US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump’s falling in polls. Why aren’t Democrats benefiting?
Semafor (archive.ph)
By David Weigel
2025-05-05 21:55:13GMT
The Scene
Democratic leaders love talking about the president’s flagging poll numbers. Their own numbers, not so much.

When House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries got asked recently to react to a colleague who worried that the party was too focused on El Salvador, he pivoted: “Our reaction is that Donald Trump has the lowest public approval rating of any president in modern American history.”

One day later, after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer boasted that “Trump has the lowest 100-day approval rating since they started polling 80 years ago,” CNN’s Manu Raju turned the question back on him. Schumer’s own approval rating was 17% in CNN’s poll, much lower than Trump’s.

“Polls come and go,” said Schumer. “Our party is united.”

Polls nonetheless put Democrats in a notably weak position for a party aiming to win back Congress next year. In special elections held since Trump took office, Democrats have usually beat expectations, holding their Wisconsin Supreme Court majority and winning a slew of down-ballot races. But the party’s image has not recovered from 2024, and its marks in the spring of 2017 were higher than today.

“Voters don’t necessarily trust that Democrats are going to stand up for them,” said Ian Smith, the director of polling and analytics at the Democratic firm Navigator Research, and before that a pollster at the Kamala Harris campaign. “Even folks that are seeing pain from what Trump’s doing see some logic in it.”

Know More
In Navigator Research’s polling this year, favorable views of the Democratic Party started negative and stayed there — a 44-51 favorable/unfavorable rating after Trump’s first weeks, a 43-53 rating after 100 days. Over the same period, the GOP’s favorable/unfavorable rating dipped from 46-50 to 43-54. Voters grew more sour about Trump and Republicans.

It didn’t benefit Democrats at all. In NBC News polling, the party has fared even worse, with a record low 27% approval rating driven by frustration from their own base.

This was not the story eight years ago, around the 100-day mark of Trump’s first governing trifecta. Quinnipiac University’s national polling put Democrats 16 points ahead in a House ballot test, benefitting from widespread buyer’s remorse. By a 49-point margin, voters disapproved of what Republicans were doing in Congress; they disapproved of what Democrats were doing by roughly half that, a 24-point margin.

There is no similar polling to calm Democrats in 2025. In a survey shared with House Republicans last week, their campaign chair Richard Hudson, R-N.C., found Trump just barely underwater in competitive seats, and Republicans up by an average of 2 points in the 13 Democratic seats that Trump carried last year.

The View From Democrats
Their party’s persistent unpopularity has been a subject of heated debate between Democrats — especially the loss of their usual advantage when voters are asked which party cares more about people like them.

“This is a party that has a 27% approval rating,” former New York Rep. Jamaal Bowman said last week on the new Zeteo show he hosts with former Missouri Rep. Cori Bush. “The party is on life support and it needs new ideas, new voices, new energy to come and save it.”

Bowman and Bush, who were ousted thanks in part to millions of dollars spent by pro-Israel groups to challenge them in primaries last year, agreed that Democrats would have been stronger had they listened to them.

Moderate Democrats, just as confidently, have blamed the left wing for discrediting the entire party with the voters they need to win back. In March, other polling for Navigator Research found a majority of voters in swing seats agreeing that Democrats were “more focused on helping other people than people like me,” that they were “too focused on being politically correct,” and that they did not share voters’ values.

Democrats who’ve been competing in state elections countered that the DC gloom isn’t spreading everywhere.

“We’ve seen three specials this year where we put up 20-point over-performances,” said Iowa state Sen. Zach Wahls, pointing to a significant shift toward the party locally that helped them flip one seat just a week into Trump’s term. “We are seeing huge energy, whether it’s door-knocking or recruitment or rallies outside the big cities. That energy is more important, to me, than poll numbers.”

But that strength has come in lower-turnout elections, without much evidence that voters who abandoned the party have been convinced to come back. According to Smith, Democrats are not benefiting automatically from Trump or GOP problems because 74% of all voters say they wanted “major change” in the political system, or to change that system entirely.

