- Joined
- May 6, 2020
https://www.reddit.com/r/evopsych/comments/lm5rdv/40_of_college_women_fail_the_piaget_waterlevel/
kek
tranny wall of text
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
https://www.reddit.com/r/evopsych/comments/lm5rdv/40_of_college_women_fail_the_piaget_waterlevel/
I know a similar study was run in a university to test ai detection in course work. A big problem universities are having is distinguishing student work that has been AI generated when marked.
How does a person delude themselves into thinking being attracted to males/male features is somehow not an attraction to men? I'm sorry, but just because a person is comfortable in their sexuality doesnt mean they're right about their sexuality.View attachment 7288229
Because God forbid you like an icky nasty hetero pairing.
Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/2025042...3n/fictional_men_gray_area/ml3t12u/?rdt=51417
Also
Ma'am this is not the DMZ and you are too stupid to understand there is no test of IQ more accurate than language comprehension.Do check how scrotes fare on the card-turning test (AB12). Also this:
View attachment 7292818
I wrote about the water test several times in the context of fake universality of IQ tests. People untrained to do IQ tests, such as latchkey children and savages, don't understand the language of the tests, they don't know what kinds of differences/relations there might be and what possibilities to try. Savages specifically don't know what page numbers and task numbers are for, they think an ordinal number or a frame around the task is a component of the task. This doesn't mean that, when the test shows IQ50, they're lichrally retarded like first-world IQ50s ("low IQ" savages are capable of living in their environment), but it does mean they're unsuited for the globohomo world. You decide how suitability for the globohomo world of Humans of Flat reflects on a person's character.
IQ researchers increasingly think that geometric IQ tests are gay and tests should have a language component. Exams in the conservative movement of classical education use extensive language tests. This makes them less suitable to demean savages, more human, and incidentally women ace them, because women are human, and men are gay.
And yes, of course the water test only indicates the ablity of the test-taker to do gay globohomo tests. People (women, savages, even filthy scrotes) understand how water works. If you were to test for a correlation between failing the water test and not knowing how IRL water works, there wouldn't be any, because gay tests are gay and only test for how gay you are.
The funniest thing is that they write it on the Internet. From a computer or phone that consumes electricity. To a website whose data center consumes a shitload of electricity and water. With a network infrastructure that also consumes electricity. It's like a vegan would kill a herd of cows and use their dead bodies to lay a “stop killing animals” text on the ground.>Muh Water
>Muh Lectrishity
In the good name of God, shut the holy fuck up.
These kinds of people NEVER cared about environmentalism, electricity, or water conservation until MUH AI. Then overnight they became the Captain Planet scold task force. God this genre of redditor really pisses me off. They really make me MATI!
do you have a link to this? i think it got nuked and i watned to read itRedditors are introduced to the water level test. You are shown a drawing of a glass with the water level marked on it. Then you are shown a drawing of a tilted glass. You have to mark the water level. Simple, right? It's literally a test for young children.
View attachment 7290101
As expected from the once in a generation geniuses that redditors (believe they) are, the top comments are full of cope about how the test is stupid and failing it actually means you're just too smart to know how water works.
View attachment 7290100
This high IQ redditor took a very real IQ test where he noticed a statistical anomaly that the writers didn't. He's so smart he got it wrong! That's what's going on here! Never mind the fact that "draw a line where the water level would be" is as clear and unambiguous as it gets.
View attachment 7290118
See? Another person is sure it's because of ambiguous wording. They just asked "where the line would be"! That's ambiguous!
Except, again, the question uses the term "water level", which means exactly one thing. Too smart to be fooled by bad wording, and also too smart to read the introductory paragraph of the article and learn what the wording actually was. That's a whole lot of smart.
One redditor wonders why women are so bad at this test.
View attachment 7290121
There is only one possible explanation: women are too smart to get it right.
View attachment 7290120
View attachment 7290119
View attachment 7290117
Or, alternatively, those horrible sexist men forced them to choose the wrong answer. By being sexist.
View attachment 7290116
Whatever the answer, one thing is for sure: redditors are never wrong. Not ever.
That's called cohesion which is the attractive force between molecules of the same type. Water is very cohesive due to the hydrogen and oxygen bonds. Each oxygen has 2 sets of free electrons on the opposite side of the hydrogen bonds. The Oxygen atom has a higher affinity towards all electrons in the water molecule which pulls the electrons from the hydrogens closer to it. This causes water to have polarity where the oxygen is slightly negative and the hydrogens are slightly positive thus attracting other water molecules nearby to it. This is why water can form raindrops as it has a high surface tension.Does water not adhere to itself?
