India-Pakistan Conflict - Land Of The Indus Versus Land Of The Pure

30+GameOvers said:
So in other words pajeets took a bunch of random guns together, tried mashing in random parts without understanding how they work and wonder why they got a barely functioning piece of shit. Why am I not surprised?
Click to expand...
I don't get why they couldn't just fucking stick to the FAL. No, they have to prove to the rest of the world that they're capable of producing "original" (original means mashing 2 assault rifle designs + 1 battle rifle design into an abhorrent abomination of a gun) firearms, and that their engineering is top-shelf, just like Germany saar. It never convinces anyone and at this point I'm starting to think they aren't capable of noticing the fact that people reject their designs (both internally and externally) due to them being redundant, unnecessary, convoluted, and, most importantly, RETARDED.
Just take a page off literally every other 3rd World/2nd World country's guidebook and start locally producing your own AKs. You don't even need to put a unique twist on it.
 
If this is a staring contest to see who blinks first as some claim and not an actual war brewing then my money is on India. Their elite forces are unbeatable.

1746589352019.webp
1746589367114.webp
1746589419928.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cnidarian, Rome's rightful successor, Pedophobe and 2 others
The Fuck's Going On Here said:
Dude 5 million is one hell of a lowball estimate.
Straight off of Google,
View attachment 7328834
If Pakistan nukes any of the top 5 cities (and Delhi and Mumbai seem to be both big targets sine they're the capital and economic hub), you essentially have a body count equivalent to an East Euro nation. Add in fallout and indirect shit like probable famines and what-not and your body count probably rises to match the population of Canada.
Click to expand...
you're forgetting one thing, these cities are massive slums built horizontally not vertically due to a lack of engineers, regulation, and resources so you'd need minimum 2 full and proper modern nuclear weapons to clear out any in the top 25
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Nome and rosecig
30+GameOvers said:
So in other words pajeets took a bunch of random guns together, tried mashing in random parts without understanding how they work and wonder why they got a barely functioning piece of shit.
Click to expand...
Kind of how they built their country! Although.... that's also how we built the USA.... must be some lurking variable involved i'm not considering 🤔
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Jose Beaner Luna and The One Who Sneeds
The Fuck's Going On Here said:
Dude 5 million is one hell of a lowball estimate.
Straight off of Google,
If Pakistan nukes any of the top 5 cities (and Delhi and Mumbai seem to be both big targets sine they're the capital and economic hub), you essentially have a body count equivalent to an East Euro nation. Add in fallout and indirect shit like probable famines and what-not and your body count probably rises to match the population of Canada.
Click to expand...
I did the math earlier in the thread and TL;DR if the bomb that hit Hiroshima were to hit New Delhi it'd be roughly 350k to 550k dead due to them being packed in up to 36k people per square km... and that bomb was much smaller than what we use now....
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Lokenstien
Thought experiment for the White nations of the world: If you went out and saw two developmentally challenged individuals having a fistfight in front of your house, and they're both open-carrying cocked pistols in their waistbands with safety off, how would you try to stop it?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: greatUncleShitHeel
Greasy Goblin said:
Probably for the better. Even for the planet at the rate at which that area is fucking up the Earth. The elimination of these two groups would be a massive net positive for the rest of the species. I genuinely believe that. It saddens me that this is the case, but when I try to seriously weigh the pros and cons it always seems to wind up a plus, despite the incredible suffering it'd cause. Jeets make up over 10% of the human population and are packed in like rodents and seem to want that for the rest of the world and are content to degrade everything they touch. Over 10% of the global population and they produce NOTHING of value. Over 3x the population of the US and nothing but pollution. The cost of India continuing on its current trajectory until 2050 would make the darkest libshit global warning ghost stories an actual reality.
Click to expand...

If we nuke them they spread and western nations don't have the stomach to turn them down or perform horrific evil tyrant shit like force castrating millions of men (yes, this is something that India did, look up The Emergency 1975). We, as in the human race, are not ready for infinity Indian refugees. The only way this shakes out like you think it will is if everyone agrees on total jeet death.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Disagree
Reactions: Bankingway, greatUncleShitHeel, StacticShock and 6 others
NoxTuk said:
How long will Pakistan and India keep this up before both give up?
A few more hours? A couple of days?
What do you think?
Click to expand...
I think there's going to be at least another month of tensions and skirmishes if this war doesn't come to a boil. Asynchronous and remote warfare can pretty much occur anytime, every time, all the time so it's very hard to predict when things cool off, if they ever do. We'll have to watch how the leaders and their keys to power operate in the coming weeks in order to gage the future.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vladislav, IAmNotAlpharius, The Fuck's Going On Here and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back