CN How Bad Is China’s Economy? The Data Needed to Answer Is Vanishing - Beijing has stopped publishing hundreds of statistics, making it harder to know what’s going on in the country

image.webp
Alexandra Citrin-Safadi/WSJ

By Rebecca Feng and Jason Douglas
May 4, 2025 9:00 pm ET

Not long ago, anyone could comb through a wide range of official data from China. Then it started to disappear.

Land sales measures, foreign investment data and unemployment indicators have gone dark in recent years. Data on cremations and a business confidence index have been cut off. Even official soy sauce production reports are gone.

In all, Chinese officials have stopped publishing hundreds of data points once used by researchers and investors, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis.

In most cases, Chinese authorities haven’t given any reason for ending or withholding data. But the missing numbers have come as the world’s second biggest economy has stumbled under the weight of excessive debt, a crumbling real-estate market and other troubles—spurring heavy-handed efforts by authorities to control the narrative.

1746416550091.webp

China’s National Bureau of Statistics stopped publishing some numbers related to unemployment in urban areas in recent years. After an anonymous user on the bureau’s website asked why one of those data points had disappeared, the bureau said only that the ministry that provided it stopped sharing the data.

1746416564990.webp

The disappearing data have made it harder for people to know what’s going on in China at a pivotal time, with the trade war between Washington and Beijing expected to hit China hard and weaken global growth. Plunging trade with the U.S. has already led to production shutdowns and job cuts.

Getting a true read on China’s growth has always been tricky. Many economists have long questioned the reliability of China’s headline gross domestic product data, and concerns have intensified recently. Official figures put GDP growth at 5% last year and 5.2% in 2023, but some have estimated that Beijing overstated its numbers by as much as 2 to 3 percentage points.

To get what they consider to be more realistic assessments of China’s growth, economists have turned to alternative sources such as movie box office revenues, satellite data on the intensity of nighttime lights, the operating rates of cement factories and electricity generation by major power companies. Some parse location data from mapping services run by private companies such as Chinese tech giant Baidu to gauge business activity.

One economist said he has been assessing the health of China’s services sector by counting news stories about owners of gyms and beauty salons who abruptly close up and skip town with users’ membership fees.

State of the economy​

Questions over China’s GDP figures go back years. Former Chinese premier Li Keqiang famously told the U.S. ambassador in 2007 that GDP data for a Chinese province he governed at the time were “man-made” and therefore unreliable, according to a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable. Instead, he said he kept track of electricity consumption, rail-freight volumes and new bank loans.

Official GDP figures were “for reference only,” he confided to the ambassador, according to the cable. Li died in October 2023.

China’s official GDP growth of 5% in 2024 exactly matched the target the government had set the previous year. Economists privately dismissed the figure, with one telling the Journal it would have been more credible if authorities had released something lower. Retail sales, construction activity and other data painted a considerably weaker picture, they noted.

Bank of Finland and Capital Economics have generally found bigger swings in GDP than what China reports—and its estimates are lower than official figures in recent quarters.

1746416306035.webp

In December, a prominent Chinese economist at state-owned SDIC Securities, Gao Shanwen, said at a conference in Washington that China’s economic growth “might be around 2%” the past few years, adding, “we do not know the true number of China’s real growth figure.”

China’s leader Xi Jinping ordered that Gao be disciplined and he has been banned from speaking publicly for an unspecified period. The Securities Association of China warned brokerages in late December to ensure their economists “play a positive role” in boosting investor confidence.

China’s statistics bureau has defended its data practices, saying that data quality has improved over the years and that it has taken steps to ensure accuracy and investigate any misconduct during collection.

In February, Goldman Sachs came up with an alternative way of measuring China’s economic growth by crunching figures such as import data, which can be read as proxies for domestic spending. The thinking was that trade data get published frequently and is hard to fudge, since China’s trading partners also report those numbers.

That approach implied that China’s growth in 2024 averaged 3.7%. Using a different method, Rhodium Group, a New York-based research outfit, said growth was closer to 2.4% in 2024.

Vanishing act​

Presenting an image of stability is paramount for China’s Communist Party, especially now, with many middle-class Chinese worried about the future and the country entering uncharted territory in its competition with the U.S.

