US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where the hell is any proof that PBS or NPR are part of a political party?
"It's all an accident and it just happens to always benefit one side, but they're all accidents so you'll just have to eat shit and accept it, heh. Checkmate, chuds!"

behold, the arguments that liberals are forced to make in the year 2025. sad
I'm reminded of the ol' "Neutral Vs Conservative: The Eternal Struggle" article from SSC.


Leftists see their bias as "neutral" because they don't actually have empathy for anyone not a leftist. (No theory of mind for conservatives, unable to write conservative characters, unable to describe conservative motivations or beliefs as anything but moral failings, etc etc.) Meanwhile these "neutral" institutions, having gotten corrupted to be leftist leaning, drive all the conservatives out, and the conservatives lose faith in them and create their own versions (which swing generally far righty because everyone on the right are sick of the "neutral" leftists) which is worse for everyone. But the lefties don't care, because they literally can't grasp that people exist in the world that don't agree with them.
 
I'm debating between living in one of five places:
- Minneapolis City (downtown), Minnesota
- Seattle City (downtown), Washington
- Urbana, Illinois
- Bloomington, Indiana
- Morgantown, West Virginia
Which would you all choose? I'm leaning towards Illinois, not too urban but not too rural
IMG_8071.webp
 
Actual Floridian here - state is currently in the worst drought in eight years. It's been obscenely hot outside for some time now, we're not even close to summer yet. Most of the state is like this right now, and in general I'm not too fond of Florida anymore despite me living here most of my life. I'm in agreement it's too hot/humid, also I don't think it's very pleasant to look at given how flat it is and how dull a lot of it is starting to look.
meh, it's been barely scraping ninety so far for highs around me
 
Although the CPB is a nonprofit corporation, not an agency or a department. The President does appoint the board members, but does that mean he has a say in its operations?
SCOTUS has been over this, Congress doesn't have the authority to create-anything-that performs Executive functions, outside the authority of the President.
The mere fact the President appoints the leadership, indicates it's part of the Executive.
 
Harvard is no longer tax-exempt.

Times of Israel: "Trump says he’ll strip Harvard of tax exempt status in latest salvo against school" (archive)

‘It’s what they deserve,’ president writes in brief social media post amid Ivy League school’s lawsuit against the administration after it froze $2.2 billion in funding​


WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump on Friday said he planned to strip Harvard University of its tax-exempt status, the latest salvo against the Ivy League school amid a larger crackdown on elite US universities.

“We are going to be taking away Harvard’s Tax Exempt Status. It’s what they deserve!” Trump said in a post on Truth Social, without specifying when he might take action.

Representatives for Harvard could not be immediately reached for comment on the president’s post.

Since taking office in January, Trump has targeted major US universities by freezing federal funding, launching investigations, revoking student visas and making other demands, saying higher education has been gripped by antisemitic, anti-American, Marxist and “radical left” ideologies.

Harvard has pushed back, suing the administration over the halted US research funding and other demands, and joining more than 200 university and college presidents in protesting Trump’s higher education policies.

The school filed a lawsuit against the university last week, which calls for a funding freeze and conditions imposed on federal grants to be declared unlawful, arguing the measures amount to political interference aimed at compromising the Ivy League institution’s independence.

Last week, Trump bashed Harvard as an “antisemitic, far left institution” that admits students “from all over the world that want to rip our country apart.”

That broadside came a day after he issued an executive order targeting higher education, upending how federal authorities decide which universities and colleges can access billions of dollars from certain grants and student loans.

The executive order seeks to clamp down on what Trump brands “unlawful discrimination,” that is, any measures that seek to promote the representation of “racial and ethnic minority individuals.”

The Trump administration claims protests against Israel’s war in Gaza that swept across US college campuses last year were rife with antisemitism.

Many US universities, including Harvard, cracked down on the protests over the allegations at the time, with the Cambridge-based institution placing 23 students on probation and denying degrees to 12 others, according to protest organizers.

But on Tuesday, Harvard released its long-awaited internal report on campus antisemitism, depicting a hostile atmosphere toward Jews and Israelis before and after Hamas’s October 7 onslaught.

Harvard President Alan Garber said last week that Trump’s administration had launched “numerous investigations” into the university’s operations.

Trump’s claims about diversity tap into long-standing conservative complaints that US university campuses are too liberal, shutting out right-wing voices and favoring minorities.

In the case of Harvard, the White House is seeking unprecedented levels of government control over the inner workings of the country’s oldest and wealthiest university — and one of the most respected educational and research institutions in the world.

Harvard has rejected the government’s supervision demands, prompting the Trump administration to freeze $2.2 billion in funding.

In Wednesday’s executive order, Trump decreed that “American students and taxpayers deserve better, and my Administration will reform our dysfunctional accreditation system so that colleges and universities focus on delivering high-quality academic programs at a reasonable price.”

