Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 25.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 62 17.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 142 39.0%

  • Total voters
    364
She does look comparatively healthy and not obviously miserable (apart from the red flag of the tattoos) too though. @Fapcop what say you?
Nick looks fucking gross. If you’re going to a Galla with a beard, at least trim it properly and shave around the edges, instead of just getting up and jumping in the first suit you see that smells the least of smoke, desperation and whore perfume.

Kayla looks… Better, but there’s just something eerie about that picture. Smile is a little too tight, she looks tightly wound.
 
Nick said yesterday you could criticize him in his chat all you wanted, just not his wife and kids. If true, he should be okay with someone going into his youtube chat and saying "Nick Rekieta has always enjoyed sucking little baby dicks." Bet you get banned for it though, even though it's "just jokes bro fr fr no cap."

It's pretty braindead for Melton to add lawyer's voice into his tips system. Even if someone like Mark Richards didn't see it, I think Kurt and maybe Nate would be willing to threaten legal action, Sean may too but I don't know. Kurt seems most likely.
Unless they're making piles of money with it, coordinated lawsuits could swamp their funds, even if they didn't go far.
 
Any legalkiwis got a take on this? I'd love to see Pedotips get dismantled.

"It's not Sean's voice, it's merely a voice AI creating an approximation of someone who sounds like him, using his image and name is just coincidence, fat stalker child" :really:
Didn’t Trump try and get a law passed to ban shit like this, or was that only for pornography?
 
Nick is using his PedoTip system to talk crap about @PotentiallyCriminal.
RekeitaLawChatLulzy11.webp
Love how Nick talks shit about the legal analysis of the guy who was right about just about everything.
 
Of course this is what they do with it, what other reason to they have to put the faces and voices of people they despise into their pedo tip jar system? It is so their "fans" can use them to play cringe messages that mock the person and put profane/criminal claims into their mouth.

Proves once again what small-minded faggots Nick and Melton are.

That example is a flat-out violation of the youtube impersonation policy IMO. Using the face and pretending (mocking or not) to speak in the voice of the person is something you really can't do.
I wonder why they haven't done Ralph yet? Oh right, Ralph would no doubt flag them all for harassment and abuse, which are easy reports on youtube. (The Ralph one would be funny, but the problem is the AI's aren't great at capturing emotion.)

Kurt is the kind of guy who wouldn’t hurt a fly.
Tell that to all those hooker corpses in the back of that random tan Civic motoring about the seedy streets of Houston...

View attachment 7294781
Sane and well-adjusted.

View attachment 7294782
Hide the pain, Kayla.
Did she get her nose done (and it's failing), or is it just unfortunate genes coming out?
 
Nick is implying that people being upset he accused meme copium of pedophilia can't take a joke.

If that's true then got a joke for Nick:

What's the one substance more prevalent in Nick's daughter than cocaine?

Nick's semen
Watching Nick repeat the classic tranny sound bites like: “You can just free speech somewhere else, just not on MAH platform!” is something else indeed.
 
So far as I know, SEEEEEEEAN SEEEEEEEEAN has not made any claims of copyright. He has talked about right of publicity, an entirely different right. I suppose we can't expect anything like legal acumen from this wetbrained crackhead cocksucker.
Nick himself has stated how Sean and Kurt are nobodies. Therefore, by Nick's definition, they aren't public figures.
 
Any legalkiwis got a take on this? I'd love to see Pedotips get dismantled.

"It's not Sean's voice, it's merely a voice AI creating an approximation of someone who sounds like him, using his image and name is just coincidence, fat stalker child" :really:
I'd say if you just used a likeness with a clear indication that it was parody, with no commercial intent, it would almost certainly be protected.

However, there is no such clear indication of parody, and how can Pedotips claim parody when they're not even the authors of what is said with the AI voices? What MAPton is doing is directly selling access to the likenesses of other people who did not consent to it. The only purpose of it is commercial.

Copyright does not directly protect such a thing, but right of publicity (a different right based on dignitary and privacy interests as well as economic) exists to protect people's use of their public image, likeness, or other identifying feature (such as their voice), whether for falsely portraying them as endorsing something or otherwise.

The penalties are generally being forced to disgorge the illicit profits, attorney's fees, and any other appropriate damages, including punitive damages, as well as an injunction against further tortious misuse.

I won't get into defamation or copyright. I think they're both weak, but there's probably enough of a copyright argument there that a DMCA wouldn't be frivolous, and while DMCA is gay, what's good for the duck is good for the cuck, and Nick's gone down that road so has no room to complain (but he would).

Then there's the additional issue of what YouTube would think if some pedo is running a platform specifically to divert income from YouTube to himself, and on top of that, the platform is fueled by harassing other YouTubers.
 
Last edited:
Back