Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Kheapathic]

Catching up with this faggot, and he's throwing shit because Kurt issued a C&D over the voice; and Balldo is making some gay ass free speech stand. Meanwhile he sends shower texts and screamed that those damn Kiwi Faggots call his wife a whore and make fun of his kids. Nick truly is a closeted gay theatre kid who wants to bully people.

 

[Thunderous Lightning]

Just imagine actually being Nick Rekieta for a second
And then tell me with a straight face that you wouldn't have killed yourself already and done everyone a favor
Keep up the good work Nicholas

 

[30+GameOvers]

It still blows my mind some people respected him at one point, lmfao

 

[RaptInPlastic]

Just imagine actually being Nick Rekieta for a second

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

I would suggest to not even joke about gaining access to government systems you shouldn't have access. Don't be a retard, it's not worth it when it involves Nick.

Yeah absolutely wouldn't encourage it I realize how stupid what I wrote sounds looking back at it.

It still blows my mind some people respected him at one point, lmfao

Some people STILL Respect him SOMEHOW.

 

[Strix454]

Melton just said Nick sent him damning "stuff" in his email allegedly about Aaron in regards to to the cum eating proof.
He's promoting the big reveal of this new material for Hackamania. If true wouldn't this fall under revenge porn by Nick? Is Nick suicidal??

It wouldn't be revenge porn in Minnesota. The law only covers the "dissemination of an image of another person who is depicted in a sexual act or whose intimate parts are exposed".

But it does seem like its reaching the level of harassment from a legal point of view. I mean you have this weird seemingly gay guy (Nick) talking in public about engaging or wanting to engage in gay sexual acts with a particular individual. But its probably not worth bothering with. The comments are far more damaging to Nick than the person he is talking about.

All this stuff Nick is saying is audience repellent. At least outside Melton, Juju, Vito and the dabbleverse.

 

[N1bbaN3rd]

$169.38 from 28 superchats plus $1.99 from a gifted membership.

So, Nick's wage for that stream is roughly $23.60 per hour. (0.472 KNU).
The kids are eating spaghettios.

 

[Niggernerd]

Melton just said Nick sent him damning "stuff" in his email allegedly about Aaron in regards to to the cum eating proof.
He's promoting the big reveal of this new material for Hackamania. If true wouldn't this fall under revenge porn by Nick? Is Nick suicidal??

IF the cyber crime shit is still happening.
It really doesn't look good for Nick when the same pedo involved with that is now involved with this "damning" stuff.
Aside from that, Aaron to his credit has taken the laughs at his expense pretty well about the cum eating.
Nick we know you're here. That makes you gay too, retard.

 

[Kheapathic]

It still blows my mind some people respected him at one point, lmfao

Can't speak for everyone; but the one decent lawyer I know is a half-brother, so when I want to talk tannerite and shit like that, he's not a stick up his ass type. Outside of that, I don't think many people interact with lawyers and realize a good deal of them are probably pretty normal people; to include wanting to laugh and mock shit that goes on in the VERY SERIOUS AND VERY PROFESSIONAL LEGAL PROFESSION. He kinda broke down the wall and showed that the wordsmiths that dress in silk stockings and charge you hundreds of dollars an hour; can't be just as weird, goofy, etc as almost anyone else. Then him being able to recite what was apparently simple base legal shit showed he could've been competent too; so he had a personality and a brain. Then eventually the magic wore off; especially after his good friend and fellow lawyer Percy Tyrone Beard botched the Vic Lasagna case by being a retard.

 

[Captain Manning]

So, to recap the situation as I understand it:

- Nick and a number of Balldoguards are on Twitter claiming that Kurt is a false flagger and copyright cuck.

Example:

Nitter Archive

- However, the stream is still up. Kurt did not apparently use Youtube's DMCA system. Which is, in fact, correct of him, because it's not copyright at issue here. You wouldn't use that system for this. It's a violation of Supertip's ToS, probably YouTube's ToS, and Nevada state law concerning likeness rights (which Melton's ToS has to adhere to).
- The Kurt voice is gone from Supertips.
- Despite not using the YouTube DMCA system (where you would know the identity of the claimant), he still knows Kurt is behind this because Kurt sent a C&D to Melton, Melton complied by taking it down, and then Melton told Nick.
- Sean will be doing the same exact thing soon.

Is that about correct?

Soooo, where the fuck is the false flag here? Where is the copyright cucking? Why am I supposed to have a visceral hatred for this man Kurt for this? Why would I call Sean a false flagger and copyright cuck when he gets his voice taken down soon?

And most importantly of all: Why is Nick such a gigantic lying faggot? Why you always lyin'? Oh my God, stop fuckin' lyyyying

This isn't a false flag. This is a true flag. Nick and Melton legitimately did a fucky-wucky.

Also, BTW, dumbshit is now down to 420k subs. Comeback is a bust. Audience alienation continues unabated. Whomp whomp.

The kids are eating spaghettios tonight.

Can't. Aaron is not there to open the can, pour it in a bowl, and put it in the microwave.

Pray for his kids.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

"I MADE FUN OF HIM ON THE INTERNET AND NOW HE'S MAKING FUN OF ME ON THE INTERNET YOU HAVE TO STOP HIM!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!!"?

