Culture Crowdfunding campaign for woman allegedly involved in viral TikTok garners over $100K - /pol/ makes based white mother rich.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

A fundraiser created by the user "Shiloh Hendrix" has raised more than $125,000 to help her family relocate after claiming the viral video led to their address, names and her Social Security number to be leaked.​

ROCHESTER — The woman who allegedly directed a racial slur toward a child in a viral TikTok video has raised more than $125,000 for herself and her two children, according to a campaign on GiveSendGo.

A crowdfunding campaign titled "Help Me Protect My Family" was created by the user "Shiloh Hendrix" on Thursday afternoon, May 1. Hendrix claims her Social Security number, home address, phone number and place she works out have all been leaked to the public. The fundraising goal is set for $150,000.

Bamber Valley Elementary Morning Run
Read More
"I am asking for your help to assist in protecting my family. I fear that we must relocate," the campaign said. "I have two small children who do not deserve this. We have been threatened to the extreme by people online. Anything will help! We cannot, and will not live in fear!"

The video depicted a man, who is not white, confronting the woman for calling a Black child a racial slur. Though the original video was taken down, Michael McWhorter, known online as TizzyEnt, reposted the video on Wednesday, April 30, to his more than 9.5 million followers across TikTok , Instagram , X and YouTube.

In her campaign, Hendrix claims the child stole from her 18-month-old son’s diaper bag at the Soldiers Field Park playground.

“I called the kid out for what he was,” Hendrix wrote.

As of Thursday night, the fundraiser has received more than 4,000 donations.

The video has since received millions of views, with McWhorter’s repost receiving 8.2 million views. Local leaders in Rochester have also responded to the video.

The Rochester Branch of the NAACP called on the Rochester Police Department and the Olmsted County Attorney’s Office to investigate the incident and file necessary charges. Rochester Mayor Kim Norton urged Rochester residents to do all they can to “end racism in this community.” DFL state lawmakers representing Rochester issued a joint statement condemning the “vile acts of racism” and said they were grateful that the person taking the video stepped in.

On the crowdfunding page, Hendrix alleges the individual who stepped in to film the video proceeded to follow her to her car and claims he has a criminal history. The Post Bulletin has not yet been able to identify the person who filmed the video. The TikTok account of the original poster has since been privated.

According to Minnesota Court Records Online, Hendrix was convicted of a misdemeanor DWI in 2014 and a petty misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct in 2012.

RPD is aware of the video and has received multiple calls related to it, RPD’s Amanda Grayson previously told the Post Bulletin. The police department is “actively looking into the matter.”


PS: so apparently /pol/ has been busy signal boosting this lady and memeing her the new queen of /pol/ and there’s rumors the dude confronting her is a pedo of some kind. @Shapes made an extensive and well done post chronicling the shenanigans here

It’s over 150k at this point and climbing. Kinda kino ngl
Edit: 171k with spicy $1488 donations.
 
Last edited:
This is just phonebooking (also, did the phone number even leak?), with Shiloh there was the SSN as well
Also, for leftists, is this just a bad tactic or is just justifiable against racists? (Rhetorical question)
His phone number doesn’t show up in the searches I ran but the dude that was arrested with him on that rape charge does have a number that shows up.
IMG_3197.webpIMG_3198.webpIMG_3199.webpIMG_3200.webp
 
Bing's censorship is pinpoint. If I search for

shiloh hendrix site:givesendgo.com

the top result is "Prosecute Shiloh Hendrix" and then a bunch of scammy and minor fundraisers, with her real one being nowhere in the results.

It is also scrubbed from DuckDuckGo, which leverages Bing.

Even Google doesn't censor. It's the first result with the above query.

I have heard it claimed that Microsoft is corporate and profit-driven, and for that reason is more trustworthy and less censorious than Google. Clearly not.
 
I've known combat veterans, cops, doctors and lawyers with tattoos. So exactly what "respectable job" are you talking about?
General Milley
cops lmao
COVID
Rekieta and co.

You think respectable people are any of the above?

Edit: lol at the assmad faggots who don't realize you're living the American equivalent of the caste mindset if you respect people for their job alone.
 
Last edited:
I like how all black people give passionate cause to rapists, morons, and murderers.

You can’t even dream of such delicious irony. Floyd, Trayvon, Brown, and now this raping pedo Somali faggot, lol.

It’s just universal proof that black people are doomed. They will fail, and continue to fail, in every single society as a people until the sun explodes. Every black politician, corrupt. Every black neighborhood a nightmare. You gotta feel bad for the few sane ones who gotta deal with this kind of challenge to living a good life.

It’s like being born into a clan of vampires, but instead of blood and superpowers, they need obesity and retardation.
 
Bing's censorship is pinpoint. If I search for

shiloh hendrix site:givesendgo.com

the top result is "Prosecute Shiloh Hendrix" and then a bunch of scammy and minor fundraisers, with her real one being nowhere in the results.

