Plagued Ruben Sim Derangement Syndrome - Because it's definitely a good look to attack a guy who takes down pedophiles.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
"Do not use Discord API data to: profile users, their identities, relationships with other users or protected charectaristics." It feels like some of you jumped to a gigantic conclusion that Discord protects pedos based on an automated E-mail that tells very little.

You don't know which individual thing or combination of things initiated the ban, you assume that it was the part where the "victims" were pedos, not that the automated ban-list could infringe on other rules, such as exposing identity or relationships with other users.
What is the point of arguing this? From a moral perspective, it doesn't matter. The net effect is that pedophiles are being protected by Discord.

Not only that, if we (especially Ruben) don't know what initiated the ban, that is a point against it, not in favor. If there was some specific rule that Ruben was violating, it would be helpful for Discord to discuss it with him so they can figure out a way to comply with them. But Discord didn't do that. They denied his appeal and told him nothing besides a vague reason.

It's clear from Discord's statement and their actions that they don't want to ban pedophiles, and they think they should be allowed to be in spaces with minors.
 
"Do not use Discord API data to: profile users, their identities, relationships with other users or protected charectaristics." It feels like some of you jumped to a gigantic conclusion that Discord protects pedos based on an automated E-mail that tells very little.

You don't know which individual thing or combination of things initiated the ban, you assume that it was the part where the "victims" were pedos, not that the automated ban-list could infringe on other rules, such as exposing identity or relationships with other users.
If we're "jumping to conclusions", then let me point out a few thing's on why people understandably think discord is protecting Predators.

Ro cleaner was designed to help filter out potential threats in communities and filters people who are in nsfw servers and condos, also condo's are only infamously known to contain a lot of predators so could you blame anyone?.

Also ask yourself why there are adults who lurk nsfw servers who are likely desensitized to nsfw whilst also joining servers related to a kids platform who are joining nsfw servers hosting games that contain sex as well as degenerate content on a kids platform that host discord servers that hardly get moderated or taken down.

Also I don't think anyone needs to point out for the millionth time that discord and it's questionable,terrible and degenerate history of a lack of moderation and how the tranny staff run that shitty platform, discord has also had a history of taking a lack of action against servers that contain disgusting illegal CSAM material or anything else disgusting because they'll rather stroke their dicks to cub content instead of doing their jobs and ban a bot that's done more than they ever will.
 
wait, what? what the fuck happened with Xiao?
Long story short: Xiao was outed as a sperg who requested minors to draw furry foot fetish art of his OC. He probably did other creepy things but nobody really talks about it.

Here's a post from the Roblox Community General that has some of his DMs

I have an entire folder of this guy being a creepy footfag and asking a kid to make furry fetish art of his OCs.


I don't blame you for not knowing this, because the entire ROBLOX community just decided into disowning him silently, without saying on what happened.

... Rightfully so, but people kept telling me how Xiao is a pedo without saying anything else, so I was really confused for like a year or so until I searched his name here (only 3 posts too, kinda crazy if you think about it).
 
Last edited:
Also I don't think anyone needs to point out for the millionth time that discord and it's questionable,terrible and degenerate history of a lack of moderation and how the tranny staff run that shitty platform, discord has also had a history of taking a lack of action against servers that contain disgusting illegal CSAM material or anything else disgusting because they'll rather stroke their dicks to cub content instead of doing their jobs and ban a bot that's done more than they ever will.
I'd suggest anyone who still doesn't get it to read that lawsuit. I'll also note Discord's deliberately predator-enabling practices, such as relying on completely unvetted unpaid moderators, also applies to reddit. At least reddit isn't explicitly advertised to minors (falsely) as a safe place.
 
"Do not use Discord API data to: profile users, their identities, relationships with other users or protected charectaristics." It feels like some of you jumped to a gigantic conclusion that Discord protects pedos based on an automated E-mail that tells very little.

You don't know which individual thing or combination of things initiated the ban, you assume that it was the part where the "victims" were pedos, not that the automated ban-list could infringe on other rules, such as exposing identity or relationships with other users.

You have to ask the question tho, why exactly Discord would prioritize banning cleaner bots (made in good faith, and may or may not break Discord TOS) and not explaining how to modify the bots to comply with TOS, over banning pedophiles and forwarding their information to the appropriate authorities.

Discord is not a secure platform, messages are not encrypted, etc. Discord can easily nuke pedophiles from their platform with a few button presses, yet they do not.
 
You have to ask the question tho, why exactly Discord would prioritize banning cleaner bots (made in good faith, and may or may not break Discord TOS) and not explaining how to modify the bots to comply with TOS, over banning pedophiles and forwarding their information to the appropriate authorities.

Discord is not a secure platform, messages are not encrypted, etc. Discord can easily nuke pedophiles from their platform with a few button presses, yet they do not.
I think a large part of it is that Discord doesn't want to open the door to it. I doubt they want any sort of bots that have an impact like that. I would love to see every pedo get nuked off the earth but if that entails Discord admins reading PMs of people under mild suspicion of chomoisms, I don't want it. That opens pandora's box. Then nothing is stopping them justifying banning users for other forms of speech I figure we are more likely to have.

What is the point of arguing this? From a moral perspective, it doesn't matter. The net effect is that pedophiles are being protected by Discord.

Not only that, if we (especially Ruben) don't know what initiated the ban, that is a point against it, not in favor. If there was some specific rule that Ruben was violating, it would be helpful for Discord to discuss it with him so they can figure out a way to comply with them. But Discord didn't do that. They denied his appeal and told him nothing besides a vague reason.