AP, Luke Tress and Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.
 
That's still a thing, but they've gotten "fancier"
View attachment 7307902
My favorite is the Mohu Leaf, but I don't know if that was just marketing, if they were the first of this kind of antenna, etc. I do need to get a HDHomeRun or other smart/DVR setup for OTA, but the OTA thing is currently up in the air thanks to ATSC 3. Basically OTA standards are changing again this year or next (again) and the greedy little fucks snuck DRM into the new standard thanks to the Biden admin, which breaks basically everything and fucks over anyone wanting to use OTA.
 
Actual Floridian here - state is currently in the worst drought in eight years.
That means you have between 3-5 years before a major hurricane strike. Make sure to buy a chainsaw, blades, gascans, and a shitty truck.

You can make a shocking amount of money, when a few billion trees get molested by a hurricane.
 
How is withholding federal funds the same as taking possession of something? If anything, that sounds like the opposite, no?
The main thing I found was the 1974 ICA which has a short history detailed here. It's not so much taking possession of something, more like it's rescinding a promise to pay something. Here's a reprint of an article from around the time of the controversy that sparked the act.

Essentially, the funds were promised to some entity or purpose by congress, and then the president prevented them from being used for that purpose and/or by that entity, thus impounding the funds. From what I can tell, the act makes it so the President can't impound funds for longer than the remainder of the financial year.

My expectation is that it's not a breach of the act because it hasn't been October 30th yet, but from what I understand, Trump has no plans to ever release the funds unless his demands are met, or at least he has yet to make those plans public. Does he plan to quietly release the funds on October 29th if he gets stonewalled out, but is banking on the other side needing the money enough to cave before then? Is he hoping that nobody realizes he's not allowed to keep them for longer? Is he provoking a bunch of judges to do stupid shit this year, so when October comes and they try to bring a real case that has merit against him like breach of the ICA, they've cried wolf?
 
DO NOT MOVE TO ILLINOIS!
IT IS LITERALLY THE WORST STATE IN THE UNION!

THE WORST GOVERNMENT, POLICE, TAXES, ROADS, AND LAWS!
THE FOOD ISN'T EVEN GOOD ANYMORE. ALL THE LOCAL BUSINESSES DIED IN COIVD!
EVERYTHING IS GOYSLOP AND GOYINDUSTRY UNLESS YOU DRIVE INTO CHICAGO!
THERE ARE NO JOBS OUTSIDE OF MAJOR CITIES THAT PAY OVER $12K-$30K A YEAR, AND EVERY YEAR THERE IS LESS BUSINESS OPERATING IN IL!
NO ONE GOES OUTSIDE SINCE THEY EITHER GET SHOT BY NIGGERS OR LIVE IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWEHERE!
YOU WILL NOT FIND AN APARTMENT FOR UNDER $2,000 A MONTH, UNLESS IT WAS BUILT IN THE 70s (typically $1,800 a month) OR IN A NIGGERHIVE!
I second this.

Here are a few more reasons:

1. Chicongo
2. Cicero
3. Rockford
4. East St. Louis
5. Dupo
6. Cairo
7. Decatur
8. Freeport
9. German Valley--and NOT just because a guy got caught multiple times fucking a horse in front of a passing schoolbus full of kids
10. Belvidere--EL BELVIDOR
 
I was not aware of that. Which case was that argued under?
Several. The among most recent was when Trump 1 tried firing Administrative law judges, at 'independent' executive agencies. Turns out, unless a particular position is specifically created by Congress, using recognized Legislative Branch Enumerated Powers, anyone in the EB can be fired by the President.

It's pure Separation of Powers law, the President can shut anything in the EB down, then according to the Impoundment Act, has to write a book report to Congress, and return unspent funds.

They haven't yet figured a way around Article 2
The executive Power shall be vested in a President
 
Last edited:
Turns out, unless a particular position is specifically created by Congress, using recognized Legislative Branch Enumerated Powers, anyone in the EB can be fired by the President.
Even Congressionally created positions like Cabinet Secretaries can be fired at-will by the President.

The Constitution is very clear that the branches are co-equal and can not regulate one another except through a Constitutional Amendment.

Judicial Review is a gentleman's agreement, not a law, and the courts best remember that.
 
Last edited:
Even Congressionally created positions like Cabinet Secretaries can be fired at-will by the President.

The Constitution is very clear that the branches are co-equal and can not regulate one another except through a Constitutional Amendment.

Judicial Review is a gentleman's agreement, not a law, and the courts best remember that.
SCOTUS directly avoided even ruling on these cases until 1926. Basically, prior to 1926, if the President told you to fuck off, you fucked off. Now we're pretty much back to the original standard.
Anyone not allergic to reading-

Can see how insane these arguments are.
 
Back