- Joined
- Feb 3, 2025
Yeah well then again I don't really think either of them would have pursued justice ahead of fucking with Chance unless he actually raped a kid.
Well it doesn't have to be set up by them, they just have to have oversight and be involved even if a private organization is doing it. Think Chris Hansen. But regardless, it's inadmissible so Cyraxx is right about one thing. Also for the record I don't think it's that the APD doesn't care, they'd love to lock pedophilic Sméagol up so he can't bother them anymore. It's just that no prosecutor would bring a case against him when the evidence is covered in shit and inadmissible, because he know he'd lose to the goblin.
True, although I am not sure if the same can be said about Kate. She seems to just hate Cyraxx and as a mother she probably wanted him locked up as evidenced by her sharing everything with the APD.
I'm pretty sure no.
I know for a fact at least that any claim they bring would not survive if it was under the 14th Amendment right to due process regarding life, liberty, and property. This goes into the State Created Danger theory which I know about because reasons. I forget the exact line of cases but basically the police/state are only actually responsible for your wellbeing when you're in their custody or they have otherwise deprived you of your agency.
So for instance, George Floyd's estate could sue the police since he was being detained when he died. Not saying they'd win since he was high on drugs and that is probably what killed him but the case wouldn't immediately be thrown out. But if the police, for instance, failed to properly handle something like not following up on a tip because they think it's bunk, you can't sue them.
Now this does exclusively deal with the deprivation of life, liberty, and property under the 14th Amendment so if there's a specific tort law maybe they have a case under that. However I highly doubt that Ohio has such a tort law. Why would the government pass a law that increases their liability, especially considering how police work is not a perfected art by any means?
So in short, probably not.
Edit: Just realized I should clarify some things.
The 14th Amendment provides that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Furthermore 42 U.S.C. § 1983 creates a cause of action (basically a valid reason to sue) for those who had been deprived of those rights under the color of state law. This protects one against the state, it does not create a right to government aid when such aid is necessary to secure those rights from private individuals committing crimes.
In the past, people have sued the police and/or government saying that they dropped the ball and as a result someone lost life, liberty, and/or property. For instance, in DeShaney v. Winnebago County, 489 U.S. 189 (1989), the mother of a kid sued the county because social services didn't remove a kid from his father who was beating him. It was known but they couldn't prove it until the kid ended up in a coma and I'm pretty sure either waking up severely retarded or dying.
Anyway SCOTUS held that as tragic as the case is, the county was not responsible because the kid did not have a "special relationship" with the state since he was not under their care when this happened nor did the state "create the danger" or in other words make things worse. As it relates to police action in particular, or rather inaction, it is likewise clear that any victim of Cyraxx cannot sue the police. See Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005) which is kinda like DeShaney but actually involves the police.
So since the government did not make Cyraxx a pedophile and assuming that any child he victimizes is not a ward of the state, they have no case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It's fucked up but the alternative is making it so any failure by the police is a Due Process violation which is retarded.
So for instance, George Floyd's estate could sue the police since he was being detained when he died. Not saying they'd win since he was high on drugs and that is probably what killed him but the case wouldn't immediately be thrown out. But if the police, for instance, failed to properly handle something like not following up on a tip because they think it's bunk, you can't sue them.
Now this does exclusively deal with the deprivation of life, liberty, and property under the 14th Amendment so if there's a specific tort law maybe they have a case under that. However I highly doubt that Ohio has such a tort law. Why would the government pass a law that increases their liability, especially considering how police work is not a perfected art by any means?
So in short, probably not.
Edit: Just realized I should clarify some things.
The 14th Amendment provides that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Furthermore 42 U.S.C. § 1983 creates a cause of action (basically a valid reason to sue) for those who had been deprived of those rights under the color of state law. This protects one against the state, it does not create a right to government aid when such aid is necessary to secure those rights from private individuals committing crimes.
In the past, people have sued the police and/or government saying that they dropped the ball and as a result someone lost life, liberty, and/or property. For instance, in DeShaney v. Winnebago County, 489 U.S. 189 (1989), the mother of a kid sued the county because social services didn't remove a kid from his father who was beating him. It was known but they couldn't prove it until the kid ended up in a coma and I'm pretty sure either waking up severely retarded or dying.
Anyway SCOTUS held that as tragic as the case is, the county was not responsible because the kid did not have a "special relationship" with the state since he was not under their care when this happened nor did the state "create the danger" or in other words make things worse. As it relates to police action in particular, or rather inaction, it is likewise clear that any victim of Cyraxx cannot sue the police. See Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005) which is kinda like DeShaney but actually involves the police.
So since the government did not make Cyraxx a pedophile and assuming that any child he victimizes is not a ward of the state, they have no case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It's fucked up but the alternative is making it so any failure by the police is a Due Process violation which is retarded.
Last edited:
