Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

What's with the tranny obsession with football stadiums, all of a sudden? It's the most stereotypically moid-brained thing ever. If I wanted to really get into the weeds, psychologically, I'd say it could be some vestige of these being damaged, unsuccessful, unpopular beta males, craving traditional masculine fellowship, belonging and tribalism, the rough, laddy camaraderie of the terraces...
Men like sports
 
Is JK Rowling a literal sex trafficker who turns all the young men into incels or something? /r/MtF discusses
Is JK Rowling the female equivalent of Andrew Tate? Or is that going too far? (archive)
Saw the above question on a random FB page and the comments were split. Very polarizing.

I'm in the camp that she's a shitty person but not AS shitty as ass bag AT.
Person 1- JK has caused thousands of rapes & murders. Hundreds of thousands of people were discriminated against solely because of Harry Potter lady. Plus: which level of hell she belongs in is mostly an academic debate, like how many angels fit on a pinhead.
1745728567539.webp
Person 2- the bardfinn response aka she's a stochastic terrorist- the terrorism so vibes based and insidious that it can never be shown but somehow is more dangerous than actual terrorism.
1745728890566.webp
Person 3- Surely this lawsuit wouldn't have happened without 70 thousand GBP from Rowling. Also don't look at how many legal defenses of trans activits who also happen to be pedos the MtF community funds.
1745728931339.webp
Person 4- Has Rowling raped or trafficked anyone yet? No I mean, NOT YET
1745729067403.webp
Preson 5- I can only assume this person is a 14 year old if they think that Andrew Tate is more well known and influential than Rowling.
1745729172853.webp
 
I posted this in the Last of Us thread about Pedro Pascal being a titty baby over Rowling's beliefs:

Tranny worship cannot and will not come close to eclipsing the all-consuming religion cultural zeitgeist that is Harry Potter. It doesn't matter how many woketard 35 year old manchildren yell at the Rowling-shaped cloud old man style. Half of the RDS patients will still consume HP media anyway.

There's still a large number of people who either don't give a shit about "transphobia" or who are proudly "transphobic" themselves who will carry on consuming Rowling's media like it's water.
 
I posted this in the Last of Us thread about Pedro Pascal being a titty baby over Rowling's beliefs:

Tranny worship cannot and will not come close to eclipsing the all-consuming religion cultural zeitgeist that is Harry Potter. It doesn't matter how many woketard 35 year old manchildren yell at the Rowling-shaped cloud old man style. Half of the RDS patients will still consume HP media anyway.

There's still a large number of people who either don't give a shit about "transphobia" or who are proudly "transphobic" themselves who will carry on consuming Rowling's media like it's water.
This is certainly true of a certain generation. The younger troons however are much more likely to have been raised in an environment that was very toxic towards Harry Potter and JK Rowling from the start. Should be interesting to see how that all plays out the next decade
 
This is certainly true of a certain generation. The younger troons however are much more likely to have been raised in an environment that was very toxic towards Harry Potter and JK Rowling from the start. Should be interesting to see how that all plays out the next decade
This is all anecdotal, but I see teens and early-twenties troons and allies in the Potter fandom all the time. They might tag their stuff with "fuck JKR" or claim they don't give her money (by pirating or buying second-hand), but they're still unwilling to let go of it and they still keep it culturally relevant by engaging with it. They have a thousand and one excuses as to why what they're doing isn't "damaging" or it's even activism (by making Sirius Black a pooner), but they're definitely not letting go of it. A lot of these people are absolutely going to watch the new show and talk about it online, even if they claim to pirate it. There's already drama about that.

In my personal life, I know a lot of kids in their early teens that love Potter and have no problem paying money for merchandising, be it books, water bottles, notebooks, pins, backpacks, whatever. They always talk excitedly about it when they find out I like it too. I even knew a thirteen year old trans identified girl (she no longer identifies as trans, thank god) who was very into online discourse, but never once mentioned Rowling or her views when she was excitedly guessing my Hogwarts house.

On a more general sense, I still see a lot of Potter cake toppers and decorations in showcases, Potter events for children and corners of libraries dedicated entirely to Potter. I see more adults who think they're making a statement by not including Potter in their classroom's reading lists than kids unwilling to read it (or watch it) on their own.

In my corner of the world, at least, Potter is as relevant as ever, and younger generations don't seem to care about Rowling's views. Older kids I've known use "transphobia" as a punchline. I agree that only time will tell, but for now I'm inclined to agree with Mourning_Cloak.
 
The younger troons however are much more likely to have been raised in an environment that was very toxic towards Harry Potter and JK Rowling from the start. Should be interesting to see how that all plays out the next decade
So a micro amount of crazy cult people hate HP. And? So do christian fundies. They still have no power to make it go away.
 
He looks like something out of the walking dead.
This is not by any means the worst he has looked.

1745850469811.webp


Thread tax:
1745850277607.webp
Look the JK Rowling thing is pretty cut and dry she is still personally being directly enriched by consumption of Harry Potter and then using those riches to actively participate in a campaign against trans people

This ain't a case of a problematic author, it's material support to terrorism

Again, they really have no clue. Mostly she tweets every now and then, which is free to do. The money she donated to For Women Scotland was pocket money for her.
 
John Lithgow Says J.K. Rowling’s Anti-Trans Rhetoric Didn’t Dissuade Him From Taking On ‘Harry Potter’ Series Role: “Why Is This A Factor At All?”

Meanwhile, Lithgow is still puzzling on something. “No one complained when I agreed to play Dahl, but I’ve received so many messages about JK Rowling. Isn’t that odd?”
You know the reason why, John. It's the same reason why troons care more about Rowling than they care about Neil Gaiman being a multiple time rapist who's now suing his victim. In the eyes of TRAs, being a woman who's mean to trannies is the worst thing you can be.

Every time troons complain about Rowling, it should be rubbed into their faces that one of their most outspoken allies turned out to be a rapist piece of shit.
 
I love it when people openly defy the trans cult and I enjoy seeing this evil group lose all the power they never deserved in the first place. There are now less and less negative consequences for not kissing their asses. I hope Lithgow and all the other actors of the new series don't let the trans bastards break them.
 
Back