Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[TheBigRevelator]

Is tiny in jail yet?

 

[Zagreus4816]

Too lazy to turn on my computer, but Lonerbox did mention Destiny and some DGG logs earlier today on stream. It's nothing important outside of him basically saying Destiny is a lying moron that is contradicting himself. ~1h:57m:20s mark of today's stream titled along the lines of, "Israel approves plan to occupy Gaza".

(Edit: Fixed capitalization and more specific time.)

 

[dezazlop]

I believe that he wants to talk about this in part to defend himself to his audience but also as a means of humiliating Pxie.

I mean, he admitted himself that he is talking more openly about the case to control the narrative. If he stood silent he would continue to bleed even the core tiny sycophants, because as much as they are trying to deny it on technicalities, the case against him is very clear cut on his guilt, optically and legally from what pixies team are arguing (with proof, even). He initially wanted to stay quiet about it (legal arc much mystery), but when the case started going forward and people started pouring through the court records he knew there was 0 chance he would come out clean from it, so he did what he does best, which is:

- Poisoning the well (pixies lawyers are random, incompetent, they cant follow protocol, they are lying)
- Groom his audience into believing it was not a severe crime (implicit consent, everyone else did it)

I don't know about the law too much, but pixies team seems to have proof/witnesses that can confirm he was still spreading non consensual recordings after the revenge porn statute came into effect, and they are already subpoenaed discord to try to get more proof of it, which will most likely include even more cases of him sending these videos to random e-girls. Meanwhile tiny's defense basically consists of saying that the evidence they got against him is not up to standard and if it is tiny does not remember doing them (not even denying it).

My biggest c/hope is that all the girls he successfuly intimidated into silence sees that the case has merits and they choose to get their slice of the pie. His community is literally brainless, and even now are still trying to bring more bpd whores to his fold, so the case becoming a big mark on his history would do wonders in relegating his disgenic ass to where he belongs, which is being the heel of political streamers.

 

[Code Cave]

Too lazy to turn on my computer, but Lonerbox did mention Destiny and some DGG logs earlier today on stream. It's nothing important outside of him basically saying Destiny is a lying moron that is contradicting himself. ~1h:57m:20s mark of today's stream titled along the lines of, "Israel approves plan to occupy Gaza".

(Edit: Fixed capitalization and more specific time.)

Thanks for letting us know. KF shout out at the end!

https://youtu.be/xqhZfFBMGbI?t=7053

The "implied consent" argument reminds me of fundamentalist Christians who think it's impossible to rape their wife. "Why would I need to get her consent? She's my wife bro, it's already implied because we're married!"

 

[SchizoNerd420]

Does it say here the damages are capped at 150k? Because it doesn't seem that clear to me at all. It seems to me that you can choose 150k in "liquidated damages" if you have trouble establishing personal damages, not that 150k is the upper limit.

Thanks for acknowledging the oft-overlooked, ever-evasive disjunctive "or." As illustrated in his response to the latest filing, Destiny is a proficient understander of English semantics and grammar, so I don't know how he could have misread the statute. One other notable thing, by referring to it as a "maximum" or "cap," he sometimes implies that the court could award a lower amount, but I don't believe that's actually true. Because Congress set a liquidated damages amount in lieu of proving actual damages, I'm not sure the court could even award a lower amount if liability is established, and that's, of course, in addition to attorney's fees and litigation costs.

Why the fuck did his lawyer allow this in his declaration!?

Not sure, but his lawyers didn't co-sign his "legal opinion" in their response; his belief that 150k is a cap on damages is only in his affidavit. My speculation is that he just wanted that belief in the court record because he relies on it to paint Pxie as money hungry, and her initial settlement demand as outrageous. But, as Pxie's attorneys have pointed out, he's essentially just testifying to a legal conclusion as a layman, and settlement negotiations aren't admissible as evidence anyway, which would arguably include her initial demand letter.