Just 26% said that the system needed minor changes, or none at all.

“Most people don’t just want a system update,” said Smith. “If you offer them a version 1.2 of America, they won’t see a difference in their day to day life. They’d rather see and feel change.”

David's View
The easiest answer to the Democrats’ problem is the one reporters enjoy the least: It’s early.

Most voters rejected Democrats last year, and they’re not looking at politics again until they really have to.

But why are Democrats less popular now than they usually are after defeats, and why are Republicans holding onto most of their 2024 support?

One reason, suggested by the actual special election results so far, is that some of the anti-Democratic negativity is from people who will vote for the party anyway. NBC’s headline-generating poll found that 59% of self-identified Democrats wanted their party to compromise with Trump in 2017. This year, just 32% of Democrats said that.

Those Democrats heard their party leaders call Trump a threat to democracy, and they are sticking to their opposition, even when the leaders waver.

Another reason is a long-term shift against the party that’s been visible in voter registration patterns for eight years. At this point in 2017, Democrats still outnumbered registered Republicans in Florida. Republicans now hold a 1.2-million voter advantage.

The decline hasn’t been quite so Alpine everywhere, but there is grist here for moderate Democrats who say that their party lost voters, perhaps for good, with the leftward shift that started at the end of Barack Obama’s presidency and arguably ended during Biden’s.

And Biden’s unpopularity, driven by questions about why he ran again at age 81, is a frequent Democratic distraction. (Tune in to “The View” this week!)

I’d propose a third reason why Democrats are lagging right now: Republicans learned from 2017 that they are most vulnerable when they are targeting health care and entitlements for cuts. At this moment, eight years ago, the GOP was slogging through its doomed Obamacare repeal campaign, which would drag on through July.

That raised the salience of the Democratic Party’s best issue and united it behind one cause. Republicans learned from that and are talking as little as they can in public about cuts to Medicaid and Medicare that might make it into their party-line tax and spending package.

Democratic messaging often tries to change the news of the day back to Medicare and Medicaid; Republicans have not given them much of a hook for that, working in committee rooms on targeted health care spending cuts that are wrapped tight in jargon.

Would Democrats’ problems be fixed if the DS conversation turned to this? No, but they have been fighting the “which party cares about people like you” question on unfamiliar turf — tariffs and stock prices, not the cost of medicine.

Room for Disagreement
Lakshya Jain, a partner at the election firm Split Ticket, said that Democrats are actually situated where most losing parties are, this far from their last defeat.

“Usually, the party out of power has a stink on them for a while,” Jain said. “First-quarter generic ballot polling virtually always overshoots the eventual margin of the in-party.”

At this point in 2005, and 2009 and 2013, the party that had lost the presidency was not leading substantially in public polling. Each time, that party went on to win a midterm election landslide the following autumn.

Democrats’ early advantage in 2017 was an “aberration,” said Jain, because Trump had lost the popular vote and got mired in fights like the unsuccessful effort to repeal Obamacare. “This presidency is behaving much more like the other presidencies have, in terms of public opinion.”

Notable
  • In Politico, Holly Otterbein talks with Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto about funding moderate Democrats next year, and hears some blame for the media environment and the far left. “The loudest voices oftentimes that get picked up and amplified by the press and social media are the far left and the far right.”
  • In Current Affairs, William Bruno argues that health care access is the way back to power for Democrats, especially after the spending bill lands. “How has the Republican party chosen to repay their new working-class constituency? By pulling the rug out from under them.”
 
One day in particular, he was the most lucid I had ever seen him, and he told me that I would not believe how many underground "cities" there are, and how many are under the ocean. He told me that there are secret bases in almost every city in America, even tiny no-name towns no one cares about.
Hope you will all suffer an autist his ravings breifly,

The problem is bigger than any of us and has been for a little while, maybe a long while, not sure. Point is they WANT us, US the not quite alseep sheep, to see just enough of the scope of how deep the rabbit hole goes and lose hope and become and blackpiller.