Often, the data that goes missing involves areas of high sensitivity or headaches for Beijing, such as the property market, whose collapse in recent years wiped out billions of dollars of household wealth and triggered protests by frustrated home buyers.

During the boom years, China’s developers furiously bought up land from local governments at sky-high prices. The transactions poured money into local governments’ coffers and signaled future development plans, a key driver of the economy.

The downturn began in 2021, after Beijing tightened credit on the sector. With home sales falling and real-estate developers going bankrupt, a Chinese think tank called Beike Research Institute released a report in 2022 that found the average housing vacancy rate among 28 Chinese cities was higher than the average in the U.S. and other places—a sign of oversupply.

The report drew attention because China doesn’t release an official vacancy rate, and property analysts were trying to figure out how badly developers had overbuilt. A few days later, Beike retracted the report and apologized, saying that some of the data had errors. Analysts said they believed the group pulled the data under government pressure.

Official data went away, too.

Figures show the value of land sales plummeted 48% in 2022—a big problem for heavily indebted local governments, which suddenly lacked funds to pay salaries or carry on with infrastructure projects. That data disappeared at the start of 2023.

1746416340059.webp

In this case, there are still private data providers that gather individual land transactions at the local level from public records.

By mid-2023, much of the talk locally revolved around the dismal job market for young people. Many of the students finishing college didn’t have job offers, and viral social-media posts showed them dressed in caps and gowns splayed out motionless on the ground, interpreted by many as a form of silent protest.

Around that time, the official youth unemployment rate hit a record 21.3%. Zhang Dandan, a Peking University economist, made headlines saying she thought China’s true youth unemployment rate might be as high as 46.5%.

In August 2023, authorities announced they would stop releasing the youth unemployment rate, saying they needed to revisit how they calculated the figures.

1746416356314.webp

Five months later, Beijing began releasing a new data series. The real youth jobless rate, it said, was 14.9%.

Officials said the new data series excluded nearly 62 million people who were studying full-time in universities, and so shouldn’t be counted as jobless. But that didn’t make sense to economists. Statistics typically count anyone actively looking for a job as unemployed, including full-time students.

Investor flight​

In April 2024, China’s stock market was teetering as economic worries deepened. Foreign investors dumped more than $2 billion of Chinese stocks over a two-week span, spooking domestic individual investors.

China’s two major exchanges in Shanghai and Shenzhen abruptly announced that they would stop publishing real-time data on inflows and outflows of foreign investors. The Shanghai Stock Exchange said in a statement that it was aligning its practices with other international markets, which don’t disclose real-time trading data of specific groups of investors.

After authorities stopped publishing the real-time data in mid-May, the CSI 300 benchmark index continued its decline for four consecutive months, until authorities announced a blitz of measures to support the country’s weakening economy in September.

Some data are still publicly available but harder to get. Beijing passed a law in 2021 that caused data providers to make certain information—such as corporate registry data and satellite images—accessible only in mainland China.

Chinese data provider Wind Information started to limit international users’ access to certain data sets, such as online retail shopping figures and land-auction records, in early 2023. That led one economist at a foreign bank in Hong Kong to start making regular weekend trips to the neighboring mainland city of Shenzhen to download data, the economist told the Journal.

Also gone in recent years: official figures on Chinese toll road operators’ year-end debt balances and the number of new stock-market investors.

1746416445103.webp

China stopped publishing national cremation data after it ended its controversial zero-Covid policy to contain the virus in late 2022—a move some analysts had estimated could lead to between 1.3 million and 2.1 million deaths. The government also censored discussions about the impact of the virus on social media.

The country’s low fertility rate has become a major economic liability—and some data pointing to it is gone, too. In the mid-2000s, an economist named Yi Fuxian questioned the accuracy of China’s population data and argued that tuberculosis vaccinations were a better measure of population growth because every newborn in China is required to be vaccinated.

In 2020, 5.4 million such vaccines were administered, according to data compiled by the private Chinese think tank Forward Business and Intelligence. Chinese authorities said the country recorded 12.1 million births that year.

A year later, the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control discontinued the weekly data release of tuberculosis vaccines administered, along with other vaccine data.

Some information that has disappeared defies explanation. Data providing estimates of the size of elementary school toilets stopped being released in 2022, then resumed publication in February. Official soy sauce production data stopped appearing in May 2021, and hasn’t returned.

