Mega Rad Gun Thread


James Reeves took a completely unbiased look at his gifted "The Mini-Fix" from Q in .300 Blackout and says it's good. Kevin, the guy who runs Q, wants The Fix platform(~$3,500 + tax) to replace the Remington 700 blueprint.
A Remington 700 ADL is about $400 on sale, Howa barreled actions are cheaper and you don't have a stock to dispose of. Throw in a trip to a reputable smith to true up the receiver face(If you really wanted to) with a new barrel and a new trigger and add a lightweight MDT chassis - you're still in at maybe a third to half the price of the Q in which you can spend the rest on an optic and can, neither of which are included with The Fix.
 
The fix is a neat design, but it’s a light weight hunting rifle. Much more cost effective to buy whatever semi decent bolt gun you can find used since it will fit most people’s hunting use case, unless you really need that much weight savings.
 
The fix is a neat design, but it’s a light weight hunting rifle. Much more cost effective to buy whatever semi decent bolt gun you can find used since it will fit most people’s hunting use case, unless you really need that much weight savings.
It reminds me again that I want a Ruger American predator in 300. Thanks Kevin!
 
The fix is a neat design, but it’s a light weight hunting rifle. Much more cost effective to buy whatever semi decent bolt gun you can find used since it will fit most people’s hunting use case, unless you really need that much weight savings.
It's a LARP gun for pretending to shoot out lights and sentries, let's not beat around the bush.
But you're right, there are better rifles out there for hunting. Kevin believes that traditional rifle stocks are not ergonomic, whereas the Fix series has an adjustable buttstock with screws and negative space where straps, fingers and fauna will get caught so I have no fucking clue what he's talking about.
 
I've shot a fix, and I own a Howa 1500 in a GRS stock. The weight difference between the howa and the Q is only significant to malnourished twinks,the QOL between the two is infinite
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Dean Pentel

James Reeves took a completely unbiased look at his gifted "The Mini-Fix" from Q in .300 Blackout and says it's good. Kevin, the guy who runs Q, wants The Fix platform(~$3,500 + tax) to replace the Remington 700 blueprint.
A Remington 700 ADL is about $400 on sale, Howa barreled actions are cheaper and you don't have a stock to dispose of. Throw in a trip to a reputable smith to true up the receiver face(If you really wanted to) with a new barrel and a new trigger and add a lightweight MDT chassis - you're still in at maybe a third to half the price of the Q in which you can spend the rest on an optic and can, neither of which are included with The Fix.
Maybe I am talking out of my ass here, but for that obscene cost, they couldn't be bothered to make this a straight pull? Seems to me like this thing is at minimum twice the cost that it should be.
 
It's a LARP gun for pretending to shoot out lights and sentries, let's not beat around the bush.
But you're right, there are better rifles out there for hunting. Kevin believes that traditional rifle stocks are not ergonomic, whereas the Fix series has an adjustable buttstock with screws and negative space where straps, fingers and fauna will get caught so I have no fucking clue what he's talking about.
I’ve heard interviews where he says it’s designed to be a lightweight hunting rifle, not the PRS gun that some people think it should be for the price tag. Apparently they thought Hillary was gonna win in 2016 and get an “Assault Weapons Ban” so they wanted to make a gun that could be sold after that.

The Honeybadger is the LARP gun. The stock on the Honeybadger is terrible.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dean Pentel
he says it’s designed to be a lightweight hunting rifle ... Apparently they thought Hillary was gonna win in 2016 and get an “Assault Weapons Ban” so they wanted to make a gun that could be sold after that
Yeah that's the same cuckold logic behind calling AR-15s "Modern Sporting Rifles", everyone knows what it actually is.
 

James Reeves took a completely unbiased look at his gifted "The Mini-Fix" from Q in .300 Blackout and says it's good. Kevin, the guy who runs Q, wants The Fix platform(~$3,500 + tax) to replace the Remington 700 blueprint.
A Remington 700 ADL is about $400 on sale, Howa barreled actions are cheaper and you don't have a stock to dispose of. Throw in a trip to a reputable smith to true up the receiver face(If you really wanted to) with a new barrel and a new trigger and add a lightweight MDT chassis - you're still in at maybe a third to half the price of the Q in which you can spend the rest on an optic and can, neither of which are included with The Fix.
A Winchester model 70 in whatever caliber you'd like is a much better gun than the Fix in every respect as well. it'd be a shit hunting rifle.
 
