India-Pakistan Conflict - Land Of The Indus Versus Land Of The Pure

@Null fun question, would kiwifarms still be available worldwide if india and pakistan nuked eachother?
A not so significant amount of the cabling connecting Europe to asia directly makes landfall there, including the coast of pakistan.
View attachment 7331574
those cables are on the seafloor so unless either side sends in a specialized craft to go down there and blow them up it should be fine. nuclear explosions in the ocean hardly do anything because of how much denser water is compared to air
 
Daily reminder that this faggot got his daughter indirectly glowbombed because of his fuckery in the russian government.
1746663873855.webp
 
Philosophically speaking, what is the percentage of countries in the world that need to be at war before it is considered a world war? Or is it simply the world was at war?
i'd say a world war is when there's a war effort on every continent except antarctica.
 
Philosophically speaking, what is the percentage of countries in the world that need to be at war before it is considered a world war? Or is it simply the world was at war?
When the most developed countries are at war with each other. Every african country could be in wars and civil wars (they already are lol) and nobody gives a shit.
 
When the most developed countries are at war with each other. Every african country could be in wars and civil wars (they already are lol) and nobody gives a shit.
because western owned media doesn't want you to. they want people more focused on nothingburgers because it prevents people from first seeing the wars around the world and then second seeing who causes these wars (israel, france, america, etc). this is all part of the neo-colonial process and is designed to keep those in the west blissfully unaware. the only time people are made aware of these conflicts is whenever it involves israel, taiwan, and ukraine (the 3 fakest countries).
 
Philosophically speaking, what is the percentage of countries in the world that need to be at war before it is considered a world war? Or is it simply the world was at war?
In principle you need I think two countries or coalitions/alliances at war over at least more than one continent or region.

Hence why the Seven Years War and American Revolution are often called "World War Zero"-because Anglo-French conflict occurred in Europe, the Americas and India.

WW2 and WW1 mostly occurred within Europe-really West Eurasia and the Pacific littoral. With other theatres usually adjacent to these regions.

When the most developed countries are at war with each other. Every african country could be in wars and civil wars (they already are lol) and nobody gives a shit.
The conflict in the Congo in the nineties was called the "african world war". Though usually yes-the term is going to imply a conflict fought in Europe or by European states.
because western owned media doesn't want you to. they want people more focused on nothingburgers because it prevents people from first seeing the wars around the world and then second seeing who causes these wars (israel, france, america, etc). this is all part of the neo-colonial process and is designed to keep those in the west blissfully unaware. the only time people are made aware of these conflicts is whenever it involves israel, taiwan, and ukraine (the 3 fakest countries).
Most wars in the third world are not in fact directly relevant to the lives of westerners. No one cares about another insurgency in West Africa-its just "expected" that region will have perpetual conflict.
 
i'd say a world war is when there's a war effort on every continent except antarctica.
By war effort do you mean mobilization and soldiers sent from or actual fighting? Because if you mean the latter, no conflict in history would qualify.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lulwhat
because western owned media doesn't want you to. they want people more focused on nothingburgers because it prevents people from first seeing the wars around the world and then second seeing who causes these wars (israel, france, america, etc). this is all part of the neo-colonial process and is designed to keep those in the west blissfully unaware. the only time people are made aware of these conflicts is whenever it involves israel, taiwan, and ukraine (the 3 fakest countries).
truke on israel taiwan and ukraine being fake countries, but maybe its not just because of western zog media o algo, maybe its just because i dont give a shit about africans and nobody does.
 
BTW, India and Pakistan are trading another round of missiles at each other.

This on the Paki side, in a town called Gujranwala:




And here's from the Indian side in a town called Amritsar:

First video is allegedly an S-400 at work


What's interesting is that Pakistan denies responsibility for the missiles here, and claim that it was either an Indian drill or they somehow fucked up so hard that they hit their own dudes, which I don't believe.
 
BTW, India and Pakistan are trading another round of missiles at each other.

This on the Paki side, in a town called Gujranwala:

View attachment 7332744
View attachment 7332745

And here's from the Indian side in a town called Amritsar:
View attachment 7332754
First video is allegedly an S-400 at work

View attachment 7332758
What's interesting is that Pakistan denies responsibility for the missiles here, and claim that it was either an Indian drill or they somehow fucked up so hard that they hit their own dudes, which I don't believe.
Thank God, these fuckers owe me some entertainment after giving me a whole days worth of blue balls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dcss and DSHK
BTW, India and Pakistan are trading another round of missiles at each other
What's interesting is that Pakistan denies responsibility for the missiles here, and claim that it was either an Indian drill or they somehow fucked up so hard that they hit their own dudes, which I don't believe.
When is pakistan going to stop playing the "it wasnt us saar" card and just start bombarding india? (inb4 paki i hope they both turn into craters)
Thank God, these fuckers owe me some entertainment after giving me a whole days worth of blue balls.
Exactly. MAD each other please
 
When is pakistan going to stop playing the "it wasnt us saar" card and just start bombarding india? (inb4 paki i hope they both turn into craters)

Exactly. MAD each other please
not soon enough
 
Pick any random African town and the streets are cleaner despite being poorer than any random Indian one. I'd speculate it has something to do with the caste system and that the unclean were kept in a lower position by enforcing their unclean status. and what not.
It's because the amount of what we see from Africa is substantially more limited compared to India. Frequently the cities are photographed after a mass cleaning campaign, before it reverts back to looking like a shithole. Also, 9/10 you're only able to see stuff within the affluent city centers and virtually nothing on the outskirts or more impoverished parts of town. Photos of villages are also non-existent, while in India you can see damn near everything. Every tiny, insignificant, isolated village, with no trash collectors. In Africa there is a very similar problem of people creating trash piles and burning them, cause they can't put them away anywhere else, it's just not shown, because most leaders are smart enough to not show how impoverished their land really is.
 
BTW, India and Pakistan are trading another round of missiles at each other.

This on the Paki side, in a town called Gujranwala:

View attachment 7332744
View attachment 7332745

And here's from the Indian side in a town called Amritsar:
View attachment 7332754
First video is allegedly an S-400 at work

View attachment 7332758
What's interesting is that Pakistan denies responsibility for the missiles here, and claim that it was either an Indian drill or they somehow fucked up so hard that they hit their own dudes, which I don't believe.
Someone better wake up Agenda-Free Steve.
 
Philosophically speaking, what is the percentage of countries in the world that need to be at war before it is considered a world war? Or is it simply the world was at war?
We're DEFINITELY in a global "cold war" right now but any day now it'll turn into WW3.

Also, please nuke each other into oblivion. Two nations full of disgusting pedophile rapists with double digit IQs turned into parking lots would be a huge boost for the global genepool. Just leave the children and non combatants out of it.
 
Last edited:
Back