 

[do ut des]

Not sure, but his lawyers didn't co-sign his "legal opinion" in their response; his belief that 150k is a cap on damages is only in his affidavit. My speculation is that he just wanted that belief in the court record because he relies on it to paint Pxie as money hungry, and her initial settlement demand as outrageous. But, as Pxie's attorneys have pointed out, he's essentially just testifying to a legal conclusion as a layman, and settlement negotiations aren't admissible as evidence anyway, which would arguably include her initial demand letter.

Since you are the expert on american law in here: Can such a affidavit even enter the trial as evidence? Where i am from, legal opinions can never be filed as evidence, not even in the form of an expert opinion/amicus brief, as it is the job of the court to have/attain knowledge about the correct legal interpretation (with a exception regarding the interpretation of foreign law). So why tf did Destiny even include this, if it, at most, is a worthless filing, and at worst, might somehow make Destinys position worse by f.e. helping to establish a pattern of behavior.

 

[SchizoNerd420]

Since you are the expert on american law in here: Can such a affidavit even enter the trial as evidence? Where i am from, legal opinions can never be filed as evidence, not even in the form of an expert opinion/amicus brief, as it is the job of the court to have/attain knowledge about the correct legal interpretation (with a exception regarding the interpretation of forgein law). So why tf did Destiny even include this, if it, at most, is a worthless filing, and at worst, might somehow make Destinys position worse by f.e. helping to establish a pattern of behavior.

I appreciate that, but I am a mere expert in bird law. But seriously, probably not (at least as to the portion of the affidavit we are referring to). The fact that he's a layman is actually a bit of a red herring; even if he was a lawyer, it would be improper for him to testify as to legal conclusions or other points of law. I can think of some niche circumstances off the top of my head where a lawyer could serve as an expert witness and submit their legal opinion as evidence (legal malpractice cases, for example, but even then they are more serving as fact-witnesses testifying to a standard of care, not really offering legal conclusions). But that's obviously not the case here. Perhaps he could testify as to his belief that the settlement demand was outrageous, and that belief is based on his interpretation of the statute, but I don't immediately see how that's even relevant to the case.

 

[do ut des]

I appreciate that, but I am a mere expert in bird law. But seriously, probably not (at least as to the portion of the affidavit we are referring to). The fact that he's a layman is actually a bit of a red herring; even if he was a lawyer, it would be improper for him to testify as to legal conclusions or other points of law. I can think of some niche circumstances off the top of my head where a lawyer could serve as an expert witness and submit their legal opinion as evidence (legal malpractice cases, for example, but even then they are more serving as fact-witnesses testifying to a standard of care, not really offering legal conclusions). But that's obviously not the case here. Perhaps he could testify as to his belief that the settlement demand was outrageous, and that belief is based on his interpretation of the statute, but I don't immediately see how that's even relevant to the case.

Thanks, also idk why eepstiny thinks its a good idea to file something that his lawyers refuse to co-sign. Like, idk why you pay your lawyers a shitton of money if you do something anyways, even if your lawyers are like "nahhh fam, im not gonna sign this, sry". At this point, if you truely think you know everything better than anybody, why dont you just represent yourself and save a shit ton of money.

 

[actual irl loser]

Thanks for letting us know. KF shout out at the end!

View attachment 7329962

https://youtu.be/xqhZfFBMGbI?t=7053

The "implied consent" argument reminds me of fundamentalist Christians who think it's impossible to rape their wife. "Why would I need to get her consent? She's my wife bro, it's already implied because we're married!"

"while cutting ties for no reason" is incredible

 

[StrangerMe]

Random Footsoldier threatening jstlk some minutes ago.

"while cutting ties for no reason" is incredible

View attachment 7331070

I truly wonder what goes in the mind of the average DGGer, are they really this stupid/autistic? is it a mass delusion?
How do they grapple with Destiny constantly lying to them for months at a time, at any given time of the year, every year?

I don't know guys, if a dude spends months cheating/lying to his wife, lying to his stream by saying that his friendship with nazi is purely platonic and you shouldn't read too much into it, insisting that the nazi isn't actually a nazi, and changing his whole politics (by embracing religion, and starting moving towards the right), all because he was addicted to the yussy, I think that at a certain point you have to simply accept that this nigga lies about everything and doesn't believe in anything.