It's clear from Discord's statement and their actions that they don't want to ban pedophiles, and they think they should be allowed to be in spaces with minors.
Because enforcing rules differently based on the fact that the victims deserved it is a terrible business move and not how it should work anywhere. I highly doubt Discord wants to keep pedos around, but I also think it makes sense for a company to save face by being fair in dishing out bans. I don't care if pedos get banned, I would prefer they did, but if the bot breaks some part of the TOS, one we can't be 100% certain of, it makes sense for it to be deleted

I agree, it is retarded that a ban on a bot that specifically deals with very bad people doesn't get a specialized message that clearly outlines the reason for the ban, that is a PR fuckup of the highest order.

I just find the way we are repeating #WakeUpYoutube #PickASideYoutube hyperbole to be disagreeable.
 
Does this account suffer from Ruben Sim Derangement Syndrome? I'm confused
One second and it's already plainly obvious
1745897044981.webp
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst
Discord is not a secure platform, messages are not encrypted, etc. Discord can easily nuke pedophiles from their platform with a few button presses, yet they do not.
They couldn't get them all, but they're not only not trying, they're actively shielding. They've been doing this for years and it was obvious even before blocking the bot for molesting children being a "protected characteristic."
 
I highly doubt Discord wants to keep pedos around,
Remember how Discord practically had a civil war to get cub porn banned after lolicon and shotacon were because Discord's admin team personally did not want it removed, arguing that it's just cute furry children uwu so it's not sexual? I do.
Edit: The biggest name at the time was the head admin AllTheFoxes. IIRC he is still working for Discord in a much lower profile position after the whole dying on the mountain of furry CP thing. You are genuinely delusional if you think Discord (and Roblox for that matter) are not aware and at this point genuinely malicious in their total enabling of this exploitation.
 
Last edited:
Remember how Discord practically had a civil war to get cub porn banned after lolicon and shotacon were because Discord's admin team personally did not want it removed, arguing that it's just cute furry children uwu so it's not sexual? I do.
I never heard of that, and if it did happen then that was a beyond retarded side to pick. I think it is fine to not want to set a precedent of caving to public pressure but c'mon.
 
caving to public pressure but c'mon.
This shouldn't have even been a conflict in the first place, there's a reason as to why cub content is reviled/hated by practically anybody with a functioning sense of tolerance when it comes to more sensitive material. Loli/shota as well. This is the only instance where caving to public pressure is the morally logical solution and if you pick otherwise then you're just a pedonigger yourself and you don't want your gooning material to be swept up.
 
if the bot breaks some part of the TOS, one we can't be 100% certain of, it makes sense for it to be deleted
even if ro-cleaner did break the tos, condo servers break it in far more serious ways that should be dealt with first. if discord had just deleted the servers we were flagging users based off of and banned their members, ro-cleaner would be obsolete and i would have no issue with them deleting it. instead, they chose to selectively enforce their tos against the only meaningful solution to one of their biggest safety issues while leaving the condo servers up. it would take one employee less than an hour to comb through these servers and delete the biggest ones but they'd rather spend those resources going after ro-cleaner.
 
This shouldn't have even been a conflict in the first place, there's a reason as to why cub content is reviled/hated by practically anybody with a functioning sense of tolerance when it comes to more sensitive material. Loli/shota as well. This is the only instance where caving to public pressure is the morally logical solution and if you pick otherwise then you're just a pedonigger yourself and you don't want your gooning material to be swept up.
That was my argument basically. They should have dealt with them because those people shouldn't be on the platform, releasing that content

even if ro-cleaner did break the tos, condo servers break it in far more serious ways that should be dealt with first. if discord had just deleted the servers we were flagging users based off of and banned their members, ro-cleaner would be obsolete and i would have no issue with them deleting it. instead, they chose to selectively enforce their tos against the only meaningful solution to one of their biggest safety issues while leaving the condo servers up. it would take one employee less than an hour to comb through these servers and delete the biggest ones but they'd rather spend those resources going after ro-cleaner.
I agree they shouldn't be around either way. I fear Discord more actively monitoring servers is a sword with two edges. It gets rid of people that walk the tightrope with the TOS as is, pedos and edgy teens alike. In a more just world those pedos would be dead or slaves
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank_MC and Nome
Github deleted the Ro-Cleaner database and the website set up as an alternative host for it was closed by the provider for "Unauthorized Discord Bot".
1745902006823.webp
@Null any chance we could arrange to host the database on here? It's a 60 MB JSON library that I update roughly once a week. Since pedophiles are hellbent on getting it taken down, the farms seems like the perfect safe haven for it.
 
Github deleted the Ro-Cleaner database and the website set up as an alternative host for it was closed by the provider for "Unauthorized Discord Bot".
View attachment 7293492
@Null any chance we could arrange to host the database on here? It's a 60 MB JSON library that I update roughly once a week. Since pedophiles are hellbent on getting it taken down, the farms seems like the perfect safe haven for it.
It's like Army of Darkness. We can't let them get the book!
 

Attachments

  • Army-Of-Darkness-web.webp
    Army-Of-Darkness-web.webp
    664.5 KB · Views: 14
Github deleted the Ro-Cleaner database and the website set up as an alternative host for it was closed by the provider for "Unauthorized Discord Bot".
View attachment 7293492
@Null any chance we could arrange to host the database on here? It's a 60 MB JSON library that I update roughly once a week. Since pedophiles are hellbent on getting it taken down, the farms seems like the perfect safe haven for it.
God bless you and your future family Ruben Sims. You’re doing the lords work.
 
Discord (owned by Microsoft) borks the "ban pedophiles from your chatroom" bot and then Github (also owned by Microsoft) borks the "ban pedophiles from your chatroom" bot

I'm not saying Microsoft's primary goal is to connect children with pedophiles, but I wouldn't be surprised if the taskbar started advertising Grindr to 17 and under microsoft sign-ins.
 
Back