CN How Bad Is China’s Economy? The Data Needed to Answer Is Vanishing - Beijing has stopped publishing hundreds of statistics, making it harder to know what’s going on in the country

image.webp
Alexandra Citrin-Safadi/WSJ

By Rebecca Feng and Jason Douglas
May 4, 2025 9:00 pm ET

Not long ago, anyone could comb through a wide range of official data from China. Then it started to disappear.

Land sales measures, foreign investment data and unemployment indicators have gone dark in recent years. Data on cremations and a business confidence index have been cut off. Even official soy sauce production reports are gone.

In all, Chinese officials have stopped publishing hundreds of data points once used by researchers and investors, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis.

In most cases, Chinese authorities haven’t given any reason for ending or withholding data. But the missing numbers have come as the world’s second biggest economy has stumbled under the weight of excessive debt, a crumbling real-estate market and other troubles—spurring heavy-handed efforts by authorities to control the narrative.

1746416550091.webp

China’s National Bureau of Statistics stopped publishing some numbers related to unemployment in urban areas in recent years. After an anonymous user on the bureau’s website asked why one of those data points had disappeared, the bureau said only that the ministry that provided it stopped sharing the data.

1746416564990.webp

The disappearing data have made it harder for people to know what’s going on in China at a pivotal time, with the trade war between Washington and Beijing expected to hit China hard and weaken global growth. Plunging trade with the U.S. has already led to production shutdowns and job cuts.

Getting a true read on China’s growth has always been tricky. Many economists have long questioned the reliability of China’s headline gross domestic product data, and concerns have intensified recently. Official figures put GDP growth at 5% last year and 5.2% in 2023, but some have estimated that Beijing overstated its numbers by as much as 2 to 3 percentage points.

To get what they consider to be more realistic assessments of China’s growth, economists have turned to alternative sources such as movie box office revenues, satellite data on the intensity of nighttime lights, the operating rates of cement factories and electricity generation by major power companies. Some parse location data from mapping services run by private companies such as Chinese tech giant Baidu to gauge business activity.

One economist said he has been assessing the health of China’s services sector by counting news stories about owners of gyms and beauty salons who abruptly close up and skip town with users’ membership fees.

State of the economy​

Questions over China’s GDP figures go back years. Former Chinese premier Li Keqiang famously told the U.S. ambassador in 2007 that GDP data for a Chinese province he governed at the time were “man-made” and therefore unreliable, according to a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable. Instead, he said he kept track of electricity consumption, rail-freight volumes and new bank loans.

Official GDP figures were “for reference only,” he confided to the ambassador, according to the cable. Li died in October 2023.

China’s official GDP growth of 5% in 2024 exactly matched the target the government had set the previous year. Economists privately dismissed the figure, with one telling the Journal it would have been more credible if authorities had released something lower. Retail sales, construction activity and other data painted a considerably weaker picture, they noted.

Bank of Finland and Capital Economics have generally found bigger swings in GDP than what China reports—and its estimates are lower than official figures in recent quarters.

1746416306035.webp

In December, a prominent Chinese economist at state-owned SDIC Securities, Gao Shanwen, said at a conference in Washington that China’s economic growth “might be around 2%” the past few years, adding, “we do not know the true number of China’s real growth figure.”

China’s leader Xi Jinping ordered that Gao be disciplined and he has been banned from speaking publicly for an unspecified period. The Securities Association of China warned brokerages in late December to ensure their economists “play a positive role” in boosting investor confidence.

China’s statistics bureau has defended its data practices, saying that data quality has improved over the years and that it has taken steps to ensure accuracy and investigate any misconduct during collection.

In February, Goldman Sachs came up with an alternative way of measuring China’s economic growth by crunching figures such as import data, which can be read as proxies for domestic spending. The thinking was that trade data get published frequently and is hard to fudge, since China’s trading partners also report those numbers.

