Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
All this beatifying of Kurt is getting absurd. Everything rotten about Nick is true - including treating Kurt poorly and "lesser than.". But Kurt is not just some earnest but dopey lovable awkward schlub. He can be a nasty bitch in his own right. Just re-watch his streams where he talks about being on a Lovequest, or any stream where he has appeared with a woman panelist. He's aggressive, rude, dismissive, nasty (particularly to women). Before I knew who any of these people were I had to turn off some panel I happened to run into about a minute in bc of his unbearable, nasty personality.

And he was wrong to defend Nick as long as he did.

I can tell you, for a GD fact, that no adult gets and starts a legitimate Adderall prescription without the proper neuropsychological testing which you have to schedule, takes time, and then requires evaluation by a licensed neuropsychologist, along with appropriate symptomatology and documented life/work impairment, managed and very closely monitored by a licensed psychiatrist.
This description makes "meet with a psychiatrist for 45 minutes and describe your struggles" sound like a multi-week event in residence at some faraway laboratory building, where you are scanned, grilled, given dozens of tricky assessments, and examined by a team of white coats. This and other parts of your comment dress up what is very often a very simple, fairy brief discussion into sounding like a bigger deal than it usually is.

Agree with you on dealing with a cokehead, and also that prn typically has a corollary ("not to exceed") (though I have seen it without for other meds; and even for adderall where there's been an rx amount it was always orally "up to" or "but you don't need to take that much and if you don't need it you shouldn't" - which is just a version of "as needed.").

He's not an evil mastermind, he's a dumb fuck retard who got caught and fucked by the government VERY quickly because he thought he was a special boy who would never be held accountable. Even now he says there's no way anyone around him knew about what he was doing, even though it's clear they did. He's not a cult leader who isolated his family and kept them away from society to fuck with them, he's an exhibitionist who streamed from a hot tub with his polycule. And the kids are out of the house all the time, it's not like him and Kayla actually teach them anything, they just don't go to a regular school.
He didn't get fucked by the government. It's not "getting fucked" when you cause it. And it's sure as hell not getting fucked when your technical potential 20 years becomes 0 [excuse me, 2 days].
 
He's not an evil mastermind, he's a dumb fuck retard who got caught and fucked by the government VERY quickly because he thought he was a special boy who would never be held accountable. Even now he says there's no way anyone around him knew about what he was doing, even though it's clear they did. He's not a cult leader who isolated his family and kept them away from society to fuck with them, he's an exhibitionist who streamed from a hot tub with his polycule. And the kids are out of the house all the time, it's not like him and Kayla actually teach them anything, they just don't go to a regular school.
If anything the homeschool thing hurt him. It meant the church was seeing his kids more, and they were concerned based on his growing complaints of Scandinavian prudes and the interventions they tried to stage. It was also a way for family to bring forward concerns since they're involved in the church. The church was able to be a focal point for what would have likely been breadcrumbs spread across the community otherwise.

The church could have gotten him some extra leeway as they were trying to see the best in him and handle it through their practices before calling in the government, but there is no guarantee a public school alone combined with a more typical Sundays only church involvement and private extracurricular activities would have triggered the report. It was a totality of circumstances that led to the mandatory report, same as the warrant. Having a half dozen mandatory reporters with likely varying levels of involvement in the children's lives outside of class, observation skills, and care for their pupils would have only diluted things imo.

Fair points. It just doesn't feel that way, not entirely. He is a control freak, and putting the children in a normal school would definitely not match up with his controlling and gaslighting ways. I feel he would have made it political and lolbertarian but really it's his ego and his need to be king of his pathetic kingdom. But anyway, it's funny and weird like so many of the things he does and says.
If the homeschooling was supposed to be a means of control then he half assed it as always and completely failed in his goal. Nick got removed from his teaching position at the church, received various talks about his beliefs and behaviors culminating in some sort of intervention. He wasn't a puppetmaster putting on a face at the church to pull the wool over the eyes of those bumpkins. He was an addict who thought he was smarter than everyone else as they got worried and tried to help him.
 
