That's modern entertainment in general. The way they write their characters is so formulaic all you have to do is see a picture of the cast to know what's going on.
The biggest thing holding the prequels back is that they're an earnest political tragedy trilogy and an earnest personal corruption trilogy forced to share the same three movies, when they really need their own time to shine. Basically everything that's a problem with them (e.g. like Red Letter Media saying the phantom menace lacks a clear protagonist) can be traced back to trying to cram all the extra worldbuilding and intrigue the political tragedy needs into the same amount of space the original trilogy had just for luke's character arc.
I think RLM influence began to wane after they went full retro and stopped doing what made them famous, like plinkett series and half in the bag. I guess it was by design. They love shit talking about so bad so good movies from 90s.
It also helped that they had a horrible take on the acolyte which amounted to "some people on the internet don't like it so we won't call it bad." That broke the shielding they had and RLM started getting called out for bad takes. People then started to go back and reevaluate their past takes. A lot of which are super bad.
You have to look at from their perspective. These are fucking old millenial WHITE men in MILWAUKEE. They have to, nay, they MUST fence sitting.
You may have figured it out already, but a way to get through these propaganda classes without painting a target on yourself or sacrificing your grades is just to frame your answers in the fantasy world they live in without strictly agreeing with it. In this ethnic studies class for example, you could start your response with "according to the definition of racism laid out by <person or text>, Black people are unable to be racist because <some bullshit>. You know that the definition is wrong and that anything that follows is wrong too, but in the professor's la-la land this would be the case.
" even if that would feel better. 
I disagree, I think they were just capable of properly laying out the reasons most people knew these movies were intrinsically bad/wrong but couldn't due to a lack of a film school background. I grew up watching the VHS tapes of the Original Trilogy and even I knew The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones were bad movies as a kid even if I liked the lightsaber fights because the characters were all wrong, the pacing was all wrong, any scene that wasn't an action scene was mind numbingly boring because all the direction is flat, etc.
Not sure where people keep getting this from, they just said that it was a mediocre show that was dumb/silly and didn't deserve the outrage it was getting. People were treating it like it was a sequel to a beloved series or raped a character the way TLJ raped Luke but it didn't do anything of the sort. They were just mystified that people were paying so much attention to this thing.
Yeah, "old" millenial take. Most older millenial feels this way. Fuck, I felt this way until I realized PUT A CHICK IN IT AND MAKE IT LAME AND GAY trend.
I think the issue is RLM like a lot of older Star Wars fans have given up on the brand, they aren't invested in it anymore. But people who still fight the 'culture war' within the brand and think if they watch/tweet enough Doomcock videos Kathleen Kennedy will be shot into the sun and Dave Filoni will retcon the sequels think anyone who doesn't go into a frothing rage at every single Star Wars announcement MUST be okay with it and tacitly approve it. And it's like, no nigger, you're just retarded and feeding into the system. Disney makes money off of you when you make 8 hour hatewatching essays about their new shitty shows, when you tweet about the show you boost the brand. The only winning move is to not play and starve the beast. It doesn't matter how many videos you make/watch, they don't care what you think and will continue to pozz the brand as long as they keep making money off your retarded tweets.
"turn left right now or we're gonna crash"
Yeah, but the stuff Disney pumped out afterwards was so awful that many of the sins of the prequel trilogy seem like no big deal in retrospect, or even warmly quirky. I can go back and enjoy those prequels, even now, as campy films with flaws that almost fit the era they came from. I do not expect to go back to Disney Wars, ever. I think this is a relatively common sentiment and why you see prequel revisionism these days.
The idea if you ignore something it will just go away has been proven false time and time again. See snowwhite, that was enemy #1 and it's failure made disney stop live action remakes all together.
So they have the ability to milk something but other don't? That is the issue. They were the ones who started this whole genre and now they want to pull up the ladder. They were the original ragebait.
This is true.
We should be able to depose and jail judges and DA due to discrimination
And the last 10 years of Disney continuing to pump out the exact same slop they always have without course correcting or recognizing even one iota of criticism disproves the idea of "autistic screeching will make the multi-billion dollar conglomerate listen to me!"
Disney's live action remakes are completely different from Star Wars though, because retards continue to buy, watch and post about Star Wars no matter how gay and retarded Disney makes it. Snow White in particular was plagued with production issues that didn't have anything to do with internet screeching.
No? No one said that. Literally no one. Why are you upset at something that isn't real?
Again you're actually like raging and pissed off about something you've invented in your head, they never said or did any of these things.
They also made a video about Acolyte, part of it was about the controversy and the rest was a review of the episodes they watched. They never said no one was allowed to do that, they were specifically talking about the scale of the controversy in relation to how small of a show it was compared to the sequel films which were supposed to carry on the legacy of the brand as a blockbuster franchise. A shitty direct to streaming show isn't the same thing at all but people were screeching bloody murder about it and basically advertised the show for Disney, no one cared about it before.
> Moriarty
The White House Xitter said:Christopher Columbus is so back
Donald Trump said:
Ah, I see Trump is a fan of The Sopranos. This would be funny no matter what race it was.
And it’s especially funny because Columbus’s Italian-ness is a contentious matter. It’s accepted that he was born around 1451, in Genoa - which was an independent city-state, and is now part of modern-day Italy.
He rocks so hard.