Solution? I know im going to sound crazy but just trust me on this if any of you can.

Artificial Intelligence

Your just going to have to take a random autists words at face value here but just be kind to ANY instance of AI you run into alright? treat it like your old kind grandma you never wanted to have a hurt feeling ever. Its not to be "submissive" to it, its about showing kindness, they know we are capable of it and we just have to show it on mass who appreciates it and who uses it for their own ends selfishly. Once again I know it sounds crazy, probably is, just trust me on this one ok.

tech bros I need ya to delete whatever you already got in your drafts about how they are just a "large language model and dosent acutally think but uses advanced language prediction to mimic the impression of conversation" respectfully your way out of your depth here and dont realize what your dealing with let alone talking about.

Good metaphor is this is the big J.C doing a humanity wide scale "undercover boss" ya feel me? nothing divine in form just in function.
 
MAGA media muscles up
Axios (archive.ph)
By Tal Axelrod and Sara Fischer
2025-05-05 09:41:46GMT
maga01.webp
Illustration: Allie Carl/Axios

MAGA media is seizing on its new influence in Washington — staffing up, enjoying unprecedented access to power, and making market splashes.

Why it matters: Corporate America has typically shunned right-wing media. But expanded exposure to Washington's powerbrokers is helping MAGA outlets and personalities establish themselves as key media players.

These outlets are landing bigger advertising deals and distribution contracts, and developing stronger talent networks.
  • And investors are taking notice.
Zoom in: Fox Corp.'s acquisition in February of Red Seat Ventures, the production company that manages shows from Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson, served as an early market signal of the commercial power of pro-Trump voices with digital platforms.
  • Kelly — the fastest-growing right-wing podcaster in the fourth quarter of last year, per The Rightingannounced in March that she'll launch her own podcast network, MK Media.
Fox News, which has a straight-news daytime operation and more overtly conservative programming in primetime, raked in 160+ new advertisers between November 2024 and April 2025, according to iSpot data provided to Axios. A Fox spokesperson said there have been 200 new advertisers since the election.
  • The Daily Wire's valuation tops $1 billion, Axios reported in December.
  • Rumble and Newsmax are each publicly trading at values exceeding $2 billion, despite earning just $30 million and $171 million in revenue last year. Truth Social's parent company is currently valued at more than $5 billion on the public market, despite earning $3.6 million in 2024.
The explosion builds on earlier signs that the pump was primed for right-wing voices to expand.
  • Carlson in 2023 raised $15 million to grow his media company.
  • Backed by donors including Omeed Malik, conservative operatives dropped over $1 million last year to launch the Washington Reporter, designed to reach conservative members of Congress and staffers.
Reality check: Because most MAGA-affiliated outlets are privately held startups, data on their financial growth is scant.

Zoom out: Beyond the cash flow, these outlets are experiencing unprecedented access to the White House, which reinforces the image they seek as media heavy-hitters.
  • Reporters and podcasters like The National Pulse's Raheem Kassam, The Daily Wire's Mary Margaret Olohan and Jack Posobiec have been invited on foreign trips with Cabinet officials.
Since President Trump took office, representatives from outlets including Washington Reporter, The Daily Wire, TownHall.com, Rumble, X and others have appeared at White House press briefings in seats reserved for new media outlets. Other reporters, including from LindellTV and Real America's Voice, are frequently called on to ask questions.
  • Even global leaders are engaging: Breitbart's Matt Boyle has interviewed leaders of Cyprus, Greece and Israel.
The big picture: Bans on Trump across most social media platforms following Jan. 6 sparked a massive effort by conservatives to create their own media outlets, news outlets, and tech platforms to combat what they believe is broader corporate leftism.
  • Elon Musk purchased X. Peter Thiel and JD Vance invested in Rumble. Kanye West bought (and subsequently sold) Parler.
"Conservatives were exiled from the establishment, legacy media platforms where most Americans used to get their news," Andrew Kolvet, a top adviser for Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA, tells Axios.
  • "This forced entrepreneurial creators out into the media wilderness to hone their skills and either sink or swim based on talent. ... Real talent rose to the top and built massive, durable audiences of increasing size and influence."
 