Source (Archive)
 
Thank you for this completely non-informative post. It’s an absolute pain in the ass to go to Chinese as tourist even from a visa-free country, so I’m curious what you mean by this
It’s better than posting a bunch of fake shit like you just did. It’s a pain in the ass getting a visa for China compared to other countries. You have to list like 10 years of travel history in addition to showing up for a meeting in person. They just added 38 (mostly) developed countries to the visa free list.
Outside of about three areas, there is no English in China. I don’t even think the general populace even understands that foreigners don’t speak Chinese. If you go anywhere they will attempt to speak to you in Chinese first.
That really has no bearing on my statement that the Federal Government is making international tourism easier.
China has the most ridiculous bureaucracy of any developed country in the world. Your passport will be asked for about fifty million times. You will not be able to book a hotel or train ticket without needing to go through a bunch of unnecessary hoops because you don’t have Chinese ID.
This isn’t really true. Historically, hotels were required to achieve certification to receive foreigners. This could be interpreted negatively (these niggas discriminating me) or positively (e.g. an attempt to protect the reputation of Chinese tourism). In any case, that is not a federal requirement and the federal Govt has ordered all localities to ensure all hotels allow foreigners. Even so, some localities may not have as yet be fully in compliance. Doesn’t change the fact that the Federal Govt is taking steps to make life easier for tourists.

Anecdotally I always found the passport shit overblown. I think I’ve been asked for passport a handful of times, mostly just at airports, cross-country train, and hotel check in. Even outside of so-called T1 cities. I once got stopped on the street by an immigration official in Vietnam but not in China.
Something as basic as paying for a meal or getting a taxi requires esoteric knowledge of Chinese apps, none of which have very good English modes.

Getting a Chinese phone number isn’t really practical for tourists.
This was another instance of needing passport. Luckily I had to bring it to get through immigration so I was good. Literally just go into a cellphone store and choose a phone number. Some random 20-something might even help you to practice his English. Needing a ID for a mobile is also a requirement here in Aus so I wasn’t offended.
You can’t get a WeChat without knowing someone Chinese. Credit cards are still stigmatized. ‘Visa? Wtf is that. We only take UnionPay. We don’t take cash.’
I don’t know if credit card is stigmatised so much as just not common. Unfortunately in recent years cash has fallen out of favour although TBH the overwhelming majority of places do take it. Acknowledging that if you don’t have the Chinese app which everybody else is using it’s gonna take a while to order but at the same time… you’re a tourist who doesn’t speak the language - what do you expect?

There was a brief period in which foreigners couldn’t use WeChat/AliPay (due to no Chinese bank acc) and cash was also falling out of favour. However, again, the Chinese Govt has changed banking regulations and foreigners can set up WeChatPay and AliPay to pay for goods and services on their holiday.
Want to know what it’s like to deal with Chinese websites? Book a flight direct on one of the Mainland carriers: China Southern, China Eastern, or Air China. The websites barely work. Most Chinese companies rely on WeChat mini-apps now, which are not very accessible to foreigners who don’t speak Chinese (if they can even get a WeChat account).
Agree their websites suck but not really sure what the federal Government’s response here is. Order them to fix their websites? Lol.
Digital safety is still a big problem. Free Wi-Fi? Congrats, you have malware.
Not my experience on an iPhone.
International food? Non-existent. All food in China is Chinese and some international fast food outside of a few areas.
You’re in China what did you expect retard? There is a lot of regional variation though.
People who go to China for tourism mainly go to the so-called ‘tier 1’ cities for short stints or go with tour groups. That’s what the government wants. I don’t see them doing anything to make it easier for tourists to explore parts of the country that are actually reflective of living conditions for most of the population.
Sure and that’s a reasonable type of tourism to encourage. At the same time they aren’t discouraging solo travel and the order to allow international guests at all hotels in particular facilitates it (tbh though it was usually like pod hotels that would reject foreigners anyway so just avoid being poor and you wouldn’t have that issue).
 
In my opinion, China would benefit from decentralization, either into completely separate nations or a Federation like America/Russia.
This is impossible due to the historic claim even the CCP is falling back on.
The "One China" policy is a direct successor to the Mandate of Heaven, under which it was the right of the "correct" dynasty to unify China under one banner.

China will never federalize in any meaningful way, because it goes against the core identity the ruling class has been propping up for the past 1000 years.
 
