Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.4%

  • Total voters
    464
Any idea why Hardin did not press on this?
Removing IFP is huge, because russtoleum would have to pay the $402. Not anything else, immediately, but it's a huge step.

Court COULD charge for some things (the fees in costs and fees) but the real winner would be removing ECF from russ, but that's much harder to argue for.
 
So Russel has repeatedly lied or misled or never even asked or checked if he had living, willing witnesses and now he says he magically has new ones?
GettyImages-tlp604314.webp
Yes, child. :smug:
 
So Russ is looking at an immediate $1400 bill, unless he can swing a bonded stay with the District judge. I'm sure he's debating whether to not pay the $400 and end the case (as a face-saving excuse in his own mind), but he really needs to be hit with more sanctions to stop him once and for all. If he uses the filing fee as the exit strategy, can Josh file to recover ALL attorney's fees?
 
It's literally in English. You can take breaks. I believe in you.
>Memorandum
>FORNIA PAUPERIS

doesn't look like english to me
Greer lost his IFP status and has to pay the court $400, otherwise the case is dismissed. Also, the case is stayed while the court decides whether to dismiss it anyway.

I may be wrong, but this is how I understood it.
and this is why kiwifarms is helpful
 
The judge scheduled that for 1:00 PM, with nothing after, and it's over in an hour?

So he gets the rest of the afternoon off?

I picked the wrong job.
Three kids on the playground are having a discussion.

My dad is the fastest, one says, he is a truck driver and he can make the drive from Salt Lake City to Denver in 7 hours!

The second kid disagrees, his dad is the fastest, he is a police man and is involved in high speed chases all the time!

No no, says the third kid, my dad is the fastest. He is a public servant and works 9 to 5, but he arrives home at 12 every day!
 
The only point Hardin didn't seem to do well with was that rusty didn't say who had discoverable information. Specifically Jersh even though he's the defendant in the case. On it's face I would think you wouldn't have to point that out because it's obvious but until now I wrote it off as "must happen in boiler plate stuff you never hear about but rusty is just such a fuckup it's a problem". But now the judge is saying it's obvious. So which is it lawfags?
I was also confused a bit by Hardin on this argument, it does seem obvious that defendants wouldn't need to be listed. I can kind of follow if he's trying to say that they weren't even witnesses before, and now all of a sudden they are defendants after many years and the statute of limitations, and therefore this is all a bit desperate or improper from the Plantiff. But hopefully the written motion he promised to file on the matter is better argued.
 
Goddamn, Greer rolled over surprisingly easy about the IFP filing thing.
paraphrasing

He wasn't ready for the question. He was very defensive about the first question "can you not pay the 400 dollars?" Lolcows are nothing if not prideful. Of course Greer had 400 dollars! What, are you trying to say I'm a broke ass genetic reject your honor?!

You could hear the wheels turning in his head after the fact though, because he started to interject and get clarification. The Judge again asked "Well, Mister Greer, if you were to pay the 400 dollars would be unable to pay your rent and food and other things you need?" And AGAIN Greer say's "No, of course I can pay for myself! I'm not a broke ass genetic reject your honor!"

Judge very quickly said "Great! I am ordering you to start paying fees!". The Judge also sounded incredibly happy as he said it. He didn't even wait a millisecond after Greer's answer.

Kino.
 
The both the judge and Hardin agreed that the magistrate can't challenge the district judge's order to reduce the sanctions to $1000. Why did the judge put discussing if that reduction was appropriate on the schedule if he already knows he can't do anything?
Because it was fully briefed and timely to rule on. This hearing took care of all the pending motions, either disposing of them or completing the process before decision on them. The reason the motion to dismiss wasn't heard was it isn't fully briefed (the deadline for Russ filing an opposition has not passed).
 
The judge scheduled that for 1:00 PM, with nothing after, and it's over in an hour?

So he gets the rest of the afternoon off?

I picked the wrong job.
Yeah, but consider this: Russ is not the most retarded plaintiff this judge has ever seen and this case is definitely not the most retarded case he's dealt with. Not only that, but this case is at least interesting/funny, with fairly short documents. Lots of cases are as dull as dish water with hundreds to thousands of pages of documents to go through and analyze.

Still want his job?
 
So the gist of it is Tardface has 30 days to scrounge together 400 bucks or the case gets thrown out? That means starting today, If Shitlips earns $13, he'll have enough cash for the IFP.

Screenshot 2025-05-06 150757.webp
Happy job hunting, fuckface! :)

Or more than likely he'll just sit on his ass and sulk, and hope that the judge feels pity on him. (Sounds not so likely at this point)
 
Back