2025-04-29 - OFCOM: Illegal Content Risk Assessment Enforcement Programme

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Null, you should ask for this letter in physical form and frame it.
So basically KiwiFarms is setting the precedent that cutting the UK off from the greater internet is the correct move going forward.

2025. What a time to be alive.
Precisely. If the easiest move is to simply block UK address, then a lot of other sites are going to do it.
 
> we have decided not to proceed with issuing an information notice requesting a copy of the written record of the illegal content risk assessment conducted

Oh, you were going to send another letter to the guy who told you to fuck off the first time? Shiver me timbers

1745951124576.webp
 
we have decided not to proceed with issuing an information notice requesting a copy of the written record of the illegal content risk assessment
although we are not issuing an information notice at this time, we may revisit this matter in future
There's an old saying: "Never give an order which can't/won't be obeyed."

Wonder if this is a case of, "We're withdrawing the order you weren't going to obey, before you can refuse to obey it and show us to be toothless. But we can totally still issue orders you have to follow!"
 
I mean, I expected them to roll over, but I didn't expect them to send an email saying they were going to roll over. I thought it was just gonna be a tacit thing where they took no further action. Well, there you go.
 
As explained in our note, the targeting of UK users by, for example, promoting ways of evading access
restrictions, could be relevant to whether that service still has links to the UK, depending on the
specific circumstances.
It's interesting that they decided KF is compliant with the act, since the splash screen users in the UK are now directed to comes with instructions on how to access the site through Tor or a VPN.

Makes the whole thing feel like a bluff on their part you correctly called. "We can't actually touch you, but we've decided you've complied so we don't have to do anything, please ignore the bit we told you not to do but did anyway".
 
Josh doesn't have to deal with the British government, and the British government successfully bullied their citizens in even the most unimportant aspects of their daily lives (having to use a VPN for access to a gossip forum).
Win-win, except for the eternal Anglos, but that's just a small price to pay for not having to speak German.
 
As
explained in our note, the targeting of UK users by, for example, promoting ways of evading access
restrictions, could be relevant to whether that service still has links to the UK, depending on the
specific circumstances.
So telling people that VPNs exist as a way to bypass country based restrictions (like every VPN sponsored youtube video) gives them reason to hassle you even after blocking UK ips? That is pretty crazy, even if it would be completely ineffective.
 
Duties to protect UK users also apply to providers of services that are capable of
being used by individuals in the UK and which pose a material risk of significant harm to them. As explained in our note, the targeting of UK users by, for example, promoting ways of evading access
"We see you are doing something we do not approve of but also we're such massive pussies we will not pursue... for now"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back