Fedoras, Mullets, or Bowlcuts? - Which are worse?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which are worse?

  • Fedoras

    Votes: 33 48.5%

  • Mullets

    Votes: 15 22.1%

  • Bowlcuts

    Votes: 20 29.4%
  • Total voters
    68
  • This poll will close: .
Curt Sibling said:
Like the trilby, some classy stars of earlier eras made the bowlcut look good...
iu

Louise Brooks made the bowl a thing in the 1920s.
Click to expand...
That's not a bowlcut, it's a bob. they're fairly different. Louise Brooks' hairstyle is short in the back with longer strands across the cheeks and a short fringe.
A true & honest bowlcut is the same length all around.
Compare:
Capture d’écran 2017-03-10 à 02.54.01.png Capture d’écran 2017-03-10 à 02.53.53.png

Capture d’écran 2017-03-10 à 02.54.21.png Capture d’écran 2017-03-10 à 02.54.06.png


By the way, how about a bowlcut-mullet mix?
yOdlh.jpeg
 
scorptatious said:
Agreed. Seeing little kids with rat tails make me cringe.

But yeah, mullets are pretty ugly all around.
Click to expand...


When I was in first grade there was a nigro kid a couple years older that rode the same bus with a short, flat top/rat-tail combo. To hold the rat-tail in place, he had a safety pin by his neckline. It was horrendous.
 
I still like mullets (sue me) but fedoras and bowlcuts are pretty retarded im not gonna lie.

Fedoras are for edgelords, children with no taste, people trying to be 1800-1950s white business men or people that ARE 1800-1950s white business men.

plus, you know who ELSE had a bowlcut?

mqdefault.jpg
 
I can't decide.

Fedora pros: looks good on suave guys.
Cons: neckbeards appropriated it

Mullet pros: MacGuyver had a mullet and MacGuyver could destroy ISIS with a box of toothpicks and a soap dispenser
Mullet cons: Rednecks appropriated it

Bowlcut pros: It looks good on some girls and sometimes cute children have them
Bowlcut cons: it's associated with weirdo monks and autists or something ?
 
conidia'95 said:
bowlcut looks stupid lazy way to do a haircut putting a bowl on someones head and cutting around
Click to expand...

Not to mention, it makes you look like you have a penis for a head.

According to the scores here, mullets > bowlcuts > fedoras. Well, I have noticed that quite a few members here have a thing for the 80s as do I (hence the vaporwave/future funk thread).

It seems like only the weeabos here have a huge problem with mullets. Lol
 
GlassesWearingGenie said:
Not to mention, it makes you look like you have a penis for a head.

According to the scores here, mullets > bowlcuts > fedoras. Well, I have noticed that quite a few members here have a thing for the 80s as do I (hence the vaporwave/future funk thread).

It seems like only the weeabos here have a huge problem with mullets. Lol
Click to expand...


No offense but bowlcuts also make one look like dylan roof.
 
Yeah, Id say thats actually WORSE than looking like a white trash redneck. Lmao
 
Mullets. There could be a decent haircut under that fedora. So at least there's that to look forward to. Bowl cuts can sometimes look cute on kids. So they aren't a total loss. But no one in the history of ever has ever looked good in a mullet. George Lynch's two tone hair disaster is quite possibly the worst mullet in the history of mullets.
Lynch1.jpg
 
Fedoras can be taken off in a second (plus older men can carry them off if they're dressed right). Bowl cuts, well, they're lame but most of them are worn by kids.

Mullets? There's only ONE person in the universe who can rock a mullet and that's Jaromir Jagr. Everyone else looks like a fucking tool.

jagr-mullet.jpg


(Seriously. If you ain't Jagr, don't even attempt it)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom