Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 25.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 62 17.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 142 39.0%

  • Total voters
    364
Wouldn't the parody defense in this particular case refer to people writing the superchats anyway?
Nick plays it on his channel. He is the legally responsible person for the content that is broadcast.
He has to make sure the content he streams does not violate any laws or TOS.

He cannot just say
"teehee, I am just allowing people to use a service, I am not responsible for them making Kurt and Aaron talk about eating my goo!" :really:
 
Nick plays it on his channel. He is the legally responsible person for the content that is broadcast.
He has to make sure the content he streams does not violate any laws or TOS.

He cannot just say
"teehee, I am just allowing people to use a service, I am not responsible for them making Kurt and Aaron talk about eating my goo!" :really:
My point being, as I undestand, the hypothetical parody defense would only apply to the authors of the text in the case parodied people would sue them (which will not happen because going after some random supperchatter is useless).

On the point of changing the names of the AI voices they didn't do it with Mama June and the girl from what I see. So at least they are not dumb enough to press their luck so far.

Unlike someone else.
 
https://nevada.public.law/statutes/nrs_597.810 I wonder who pulls the trigger on this first
This would be used to slap around Melton.

But if someone really wanted to make Nick shit himself, the Common Law Tort of Invasion of Privacy is recognized in Minnesota.
The tort of invasion of privacy consists of four distinct wrongs:
  • the intrusion upon the plaintiff’s physical solitude or seclusion;
  • publicity which violates the ordinary decencies;
  • putting the plaintiff in a false, but not necessarily defamatory position in the public eye; and
  • the appropriation of some element of the plaintiff’s personality for a commercial use.
 
For archival purposes, here are all the Kurt seething tweets from last night that my scraper collected. It couldn’t archive them through GhostArchive or archive.today, but they’ll still be searchable via XenForo search.

Tweet Date (UTC)Tweet IDAuthorTweet TextTweet URL
Apr 30, 2025 at 07:521917487213828329909RekietaLawThis guy is way above the standards.
Apr 30, 2025 at 07:301917481702898766273RekietaLawNot the way i used to.
Apr 30, 2025 at 07:221917479552000917795RekietaLawAll six things you mentioned are incorrect
Apr 30, 2025 at 07:151917477795497926876RekietaLawKurt is fat, but calling him a "bunch of lawyers" is a bit rude.
Apr 30, 2025 at 07:131917477273571147821RekietaLawSatire and parody have been protected speech forever. Kurt knows this, and is being dishonest.
Or Kurt doesn't know this and is being fucking dumb.
Apr 30, 2025 at 07:081917476162357363034RekietaLawThe legalities as understood by youtube?
Youtube isn't involved at all. No legal decisions or rulings have been made, silly.
Apr 30, 2025 at 07:061917475633002578090RekietaLawI didn't have anyone say anything.
But you knowing it wasn't Kurt undermines any legal claim he has.
Apr 30, 2025 at 06:311917466830920183960RekietaLawI didn't take it down, dummy.
Apr 30, 2025 at 06:301917466649361276977RekietaLawI didn't remove it. It was removed. Not by me.
Apr 30, 2025 at 06:261917465543977689560RekietaLawYou are also gay
Apr 30, 2025 at 06:241917465153068753027RekietaLawThere hasn't been a legal action. Your comment doesn't make sense.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:541917457628818440286RekietaLawParody is not the same as what you are saying.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:531917457324760879266RekietaLawYou having the wrong legal opinion isn't my problem.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:521917457034385002765RekietaLawI didn't take it down...I would have laughed at Kurt and told him to apply ass cream.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:481917456049809863081RekietaLawThis is getting played.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:461917455402398085552RekietaLawYou don't have to pay someone for parody or an impression.
Ai voice cloning is about protecting rights of publicity. Unlawful voice cloning is using AI to give the false impression that it is the speaker.
Obvious parody like supertip is not in that category.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:431917454827656995082RekietaLawI absolutely did not.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:361917452978769764474RekietaLawEast asia...we've always been at war with a guy the size of east asia.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:351917452692835774542RekietaLawParody voices and impressions have been protected comedic speech forever.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:331917452105498890609RekietaLawKurt isn't awesome. Kurt is an envious, spiteful loser. He's also so incapable of taking a joke that he took down the silly AI voice using legal theory that he knows is bogus.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:311917451651578765779RekietaLawIt's like a double negative and the parody is a normal, well adjusted person
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:131917447223270387854RekietaLawNo way. I would never parody Kurt in any way
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:111917446666527068202RekietaLawHe forgot about him.
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:071917445687417135508RekietaLawOh, it's about to get a lot more fun
Apr 30, 2025 at 05:041917445042853040320RekietaLawThe@UncivilLawvoice has been removed from SuperTips due to a case of acute vaginitis.
An ointment is already in the works and will be applied with all haste.
Apr 30, 2025 at 04:481917440838910513189RekietaLawHey,@UncivilLaw, that was a giant bitch move and I'm going to make fun of you a shitload for it.
Better stock up on that ass cream.
25.04.30 04.48 - RekietaLaw - 1917440838910513189.webp 25.04.30 05.04 - RekietaLaw - 1917445042853040320.webp 25.04.30 05.07 - RekietaLaw - 1917445687417135508.webp 25.04.30 05.11 - RekietaLaw - 1917446666527068202.webp 25.04.30 05.13 - RekietaLaw - 1917447223270387854.webp 25.04.30 05.31 - RekietaLaw - 1917451651578765779.webp 25.04.30 05.33 - RekietaLaw - 1917452105498890609.webp 25.04.30 05.35 - RekietaLaw - 1917452692835774542.webp 25.04.30 05.36 - RekietaLaw - 1917452978769764474.webp 25.04.30 05.43 - RekietaLaw - 1917454827656995082.webp 25.04.30 05.46 - RekietaLaw - 1917455402398085552.webp 25.04.30 05.48 - RekietaLaw - 1917456049809863081.webp 25.04.30 05.52 - RekietaLaw - 1917457034385002765.webp 25.04.30 05.53 - RekietaLaw - 1917457324760879266.webp 25.04.30 05.54 - RekietaLaw - 1917457628818440286.webp 25.04.30 06.24 - RekietaLaw - 1917465153068753027.webp 25.04.30 06.26 - RekietaLaw - 1917465543977689560.webp 25.04.30 06.30 - RekietaLaw - 1917466649361276977.webp 25.04.30 06.31 - RekietaLaw - 1917466830920183960.webp 25.04.30 07.06 - RekietaLaw - 1917475633002578090.webp 25.04.30 07.08 - RekietaLaw - 1917476162357363034.webp 25.04.30 07.13 - RekietaLaw - 1917477273571147821.webp25.04.30 07.15 - RekietaLaw - 1917477795497926876.webp 25.04.30 07.22 - RekietaLaw - 1917479552000917795.webp 25.04.30 07.30 - RekietaLaw - 1917481702898766273.webp 25.04.30 07.52 - RekietaLaw - 1917487213828329909.webp

Edit: I didn’t paste every single one of them. It’s fixed now.
 
Last edited:
This would be used to slap around Melton.

But if someone really wanted to make Nick shit himself, the Common Law Tort of Invasion of Privacy is recognized in Minnesota.
Really hoping one of these lawyers around here files suit against Nick in Kandiyohi so that Judge Whatshisname gets to look at his docket and see Nick's name again.
 
View attachment 7297835View attachment 7297836
Nick definitely got hit with a privacy complaint because he is hyper assblasted on Xitter at 01:30 central time, right now.
If Nick continues to fuck with Kurt then Kurt is within his rights to and should continue to file privacy complaints

Imagine the seethe if Nick gets his channel rightfully taken down during probation because he can't stop being an asshole to people.
 
it sure does take a lot of substances for him to not even miss those other substances one bit
I just want to point out that Rekieta uses drugs to enjoy sex. He's either so gay or the pussy is so trash that he can't get an erection without chemical assistance--even with his balldo cockring for the disabled. My money is on both.

He uses drugs because both his wife and his girlfriend are fucking ugly and bad in bed, and because he's a huge faggot. Keep using, faggot!
 
Last edited:
People like Nick (I might as well just say 'faggots') mistake jokes for unseriousness, probably because they're autistic and can't entertain that humour is a complex thing beyond just "That guy said something and didn't entirely mean it! Haw haw!". They think anything qualifies as a joke so long as it isn't said with complete sincerity, and it's somehow the audience's fault for 'not getting it', or 'lacking a sense of humor', or 'being PC' and so on and so forth. At no point does it enter their thick fucking skulls that a joke has to have qualities that, even if it's only subjectively funny, appeals to the intended audience. I don't think there even is an audience that would find Nick's jokes overwhelmingly funny. You'd have to have lived a similar life of drug abuse, cuckoldry, pedophilia-adjacency, professional failure, and all the other shit that comes with being such an abject loser. And even then that's probably not funny to talk about, just all-too-real.
Would you say that Nick just doesn’t understand social cues?
 
Google AI is pretty clear:

Privacy Violations: Voice cloning without consent is a clear violation of privacy. Individuals have a right to control how their likeness, including their voice, is used. Unauthorized use of a cloned voice for commercial purposes, pranks, or to harm someone's reputation can be grounds for a legal claim
The argument could easily be made that as the messages sent by audience members are often very specifically related to the person's voice they're using ie. Having a Pedotip where Aaron's voice is talking about eating Goo or Sean talking about being fat and eating sandwiches, that it's a commercial service not just a donation button, maybe people wouldn't send in money or as much money if they couldn't put words in the mouths of the people they alog.

It's clearly illegal and there's a reason that no one aside from the Pedo Melton has implemented it yet, it's not because they didn't think of it, it's because they'd get sued into oblivion, luckily for Melton though his Pedotip system is well below the radar for now but one lawsuit would be enough to torpedo everything, it's only a matter of time.
 
For archival purposes, here are all the Kurt seething tweets from last night that my scraper collected. It couldn’t archive them through GhostArchive or archive.today, but they’ll still be searchable via XenForo search.
4:48am to 7:52am?
He was coping and seething about some nonce soundboard image macro being removed for three hours straight.
Is this what the court considers "gainful employment"?
It's 8am in Minnesota now, most people have already woken up an hour ago, those tweets were made 5 hours ago. He was whining until 3am in the morning.

:really:
ADHD and narcolepsy medication, everyone.
 
4:48am to 7:52am?
He was coping and seething about some nonce soundboard image macro being removed for three hours straight.
Is this what the court considers "gainful employment"?
It's 8am in Minnesota now, most people have already woken up an hour ago, those tweets were made 5 hours ago. He was whining until 3am in the morning.

:really:
ADHD and narcolepsy medication, everyone.
Melanie Little and Kurt are already streaming. Wake up, cuck!
 
4:48am to 7:52am?
My scraper logs in UTC, so for CDT that would be 5 hours earlier. He was seething on Twitter from 11:48 p.m. to 2:52 a.m.

He ranted about his "fair use" for "parody purposes" regarding Kurt for over two hours. It’s especially funny considering he was banning every Mandy user in his own chat at the same time. But hey, according to him, “no one gives a shit about principles” and they’re just “extensions of courtesy”—his so-called “rights on loan to others.”
(Xeet | Archive)
 
Back