No one tell him that China is modernized with several levels of government just like western countries. The rampant corruption and extreme culture of lying about everything is what keeps fucking them over every time.
The way China’s government is structured is nothing like a free country. It’s much more like the Soviet Union. The turnover rate for government positions is really high. People are constantly changing roles. Departments are continually getting restructured. There is little point to the structures because it’s all controlled by the Beijing CCP anyway. Discourse and debate is an illusion. It’s all smoke and mirrors to make it seem like the country is ‘developing’ and ‘reforming’ when in reality it’s all just a power struggle for CCP members. The government structure doesn’t exist to provide a rule of law, it exists to justify the CCP’s own actions.
That really has no bearing on my statement that the Federal Government is making international tourism easier.
Why not? My thesis is that Xi Jinping wants to move China towards a more Marxist state. Making the overall country less accessible to tourists aligns with that, and less English, the lingua franca, discourages tourism. This is exasperated by the plan to drop English from schools.
This was another instance of needing passport. Luckily I had to bring it to get through immigration so I was good. Literally just go into a cellphone store and choose a phone number. Some random 20-something might even help you to practice his English. Needing a ID for a mobile is also a requirement here in Aus so I wasn’t offended.
So you do need to use your passport a lot. And you’re an Aussie, a straight-up totalitarian state, so your opinions go in the trash.
I don’t know if credit card is stigmatised so much as just not common. Unfortunately in recent years cash has fallen out of favour although TBH the overwhelming majority of places do take it. Acknowledging that if you don’t have the Chinese app which everybody else is using it’s gonna take a while to order but at the same time… you’re a tourist who doesn’t speak the language - what do you expect?

There was a brief period in which foreigners couldn’t use WeChat/AliPay (due to no Chinese bank acc) and cash was also falling out of favour. However, again, the Chinese Govt has changed banking regulations and foreigners can set up WeChatPay and AliPay to pay for goods and services on their holiday.
In no other country in the world do you need to deal with any of this bullshit.
Agree their websites suck but not really sure what the federal Government’s response here is. Order them to fix their websites? Lol.
If they wanted to encourage foreigners to use these carriers to go anywhere, that’s exactly what they’d do. Instead the government encourages tour groups to book the planes for them to specific itineraries.
Not my experience on an iPhone.
This isn’t a matter of opinion. Corporate policy at various major institutions, public or private, is to not bring anything sensitive into China.
You’re in China what did you expect retard? There is a lot of regional variation though.
Basically every other developed country in the world has access to a variety of different foods. Even countries less developed than China have more options for food. I can’t stay in the mainland for more than a week because I get fucking tired of the food.

The only real points you’ve made to show that it’s easier for foreigners to travel to China is making it easier to stay at hotels and some more visa-free countries, meanwhile anyone who has been paying attention can see that China has continually focused on ensuring its people are tracked and controlled as much as possible through unusual methods of travel control (compared to other countries), discouraging the use of cash and bank cards for apps whose accounts can be deleted for any reason, not making the use of foreign apps or internet services accessible to even visitors, not accommodating methods of services preferred by foreigners (i.e. websites, English apps) and discouraging the use of English.
 
This isn’t a matter of opinion. Corporate policy at various major institutions, public or private, is to not bring anything sensitive into China.
That policy is in place for all countries as they all reserve the right to search your electronics. In fact, it is well known that the main panty sniffer is the USA.
The only real points you’ve made to show that it’s easier for foreigners to travel to China is making it easier to stay at hotels and some more visa-free countries
Yes, my belief that Chinese Government is attempting to encourage international tourism is based on following recent policies of the Government of China:
  • Citizens of an additional 38 Western nations allowed free travel for 30 days
  • Universal access to hotels for foreigners
  • Changes in banking regulations to allow foreigners to use domestic payment systems.
Your position, that the Chinese Government is attempting to reduce international tourism, is based on the following observations and opinions:
  • You don’t like that Chinese people speak Chinese
  • You don’t like that Chinese people use a native digital infrastructure
  • You don’t like Chinese food
  • China isn’t restructuring their entire society to make a 1 week holiday more convenient for you.
Congratulations, you’re retarded. What’s your next hot take, South Korea hates America because they don’t use Google Maps?
 