What killed me was the way they approached this information. Instead of “welp, this is an interesting precedent, maybe it's time we learn to think critically” they went into full on ree mode.Damn you you beat me to it.
This just proves what everyone already knew: reddit is very gullible and should never be taken seriously with anything. They are easily manipulated sheeple, barely human
And then kek at the mods "we would like an apology, and not to post your study, you broke our rules and showed we're complete gullible morons" and the researchers in a way of 5000 words I ain't reading, basically says "no get fucked"
This is actually pretty worrisome. Just imagine the sheer amount of retards incapable of forming a single independent thought for this study to be as impactful as it was. Social media is basically a form of very insidious psychological warfare and it will get worse as time goes by with education getting worse and worse. Keep in mind, education nowadays is especifically designed to make you as receptive to information as possible without the capability of processing it in a critical way.
They also think guns or gun accessibility has an impact on violence and/or shootingView attachment 7293663
source
View attachment 7293665
View attachment 7293671
People do be acting like places without guns are utopias.
Your point is invalid; LLMs aren't allowed to say slursAs retarded as a Redditor can be, if you think a good LLM isn't easily in the top 10% best debaters in the world, maybe 5%, you're sadly way too optimistic.
I've met people who are level 1 but clearly have problems that do/will effect them in the long run It's usually nothing major but it's usually just poor social skills (that you don't even notice unless you have a conversation with them), being only able to really work in one specific field or having a deficiency with something (like not being able to estimate time).Group 1: the normal people with ADD/Autism. They might act a little weird at times, or you might not notice it at all. Maybe they can't look you in the eye or some shit, but overall, they are very well adjusted, can fend for themselves, can do everything a regular person can, and have normal human interests like sports or movies, often times really good at one or two skills (construction, forming mental images for painting, etc). In other words, they can fit into society no problem. around 60 percent of the autistic spectrum are these people. You could argue their level 1 autistic by the DSM-5, but i'd argue there's only 2 levels that way, No support and Support needed.
I browse /r/professors sometimes (just because the stories about students on there are funny even if I'm convinced most of them are ersatz and homosexual). A lot of the posts on there now are about students getting lazy and using AI. Obviously there are times when this is completely detectable, especially when they don't remove the "sure! here's X" ChatGPT likes to put at the start of messages (or when the writing style doesn't match the writing style that the student has on other assignments). But with how good LLM's are getting I have to wonder how many of the professors on there (or just in general) have either false-flagged something that wasn't ai generated as ai generated or vice versa. You can also mask AI work pretty easily by just editing what chatGPT spits outI know a similar study was run in a university to test ai detection in course work. I big problem universities are having is distinguishing student work that has been AI generated when marked.
Redditors are the people with the least political and moral conviction or critical thinking skillsAI aside, I'm just surprised it was so easy to change opinions, I figured most people just dug their heels in,. especially Reddit retards.
But with how good LLM's are getting I have to wonder how many of the professors on there (or just in general) have either false-flagged something that wasn't ai generated as ai generated or vice versa.
Every time an environmentalist screeches about “muh carbon footprint”, tell them to go to India or China and preach there. Just see how they react.The funniest thing is that they write it on the Internet. From a computer or phone that consumes electricity. To a website whose data center consumes a shitload of electricity and water. With a network infrastructure that also consumes electricity. It's like a vegan would kill a herd of cows and use their dead bodies to lay a “stop killing animals” text on the ground.
some of them find ways of working around the filters and it always is interesting seeing chatbots that aren't allowed to say nigger still manage to say nigger. But yeah they're not the best at doing serious shit which the over-application to serious uses is going to end very badly if it keeps up.Your point is invalid; LLMs aren't allowed to say slurs
redditors pushing back against the transformer insanity is the beginning of the end for trannysMeanwhile in r/soccer:
View attachment 7294795
This one mod got utterly annihilated in the comments. Check the votes.
View attachment 7294806
View attachment 7294807
View attachment 7294808
that's why I kinda leaned that into level 2. you do make a valid point, though.I've met people who are level 1 but clearly have problems that do/will effect them in the long run It's usually nothing major but it's usually just poor social skills (that you don't even notice unless you have a conversation with them), being only able to really work in one specific field or having a deficiency with something (like not being able to estimate time).
It's more like going from a level 1 to a level 1.5. You have the people with no outward issues and then you have the people with outward issues that are still quite functional despite them.
you should do that though, fuck goldstein for hiring a retarded HR firm that has no knowledge of the fields they supposedly hire for.or lie in a job interview.
they get uppity and tell you about YOUR carbon footprint, really funny seeing them get uppity.Every time an environmentalist screeches about “muh carbon footprint”, tell them to go to India or China and preach there. Just see how they react.