I always felt the trad dad and homeschooling was much more sinister than simple fakery. It removes another layer of scrutiny from super normal Rekieta and his presumably eternal perversion. He was never a normal person from before he married Kayla. Children could never be allowed to innocently inform on what the parents got up to. That would also mean the deviancy is nowhere near as recent as some think.
I don’t think it was some “all along” thing, I think he just got rich quick by drinking a bottle of whisky every night on stream. Success and whisky fired up the little nigger inside Rekieta’s mind—as you know all men have a little nigger in their mind driving them to stupidity and misadventure, this little nigger is the source of male criminality almost in toto. The little nigger told him he was indestructible. Nick believed it since was sauced out of his fucking gourd for like a year straight, and then as you certainly expected the little nigger knifed and killed Nick and now Nig Rekieta is driving the bag of bones.

He decompressed the second he had money and a ‘fun’ identity after spending his whole life making good but boring life choices. He wanted sex and drugs because he was bored and his wife was plain and also because Minnesota by all appearances is an uneventful and dull forest with nothing of note or significance besides many tiny lakes and two shithole cities full of Floyds and similar sorts.

Almost no one is actually cut out for a long public life full of sex and drugs. Sex and drugs are extraordinarily fun but also deprive you of dignity when you would need it badly.
 
There's definitely a way to hide the address for digital goods. I REALLY FUCKING WONDER why they didn't do that though???
During the Supertip TOS breach by Pat Dixon, he first said his ex’s zip code was visible and later said her name was as well. I don’t know if he saw her full address. The point was that Supertips allows customers to send “anonymous” comments that are not anonymous at all — and does not disclose that anywhere. Patrick Melton admitted that they “probably should.” They still don’t.

And disclosing customer data acquired through the Stripe integration is also against their TOS. Even Melton pointed this out to moron Dixon, who continues to insist “If you could do anything bad with the information, Stripe wouldn’t let me have it!” Completely ignoring that publicizing customer data without consent IS the “something bad.” Dixon is a lying, manipulative retard.
 
Last edited:
Some information on Hackamania (May 9-11 - May 8 and 9 for Nick)
- Nick is still not listed in the lineup, though he's indicated he's been given clearance to go.
- The events (and probably more) WILL be live-streamed with the odd declaration that there will be nudity.
1746104367342.webp
1746105041474.webp
If an intrepid Farmer wishes to farm, it's possible. You'll be required to watch live. After that, each creator will own the content and publish on their platforms as they see fit. I'm curious what $200 gets you. Link Having said that, Nick is only there on Thursday and Friday. I doubt much, if anything, from Thursday will be streamed. That leaves Friday.
1746104807305.webp
1746105201181.webp
I imagine Nick will be featured in Dax & Vito's show and the Karaoke Party (assuming it's streamed).
 
Last edited:
The events (and probably more) WILL be live-streamed
Melton made clear last night that any stream sniping will result in a copyright strike and that they will be periodically porn-bombing the stream to discourage sniping. So Melton and Moody will be streaming literal porn to customers who signed up for a “comedy” livestream.
 
Melton made clear last night that any stream sniping will result in a copyright strike and that they will be periodically porn-bombing the stream to discourage sniping. So Melton and Moody will be streaming literal porn to customers who signed up for a “comedy” livestream.
is porn streaming like that legal? is anything Melton does NOT sketchy? Doesn't seem like it.
 
Melton made clear last night that any stream sniping will result in a copyright strike and that they will be periodically porn-bombing the stream to discourage sniping. So Melton and Moody will be streaming literal porn to customers who signed up for a “comedy” livestream.
Is Melton streaming it? Isn't that going to end up with his own stream getting struck?
 
Is Melton streaming it? Isn't that going to end up with his own stream getting struck?
They’re not using YouTube to stream. It’s a PPV platform. I would imagine the contract allows them to stream the “big old dicks” with which Melton promised to be porn-bombing the event stream.
 
Does Nick really believe the AI voice donations are a copyright issue?

Nick should put Montegraph on his AI face/voice thing. Why wouldn't he want his audience to be shouting out using Montegraph's face and voice about how he likes to suck little boy's dicks.

Go on, Nick. Don't be a copyright cuck. Stand up for your freeze peach rights. It's satire, right? It's protected by lore. Monty and his lawyer won't stand a chance against the Lawpope's big lawyer brain.

Take a big long slug of whiskey and go for it.
So Melton and Moody will be streaming literal porn to customers who signed up for a “comedy” livestream.