I don't know how anyone can trust Destiny after Lauren Southern, let alone the Anavoir drama, let alone now this.
How do these people explain everything? they think Lonerbox is simply lying? that all his personal relationships genuinely cut him off from one day to another without looking into the situation at all behind the scenes? that all the girls are secretly plotting together, while at the same time he insists that they are disorganized/dumb, and even tho they clearly have completely different goals (Chaeiry criminal case, and doesn't want to get involved with the Civil suits.)

(notice how he unironically uses the "fascism tactic"/propaganda, that his "enemy" is infinitely strong, while at the same time, infinitely weak)

It's genuinely baffling. There's a certain amount of justification that I can forgive, they are in a cult-like relationship after all, however, how their whole world doesn't come crashing down when Destiny is so easily cornered about any and all of the allegations, that he has to go as far as making complete lies on the spot like Tinder requiring age verification to justify the fact that Rose was almost certainly underaged. How do they grapple with stuff like that, or does it simply not process?

I genuinely (don't mean this as an insult, even tho it is) would be interested in stats of the sort of people that stuck around in DGG, like: employment, age, weight, IQ, their day to day life, social life, hobbies, and the comparison with those Footsoldiers that actually left after everything became public.

Like even @Radon (idreamofpikas) (retarded faggot) (likely brutally molested or neglected in childhood) eventually accepted the fact that Destiny is guilty, so he moved to the excuse that all of it is pointless and that he has suffered enough. And he seems to be Destiny's #1 Footsie, as at least most of the others are able to resist the urge of arguing in the thread, however, his love for Destiny is too strong! so I wonder what goes in the mind of the other regular/no life/all day in DGG Footsoldiers.

 

[cloudy1]

Random Footsoldier threatening jstlk some minutes ago.

if you're gonna dox someone you just do it. you don't threaten it like a faggot. this is just dgg once again larping like they are 2008 4chan legion when in reality all they do is spam the report button like that kike faggot dan saltman and accomplish NOTHING.

 

[do ut des]

if you're gonna dox someone you just do it. you don't threaten it like a faggot. this is just dgg once again larping like they are 2008 4chan legion when in reality all they do is spam the report button like that kike faggot dan saltman and accomplish NOTHING.

B-but the adpocolypse is totally working

Dan said so, so it must be true. All these streamers leaking their income charts MUST be lying and must be pro hamas terrorist supporters who want to kill all the jews.

 

[StrangerMe]

if you're gonna dox someone you just do it. you don't threaten it like a faggot

I'm not gay tho...

*Edit:
I just realized this can be misunderstood as me implying I'm the account/Footsoldier threatening jstlk, I'm not.
It's just a joke about the fact that I often announce I will search for the "journalistic location" of someone before I do it.

I'm really not gay tho guys... Why are you niggas doubting me...
Sure, I talk a lot about how dreamy Alain Delon was, but, can't a sensitive young man appreciate the beauty of both sexes without being a faggot? Sure, I have a specific folder in my computer dedicated to pictures of him, but guys, I'm an artist, I'm not a fag, I swear!

*Edit 2:
Grammar (double negative)

 

[Anime afficionado]

I think the fact of the matter is, at the end of the day, is that Destiny's remaining footsoldiers are basically a cult of personality built up around him.

We know that his audience trends young very male, so it's easy to see how an assorted bunch of rudderless losers have latched onto him - they literally need him for internal validation as they have nothing else.

Just like any cult, even if you intuitively know there is something wrong seriously wrong with your leader, you're willing to justify his behavior because admitting anything else would be too painful and shatter the illusion.

Most of the more "normal" members of Tiny's audience have long been driven off through purges over disagreements with his behavior. All that's likely left are true believers who need to justify Destiny's behavior because of he crumbles, they will crumble too. It's one of the reasons why a lot of Destiny's absolutely bullshit comments about the lawsuit are solely cope for his audience - he needs to give them hope.

I agree it's baffling, but it's also really disturbing as it leads to people like that Radon dude existing, who are seemingly empty husks that exist only to be filled with Destiny's nonsense.