That approach implied that China’s growth in 2024 averaged 3.7%. Using a different method, Rhodium Group, a New York-based research outfit, said growth was closer to 2.4% in 2024.

Vanishing act​

Presenting an image of stability is paramount for China’s Communist Party, especially now, with many middle-class Chinese worried about the future and the country entering uncharted territory in its competition with the U.S.

Often, the data that goes missing involves areas of high sensitivity or headaches for Beijing, such as the property market, whose collapse in recent years wiped out billions of dollars of household wealth and triggered protests by frustrated home buyers.

During the boom years, China’s developers furiously bought up land from local governments at sky-high prices. The transactions poured money into local governments’ coffers and signaled future development plans, a key driver of the economy.

The downturn began in 2021, after Beijing tightened credit on the sector. With home sales falling and real-estate developers going bankrupt, a Chinese think tank called Beike Research Institute released a report in 2022 that found the average housing vacancy rate among 28 Chinese cities was higher than the average in the U.S. and other places—a sign of oversupply.

The report drew attention because China doesn’t release an official vacancy rate, and property analysts were trying to figure out how badly developers had overbuilt. A few days later, Beike retracted the report and apologized, saying that some of the data had errors. Analysts said they believed the group pulled the data under government pressure.

Official data went away, too.

Figures show the value of land sales plummeted 48% in 2022—a big problem for heavily indebted local governments, which suddenly lacked funds to pay salaries or carry on with infrastructure projects. That data disappeared at the start of 2023.

1746416340059.webp

In this case, there are still private data providers that gather individual land transactions at the local level from public records.

By mid-2023, much of the talk locally revolved around the dismal job market for young people. Many of the students finishing college didn’t have job offers, and viral social-media posts showed them dressed in caps and gowns splayed out motionless on the ground, interpreted by many as a form of silent protest.

Around that time, the official youth unemployment rate hit a record 21.3%. Zhang Dandan, a Peking University economist, made headlines saying she thought China’s true youth unemployment rate might be as high as 46.5%.

In August 2023, authorities announced they would stop releasing the youth unemployment rate, saying they needed to revisit how they calculated the figures.

1746416356314.webp

Five months later, Beijing began releasing a new data series. The real youth jobless rate, it said, was 14.9%.

Officials said the new data series excluded nearly 62 million people who were studying full-time in universities, and so shouldn’t be counted as jobless. But that didn’t make sense to economists. Statistics typically count anyone actively looking for a job as unemployed, including full-time students.

Investor flight​

In April 2024, China’s stock market was teetering as economic worries deepened. Foreign investors dumped more than $2 billion of Chinese stocks over a two-week span, spooking domestic individual investors.

China’s two major exchanges in Shanghai and Shenzhen abruptly announced that they would stop publishing real-time data on inflows and outflows of foreign investors. The Shanghai Stock Exchange said in a statement that it was aligning its practices with other international markets, which don’t disclose real-time trading data of specific groups of investors.

After authorities stopped publishing the real-time data in mid-May, the CSI 300 benchmark index continued its decline for four consecutive months, until authorities announced a blitz of measures to support the country’s weakening economy in September.

Some data are still publicly available but harder to get. Beijing passed a law in 2021 that caused data providers to make certain information—such as corporate registry data and satellite images—accessible only in mainland China.

Chinese data provider Wind Information started to limit international users’ access to certain data sets, such as online retail shopping figures and land-auction records, in early 2023. That led one economist at a foreign bank in Hong Kong to start making regular weekend trips to the neighboring mainland city of Shenzhen to download data, the economist told the Journal.

Also gone in recent years: official figures on Chinese toll road operators’ year-end debt balances and the number of new stock-market investors.

1746416445103.webp

China stopped publishing national cremation data after it ended its controversial zero-Covid policy to contain the virus in late 2022—a move some analysts had estimated could lead to between 1.3 million and 2.1 million deaths. The government also censored discussions about the impact of the virus on social media.

