Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 45 15.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 101 34.0%

  • Total voters
    297
Question for people with more legal knowledge than I regarding the supertips.

Would it be possible (or wise) for the lawyers like (Sean, Nate and,Kurt) to join forces, contact people of interest who have had their NIL used and file some group/class C&D action?
 
As long as nick keeps doing stupid shit like this
Nick has zero ability to play the tape forward and anticipate unintended consequences of the actions he takes while in the grips of emotions he cannot control. This is one of the cognitive defects that make him so dangerous to his wife and children. There is a non-zero chance this faggot ends up doing something drastic and irreversible to them because he cannot restrain his babyish compulsion to lash out in anger.
 
I hope Kurt bears in mind that Nick and Melton can’t actually do shit to hurt him.
The issue is that if this was private bullshitting, ignoring it could work.
But this is a public attack on his image, which hurts not just him personally, as it is intended to, but also his brand.

You and me both know this is not a "once and over" thing. Nick and Melton have proven to be vengeful bastards who keep this shit going for months.
I fully expect this to end with Nick getting a Youtube strike against his channel. Kurt will not let this stand, he is much to thin-skinned for that and he is also in the right.
 
Here are the A.I. voice selections.

Supertips Options - Copy.webp

Depressed Incel Lawyer - Copy.webp
This is just so fucking gay. Now I actively hope these people send C&Ds just to see what the replacement becomes.
>Fat Sandwich Munching Lawyer
>Nigger comic book man
>Nigger lawtuber
Are we sure he's in his 40s?
 
Rekieta has prompted at least two and if Aaron is to be believed four of his Supertips victims to issue letters so far. Eric July might laugh it off. Or he might not. Ditto the others. Meanwhile none of this is likely to give Melton happy thoughts or make him sympathetic to this junkie faggot. Smart money would be to stay home and not got to pedomania. But Rekieta is a smug halfwit faggot so naturally he will go anyway.
Hopefully into the kind of social media ambush inferno that he so richly deserves. But who knows.

I can’t quite decide if Rekieta actually has enough brain cells left to intentionally generate controversy to boost his viewership numbers. (He reads this thread so he’ll probably see this theory and claim it’s true.)

On one hand, the Supertips drama has been the only remotely interesting thing about his return to streaming beyond day 1 cope. On the other hand, he’s literally only punching down at one of the few lawtubers with a smaller stream than his.

I tend to believe the remaining neurons in his brain aren’t bumping into each other and he’s just trying to look cool to the few remaining winemoms and balldoguards left. Great strategy, intentionally antagonizing actual practicing lawyers. (Regardless of their channel size)
 
But this is a public attack on his image, which hurts not just him personally, as it is intended to, but also his brand.
I don’t agree. Nick doesn’t have the reach, influence or credibility it would take to cause real damage to Kurt. This is all an effort to provoke him into creating more content for Melton and Nick to milk for attention and money.
 
The issue is that if this was private bullshitting, ignoring it could work.
But this is a public attack on his image, which hurts not just him personally, as it is intended to, but also his brand.

You and me both know this is not a "once and over" thing. Nick and Melton have proven to be vengeful bastards who keep this shit going for months.
I fully expect this to end with Nick getting a Youtube strike against his channel. Kurt will not let this stand, he is much to thin-skinned for that and he is also in the right.
Rekieta's still trying to be Dax and he thinks he's found his own litigation epic arc. Rekieta is going to lose badly and so is Melton.
 
I don’t agree. Nick doesn’t have the reach, influence or credibility it would take to cause real damage to Kurt. This is all an effort to provoke him into creating more content for Melton and Nick to milk for attention and money.
I am not talking about legal action, I am talking about using Youtube TOS to slap Nick in the face.

The legal C&D are reserved for the provider of the content, which is Melton through Supertips, which is offering this Kurt caricature to all people using the service.
 
I am not talking about legal action, I am talking about using Youtube TOS to slap Nick in the face.
And I was talking in terms of Kurt needing to realize that these people can’t hurt him emotionally unless he consents to that. I have no opinion on what he should or should not do legally/procedurally. But on an emotional level, I would like to see Kurt internalize the fact that he doesn’t have to allow anyone the power to hurt him. Because he is so sensitive to criticism, the odds are very much against that.
 