I'll ask here since the innawoods thread is slower than molasses whats a good handgun for backpacking keep in mind I'm more concerned for 4 legged critters than 2 after doing a bit of research I'm heavily considering the Ruger SP101 for the following major reasons:
Weight: Ironically enough the weight is something I was originally wary of until I realized bear defense rounds for .357 kick like a mule
Concealability: I need a CCW and on backpacking trails alotta people get wigged out when you open carry (people go missing on trails/parks alot)
Robust Build: Ruger makes this particular model like a fucking tank hence the enhance weight and 5 round capacity vs the traditional 6
Aftermarket Support: The Sp101 was released in the 90s and has stuck around for a while so you can find aftermarket shit EVERWHERE
Budget: S&W are overpriced

Why a Revolver vs Semi? (Inb4 Fudd Faggot): >tfw you will never be Arthur Morgan
a few but a major reason(s) is dirt and mags, dirt is like sand for trails it gets everywhere and since 10mm is the minimum for bear defense in a semi this impacts reliability in all semis. or as scotty kilmer would put it "more moving parts more stuff can go wrong" Mags take up more space, weigh more (loaded), and usually require belt mounting (for ease of access) , vs 2 speed strips of .357.

Secondary Questions:
Holsters: Im not against hard holsters but I want the malleability and softening of leather since I'll be walking with it on my hip for 6 hrs+ on a hike
Handles: I've got big catchers mitts so I'll need some proper grippers (preferable to wood for the look)
Barrel length: I'm leaning towards 2.5-2.75 but I'd like to hear other kiwi takes
Any other accessories: for any other SP101 owners any accessories like sights, speed loaders, or tips are appreciated
 
since 10mm is the minimum for bear defense in a semi
It's not though. Pure fudd lore. Any gun can kill, or drive off, a bear. There are a lot of stories floating around, but not nearly as much solid documentation about bear defense. What documentation is out there would suggest any gun can do the job. Shot placement is absolutely key and a red dot on a modern autoloader is objectively better than a double action pistol which commonly don't have the ability to mount an optic. The only practical leg up wheelguns have is stopping power, but you still have to hit the target and weigh if the stopping power counters all the negatives: higher recoil, sight acquisition, cost (ammo), ergonomics, aftermarket support, weight (you don't need to carry multiple magazines when you have up to triple the ammo in one magazine vs 2 clips & the gun), trigger pull and more.
Please read the following article: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/06/handgun-or-pistol-against-bear-attacks-104-cases-97-effective/
"more moving parts more stuff can go wrong"
The SP101 revolver has ~double the parts compared to a Glock.
If you're dead set on revolvers, which again I'd argue isn't necessary, the SP101 is good.
glhf hiking/camping
 
It's not though. Pure fudd lore. Any gun can kill, or drive off, a bear. There are a lot of stories floating around, but not nearly as much solid documentation about bear defense. What documentation is out there would suggest any gun can do the job. Shot placement is absolutely key and a red dot on a modern autoloader is objectively better than a double action pistol which commonly don't have the ability to mount an optic. The only practical leg up wheelguns have is stopping power, but you still have to hit the target and weigh if the stopping power counters all the negatives: higher recoil, sight acquisition, cost (ammo), ergonomics, aftermarket support, weight (you don't need to carry multiple magazines when you have up to triple the ammo in one magazine vs 2 clips & the gun), trigger pull and more.
Please read the following article: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/06/handgun-or-pistol-against-bear-attacks-104-cases-97-effective/

The SP101 revolver has ~double the parts compared to a Glock.
If you're dead set on revolvers, which again I'd argue isn't necessary, the SP101 is good.
glhf hiking/camping
I've been researching bear caliber recently for handguns. I have seen both 10mm and 45acp hard cast (+p or not) penetrate pretty much identically. The article you linked is good reading. Carrying spray and also warning shots are shown to be effective at scaring bears and basically the one situation they can be warranted. If you're trying to budget a police trade in Glock 21 in 45 and underwood hard cast isn't inadequate at all. That said I've never shot a bear. Apparently the inventor of buffalo bore carries 45 over 10mm for bear unless he absolutely needs a revolver.

As for spray. I recommend always with any sort of spray to have Decontamination wipes ready in case of contamination or wind.
 