The country’s low fertility rate has become a major economic liability—and some data pointing to it is gone, too. In the mid-2000s, an economist named Yi Fuxian questioned the accuracy of China’s population data and argued that tuberculosis vaccinations were a better measure of population growth because every newborn in China is required to be vaccinated.

In 2020, 5.4 million such vaccines were administered, according to data compiled by the private Chinese think tank Forward Business and Intelligence. Chinese authorities said the country recorded 12.1 million births that year.

A year later, the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control discontinued the weekly data release of tuberculosis vaccines administered, along with other vaccine data.

Some information that has disappeared defies explanation. Data providing estimates of the size of elementary school toilets stopped being released in 2022, then resumed publication in February. Official soy sauce production data stopped appearing in May 2021, and hasn’t returned.

Source (Archive)
 
1746514622613.webp


1746513974786.webp 1746514187408.webp

New York Times: The World According to China
Stastista: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in China Turns Negative For First Time in 25 Years
Rhodium Group: Two-Way Street: 2019 Update US-China Direct Investment Trends

Empire of Dust (This Is What BRI Winning Looks Like):

The CCP caught Japanese Disease a few decades ago. They expected their phenomenal growth to go on forever, and so began to dump massive amounts of capital in the developing world via their Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). They soon encountered the same problems the World Bank and IMF ran into when sending money to African and South American governments with poor oversight and using dubious Chinese contractors. (see Why Nations Fail for details).

Similar problems developed with domestic investment in state-owned enterprises and incestuous corporate communist schemes like Evergrande. Not every investment has been a disaster - the CCP has managed to build an astounding high speed rail infrastructure - but there's been enough traditional Chinese socialist nepotism and corruption that foreign investment has been drying up. This has been badly exacerbated by Trump's aggressive global trade war.

Per standard socialist operating procedure, this has triggered the CCP to transition from a relatively benign authoritarian relationship with foreign investors to a more traditional Marxist "fuck you" mode.

The CCP publishes economic data to coax higher levels of foreign investment. That foreign investment has dried up for the first time since the Dengist era. Instead the CCP is now investing in military technology and equipment, to include a first-rate navy and air-to-sea missile systems like the YJ and DF series.


"China’s main anti-ship missiles are the YJ-12, YJ-18, YJ-83, DF-21, and DF-26. The YJ-12 serves as a primary weapon for bombers and coastal launchers; the YJ-18 is a primary weapon for submarines and large surface warships; the YJ-83 is fielded by multirole aircraft and surface warships smaller than destroyers; and the DF-21 and DF-26 ballistic missiles are China’s most long-ranged land-based anti-ship weapons."
CIMSEC: China’s Anti-Ship Firepower and Mass Firing Schemes

"American strategists should accept that bilateral trade between the United States and China is no longer the stabilizing factor it once was, though bilateral trade mitigated the risks of political conflict up to about 2008. China emerged from the financial crisis of 2007–08 with buoyed economic confidence, especially after the Chinese economy outperformed all other major economies in 2010 with a gross domestic product growth rate of about 10 percent. The assumption is that Beijing’s leaders became more confident in China’s ability to weather a US trade war."
US Army War College: War with China: A View from Early 2024

Xi Jinping seems to have come to the conclusion that the period of playing nice with the Western devils is over. That means the Indians, Vietnamese, Japanese and especially the South Koreans and Taiwanese should be very nervous.

I am very happy to have divested from China. It's been a shitshow for a while but it's going to get worse.

You lucked out. I saw this coming when Peter Schiff was shilling Chinese investments.

That is another reason to move supply chains out of China.

The real question is whether (or when) the CCP goes full Venezuela on their investors.

And when the CCP will ran out of paycheck, the SHTF real big.