Yeah, is there anybody who isn't an active paedophile watching this guy's streams? I don't think so.
 
Last edited:
Nick should put Montegraph on his AI face/voice thing.
Nick doesn’t have the courage to even request such a thing from Melton, let alone use it. He’s got government orders to follow and has made it clear that when Kandiyohi County authorities tell him to jump, he asks “How high?” Those boots aren’t going to lick themselves.
 
Screenshot_20250501-143914.webp
Suing Nick or any of his fairweather friends: Evil. Stupid. They don't know the law. Going to lose.

Suing any of Nick's sworn enemies (people who mildly criticise him): Based. Hilarious. They are justified. Going to win.

Now Nick. You say free speech in your presence was an extension of courtesy or whatever the fuck. I get the premise, despite your ideological hypocrisy,

But this is Kino Casino v RazorFist. You aren't involved and yet you can't even summon a hint of free speech defence? Despite your supposed right to misappropriate people's identity and call Aaron gay til your blue in the face?

I shouldn't find myself so shocked by his utter moral bankruptcy, but it still happens.
 
Crossposting from Aaron’s thread about Louisiana loser Wil Herren running D for his Senpai (clips included in linked post):

Wil Herren has admitted that:

1. Aaron in fact did NOT write the email to Wil’s boss, despite Wil claiming just a few days ago that he had “proof” that Aaron did so and would be sharing it.

2. Wil has a new clip channel he’s using to profit from his Rekieta coverage after his existing clip channel was demonetized. Wil does not reveal the name of his clip channel, so that’s yet another conflict of interest he hasn’t disclosed in his “reporting” (read: taking dictation from Nick Rekieta).

Relevant clips:

View attachment 7303246
 
Last edited:
Nick fully admitted today that he has never taken a trial to jury. Everything he has has done has either been a bench trial or some petty shit like a trust/will. He goes on and on about how much more experience he has over Kurt but the reality is that he has ZERO trial experience.
What's he gonna do when Sean gets his voice taken down?

Let me guess... Sean is fat?

View attachment 7303223
Suing Nick or any of his fairweather friends: Evil. Stupid. They don't know the law. Going to lose.

Suing any of Nick's sworn enemies (people who mildly criticise him): Based. Hilarious. They are justified. Going to win.

Now Nick. You say free speech in your presence was an extension of courtesy or whatever the fuck. I get the premise, despite your ideological hypocrisy,

But this is Kino Casino v RazorFist. You aren't involved and yet you can't even summon a hint of free speech defence? Despite your supposed right to misappropriate people's identity and call Aaron gay til your blue in the face?

I shouldn't find myself so shocked by his utter moral bankruptcy, but it still happens.
Remember: Whichever side he backs usually loses.
 
So this is interesting. Nick brought up the old Rev. Jerry Falwell vs Larry Flynt (Hustler) case (1987/88) in Melton's chat last night. Basically saying you cannot sue over Supertips a.i. voices because it's parody.
Of course Falwell lost his libel suit, but still won 150k in damages later.

Falwell vs Larry Flynt is strictly a decision about libel and defamation law concerning parody. It said that there is no "end-run" around the requirements for a finding of defamation of a public figure based on the damage done to that public figure. It provides a protection for clear parody under the libel laws.
However, as you say, Falwell still managed to prevail in the case over issues of intention infliction of emotional distress (the $150k) even though he lost on the issue of libel.
Its also worth noting that in that case the parody went out of its way to mark itself as parody in the publication. They put text on it to say that it was a parody. What Nick is doing with supertips has what appears to be a superchat by that person speaking in an AI generated voice as that person with no indication that it is parody.

The likely issues with the supertips system are going to be copyright, impersonation and NIL related. Falwell vs. Flynt provides no protection at all on those issues. And even if supertips were to win in court, it would lose through the platform & ToS rules in youtube which are more strict that the legal system. Strikes based on impersonation, copyright and harassment would be likely to prevail in this situation.
 
is porn streaming like that legal? is anything Melton does NOT sketchy? Doesn't seem like it.
It is legal (assuming legal porn). But any streming service that allows porn charges an high premium. If he is streaming on any of the normal platforms it is a high likelihood it would be against the TOS. But could be he plans to stream on PornHub.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAroXX
Back