars on the road now, and surely they won't stop trying to legislate older cars off the roads.
 
Back