Last edited:
I'll ask here since the innawoods thread is slower than molasses whats a good handgun for backpacking keep in mind I'm more concerned for 4 legged critters than 2 after doing a bit of research I'm heavily considering the Ruger SP101 for the following major reasons:
Weight: Ironically enough the weight is something I was originally wary of until I realized bear defense rounds for .357 kick like a mule
Concealability: I need a CCW and on backpacking trails alotta people get wigged out when you open carry (people go missing on trails/parks alot)
Robust Build: Ruger makes this particular model like a fucking tank hence the enhance weight and 5 round capacity vs the traditional 6
Aftermarket Support: The Sp101 was released in the 90s and has stuck around for a while so you can find aftermarket shit EVERWHERE
Budget: S&W are overpriced

Why a Revolver vs Semi? (Inb4 Fudd Faggot): >tfw you will never be Arthur Morgan
a few but a major reason(s) is dirt and mags, dirt is like sand for trails it gets everywhere and since 10mm is the minimum for bear defense in a semi this impacts reliability in all semis. or as scotty kilmer would put it "more moving parts more stuff can go wrong" Mags take up more space, weigh more (loaded), and usually require belt mounting (for ease of access) , vs 2 speed strips of .357.

Secondary Questions:
Holsters:
Im not against hard holsters but I want the malleability and softening of leather since I'll be walking with it on my hip for 6 hrs+ on a hike
Handles: I've got big catchers mitts so I'll need some proper grippers (preferable to wood for the look)
Barrel length: I'm leaning towards 2.5-2.75 but I'd like to hear other kiwi takes
Any other accessories: for any other SP101 owners any accessories like sights, speed loaders, or tips are appreciated
Firearm ownership is a very personal decision, but this is something I have put a lot of thought into and I will give my input for what it is worth:

Just get a 9mm handgun with 9mm NATO ammunition (which is +p) and train with it frequently. About 60% of all successful bear defense in America is with 9mm, so it's definitely up the task, and it will be far more economical and easy to carry, especially concealed, than anything else. 10mm is not the minimum for bears, and whoever told you that is objectively wrong. Any modern production 9mm semi auto from a quality manufacture will work fine, and you are working off of a lot of baseless fuddlore to justify your preference for revolvers.

I don't generally agree with carrying magnum handguns for wilderness defense because most guys who use them don't train with them nearly often enough due to recoil and cost, and because they don't carry them often enough due to weight. The number of guys I met who hadn't shot their magnum revolver in years, or who left it in the truck or tent all the time is astounding, and obviously defeats the purpose of carrying. Your comment about 357 bear loads kicking like a mule is a prime example of why so few people who "carry" magnum handguns actually shoot them with any regularity, let alone train with them. Even my buddy who used to everyday carry a 357 magnum hardly shot the thing and when he did, he would do half a cylinder because his hand would hurt after a few rounds. He now carries 38 special in it because the extra power wasn't worth the discomfort, poor control, and infrequent training.

Your revolver focus isn't necessarily wrong in that it would be a decent choice for defense, but I personally disagree with it in about every single way I could. Lower capacity, greater weight, greater recoil, greater cost, slower reloading; you are giving up every modern advancement for fuddlore and aesthetics. If you absolutely insist on a revolver, I would recommend getting standard 357 magnum range ammo, as it will likely be loaded a little less hot, be much cheaper, and still absolutely get the job done, rather than some extra spicy Buffalo Bore loads that cost three time as much. Whatever you do, the most important part is to always have the gun on you, and the second most important part is train as frequently as is feasible with the firearm. It is not a magical totem of destruction.

As for holsters, handles, etc. I don't have any input. I always use an IWB for my 9mm when I am "innawoods" since I don't personally favor open carry unless you have a long gun, but otherwise a revolver aficionado would have to give his opinion.
 
Just get a 9mm handgun with 9mm NATO ammunition (which is +p)
I would say you likely want a flat nosed bullet to get through bone and fat better than a round nose. Bear anatomy protects their vitals pretty well

black-bear-vitals-diagram-6333.webp
 
I would say you likely want a flat nosed bullet to get through bone and fat better than a round nose. Bear anatomy protects their vitals pretty well

View attachment 7312490
The current 9mm NATO 115 grain loading is a flat nosed bullet, that is part of why I recommended it, but you are right that I should have been more specific, as the 124 grain 9mm NATO loading is a round nose. Specifically, either the Winchester Active Duty or the Winchester High Pressure 115 grain 9mm ammo both fit this bill and both can be found easily.
 
Back