Your position, that the Chinese Government is attempting to reduce international tourism.
That has never been my position. My position is that whatever international tourism China is attempting to promote is not in conflict with Xi Jinping’s desire to bring China’s economy more in line with a Marxist state. This is because the encouragement of international tourism is designed around encouraging people to come to accessible ‘tier 1’ cities where prices and development are relatively high, bringing money into the country and presenting a crafted image of China. The Chinese government does not want international tourism in the rest of the country and hardly does anything, if at all, to promote it. That you can’t distinguish between these two concepts shows how retarded Australians are.
 
That has never been my position. My position is that whatever international tourism China is attempting to promote is not in conflict with Xi Jinping’s desire to bring China’s economy more in line with a Marxist state. This is because the encouragement of international tourism is designed around encouraging people to come to accessible ‘tier 1’ cities where prices and development are relatively high, bringing money into the country and presenting a crafted image of China. The Chinese government does not want international tourism in the rest of the country and hardly does anything, if at all, to promote it. That you can’t distinguish between these two concepts shows how retarded Australians are.
It’s embarrassing that you’ve had to walk your initial claim so far back lol now it’s just guilty of not promoting one specific form of tourism enough? Wake me up with Trump is encouraging Japs to go visit Lowndes County Alabama, I guess.

Also if think we aren’t in disagreement then why do you keep trying to argue with me about it, you spastic?
 
It’s embarrassing that you’ve had to walk your initial claim so far back lol now it’s just guilty of not promoting one specific form of tourism enough? Wake me up with Trump is encouraging Japs to go visit Lowndes County Alabama, I guess.

Also if think we aren’t in disagreement then why do you keep trying to argue with me about it, you spastic?
This was my initial claim:
I believe there was a failed coup after the Covid period and part of this is the fall out from that. Xi wants to start sealing the country up and return more towards a Marxist economy.
I never walked that back.

Your argument is that Xi does not want to start sealing up the country because the government did three things to make it easy for people to visit China, without considering either any other multi-order effects of how those three things could go back to reinforcing my argument, nor any of the other things going on in China that would reinforce my argument. In short, you tried to use a flippant, undeveloped argument to try to discredit my point and are now malding because I pointed out how you’re being an idiot.

You literally are a smooth brain retard who can’t understand multi-order effects and just thinks that what a state enacts as policy does what the state says will happen, i.e. an Australian.
 
If orange man actually manages to total retard war the chinks into economic ruin without firing a shot he will go down as the most consequential American president of the 21st century. The CCP has been a global thorn since it infiltrated mainland China and that system will have to be utterly broken, and with their eyes on Taiwan, nuking their economy is probably the only way to see them collapse without having a global war because even commie soldiers expect a paycheck.
 
If orange man actually manages to total retard war the chinks into economic ruin without firing a shot he will go down as the most consequential American president of the 21st century. The CCP has been a global thorn since it infiltrated mainland China and that system will have to be utterly broken, and with their eyes on Taiwan, nuking their economy is probably the only way to see them collapse without having a global war because even commie soldiers expect a paycheck.
And when the CCP will ran out of paycheck, the SHTF real big.
 
It's literally the soviet union all over again. It boggles the mind that there are still communists in this world it all ends the same, always (although china is more fascist than communist these days).
No, it's all three Marxist Empires. The Washington Empire, Soviet Union and the CCP. The USSR is dead, Washington Empire is mortally wounded and the CCP is joining the fall
 
It's a good attitude to just assume everyone lies.
Look at how Spain supposedly has a larger GDP than Russia, while one can outproduce NATO in weapons while the other has nationwide blackouts
They count government spending on GDP, I'm pretty sure that alone makes it a fake and gay measurement. Can't account for a country like Russia that actually produces the raw materials it needs, so while Russia may have a smaller GDP, it's economic production is more real as opposed to moving numbers on excel spreadsheets and sending e-mails.
 
Used to watch Peter Zeihan before he caught terminal TDS. He'd brought this issue up quite some time ago.
Zeihan is a guy who knows JUST enough about a lot of things to fool people who are completely ignorant of a subject that he has a comprehensive understanding of it. Once you hear him attempt to talk confidently about something you personally know a lot about, you realize he's a total bullshit artist.

Not that he's necessarily wrong about China, but if he's right it wouldn't be because he has any particular insight on the matter.
 
Back