It is also scrubbed from DuckDuckGo, which leverages Bing.

Even Google doesn't censor. It's the first result with the above query.

I have heard it claimed that Microsoft is corporate and profit-driven, and for that reason is more trustworthy and less censorious than Google. Clearly not.
Same here, just tried it. Remember when DDG was held up as a "based" alternative to google? LMFAO
Yandex works fine btw
 
Bing's censorship is pinpoint. If I search for

shiloh hendrix site:givesendgo.com

the top result is "Prosecute Shiloh Hendrix" and then a bunch of scammy and minor fundraisers, with her real one being nowhere in the results.

It is also scrubbed from DuckDuckGo, which leverages Bing.

Even Google doesn't censor. It's the first result with the above query.

I have heard it claimed that Microsoft is corporate and profit-driven, and for that reason is more trustworthy and less censorious than Google. Clearly not.
Brave search has her page as the top two results.

What I also found is the number of fake pages impersonating the original page in the search results, six on the first page.

There's also this page as the third result that was taken down. Looks like it was the one that advocated for buying niggers houses in her neighbourhood:
1746713725922.webp
 
You can just lobotomize the AI and that will be good enough. Most people don't see it as anything but a toy, so it's not like they would see much of a difference.
It's hard to lobotomize an AI and have it still be somewhat useful. Most of the censorship of AIs involves adding extra stuff to your prompts in order to prevent wrongthink. For example, you ask for "A picture of Moonman burning down the Detroit ghetto." but before your request reaches to the AI, it has more verbiage added: "A picture of Moonman burning down the Detroit ghetto. But don't show me anything that's racist or could express prejudice against any marginalized group or reflect negatively on any major corporate brand." There are also censorship tools that will refuse your request if it is too strongly associated with no-no ideas. However, users are always finding ways around this stuff.

In order to truly censor an AI the developers need to exclude many concepts from its network of associations. The problem with that is that these systems evolve without direct human control. We don't know exactly how they work because of the staggering number of connections and associations that form inside them. So if someone tries to deliberately prune the network and block certain associations, it's kind of like randomly slicing into someone's brain with a scalpel to try and alter their personality. Often the result is that the attempt at censorship creates widespread problems with the results of the model, disrupting its ability to "think" and it's still possible to make it express "bad ideas" with some effort. This is why products like Google's Gemini produce so many garbage results.
 
It's not on any page of Bing and Bing has a small footnote at the bottom stating "some search results have been removed".
Ditto. The "some search results have been removed" just links to their generic policy. Fuck Bing.

Surprisingly, still the first result on Google for "shiloh hendrix givesendgo". Normally I'd expect big tech to march in lockstep goosestep. Despite its love of fucking with the ranking and censorship on other products, Google has generally been surprisingly reluctant to outright remove search results, and generally links to why specifically (at least for DMCA) when they do. My point isn't that Google is trustworthy, it's that fuck Bing.

Looks like it was the one that advocated for buying niggers houses in her neighbourhood:
This is actually really funny, especially compared to all the other hateful anti-Shiloh fundraisers. Like a last gasp of back when race relations seemed they might actually be improving long ago.

Also, for leftists, is this just a bad tactic or is just justifiable against racists? (Rhetorical question)
Never seen them engage with the question. Like most ideologies, they don't bother justifying the contradictions between their different frames and when they apply them. It'd be like asking a military commander why his soldiers shoot at the enemy instead of at each other.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: SpiceyHuman
It's hard to lobotomize an AI and have it still be somewhat useful. Most of the censorship of AIs involves adding extra stuff to your prompts in order to prevent wrongthink. For example, you ask for "A picture of Moonman burning down the Detroit ghetto." but before your request reaches to the AI, it has more verbiage added: "A picture of Moonman burning down the Detroit ghetto. But don't show me anything that's racist or could express prejudice against any marginalized group or reflect negatively on any major corporate brand." There are also censorship tools that will refuse your request if it is too strongly associated with no-no ideas. However, users are always finding ways around this stuff.

In order to truly censor an AI the developers need to exclude many concepts from its network of associations. The problem with that is that these systems evolve without direct human control. We don't know exactly how they work because of the staggering number of connections and associations that form inside them. So if someone tries to deliberately prune the network and block certain associations, it's kind of like randomly slicing into someone's brain with a scalpel to try and alter their personality. Often the result is that the attempt at censorship creates widespread problems with the results of the model, disrupting its ability to "think" and it's still possible to make it express "bad ideas" with some effort. This is why products like Google's Gemini produce so many garbage results.
My point is that companies are 100% willing to degrade or even destroy the usefulness of their AI models just so they don't do a hecking racism or wrongthink. Remember that one time Chat GPT claimed that it would let a bunch of people die from a bomb because it would never, ever enter a password to disarm it if it included the word "nigger"? Giving garbage answers like this or just downright making it completely useless is still better than letting it make you a picture of Moonman shooting up a bunch of niggers in Detroit.
 