 

[Datman]

Thanks for letting us know. KF shout out at the end!

View attachment 7329962

https://youtu.be/xqhZfFBMGbI?t=7053

The "implied consent" argument reminds me of fundamentalist Christians who think it's impossible to rape their wife. "Why would I need to get her consent? She's my wife bro, it's already implied because we're married!"

Lonerbox might come out as the hero here if he continues to play his cards right.

The fact that he's been relatively unresponsive to any of the current legal drama and Destiny's retarded antics, hampers Destiny's ability to fallback on the "anti-fan" deflections for when he inevitably does make a more detailed/through response, since if it was the case that he was just trying to appeal to anti-fans, then the implication would be he would have been covering this more in-depth from the start. Him waiting for there to be a specific threshold of evidence to be made public, will also incidentally make it seem like he was more patient/good faith in forming a full opinion from Destiny's audiences pov, at least opposed to those evil "anti-fans" like JSTLK or Kuihman.

It also helps that Lonerbox is so well respected in Destiny's community for things outside of just being a Destiny orbiter, hence why they still have a lingering respect for him even after he left it. He's unironically better at formatting and justifying his positions than Destiny is, making it hard for Destiny to influence his audience to just ignore him.

 

[A. G. Peak]

Pxie has responded to Destiny's objections.

Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Evidentiary Objections to Declarations Submitted in Support of Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 66]

Spoiler: Document 69

---

Edit: I think he's supposed to have a conversation with Zee Cohen-Sanchez sometime this week.

View attachment 7325894

https://x.com/TheOmniLiberal/status/1919772619521372381

Zee was on Destiny's stream for over an hour today.


Timestamp: 00:03:52

 

[Luke gama]

Lonerbox might come out as the hero here if he continues to play his cards right.

The fact that he's been relatively unresponsive to any of the current legal drama and Destiny's retarded antics, hampers Destiny's ability to fallback on the "anti-fan" deflections for when he inevitably does make a more detailed/through response, since if it was the case that he was just trying to appeal to anti-fans, then the implication would be he would have been covering this more in-depth from the start. Him waiting for there to be a specific threshold of evidence to be made public, will also incidentally make it seem like he was more patient/good faith in forming a full opinion from Destiny's audiences pov, at least opposed to those evil "anti-fans" like JSTLK or Kuihman.

It also helps that Lonerbox is so well respected in Destiny's community for things outside of just being a Destiny orbiter, hence why they still have a lingering respect for him even after he left it. He's unironically better at formatting and justifying his positions than Destiny is, making it hard for Destiny to influence his audience to just ignore him.

I normally like lonerbox and I hate internet tough guys but he was a sort detached and passive that for some reason bothered me.

I couldn't shake the feeling that he really wanted this to blow over so he could return to getting clout from destiny.

Something about his demeanor just seemed odd. He definitely wanted much more all in for Israel because it mirrored destiny and he could be destiny's back up in debates

 

[Latrell Sprewell]

He's back to net positive subscriber numbers. I'm sure him kibitzing the Ethan/Hasan debate helped with that.


Reddit reaction:
https://old.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1kgwapw/are_we_so_back/ | https://archive.ph/tkwch

Pretty funny seeing a DGG'er accuse others of falling for manipulation tactics. I wonder what he thinks of Destiny saying he'd ban people from DGG for defending sending others' pornography without explicit consent then basing his legal strategy around assumed (not explicit) consent. Or why Destiny thought it was important to imply Pxie might have sent videos of someone else to Destiny without that person's consent, then bitch about people doing the same thing to him regarding that recorded audio.

Also, it's kind of disappointing that because Pxie's lawsuit is the most active allegation against him that it's being treated as the only allegation. @Code Cave covered it pretty well last page, there are several other women who have made very similar claims as Pxie but are basically forgotten about.

Pxie has responded to Destiny's objections.

Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Evidentiary Objections to Declarations Submitted in Support of Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 66]

When can we expect all these evidentiary objections to come to a head and a hearing scheduled with the magistrate judge?