They solved that problem in 1989. The urban elite soldiers are the best educated and trained, but their loyalty is questionable. The troops the CCP can depend on are the illiterate hillbillies from the rural provinces. They work cheap, are uncritically loyal to the CCP and Maoism, and have the added advantage of utterly despising the college kids. Imagine the Chinese version of good old boys from Alabama - the sort that happily fired automatic weapons into unarmed Tiananmen Square protesters.
 
Last edited:
Nigga just stop. You started this “argument” by lying about whether Google is allowed the data (they are).

It literally is as simple as processing the data in Korea because that’s the solution the Korean Govt has presented to Google. Google has the resources and capacity to do this, they just don’t want to.
You are a dumbass. Just because there is a path for Google to getting data does not mean they are, at this present moment, allowed access to that data. That’s like saying everyone from Africa is allowed to go to America without explaining that there is a visa requirement and a complicated consulate process towards getting a visa. Sure, by presenting some very specific and limited definition of ‘allowed’ you can argue that Africans are ‘allowed’ into the United States, but that’s not really what people mean by the common definition of the word.
 
Xi Jinping seems to have come to the conclusion that the period of playing nice with the Western devils is over. That means the Indians, Vietnamese, Japanese and especially the South Koreans and Taiwanese should be very nervous.
Not just them, but probably all of Asia.

This is probably my only concern with the trade wars: China has very good incentive to lash out. I'm hoping their weapons are as tofu dreg-ridden as the rest of their infrastructure.
 
Honestly, the biggest blackhole for thunderdomers and Null is that they are completely retarded about China. I think its right wing angst about the declining West projected outwards. It's a little pathetic ngl, though the CPC (or rather the SEE SEE PEE lol) does not help with the economic and political drama.

The bugmen are gonna win. There will be no catastrophic collapse where the veil will rend. You and your children will be raped by niggers forever without the satisfaction that atleast the chinks smoke and mirror show got found out, sorry.
Tossing in that nigger rape bit makes me think you maybe aren't serious, you're filling out a bingo card instead
 
You are a dumbass. Just because there is a path for Google to getting data does not mean they are, at this present moment, allowed access to that data. That’s like saying everyone from Africa is allowed to go to America without explaining that there is a visa requirement and a complicated consulate process towards getting a visa. Sure, by presenting some very specific and limited definition of ‘allowed’ you can argue that Africans are ‘allowed’ into the United States, but that’s not really what people mean by the common definition of the word.
There is no complicated visa approval process to access the data. There is only a complicated approval process to export the data outside of Korea. Companies which choose to operate within Korea are not subject to that process. Google is not bound by any restrictions, they simply choose not to operate in Korea.
 
There is no complicated visa approval process to access the data. There is only a complicated approval process to export the data outside of Korea. Companies which choose to operate within Korea are not subject to that process. Google is not bound by any restrictions, they simply choose not to operate in Korea.
How can Google be ‘not bound by any restrictions’ while also having a ‘complicated approval process to export the data outside of Korea’?
 
This is probably my only concern with the trade wars: China has very good incentive to lash out.

The CCP is Marxist. That's no joke. It was always a matter of time before they turned on the West.

I'm hoping their weapons are as tofu dreg-ridden as the rest of their infrastructure.

I wouldn't count on it. The PRC may not give a damn about its people but care a great deal about its military infrastructure. Compare the ruinous mess of their ghost cities to the dependable efficiency of their high speed rail. When the Left fascists care about something, it's done right.
 
How can Google be ‘not bound by any restrictions’ while also having a ‘complicated approval process to export the data outside of Korea’?
The access and use of the data is not restricted, only exporting it is. This is in contrast with your lie that South Korea “doesn’t give” the data. It does. It doesn’t allow the data to be exported to foreign powers.
 
Honestly, the biggest blackhole for thunderdomers and Null is that they are completely retarded about China. I think its right wing angst about the declining West projected outwards.

Oh my sweet summer child.

