Why do all Jews have some kind of German-sounding name?

Kiwi & Cow

Professional jimmies rustler master of shitposting
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 21, 2018
Klein - Small
Berg - Mountain
Stein - Stone
Baum - Tree
Schmidt - Smith

Like the only exception to the rule is John Money.

Also there are Strauss and Clauss that also sound German, but IDK what they mean or where they come from TBH.
 
An incredibly easy one to answer. Even niggers from 60 years ago knew why... Why did Melvin Kavinsky become Mel Brooks? Why did Jonathan Liebowitz become John Stewart? It's an old Kike tactic, stealing White and especially anglicized names in order to hide amonst White people and corrupt them from within. They've been doing it for hundreds of years.
Jews are not White.webp
 
An incredibly easy one to answer. Even niggers from 60 years ago knew why... Why did Melvin Kavinsky become Mel Brooks? Why did Jonathan Liebowitz become John Stewart? It's an old Kike tactic, stealing White and especially anglicized names in order to hide amonst White people and corrupt them from within. They've been doing it for hundreds of years.
View attachment 7312573
Jews are white tho
 
Ironically enough, names like Deutsch or Nimoy, both mean literally '''German'', are Jewish too (not exclusively). Likely because to Slavic-speaking people, both German and Yiddish sound about the same.
 
I always thought it would be really funny to make a video on social media where you expose the disproportionate control ethnic Germans have over the media and financial sector and point out a bunch of people with names like Rosenstein and Rothschild and Goldblatt but I'm too lazy to do it.
 
Most Ashkenazi Jews lived in German-speaking areas, so when governments started requiring surnames in the 1700s–1800s, they got stuck with German ones. Some picked nice ones, some got assigned names based on jobs (like Schmidt = smith), and some got intentionally bad ones by bureaucrats. If you had money, you could bribe your way into a fancy name like Goldstein, if not, you're fucked. That's why you see all the Stein, Berg, and Baum names. Strauss means bouquet or ostrich, Clauss is just a German take on Nicholas.
Since you're going to get banned soon and we'll lose all your insightful poasts I decided to immortalise your reply for future generations! :semperfidelis:
 
They don't. These aren't Jewish names, they're ashkenazi names

Ashkenaz was a totally different branch of the human family tree

The ✡️ has successfully lied to you into thinking theyre jews

Jews are white tho
Jews are semitic. They are brown.

White people are not semitic.

Noah had three sons. Shem is where brown people came from, he settled in the modern mideast. Ham was the father of the niggers. Japheth settled up in europe, he is the father of europeans and whites

Shem was an ancestor of judah, the progenitor of the jews.

White people, japhetites, are nowhere genetically near this. Ashkenaz was a son of japheth, not a son of Shem, nowhere related to judah
 
Last edited:
Klein - Small
Berg - Mountain
Stein - Stone
Baum - Tree
Schmidt - Smith

Like the only exception to the rule is John Money.

Also there are Strauss and Clauss that also sound German, but IDK what they mean or where they come from TBH.
Geg. I can't quote the whole OP, but I can highlight the whole OP and quote it.

Anyway the reason is jews don't know how to do / find names in Hebrew because they're semi-literate at best, or illiterate in terms of Hebrew. And some people who think they're jews aren't. (In the Israeli state they throw Hebrew-ish stuff at the wall and see if it sticks, it's not much better.)

This sums up all the causes incl. the political sperging. Same idea for "why do so many Europeans have Jewish-ish first names"*; they don't know their shit, and in exceptional cases they're not even European.

* names like:
  • Noah
  • Sam
  • Aaron
  • Isaac
  • Jacob
  • Debora
  • Miriam
  • Sara
  • Rachel
Japheth settled up in europe, he is the father of europeans and whites
This is from a midrash or a daf of talmud, one of them... question marks apply. It's an interesting hypothesis but I wouldn't want to learn talmudic reasoning (or chr*stian hermeneutics for that matter) just to validate it.
 
This is from a midrash or a daf of talmud, one of them... question marks apply. It's an interesting hypothesis but I wouldn't want to learn talmudic reasoning (or chr*stian hermeneutics for that matter) just to validate it.
It's not in either of those, it's in the bible (the table of nations and the other geneaologies in there) and was the accepted world view all over the known world up until the 1800s (when the Rockefellers made up the out of africa/evolution stuff).

The talmudic view is that we're all just monkeys that came from Africa and somehow turned into people

The europeans also corroborate this. The major islands of Greece are all named after japheths sons and the "father of the greeks" is named Japheto.

And of course we just have regular logic. The nigs are where these histories say. The whites the same, the semites and browns the same

Would be a pretty big coincidence if evolution was not only true but the nigs ended up in the Sahara like ancient histories say
 
  • Political Sperging
Reactions: Free4Ever
It is.