 

[StrangerMe]

Ok, all my "personal issues" have been resolved, so I can go full autism again. Currently writing a timeline of the leaks, Code Cave gave the idea a couple weeks back, to make it somewhat similar to the list of orbiters I did some months ago.

So currently I'm writing "X Person: Is related because of Y , the case is Z ..." etc. As a sort of introduction to each people, as there's a lot of names involved in this situation, probably will include pictures so it's easier for people (who might not be kfers, or know the situation to extreme detail as we do in here) to remember who is who.

After making the small introductions for everyone, I will start the long timeline of events, with clips, timestamps, dates, etc. I had already worked on writing a timeline before, but I don't think I like it, so I'm starting a new one (again), the old timeline isn't entirely poitnless tho, as I did go back in his vods to determine what was happening when, which happened first, which happened later, etc.
Currently deciding how far back I want to go with some of the details, but I'm writing it to be pretty detailed, but we'll see if I cut out the fat.

I haven't worked anything regarding Rose for a while now, but I'll probably start doing drawings/studies of her skull, to be able to create an accurate 3D replica. Still, don't get your hopes up because we do have very few/bad pictures of her.

Lonerbox might come out as the hero here if he continues to play his cards right.

The fact that he's been relatively unresponsive to any of the current legal drama and Destiny's retarded antics, hampers Destiny's ability to fallback on the "anti-fan" deflections for when he inevitably does make a more detailed/through response, since if it was the case that he was just trying to appeal to anti-fans, then the implication would be he would have been covering this more in-depth from the start. Him waiting for there to be a specific threshold of evidence to be made public, will also incidentally make it seem like he was more patient/good faith in forming a full opinion from Destiny's audiences pov, at least opposed to those evil "anti-fans" like JSTLK or Kuihman.

It also helps that Lonerbox is so well respected in Destiny's community for things outside of just being a Destiny orbiter, hence why they still have a lingering respect for him even after he left it. He's unironically better at formatting and justifying his positions than Destiny is, making it hard for Destiny to influence his audience to just ignore him.

I think we have started to grow on people more. Sure, they still think we are deranged, but they don't say we are wrong anymore, small steps.

More directly related to what you are saying tho, I think that Destiny desperately wants Lonerbox back. He was desperately watching those Israel videos a couple months back, and banned people in his chat for sad posting about Lonerbox.
And he keeps repeating this cope that Lonerbox is currently mind fucked, but it's not because of his behaviour, surely it's actually about Pxie having fucked him! I agree that it's simply him lying/creating a narrative for his Footsies, but I do also think he's delusional and thinks Lonerbox will eventually come back.

Also Datman, mind messaging me if you have made any progress regarding Lauren Southern's dox, tell me if you've found the Starbucks already, if you haven't I can look for it later today as I'm no longer busy with stuff.

Pretty funny seeing a DGG'er accuse others of falling for manipulation tactics. I wonder what he thinks of Destiny saying he'd ban people from DGG for defending sending others' pornography without explicit consent then basing his legal strategy around assumed (not explicit) consent. Or why Destiny thought it was important to imply Pxie might have sent videos of someone else to Destiny without that person's consent, then bitch about people doing the same thing to him regarding that recorded audio.

I genuinely have had to stop reading that subreddit, and the threads related to the cases, and I've started to avoid reading his Footsies regarding the case in rustlesearch. I genuinely get too trigger and consider making an account to simply go argue with them, but ultimately always decide that it's not only pointless, it's also retarded.
Don't wallow with the pigs.

 

[GarlicFragment]

Pxie has responded to Destiny's objections.

In response to the objection of using Abbymc's testimony. The defense claimed that Abbymc "is referring to unrelated and irrelevant videos, which do not feature Plaintiff." Plaintiff stand by their assertion that it does indeed include the video of Pxie, "Abbymc is referring to the video at the center of this cause of action [...] Defendant did in fact share the Video of Plaintiff with Abbymc."

This response in relation to Witness A is interesting, as it claims that Witness A "is another victim of the Defendant." This was not mentioned in Witness A's declaration.