That old capitalist bourgeoisie in top hats evolved to profit from socialist criminality long ago. Socialists may be greedy treacherous criminals but they have no head for business. They know how to steal factories and farms and how to enslave workers but they haven't a clue about how to put capital and labor together to make a profit. The corporate elite quickly realized that they had a management skill set that they could use to provide valuable services for the Left fascists. Socialists have been leasing out workers as slaves for the transnational corporations and have gotten filthy rich on the proceeds ever since.

1746527840796.webp 1746527873431.webp

The fuerdai, China’s second-generation rich kids, are the most loathed group in the country. They’re also its future.

"Of the three groups, only the Low are never even temporarily successful in achieving their aims. It would be an exaggeration to say that throughout history there has been no progress of a material kind. Even today, in a period of decline, the average human being is physically better off than he was a few centuries ago. But no advance in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution has ever brought human equality a millimetre nearer. From the point of view of the Low, no historic change has ever meant much more than a change in the name of their masters.”
-George Orwell, 1984

The bugmen are gonna win. There will be no catastrophic collapse where the veil will rend. You and your children will be raped by niggers forever without the satisfaction that atleast the chinks smoke and mirror show got found out, sorry.

The bugmen are going to get allotted to Left fascist overseers. In the name of diversity, equity and inclusion they will be managed, manipulated, folded, spindled and mutilated, farmed and milked and die poor. The people who own them will live in phenomenal wealth and outrageous leisure and do whatever they please.

1746529317663.webp

Socialism in action.

To be fair, all those prole children are not going to get brutally raped and exploited because their parents are too poor and too exhausted to have them. The bugmen aren't breeding, so unless the limousine Left can start manufacturing proles in breeding tanks to spec they're going to need to train those Third World rapists to make increasingly complex chipsets in clean rooms.

1746528538823.webp

Don't think they aren't working hard on it. Lots of revenue at stake.
 
The access and use of the data is not restricted, only exporting it is. This is in contrast with your lie that South Korea “doesn’t give” the data. It does. It doesn’t allow the data to be exported to foreign powers.
Google is an AMERICAN company you fucking retard. The company cannot access the data without it being exported from Korea because a foreign company accessing content from country is the same as exporting that content.

Maybe the Korean government has afforded for Korean employees working for Google in Korea to access the data, but that does not mean the company has access in the general sense. And I’ve failed to find any information that such a thing has even happened.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji
Google is an AMERICAN company you fucking retard. The company cannot access the data without it being exported from Korea because a foreign company accessing content from country is the same as exporting that content.
Google can absolutely access the data from within Korea. Obviously it’s restricted in that, say, its Taiwanese or Japanese or Californian offices are unable to then use that data. Korean companies also face the exact same restrictions. Data localisation laws are commonplace throughout the world and it’s ridiculous to claim that it’s a serious barrier to trade, rather than a slight dampener on Google super-profits.
Maybe the Korean government has afforded for Korean employees working for Google in Korea to access the data, but that does not mean the company has access in the general sense. And I’ve failed to find any information that such a thing has even happened.
Yes it does. It’s enough that the company can have representative with access to the data. You might as well be saying “Lockheed Martin doesn’t have access to military secrets because only Lockheed Martin employees with appropriate clearance have access to them”. It’s just a silly claim to make.
 
Google can absolutely access the data from within Korea. Obviously it’s restricted in that, say, its Taiwanese or Japanese or Californian offices are unable to then use that data. Korean companies also face the exact same restrictions. Data localisation laws are commonplace throughout the world and it’s ridiculous to claim that it’s a serious barrier to trade, rather than a slight dampener on Google super-profits.

Yes it does. It’s enough that the company can have representative with access to the data. You might as well be saying “Lockheed Martin doesn’t have access to military secrets because only Lockheed Martin employees with appropriate clearance have access to them”. It’s just a silly claim to make.
Whether they can access the data or not within Korea is unclear to me because none of the articles I read specify whether they can or not, so unless you can point out otherwise, I’m not just going to take your word on that. But this article flexibly uses ‘access’ and ‘export’ to mean the exact same thing: https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.co...ks-with-US-paving-way-for-Google-Maps/2289568

You are a fucking malding retard hyperfocused on Google being an evil corporation which is not even the issue here.

