Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 Changes are being made. Got a request? Shoot your shot.
    💹 I am interested in growing the non-English section of the site. Discuss.
    🖼️ Old attachments may be broken. I am rebuilding the local filesystem. They are not lost.
I found this amusing S. Baum has been sniffing Tony's farts.

Funny there is no mention of Ben Ryan's comprehensive debunking of Tony's so called "deboonking."

Screenshot 2025-05-05 213953.webp
 
I've always thought he looks like a real-life Ed, Edd & Eddy character. There's something extremely dysgenic about him.
I've always pegged him as like an extra from a Kevin Smith movie. Like his district elected a real woman called Zoey Zephyr and he's being paid like five bucks to stand in as her for some inane reason in between smoking industrial amounts of weed. Because literally every time I see a picture of him he looks like he's about to propose building a time machine so your pizza delivery turns up before it's even like left the oven dude
 
I sure love the enlightened style of online discussion where all transphobe arguments are wrong and so im going to write a 50 tweet chain against a completely different point no one fucking made and declare victory.

We are just speedrunning the X is wrong, X doesn't exist, X actually hurts your case, X has been dunked, X is a massive simplification, X is good actually meme with every news release.
 
The US Department of Health and Human Services has issued a 400-page document entitled "Treatment of Pediatric Gender Dysphoria - Review of Evidence and Best Practices". Tony wrote a 49 part-tweet chain about it and promise an article later.
View attachment 7305885
"I'm not sure I will be able to tear this apart tonight"
Nothing assures me that Tony's an unbiased party like describing reading this report for the first time as "tear[ing] it apart", eh?


"I don't know that it's possible to do a [409-pg] review like this in a 3 month timeframe"
But according to Tony his totally unbiased and very thorough critique of this report was done in like 5 hours. And it's definitely not just a long form howl of cope and seethe!

The projection is completely off the charts!

View attachment 7315290
View attachment 7315296
[Tony, proofreading his work] More adjectives!! MORE!

I see a lot of accusations on Tony's part that this is just ideologically motivated slop coming from the Trump admin but no actual evidence... which the HHS report had.

He's the one with preordained conclusions, masquerading as a science journalist. Knowing at least some left wing journalists buy the schtick and think "Erin Reed" is a credible source is pretty horrible.
 
Tony thinks people cannot tell he is a troon.

Also there is no credible evidence behind the "99% of the time" assertion.

View attachment 7332526
And he's also conveniently sidestepping the fact that even if this was true, if it wasn't for tranny perverts creeping into woman only spaces, we'd never have had situations like this in the first place.

But lets not allow mere details derail screechy arguments from perverts...
 
Tony thinks people cannot tell he is a troon.

Also there is no credible evidence behind the "99% of the time" assertion.

View attachment 7332526
"Bathroom bans don't work because you can't tell whose [sic] trans by looks alone."

Translation:
"We men who pretend to be women will deliberately violate the law and continue to use women's toilets because we will be able to get away with it."

The relentless telling on themselves.
 
Tony thinks people cannot tell he is a troon.

Also there is no credible evidence behind the "99% of the time" assertion.

View attachment 7332526
Its just a reuse of their former bullshit of "you never hear of Trans women raping "other" women or behaving inappropriately, but trans women get murdered every day by TERFs and Redneck chuds. acting on JK Rowling's express orders."

But it did evolve a little in the face of evidence.

"If you do hear of a trans woman creeping on "people" then that is not a true trans person so it doesn't count".

"Chris Chan might have raped "her" mother, but that is no reason to misgender her, which is a much worse crime".

It really follows a pattern of from whataboutism to cope, to justification and diminishing.
As much as they claim to be anti religion and pro science, they really do think like scientific method denying creationists and flat earthers.
 
Zack in every Pic I've ever seen has the affect as if he's been blunted with a lead pipe.
To me, he looks like a faggot. By which I mean, he has that sort of arch theatricality in every expression he pulls, like he’s a recently-out gay man who feels like he has to be 100% camp, 100% of the time. I can’t take him seriously, not just because he looks ridiculous, but because he never looks serious. Like,”Um, #letherspeak pleeeeeease, thank you very much!” (drops imaginary mic)
Tony thinks people cannot tell he is a troon.

Also there is no credible evidence behind the "99% of the time" assertion.

View attachment 7332526
If most trans women are indistinguishable from real women, how come the only ones standing up for trans rights are the ones that don’t pass? I mean, statistically, there must be at least one willing to demonstrate her flawless beauty.
 
Tony is all excited about a so called "peer reviewd" critique of Cass. Except that the "critique" was done by am astronomer, a geographer, a mathmetician, and at least three fringe troon activists including Florence Ashley and Natch Kennedy. Basically all people with no relevant qualifications whatsoever and massive conflicts of interest.

Screenshot 2025-05-10 091331.webp
Screenshot 2025-05-10 091611.webpScreenshot 2025-05-10 091511.webpScreenshot 2025-05-10 091447.webpScreenshot 2025-05-10 091409.webpScreenshot 2025-05-10 091425.webp

Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims
 
Tony is all excited about a so called "peer reviewed" critique of Cass.
Literally the first objection in the Noone et al paper is that the seven systematic reviews on which Cass is based (from the University of York) excluded non-English-language papers. Where do you even start with this? Is there a deep vein transgender research written only in Japanese or German? The international language of science is English. Crazy.

Here's a brief thread by Ben Ryan about this (archive), including a post by one of the authors alleging that the people who peer-reviewed the York systematic reviews were bribed.
GqmA_XKX0AAfYge.webp
McLamore post on Bluesky (archive).

Edit: I couldn't help myself and skimmed it. It's as much a work of activism and not of science as are Tony's blog posts. Check this shit out:
Noone et al said:
The authors also claim there was a two-phase growth in referrals for GAC, with an “acceleration” in 2015, without justifying this by statistically modelling the claim and comparing it to alternative models.
Figure 11 of the Cass report, showing referrals to GIDS. Note the change in angle in 2014-15. Note that the slope between 2014-15 and 2017-18 is substantially steeper than the period up to 2014-15.
20250510-181323-1.webp
Anyone with eyes can see that there was an acceleration in referrals. The purpose of the Noone et al paper is not to make meaningful claims against the Cass report, but just to make those claims in such a way that it appears to have authority ("a peer-reviewed critique of the Cass report"!). Literally no different from any other bullshit "trans science" shat out by Jack Turban or whoever.
 
Last edited:
How can this nonsense be a peer review when Dr Cass is a world renowned pediatrician and these people are not? They're LBGT grifters who have a clear bias in their reasons for contributing to this shit. Calling it a peer review is a feeble attempt to muddy the waters of what they're really doing. They're just trying to throw something together that the trannies can scream about and hope the noise confuses the normies.
 
Literally the first objection in the Noone et al paper is that the seven systematic reviews on which Cass is based (from the University of York) excluded non-English-language papers. Where do you even start with this? Is there a deep vein transgender research written only in Japanese or German? The international language of science is English. Crazy.
Lol, yeah English is the language of academia, Swedish papers for example are written in both Swedish and English to get recognition outside of the country.
 
Back
Top Bottom