India-Pakistan Conflict - Land Of The Indus Versus Land Of The Pure

India will utilize pigs as shields while the Pakis will do the same for cows. That’s how you will see the difference
That's a common flaw I see in the Indian line of thinking. They assume the reason Muslims don't eat pork is because they worship pigs like Indians worship cows. So on Twitter they'll send pictures of pork to Pakis to set them off but throw a fit when they respond with a picture of beef.

The Indian shield strategy won't work.
 
You are aware that nuclear test radionucleotides are different than nuclear waste radionucleotides?
For fucks sake, we can determine carbon isotopes from a million year ago.
no you can't lmao. radiocarbon dating stops being useful after 10,000 years and is best to go to other methods. and yes i am aware but you need to realize that the people conducting those tests are incompetent. even if the stats are right, my point still stands because nothing fucking happened
 
Operation Sindoor failed, failed completely
1746576919134.webp
 
You are aware that nuclear test radionucleotides are different than nuclear waste radionucleotides?
For fucks sake, we can determine carbon isotopes from a million year ago.

Tritium is not vital for detonation. Modern nukes are designed so the tritium charge can be replaced if need be. If you use design with li-6 you don't even need to do that. The yield with expired tritium will be lower but not 0.
The plutonium sponge has to be recast due to helium embrittlement anyway.
Nukes require a decent amount of maintenance and it's just easier to make more new ones if you have the abilities.
And you are aware coal power plants contribute more to background radiation than nuclear tests?
 
A very mild nuclear winter can only occur if
>every nuke is detonated
>every nuke is detonated on the ground

and even then, how many of the nukes from the cold war even still work? tritium is in short supply and it only has a half life of ~12 years
Groundburst is just for fallout. Nuclear winter theory hypothesizes that the smoke from burning cities will block out the sun (which can just as likely happen with airburst). The question is whether that much smoke will actually be released, whether the effect would be global or localized, and whether the change it will have would be significant.

And I think most nukes still work.
 
Important to mention, I assume most here dont care and just see brown people, but Punjabi's and Sindhi's are Indian, while Pashtun and Baluchi's are Iranic. Im not too knowledgeable on Indian Race lore, as no one should be punished to, but I believe Ladahk's are Tibetan. Thats the extent of what I know off the top of my head.
I verified your information with trusted and prestigious sources, and your racism is tuned and accurate. Congratulations.

Vic3 - Punjabi.webp

Vic3 - Sindi.webp

Vic3 - Pashtun.webp

Vic3 - Baluchi.webp

Vic3 - Ladakh.webp
 
And you are aware coal power plants contribute more to background radiation than nuclear tests?
Not just coal. The natural gas in your home is slightly radioactive as well (Radon form uranium decay).
 
S2Underground Report Priority Released.
//The Wire//2300Z May 6, 2025//
//PRIORITY//
//BLUF: INDIA CONDUCTS MISSILE STRIKES IN PAKISTAN.//

-----BEGIN TEARLINE-----

-International Events-

India: This afternoon India carried out multiple missile strikes in eastern Pakistan. India announced the launch and subsequent completion of "Operation Sindoor", which involved 9x missile strikes at varying sites throughout eastern Pakistan. Most of these strike locations are comparatively remote sites right along the border.

Pakistan: Officials have claimed to have shot down at total of 5x Indian military aircraft (including two fighters and one helicopter), though this remains unconfirmed at this time. Shortly after the airstrikes, Pakistan announced their counterattack had begun. Pakistani officials/sources claimed that around a dozen sites were struck by Pakistani aircraft in Kashmir. Again, this remains largely unconfirmed.

Artillery units in the border regions of both nations have begun various bombardment efforts, with locals reporting significant explosions throughout the region, though without any hard evidence to indicate how successful these cross border fires are.

-----END TEARLINE-----

Analyst Comments: Reports are numerous, but many are contradictory or otherwise unreliable. Right now (and as with any similar crisis) the word "confirmed" is being thrown around without much consideration for what confirmation of an event actually means. At least 90% of the content on social media right now is fake and/or old footage of conflicts not even in India or Pakistan, so the manipulation of the information space is exceptionally high at the moment.

In about an hour the sun will be up, and a more reliable Battle Damage Assessment can be conducted. Right now it's still dark throughout the region, so daylight will provide much more evidence of whatever aircraft were shot down, if any. It is possible that what appeared to be an aircraft shootdown incident to locals on the ground, was actually Pakistan shooting down unmanned reconnaissance drones. These are exceptionally easy to shoot down, and at night would look very similar to untrained civilians who didn't get close to the various debris fields.

India claims to have only struck "terrorist" camps, and not specifically Pakistani military sites. If true, this is probably to avoid too much escalation since India very well knows that Pakistan will be forced to respond in kind, even if it's just to save face. Of note, Pakistani sources refute this claim and state that Pakistani military sites were hit, though which ones remains unclear at the moment. It is a bit of a stretch, but it's possible that an old outpost at the Muzaffarabad Airport was hit, which could mean that both sides are partially correct. Old, defunct military outposts are frequently occupied by everyone from local street vendors to insurgent groups in this part of the world, so this will probably add to the confusion as to what targets India actually struck.

Considering that India immediately announced their entire plan seconds after the strikes hit, India probably isn't looking for the global thermonuclear war that many people are expecting. Pakistan is not looking for such a conflict either, and though they will have to retaliate in kind, how this retaliation manifests will be an indication of how concerned to be. If India's actions were a one-and-done strike, and Pakistan responds with a similar one-and-done strike, tensions may ease a bit. If not, this may become a rather concerning and serious event.

More strategically however, the overall concerns remain rather important in the context of two nuclear powers engaging each other in a land war in Asia. The concern is not necessarily that one nation will pull the pin and conduct a nuclear first strike...the main concern is that one of these parties may accidentally stumble into such. Either way, it's a dangerous game that will remain concerning as the world watches the events of the next few days.
 
Tritium is not vital for detonation. Modern nukes are designed so the tritium charge can be replaced if need be. If you use design with li-6 you don't even need to do that. The yield with expired tritium will be lower but not 0.
The plutonium sponge has to be recast due to helium embrittlement anyway.
Nukes require a decent amount of maintenance and it's just easier to make more new ones if you have the abilities.
using li-6 isn't optimal. also what even is the point in this infodump? my point is that most nuclear weapons probably don't work and the maintenance programs for them are not doing enough. you should be talking about the funding allocated to them not the materials the bombs are made of and the process for maintenance (which I already know).
 
It's literally anything but.

Reminder that the originator of nuclear winter theory was the hackfraud Carl Sagan, who before that point was notoriously anti-nuke. That's not to say that it can't be a real phenomena, but that the people who pushed the idea had/have a political reason to do so.
The original simulations of nuclear winter back during the 1980s were probably overblown. The fact that some of the predictions for "extreme nuclear winter" sounded worse than the Chicxulub event, when involved several times more energy than every nuclear weapon that existed at the time going off at once in the same spot, should have really been a dead giveaway as far as that's concerned. The authors of the study even acknowledged that their results required a perfect storm of worst-case scenarios to be applicable.

With that being said, though, basically every study ever done that doesn't assume a best case scenario (ie., war occuring in the winter limits woodland wildfires, all other non-urban firestorms are minimal, and most particulate debris remains in the Troposphere where it can rain out)  does predict some degree of cooling, along with damage to the ozone layer. It probably wouldn't mean the end of Western Civilization if India and Pakistan got into a nuclear exchange, but there's a good chance it would have global consequences.
 
Back