The question is why does Google Maps not work in Korea and it’s because the developers (who primarily live in America) don’t have the data to make it work. Why don’t they have the data? Because the Korean government says they are at war and they can’t have the data without specific conditions. That’s the point. It doesn’t fucking matter if Google is retarded or Korea is retarded. None of that shit changes the answer to the original question.
 
This is not a surprise. As i've stated before. They are sitting almost over the leading edge off multiple cliffs, including demographic, economic, industry, real estate, construction (the latter two basically holding up the entire economy, from banking to government and normal people's money) and more. The world was already starting to pull out and their days were numbered for manufacturing even before covid knocked some sense into the world. This right here is the beginnings of why ccp china was so mindlessly aggressive at trying to establish their empire, and so belligerent in general. (not to mention locking down society... social credit etc) They know time is not on their side and it will be the better part of a century before they get another shot in the very best of cases.

The hilarious part is that you couldn't trust the numbers to begin with.. but things are so bad now that they don't feel safe saying anything at all. Reminds me of the USSR on shit like this. They would put out projections (wishful thinking/fantasy) as official numbers simply because most lower and mid level officials were scared to fall short.
 
Whether they can access the data or not within Korea is unclear to me because none of the articles I read specify whether they can or not, so unless you can point out otherwise, I’m not just going to take your word on that. But this article flexibly uses ‘access’ and ‘export’ to mean the exact same thing: https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.co...ks-with-US-paving-way-for-Google-Maps/2289568
It’s pretty obvious if you read any decent article on the topic. For example
Authorities have maintained that export approval could be granted if Google establishes a local server in Korea. However, the company continues to seek the data without setting up a domestic data center. Critics argue that Google is trying to avoid paying Korean corporate taxes, as operating a local server would qualify it as a permanent establishment subject to taxation.
You are a fucking malding retard hyperfocused on Google being an evil corporation which is not even the issue here.
Actually Apple faces the same issues but you just keep going to bat for Google. I don’t mind Google but it’s pretty obvious what’s going on in this instance.
The question is why does Google Maps not work in Korea and it’s because the developers (who primarily live in America) don’t have the data to make it work. Why don’t they have the data?
Because they refuse to comply with the requirement to keep the data within Korea and want to be above national rules.
Because the Korean government says they are at war and they can’t have the data without specific conditions. That’s the point. It doesn’t fucking matter if Google is retarded or Korea is retarded. None of that shit changes the answer to the original question.
The conditions are identical for domestic and foreign companies though, which is really the central issue. You claimed that foreign companies can’t get the data: they can get it under the same conditions as local companies.

However, they may choose not to engage in the Korean market. Most likely these companies are trying to avoid the precedent of countries forcing data localisation on them (similar to porn sites geoblocking Texas in protest of age verification laws), but maybe it’s just not profitable enough.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Dr Cruel
It’s pretty obvious if you read any decent article on the topic. For example
You are retarded. That article is about Google wanting to increase the resolution of their maps.

First of all, Google has had datacenters in Korea since at least 2020:
1746539171993.webp
1746539233286.webp

Google Maps works in Korea and has for many years:
1746539039301.webp

This is what it used to look like:
1746539021827.webp
That map was much, much worse than everywhere else in the world and the minimum zoom level was crazy high.

Today's resolution is more than high enough to see individual buildings:
1746539570041.webp
(1 in = 20 ft)

The only difference that most people will notice between Korea and the rest of the world in the current version of Google Maps is the lack of 3D buildings, but they're far from the only country that doesn't allow them (e.g. China and Israel).
 
You are retarded. That article is about Google wanting to increase the resolution of their maps.