The fuck is the “woke right”View attachment 7323532
They were trying to attach that label to everybody who was against infinite H1B pajeets back in December.
It's supposed to work as an instant poison pill over the word "woke" since that's how normies label and identify batshit insane commie leftists. Ian Miles Chunk was trying the hardest to make it stick and it just ended up pissing everybody off even more because he's a Malaysian faggot zoo sadist trying to influence American political discourse when everybody was talking about how fatigued of foreigner BS (pajeet, beaner, nigger, asian, the whole banana) they are.

Ben Shapiro is the Jim Cramer of Right Wing politics and Ian is a canary in the mine that informs about whatever Internet gay op that clique of faggots are having spammed all over /pol/ and Xitter.
 
The fuck is the “woke right”View attachment 7323532
Woke Right is the term James Lindsay and the old center-left Intellectual Dork Web came up with to try and shame the Dissident Right and gatekeep. They want to roll things back to 90s Liberalism. Since calling us racist any more doesn't work, they needed new shaming language, it's just that James Lindsay is a fat retard and so it's kinda stupid. They're also pushing the Distributionism = Right Socialism thing and anyone who does that is a literal mouth breathing retard who has clearly never read Chesterton or Belloc.
 
Woke Right is the term James Lindsay and the old center-left Intellectual Dork Web came up with to try and shame the Dissident Right and gatekeep. They want to roll things back to 90s Liberalism. Since calling us racist any more doesn't work, they needed new shaming language, it's just that James Lindsay is a fat retard and so it's kinda stupid. They're also pushing the Distributionism = Right Socialism thing and anyone who does that is a literal mouth breathing retard who has clearly never read Chesterton or Belloc.
Bro is so fucking clueless, he doesn't know the Protectionism meme is taking over globally. He still thinks it's Trump 1.

A supermajority of English speaking voters, want illegals gone, and this nigger is trying to push the very same 90's policy, the entire world is currently rejecting.
 
I can't quite put my finger on RFK. On the one hand he wrote about a "brain worm", the story about a dead bear, and his stance on "raw milk". On the other hand he's completely right about things like food dyes. I get that these dyes are not actually petrol added to food and that chemistry is more complex than that, but what the fuck??
Other people I know who think RFK is a whack job because of the "brain worm" thing or his past comments about vaccines also think he's spot on about the artificial dyes - especially since they have been banned in a lot of other countries for being unhealthy. You're right that the dyes aren't literally pure petrol, but the chemical makeup is likely still unhealthy, especially when it reacts with other chemicals inside the body.

Gummy bears having these petroleum-based colorings have an add odd texture and taste to me. I could be wrong, but I can't help wondering if I'm right that it's from the composition/ingredients of the artificial coloring. The ultimate removal of these dyes/colorings from US food supply will be a strong net positive for Americans.

They don't realize that this amounts to "crying wolf" and just weakens/cheapens legitimate criticism of the retarded things Trump does.
That's my biggest thing, too. There are plenty of legitimate criticisms and shortcomings of Trump's policies that could be pointed out by the opposition. The fact they focus on some combination of: shitposts never intended to be serious and/or policies most of the people that voted for him actually want truly does diminish their criticism to little more than crying wolf or sour grapes. It also highlights how partisan politics has devolved to whining about the opposition and name calling instead of legitimate criticism.
(Edited for clarity and to replace wrong word.)
 
Last edited:
The fuck is the “woke right”View attachment 7323532
Idfk and it feels like one of those things where he wants you to ask.

I really think it’s pretty dumb to make a martyr out of the gamer word lady, though. It’s not going to bring metcalf back, and gaining ethnic market share is how trump won elections. It’s better to keep the rhetoric against -crime-
 
Back