- Joined
- Jul 24, 2024
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
>Muh WaterView attachment 7284162
Imagine being this much of a faggot while billionaires and washed up whores make 10x the fucking carbon emissions but nah, it's our problem.
Extreme hydrogen bonding says yes but for the purposes of wetting it doesn't count.Does water not adhere to itself?
Redditors cared about the environment until COVID, and then allow of a sudden, single-use everything was AOK.>Muh Water
>Muh Lectrishity
In the good name of God, shut the holy fuck up.
These kinds of people NEVER cared about environmentalism, electricity, or water conservation until MUH AI. Then they became the scold police. God this genre of redditor really pisses me off. They really make me MATI.
Not a single appeal to logos I can see anywhere. No data, evidence, studies, etc.I can't believe nobody posted any of the comments from the AI yet. Redditors got all of the accounts deleted but there are still some archives (basically just the first page of the profile). The archives are all from about a month ago and I don't think there's any way to see if any of the comments were given a delta unless an archive of the actual page with the question exists but I'm too lazy to go that far.
View attachment 7293984View attachment 7293986View attachment 7293989View attachment 7293990View attachment 7293991View attachment 7293993View attachment 7294000View attachment 7294002View attachment 7294004View attachment 7294010View attachment 7294016View attachment 7294024View attachment 7294025View attachment 7294026View attachment 7294027View attachment 7294029View attachment 7294031View attachment 7294034View attachment 7294044View attachment 7294047View attachment 7294054View attachment 7294056View attachment 7294068View attachment 7294071View attachment 7294073View attachment 7294078View attachment 7294079View attachment 7294081View attachment 7294082View attachment 7294083View attachment 7294084View attachment 7294088View attachment 7294090View attachment 7294094View attachment 7294098View attachment 7294102View attachment 7294103
https://www.reddit.com/r/evopsych/comments/lm5rdv/40_of_college_women_fail_the_piaget_waterlevel/
I know a similar study was run in a university to test ai detection in course work. A big problem universities are having is distinguishing student work that has been AI generated when marked.
How does a person delude themselves into thinking being attracted to males/male features is somehow not an attraction to men? I'm sorry, but just because a person is comfortable in their sexuality doesnt mean they're right about their sexuality.View attachment 7288229
Because God forbid you like an icky nasty hetero pairing.
Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/2025042...3n/fictional_men_gray_area/ml3t12u/?rdt=51417
Also
Ma'am this is not the DMZ and you are too stupid to understand there is no test of IQ more accurate than language comprehension.Do check how scrotes fare on the card-turning test (AB12). Also this:
View attachment 7292818
I wrote about the water test several times in the context of fake universality of IQ tests. People untrained to do IQ tests, such as latchkey children and savages, don't understand the language of the tests, they don't know what kinds of differences/relations there might be and what possibilities to try. Savages specifically don't know what page numbers and task numbers are for, they think an ordinal number or a frame around the task is a component of the task. This doesn't mean that, when the test shows IQ50, they're lichrally retarded like first-world IQ50s ("low IQ" savages are capable of living in their environment), but it does mean they're unsuited for the globohomo world. You decide how suitability for the globohomo world of Humans of Flat reflects on a person's character.
IQ researchers increasingly think that geometric IQ tests are gay and tests should have a language component. Exams in the conservative movement of classical education use extensive language tests. This makes them less suitable to demean savages, more human, and incidentally women ace them, because women are human, and men are gay.
And yes, of course the water test only indicates the ablity of the test-taker to do gay globohomo tests. People (women, savages, even filthy scrotes) understand how water works. If you were to test for a correlation between failing the water test and not knowing how IRL water works, there wouldn't be any, because gay tests are gay and only test for how gay you are.
The funniest thing is that they write it on the Internet. From a computer or phone that consumes electricity. To a website whose data center consumes a shitload of electricity and water. With a network infrastructure that also consumes electricity. It's like a vegan would kill a herd of cows and use their dead bodies to lay a “stop killing animals” text on the ground.>Muh Water
>Muh Lectrishity
In the good name of God, shut the holy fuck up.
These kinds of people NEVER cared about environmentalism, electricity, or water conservation until MUH AI. Then overnight they became the Captain Planet scold task force. God this genre of redditor really pisses me off. They really make me MATI!
do you have a link to this? i think it got nuked and i watned to read itRedditors are introduced to the water level test. You are shown a drawing of a glass with the water level marked on it. Then you are shown a drawing of a tilted glass. You have to mark the water level. Simple, right? It's literally a test for young children.
View attachment 7290101
As expected from the once in a generation geniuses that redditors (believe they) are, the top comments are full of cope about how the test is stupid and failing it actually means you're just too smart to know how water works.