First of all, Google has had datacenters in Korea since at least 2020:
Yeah retard I even posted the name of that data centre earlier in the thread. Google wants to export the high resolution map data rather than use the map data on local data centres and has been refused permission to export it.

As for the rest of your comment I have never said Google Maps doesn’t work in Korea. I know it does.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: George Lucas
It’s pretty obvious if you read any decent article on the topic. For example
That’s the article I posted earlier.
Actually Apple faces the same issues but you just keep going to bat for Google. I don’t mind Google but it’s pretty obvious what’s going on in this instance.
Because the question was about Google, not Apple. No need to overcomplicate the answer.
Authorities have maintained that export approval could be granted if Google establishes a local server in Korea. However, the company continues to seek the data without setting up a domestic data center. Critics argue that Google is trying to avoid paying Korean corporate taxes, as operating a local server would qualify it as a permanent establishment subject to taxation.
I don’t get this. Do they have a ‘local server’ or not? Do they lease a server? Is the issue that they need to establish a special ITAR-esque server with special access and audits and not just any rudimentary server? Again, this article is very recent.
Because they refuse to comply with the requirement to keep the data within Korea and want to be above national rules.
No one is breaking any rules and I honestly don’t think either side is being a dick. They are negotiating and seem to be doing business in the appropriate way. Google is not trying to work on the data in secret. They also aren’t crying to the media about the Korean government being unreasonable. They don’t need to be in compliance because they never agreed to be in compliance in the first place, just like how American companies don’t need to bother with the GPDR so long as they don’t fuck around in the EU.
The conditions are identical for domestic and foreign companies though, which is really the central issue. You claimed that foreign companies can’t get the data: they can get it under the same conditions as local companies.
I never said they couldn’t get the data at all. A plain reading of all my posts shows I am talking about Google’s access to the data at this present time.
However, they may choose not to engage in the Korean market. Most likely these companies are trying to avoid the precedent of countries forcing data localisation on them (similar to porn sites geoblocking Texas in protest of age verification laws), but maybe it’s just not profitable enough.
You are reading way into the situation. Google doesn’t have much of a market in Korea. Everyone uses Samsung and Apple phones which have their own services. There’s not much incentive for Google to do what the Korean wants to get the map data they want.
You are retarded. That article is about Google wanting to increase the resolution of their maps.

First of all, Google has had datacenters in Korea since at least 2020:
View attachment 7325065
View attachment 7325068

Google Maps works in Korea and has for many years:
View attachment 7325064

This is what it used to look like:
View attachment 7325062
That map was much, much worse than everywhere else in the world and the minimum zoom level was crazy high.

Today's resolution is more than high enough to see individual buildings:
View attachment 7325106
(1 in = 20 ft)

The only difference that most people will notice between Korea and the rest of the world in the current version of Google Maps is the lack of 3D buildings, but they're far from the only country that doesn't allow them (e.g. China and Israel).
Thank you for providing some insight. I was not aware to what degree the resolution disaffected the app. The article I posted was recent, so I assumed Google Maps was still basically unusable in Korea. It sounds like that’s no longer the case and @NVLLS BR0k3n D!€K statement about the app which led to the question I responded to was made in error.
 
Last edited:
The article I posted was recent, so I assumed Google Maps was still basically unusable in Korea. It sounds like that’s no longer the case and @NVLLS BR0k3n D!€K statement about the app which led to the question I responded to was made in error.
Nigger I said Koreans don’t use Google Maps and they don’t. I never said the app didn’t work it just sucks ass. There’s more to an app than looking at static drawings of buildings.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: George Lucas
Imagine the Chinese version of good old boys from Alabama - the sort that happily fired automatic weapons into unarmed Tiananmen Square protesters.

Much or most who shot those protesters were Moslems who more recently have suffered persecution given Communist Party angst about the low Han Chinese birthrate. If China ever tottered, they'd be the first out.
 
Back