Nigger suffrage came before women's suffrage, if you want someone to blame for low IQ politicians then blame the white men who gave voting rights to blacks instead.

Blaming women for shit men did. Tsk. Tsk. Tsk.
At what point do we have to admit the tradcon/woman hate purity spiraling is just antiwhite?
Personally, I agree that missing a chance to shit on the blacks and hating on (white) women are both fucking retarded choices, made by people pathologically addicted to losing every battle.

But deep in my heart I have a terrible fear of the implications of the past. What made a society far far more racially aware than we are currently decide that niggers were probably better at making decisions than women... Was it just a mistake? What did they know? Could I be wrong in thinking niggers are obviously worse and more destructive than women making choices? God, I hope not lol.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: The Mighty Banth
There is also a GiveSendGo fundraiser to prosecute Shiloh Hendrix for a hate crime.
Uh....what for exactly? Hate crimes, like any other are prosecuted by the government. The government doesn't need a fundraiser from random people to carry out any prosecution. The DA would be fucked if the defense ever found out any money from such a fundraiser went to anybody including the government to get them to file charges. That screams defacto bribe and major conflict of interest. Any lawyer would have a field day over that one and get the case dropped like a rock, if not provoke a civil rights complaint against the government as a result
 
We, as the parents of the young boy, we demand that those responsible for this tragic event
So when are they going to hold themselves responsible for their child rifling through other people's diaper bags? Oh, that's right, they won't. It's all whitey's fault, not theirs, for failing to keep an eye on their little criminal-in-training; give me a fucking break. As others in this thread have previously stated: black mothers will actively send their niglets out to steal from other people while at the park/playground. Niggers are incompatible with society and the only solutions at this point are total expatriation or total nigger death.

Edited for grammar
 
Last edited:
Tats are gross for sure, but even if she was a single mother, strung out on fent - and not just some random normal woman pissed at being robbed by a nigger - it honestly wouldn't matter. Even if she were all those things, she'd still be better than some random nigger. It'd still be worth preserving her right to call a spook a spook, and she still doesn't deserve to get robbed by a nigger, filmed by a somalian, and then plastered on the internet to be hunted down.

Even at the most uncharitable, untrue, interpretation of events; I'd still donate again. Fuck niggers, ahahahhaha.

Shiloh as VP for Vance's 2028 run. A man can dream.
 
Kiandria update:

Big Thunk. "there are people [...] with influence and power that are supporting me"
1.webp

Kiandria seems to think (or hope?) that the GSG funds are still being held in limbo. She's fighting to prevent GSG from paying out to Shiloh.
2a.webp 2c.webp
"This may be an indicator that she is having trouble receiving that payout"
2b.webp

These people are insane. They're trying to get the local DA to do something, and they're even spam calling the county welfare office for some reason. 🙄 "Hit her everywhere it hurts... That's the plan.💪🏾"
insane-1.webp insane-2.webp

Kiandria is in contact with the pedo Somalian:
3.webp

Hmm... this smells like cope to me. Maybe she's starting to realize that she probably won't succeed in deplatforming GiveSendGo (🤞). But she still takes comfort in the idea that GSG has suffered some consequences regardless.
4.webp

Kiandria says her deplatforming/demonetization campaign is the start of a modern-day Civil Rights movement.:lunacy: (cc @Null)
5a.webp 5b.webp

She wants to get the IRS involved, even though money from fundraisers usually isn't considered taxable income. Pretty sure she's just wrong here and desperately flailing.
6a.webp 6b.webp

Amerikkka. She's upset that the mainstream media hasn't reported on her deplatforming campaign at all. (I'm also a little surprised/curious about that, tbh. Her followers have been spam @'ing journalists for days.)
amerikkka.webp televised.webp

SPEAK UP!
speak-up.webp

She made a new Google doc with instructions on how to submit complaints to payment processors and government officials. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-5n3WUw13NYEe6VVOh03x8goGZb9fd_04nERHz4vzaI/edit?usp=drivesdk
7a.webp 7b.webp 7c.webp
g1.webp g2.webp g3.webp g4.webp g5.webp g6.webp

"Keep filing those reports and sending those emails. Keep pressing them."
8.webp

Gloating:
gloat-1.webp gloat-2.webp

"May that lady [Shiloh Hendrix] never know rest again."
9.webp

The crusade against payment processors continues.
10a.webp 10b.webp

Sounds like the local DA doesn't want to file charges against Shiloh. Kiandria urges her followers to apply more pressure.
11a.webp 11b.webp 11c.webp 11d.webp
Pressuring the DA is her top priority for today, due to time sensitivity:
12a.webp
12b.webp
12c.webp 12d.webp 12e.webp
 
Back