View attachment 7290100
This high IQ redditor took a very real IQ test where he noticed a statistical anomaly that the writers didn't. He's so smart he got it wrong! That's what's going on here! Never mind the fact that "draw a line where the water level would be" is as clear and unambiguous as it gets.
View attachment 7290118
See? Another person is sure it's because of ambiguous wording. They just asked "where the line would be"! That's ambiguous!
Except, again, the question uses the term "water level", which means exactly one thing. Too smart to be fooled by bad wording, and also too smart to read the introductory paragraph of the article and learn what the wording actually was. That's a whole lot of smart.
One redditor wonders why women are so bad at this test.
View attachment 7290121
There is only one possible explanation: women are too smart to get it right.
View attachment 7290120
View attachment 7290119
View attachment 7290117
Or, alternatively, those horrible sexist men forced them to choose the wrong answer. By being sexist.
View attachment 7290116
Whatever the answer, one thing is for sure: redditors are never wrong. Not ever.
That's called cohesion which is the attractive force between molecules of the same type. Water is very cohesive due to the hydrogen and oxygen bonds. Each oxygen has 2 sets of free electrons on the opposite side of the hydrogen bonds. The Oxygen atom has a higher affinity towards all electrons in the water molecule which pulls the electrons from the hydrogens closer to it. This causes water to have polarity where the oxygen is slightly negative and the hydrogens are slightly positive thus attracting other water molecules nearby to it. This is why water can form raindrops as it has a high surface tension.Does water not adhere to itself?
What killed me was the way they approached this information. Instead of “welp, this is an interesting precedent, maybe it's time we learn to think critically” they went into full on ree mode.Damn you you beat me to it.
This just proves what everyone already knew: reddit is very gullible and should never be taken seriously with anything. They are easily manipulated sheeple, barely human
And then kek at the mods "we would like an apology, and not to post your study, you broke our rules and showed we're complete gullible morons" and the researchers in a way of 5000 words I ain't reading, basically says "no get fucked"
This is actually pretty worrisome. Just imagine the sheer amount of retards incapable of forming a single independent thought for this study to be as impactful as it was. Social media is basically a form of very insidious psychological warfare and it will get worse as time goes by with education getting worse and worse. Keep in mind, education nowadays is especifically designed to make you as receptive to information as possible without the capability of processing it in a critical way.
They also think guns or gun accessibility has an impact on violence and/or shootingView attachment 7293663
source
View attachment 7293665
View attachment 7293671
People do be acting like places without guns are utopias.
Your point is invalid; LLMs aren't allowed to say slursAs retarded as a Redditor can be, if you think a good LLM isn't easily in the top 10% best debaters in the world, maybe 5%, you're sadly way too optimistic.
I've met people who are level 1 but clearly have problems that do/will effect them in the long run It's usually nothing major but it's usually just poor social skills (that you don't even notice unless you have a conversation with them), being only able to really work in one specific field or having a deficiency with something (like not being able to estimate time).Group 1: the normal people with ADD/Autism. They might act a little weird at times, or you might not notice it at all. Maybe they can't look you in the eye or some shit, but overall, they are very well adjusted, can fend for themselves, can do everything a regular person can, and have normal human interests like sports or movies, often times really good at one or two skills (construction, forming mental images for painting, etc). In other words, they can fit into society no problem. around 60 percent of the autistic spectrum are these people. You could argue their level 1 autistic by the DSM-5, but i'd argue there's only 2 levels that way, No support and Support needed.
I browse /r/professors sometimes (just because the stories about students on there are funny even if I'm convinced most of them are ersatz and homosexual). A lot of the posts on there now are about students getting lazy and using AI. Obviously there are times when this is completely detectable, especially when they don't remove the "sure! here's X" ChatGPT likes to put at the start of messages (or when the writing style doesn't match the writing style that the student has on other assignments). But with how good LLM's are getting I have to wonder how many of the professors on there (or just in general) have either false-flagged something that wasn't ai generated as ai generated or vice versa. You can also mask AI work pretty easily by just editing what chatGPT spits outI know a similar study was run in a university to test ai detection in course work. I big problem universities are having is distinguishing student work that has been AI generated when marked.
Redditors are the people with the least political and moral conviction or critical thinking skillsAI aside, I'm just surprised it was so easy to change opinions, I figured most people just dug their heels in,. especially Reddit retards.
But with how good LLM's are getting I have to wonder how many of the professors on there (or just in general) have either false-flagged something that wasn't ai generated as ai generated or vice versa.
Every time an environmentalist screeches about “muh carbon footprint”, tell them to go to India or China and preach there. Just see how they react.The funniest thing is that they write it on the Internet. From a computer or phone that consumes electricity. To a website whose data center consumes a shitload of electricity and water. With a network infrastructure that also consumes electricity. It's like a vegan would kill a herd of cows and use their dead bodies to lay a “stop killing animals” text on the ground.