Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 21.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 43 14.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.0%

  • Total voters
    294
Nick is using his PedoTip system to talk crap about @PotentiallyCriminal.
View attachment 7294660
[EDIT to add Nick winning the winemoms over with his edgy humor]
View attachment 7294672
Sean, I suggest you wait until after he loses the Monty lawsuit and then publicly declare that you're suing him for copyright infringement. You don't even have to commit to the legal action; just wait until he's in another financial hole and then scare him with another potential money drain.
 
Nick himself has stated how Sean and Kurt are nobodies. Therefore, by Nick's definition, they aren't public figures.
Given he reads this thread, he's probably gonna go with that now if either one of them sues him or Melton.

You should bill him for the legal advice.
 
So far as I know, SEEEEEEEAN SEEEEEEEEAN has not made any claims of copyright. He has talked about right of publicity, an entirely different right. I suppose we can't expect anything like legal acumen from this wetbrained crackhead cocksucker.
There's also the ToS for supertips....but what do I know. I do shoddy analysis......

Screenshot_20250429_130054_Chrome.webp
 
The dress is old; however, the photo is new. You can tell because Kayla is noticeably fatter and has at least two new tattoos: some awful musical notes that look like they were drawn on with magic marker by one of her children, and some mysterious piss-colored splotch on her left shoulder. (Also, someone please give this woman a fucking hairbrush.)

View attachment 7294640
I can't get over how much she changed up her face. She legit looks like a different person. Whether going from Gollum to Madonna-in-the-making is an upgrade I'll leave to the likes of Fapcop. She looks uncanny as hell to me, before and after the nip and tuck.
 
Given he reads this thread, he's probably gonna go with that now if either one of them sues him or Melton.

You should bill him for the legal advice.
Wouldn't that make it worse?
I'm saying that Nick thinks that Kurt and Sean aren't public figures, so that opens Nick up to more liability if sued because he's fucking with random civilians, right?
 
There's also the ToS for supertips....but what do I know. I do shoddy analysis......

View attachment 7295029
"You have the written consent, release, and/or permission of each and every identifiable individual person in your Contributions to use the name or likeness of each and every such identifiable individual person to enable inclusion and use of your Contributions in any manner contemplated by the Services and these Legal Terms."

People like Kurt, Aaron and yourself never consented to the use of likeness.
Send Melton a formal takedown notice. Nick is in clear violation of the Right of Publicity and is engaging in Misappropriation of Likeness for commercial gain.
Mods remove my post if I'm being a cowtipping faggot but fuck Pedotips.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure on the copyright infringement, its a weak case by all accounts.

A comicsgate cow named Liam Grey successfully used it a long while back on YT to get strikes on channels. People were using an avatar that looked like him and pretending (without AI) to talk like him. A legal copyright infringement case might be difficult. But getting TOS violations on YT might be possible.
 
There's also the ToS for supertips....but what do I know. I do shoddy analysis......

View attachment 7295029
My question with that is: Can you compel enforcement of a ToS, when the entity responsible for drafting and enforcing a ToS doesn't give a shit?

The issue here is that it's Melton's company. He also regularly ignores that clause on his own.

Wouldn't you have to lean more on a law than a ToS to get him to comply?

Wouldn't that make it worse?
I'm saying that Nick thinks that Kurt and Sean aren't public figures, so that opens Nick up to more liability if sued because he's fucking with random civilians, right?
Absolutely correct. But Nick is an idiot, so you should still bill him for giving him advice that sabotages him.

ETA: Nick doesn't understand the "public figure doctrine" at all. I figured that out back during Weebwars.
 
Last edited:
My question with that is: Can you compel enforcement of a ToS, when the entity responsible for drafting and enforcing a ToS doesn't give a shit?
This has as much to do with Melton's ToS as it does with copyright. This is about SEEEAAAAN's NIL rights. NIL rights are new and subtle and still have a bit of a legal patchwork but are becoming much more enforceable largely thanks to NCAA athletes. Rekieta wouldn't know this because he's not a practicing lawyer and the jurisprudence is mostly very young on NIL rights (hence his sophomoric copyright "analysis"). Melton's lawyer probably put that in his ToS so that he would have cover from retards like Nick using people's voices without permission.
 
My question with that is: Can you compel enforcement of a ToS, when the entity responsible for drafting and enforcing a ToS doesn't give a shit?

The issue here is that it's Melton's company. He also regularly ignores that clause on his own.

Wouldn't you have to lean more on a law than a ToS to get him to comply?
You enforce it on Youtube, not Melton.
Just send them a C&D about violation of "Right to Publicity" by the company supertips.gg used on the following channels "<list>" and they will shut the channels faster than you can blink.
 
We actually discussed "likeness" a.i. voice model abuse in my music business law class last week. My professor who is a longtime attorney said it's still a gray area the courts are going to have to figure out. She did say that the more famous you are the more likely you would have a case. For instance the fat greasy nonce could not use Frank Sinatra, Michael Jackson, or any major familiar celebrity a.i. voice without them bringing the hammer down. Small potatoes e-celebs would probably have to prove that Fatrick's Supertips voices are causing harm. They are being misused in lewd and disturbing ways. Several Onion degenerates have made comments about pedophilia using the Supertips voices.
 
I can't get over how much she changed up her face. She legit looks like a different person. Whether going from Gollum to Madonna-in-the-making is an upgrade I'll leave to the likes of Fapcop. She looks uncanny as hell to me, before and after the nip and tuck.
Nick must have walked into that surgeon's office and slid him this picture, going "Yeah, I'm really into the great Cornholio but with tits, can you make that happen?"
Cornholio101.webp
And the surgeon made it so.
007.009.13.webp
 
Sean, I suggest you wait until after he loses the Monty lawsuit and then publicly declare that you're suing him for copyright infringement.
Where's the copyright? The only thing I see there is the image thumbnails. Ordinarily that kind of thing is never going to be infringing. I think in the special circumstances of how they're being used, it's arguable they're infringing, but it's a novel and I think weak argument.
 
Back