That you are incapable of understanding what parts of Nick's behavior amount to harassment and Invasion of Privacy, a common law tort recognized by the state of Minnesota, is not my problem.

If someone had a hate boner big enough, they could report Nick and file for a TRO to make him shut the fuck up.
That would absolutely have a negative impact on Nick's probation. That you get assmad when people discuss the possibility is fucking hilarious.

Go write your MATI bitching into your diary and don't shit up the thread.
Or better, send me a DM and rant there, that way only I have to suffer through your seething.

Soooo, where the fuck is the false flag here? Where is the copyright cucking? Why am I supposed to have a visceral hatred for this man Kurt for this? Why would I call Sean a false flagger and copyright cuck when he gets his voice taken down soon?

Copyright Cuck has been a known term and using it makes everyone assume they understand what is going on.
Nick is intentionally misrepresenting the facts to make himself look better. People who just pass by and do not engage with the topic won't understand what it is actually about. Nick pretends that Kurt is enforcing some kind of copyright on his likeness. Which is a very simplified way to look at it.

 

[parsnip]

 

[Horrified Bystander]

Just imagine actually being Nick Rekieta for a second

I seem to have just killed myself. I’d like out of this hypothetical please.

 

[Canard]

So, Nick's wage for that stream is roughly $23.60 per hour. (0.472 KNU).
The kids are eating spaghettios.

And he can't even move somewhere cheaper...

 

[Me262PrinceOfTurboJet]

I know people with convictions for obtaining drugs by deception (though I'm not in Minnesota,).

In that case, all it took was for a doctor to stand up in court and say 'He told me his previous doctor was prescribing A. He didn't tell me Dr. X, Dr. Y and Dr. Z were also prescribing to him simultaneously.' My friend didn't expect the doctor to testify, thinking that his oath of confidentiality would cover his arse, but if the doctor has been lax in his prescribing practices (and you can only scam the lax ones into overprescribing in this way), the cops have got a lever they can use to persuade them to testify. And juries tend to believe doctors over junkie scam artists.

You're not wrong that it COULD happen. But it almost certainly won't happen in Nick's case because he will fuck up well before they ever look at his doctor or prescriber. A guy literally died from overdosing on telemedicine Adderall and it's still legal.

 

[Edward Teach]

View attachment 7302516

He was up late in NLOs chat.....I am sure this was on his mind...a lot. Faton made a comment that it is the new owners problem for any lawsuits....

 

[Strix454]

Soooo, where the fuck is the false flag here? Where is the copyright cucking? Why am I supposed to have a visceral hatred for this man Kurt for this? Why would I call Sean a false flagger and copyright cuck when he gets his voice taken down soon?

Obviously there is none. The cuck in this situation, if there is one, is Melton. Melton made the decision to comply with the C&D order which clearly is aligned with Melton's own ToS for his superchat system. If Nick is legally correct about everything, then Melton should be taking his advice and ignoring the C&D.

Kurt had and still in my opinion has many options for youtube complaints that could have gotten Nick at least one strike by now. He took the high road and did the least damage possible. But these people are all just morons. Few of any of them even understand what a false flag is.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

It wouldn't be revenge porn in Minnesota. The law only covers the "dissemination of an image of another person who is depicted in a sexual act or whose intimate parts are exposed".

But it does seem like its reaching the level of harassment from a legal point of view. I mean you have this weird seemingly gay guy (Nick) talking in public about engaging or wanting to engage in gay sexual acts with a particular individual. But its probably not worth bothering with. The comments are far more damaging to Nick than the person he is talking about.

All this stuff Nick is saying is audience repellent. At least outside Melton, Juju, Vito and the dabbleverse.

Of course it would and then some. The implication being that Melton has CCTV footage of Aaron guzzling Nick's goo out of April's snatch.

Not only have you then distributed something without consent, which is a sexual act, you have also then illicitly recorded it in the first place.

It is still retarded, as the chances of Nick having the right angle and the definition to capture clear goo eating is near non existent.

So, hypothetically, let's say Nick has footage, the best case would be it shows snatch licking and then later April said Nick's goo was inside and Aaron enjoyed it.

Nick is sick in the head. Firstly, they were fucking each others wives and sleeping 4 to a bed. Some bodily fluids got swapped somewhere. We all get it.

Secondly, so fucking what? How does Nick proving it help him in any way? Probation shorter? Viewers come back? The Judge announced the test result on his kid is totally doesn't count? His wife isn't a whore? He totally didn't do that coke stream? Wtf...

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

How does Nick proving it help him in any way?

Seaaaaaaan, Seaaaaaan! Aaron ate my goo! I proved it in the court of public opinion!
I am the better lawyer! Come back to meeeeeeeeeeeeee! *hick*

[EDIT] If Melton is really selling Supertips with all the "content", then he is really fucking someone over by misrepresenting ownership of those images and AI voices. I hope its a big company, because in that case they will go after him for it.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

. If Nick is legally correct about everything, then Melton should be taking his advice and ignoring the C&D.

Taking legal advice from Nick? Sounds like a winning plan. I dunno why Mapton didn't listen.
Guess your friends don't believe you're a skilled not lawyer Nick!

I'm glad they're going affter Mapton for this. Hit em where it hurts. Get Mapton pissed off and dropping nick from the chat dono system. Too much heat.