... which is a translation of a German translation, of a Latin translation, of the Greek translation of Tana"kh,
the bible isnt a german translation of anything. there are german translations OF the bible, but that is derivative of the bible. the original work cannot be a translation of something that came later.
written (at swordpoint) by... *drum roll* a 100 Pharisaic rabbis,
the pharisees didn't write the tanakh. the pharisees didnt even exist when the tanakh was written. youre history is all mixed up. the pharisees came AFTER the books of the old testament were written.
whose students wrote the midrashim and the talmud.
right. but not the bible. these are totally different things unrelated to judiasm or Christianity.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: dick brain
the bible isnt a german translation of anything. there are german translations OF the bible, but that is derivative of the bible. the original work cannot be a translation of something that came later.

the pharisees didn't write the tanakh. the pharisees didnt even exist when the tanakh was written. youre history is all mixed up. the pharisees came AFTER the books of the old testament were written.

right. but not the bible. these are totally different things unrelated to judiasm or Christianity.
I said the Pharisees translated the Tana"kh into Greek - into the pentateuch - which was translated into the Latin - the vulgate -, etc..

For example Martin Luther's bible was translated from the vulgate and the pentateuch, but not from the Hebrew (let alone exclusively from it - let alone by someone literate in authentic Hebrew). It was the first in that it was German and translated on the basis of both the Latin and the Greek translation, rather than just from the Latin which was the going norm at the time. The first English bible of this kind - complete and based on a synthesis of the Latin & Greek translations both - is from the same period, the 1500s.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: dick brain
Because what you're calling "all Jews" means "Jews in America/Western Europe" which means "Ashkenazi Jews." Jews in ancient/Medieval times settled in Germany and developed a Yiddish culture (creole of Jewish and German), which then spread into Eastern Europe and ultimately mass migrated to America in two waves (one in the 1840s with other Germans and the other in the late 1800s/early 1900s with the Italians and Polish).

Contrast with Sephardic Jews (Jews concentrated in Spain and Spanish possessions like the Netherlands), who spoke a Jewish/Spanish creole called Ladino and came to America earlier (in the colonial era, concentrated in the South) and Mizrahi Jews, Middle Easterners that STAYED in the holy land and were that tiny minority that lived in Palestine the whole time.

It's extra fun that Ashkenazi Yids are Ashke-nazis, proving God has a sense of humor and hates Yids.

TLDR they're Germans.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: dick brain
I said the Pharisees translated the Tana"kh into Greek - into the pentateuch - which was translated into the Latin - the vulgate -, etc..

For example Martin Luther's bible was translated from the vulgate and the pentateuch, but not from the Hebrew (let alone exclusively from it - let alone by someone literate in authentic Hebrew). It was the first in that it was German and translated on the basis of both the Latin and the Greek translation, rather than just from the Latin which was the going norm at the time. The first English bible of this kind - complete and based on a synthesis of the Latin & Greek translations both - is from the same period, the 1500s.
The Tanakh was translated into Greek by apostles. Paul, Peter, etc
 
The Tanakh was translated into Greek by apostles. Paul, Peter, etc
wtflol, I hadn't even heard of that narrative. 100 rabbis (probably misremembered), 70, 72, 5... not any apostles.

Is this documented somewhere I can read? The version I'm familiar with corresponds to the Letter of Aristeas to Philocrates. I'm not aware of any sources placing the writing of the septuagint later than the second century BC - before there could have been apostles.

Edit: and the septuagint is called so from septuaginta, which is Latin for 70...
 
Last edited:
Like the only exception to the rule is John Money.
Ah, beyond the whole "blending in with your host" strategy, jews in any nation are likely to use surnames related to currency
For example in anglo nations Silver, Goldman, etc
In china as a particular example they use the surname Jin, meaning gold
I always found that interesting
 
  • Informative
Reactions: dick brain
wtflol, I hadn't even heard of that narrative. 100 rabbis (probably misremembered), 70, 72, 5... not any apostles.

Is this documented somewhere I can read?
The bible. The apostles had to translate the old testament into european languages like greek. Paul and peter were writing letters to europeans
The version I'm familiar with corresponds to the Letter of Aristeas to Philocrates. I'm not aware of any sources placing the writing of the septuagint later than the second century BC - before there could have been apostles.
no im not talking about the writing, im talking about the formal translation from hebrew and aramiac into european languages
 
The bible.
That's very unspecific.
The apostles had to translate the old testament into european languages like greek. Paul and peter were writing letters to europeans
But it was already translated into Greek in the 2nd or 3rd century BC...
no im not talking about the writing, im talking about the formal translation from hebrew and aramiac into european languages
Oh. So not even an actual paper bible? This sounds like a "trust me, bro" story.
 
That's very unspecific.
The new testament
But it was already translated into Greek in the 2nd or 3rd century BC...
Sure probably. I mean, I can translate things all day. But that isn't the same as a formal, widespread translation the proliferates
Oh. So not even an actual paper bible? This sounds like a "trust me, bro" story.
I don't know what you mean. You know that something has to be written before it's translated right? And in ancient times, the time between original writing to transmission thousands of miles away, and then translation into those languages can be centuries
 
Back