Remember when his chat was so fast, you cannot read anything?
Neither do I.
Well, I think attachments broke.
jo choy
All hail our Law pope!

Rekieta Law turned on subscribers-only modeOnly channel subscribers of 5 minutes or longer can send messages
Rekieta Law
Try out https://supertip.gg/RL and check out our NEW VOICES!


Mr K
HAHAHAHA

Mr K
loving the new supertips voices

Mr K
i can see one of them getting some extra attention tonight

Mr K
aww, didnt realise its just MS voice for the depressed incel lawyer. thats depressing


DWhat
he’s late

DWhat
and extremely ghey


DWhat
btw smash the like

BobTube@DWhat is an enabler

poopnachHow does a child magically get 10x the legal limit of cocaine metabolites in their hair?

😴 Irrelevant.
 
“Dear John you’ve got a problem John. You made these posts on Kiwifarms John. That’s not very healthy John. Now excuse me John while I go on to post all day about Aaron on Twitter and give superchats to a possible pedophile John”

🥃:really:

Calling someone as being always online posting doesn’t work when you stay up into the early AM making maniac tweets.
 
Let's not forgget, he was not only on KF during Easter (very trad dad), he was activly messaging Null to cry 'bu hu site rules' on MNPB to ban her (i hope its a woman becasue that would make Nick seeth even more). He could easily use that posts to talk about his dead janny, maybe try to score some pitty points, but no, he's so wetbrained he have to keep attacking people, it's not like last time he leashed out on Manning it turned out well for him, but he just can't learn, i hope Nick will donate what's left of his brain to science studies.
 
"Depressed Incel Lawyer" Hmmm... whoever could this be?
I wonder what other monikers all the other unimpressed "contributions" will receive once further C&Ds are submitted.

While the "texan moon face" image and "depressed incel lawyer" description may be vague enough to avoid violating likeness rights, if Nick admits that the intent was to deliberately circumvent Kurt’s cease-and-desist and that this particular “contribution” is meant to specifically parody or imitate Kurt, would that still constitute commercial misuse of likeness?

Edit:

Screenshot_20250505-132353.webpScreenshot_20250505-132440.webp
Nick essentially declares Open Season for any alog seeking to fuck with him. He VILL respond to anyone, from one subscriber to a million. You will be pushed in a locker, stalker nerd child.
 
Last edited:
I am not talking about legal action, I am talking about using Youtube TOS to slap Nick in the face.
Kurt acting like a flaggot—even if some people in the thread think it's justified—would only pour gasoline on the fire, which is exactly what Rekieta is baiting him to do. The smartest move Kurt could make is to focus on his own channel. Let’s be honest—the brand he’s built doesn’t exactly thrive on petty slap fights, and getting dragged into this mess would just make him look insecure and reactionary.
 
I wonder what other monikers all the other unimpressed "contributions" will receive once further C&Ds are submitted.

While the "texan moon face" image and "depressed incel lawyer" description may be vague enough to avoid violating likeness rights, if Nick admits that the intent was to deliberately circumvent Kurt’s cease-and-desist and that this particular “contribution” is meant to specifically parody or imitate Kurt, would that still constitute commercial misuse of likeness?

Edit:

View attachment 7320820View attachment 7320828
Nick essentially declares Open Season for any alog seeking to fuck with him. He VILL respond to anyone, from one subscriber to a million.
EA sports tried this with their college football game not using names and they still had to shut it down for over a decade once challenged.
 
Kurt will not let this stand, he is much to thin-skinned for that and he is also in the right.

I am not talking about legal action, I am talking about using Youtube TOS to slap Nick in the face.

Let’s be honest—the brand he’s built doesn’t exactly thrive on petty slap fights, and getting dragged into this mess would just make him look insecure and reactionary.
The YouTube TOS report function is quasi anonymous (although it is recorded to your account), and Nick is pretty clearly abusing/ harassing people. That's not like reporting dmca violations, which is a parallel process on YouTube, but should only be done by the copyright holder.

Maybe a takedown is what Nick is hoping for? My guess is he's just being a giant faggot and not thinking about the consequences of his actions. Eventually this behavior will be noticed and actioned.
 
Back