Off-Topic Transgender Legislation and Litigation

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Straight as a fucking arrow here, but holy shit I would go gay for Nancy if she wanted me to. She is a pleasure to listen to when she goes full 'you're retarded' mode.
Australia needs a Nancy Mace in our own House of Representatives. But there won't be one, if there is one, for years. Our allegedly 'conservative' party expels women who stand up for women.
 
Australia needs a Nancy Mace in our own House of Representatives. But there won't be one, if there is one, for years. Our allegedly 'conservative' party expels women who stand up for women.
Agreed.

Same for many of the king’s realms, like tranada. With our current pm having a trans/nb/whatever daughter I don’t see things improving anytime soon.

Helen Joyce, the Irish journalist and author, has a good clip on how parents of trans identified children infect many organizations up to the point of full on trans acceptance. I’d scour the ranks of the “conservative” party you refer to, to see if any of the leadership has trans identified children. Might explain the silencing of women speaking the truth?

Edit: video…

 
Winning!

Get fucked Big Al!

Screenshot 2025-05-08 162527.webp
 
Pft, served honorably? Nah, they joined for the free health care and the government funded surgeries, not out of interest of serving the country.

If the military had actually been allowed to follow its own acceptance criteria for personnel (that excludes persons with conditions, mental or physical, that have the potential to prevent or delay deployability), these fucktards wouldn't have passed screening in the first place. No HRT on the front lines, Al.
 
If bone spurs were enough to keep someone out of the military, surely cutting off your cock would qualify to disqualify someone as well.

It was disqualifying even without Trump's executive order. Tranny were just given unjustified special exceptions.

DISQUALIFICATIONS

b. Male genitalia.

(1) Absence of both testicles, either congenital, or acquired, or unexplained absence of a testicle.

(2) Epispadias or Hypospadias, when accompanied by evidence of infection of the urinary tract, or if clothing is soiled when voiding.

(3) Undiagnosed enlargement or mass of testicle or epididymis.

(4) Undescended testicle(s).

(5) Orchitis, acute or chronic epididymitis.

(6) Penis, amputation of, if the resulting stump is insufficient to permit normal micturition.

(7) Penile infectious lesions, including herpes genitalis and condyloma acuminata, acute or chronic, not amenable to treatment. Such treatment must be given and demonstrated effective prior to accession.

(8) Prostatitis, acute or chronic.

(9) Hydrocele. Left varicocele, if painful, or any right varicocele.

c. Major abnormalities and defects of the genitalia, such as a change of sex, a history thereof or dysfunctional residuals from surgical correction of these conditions.

Medical Conditions That Can Keep You from Joining the Military


 
Last edited:
Very interesting. I wonder what it is about gender ideology that makes people’s brains fall out? We had rules in place, some just social rules, but for some reason people seem perfectly happy to ignore all that.
Because, at least in my jurisdiction, they included gender identity in the human rights code with a silent update without debate 5-10 years ago or so.

From that point on, protected characteristic.

Biggest mistake ever to include this mental illness as a protected status.
 
Now do the mask wearing trans-tifa and free palestine fags.

Fucking idiot! Of course it is somehow different when Fat Dumb Gay al's cult does it.

Screenshot 2025-05-09 150634.webp
Screenshot 2025-05-09 150620.webp

ROFLMAO. No it isn't.

Screenshot 2025-05-09 171621.webp

Screenshot 2025-05-09 174344.webp






Sure Tony. If you say so.

Screenshot 2025-05-09 150708.webp

Tranny Tony Reed fan doesn;t understand the difference between physical advantage and mental unfitness.

Screenshot 2025-05-09 154314.webp
 
Last edited:
Sure, I'll make it make sense.

In sports, you're crushing biological females when you're physically stronger than they are. You get accolades for smashing female records.

In the military, you receive no accolades for being a special snowflake and instead are a continual pain in your leaderships's collective asses, as well as a pain in your peers's collective asses because they have to make constant accommodations for your dumbassery. That makes you weak (weak-willed, at the very least - never mind that your pitiful T levels make you physically weak compared to your fellow male counterparts. And while you are physically stronger than your female counterparts, 95% of them will be mentally stronger than you and unwilling to put up with your bullshit). That makes you incapable - we can't rely on you for fucking anything because it'll trigger a meltdown, a screeching hissy-fit about being treated unfairly because TrAnS. That makes you untrustworthy, because nobody can trust you to actually do the fucking job that needs to be done because you're a mental fuckwaffle. If we can't trust you to piss while standing and hold your dick like a man, how can we trust you to do anything with or without supervision? If we can't trust you to NOT make yourself the center of fucking attention and your SuPeR-sPeCiAl gender bullshit a topic of conversation, how are we going to trust you to carry a gun? If we can't trust you to not act like a spastic twerp if you're no longer capable of getting your HRT, how can we trust you to operate as required under duress? If we can't trust you to understand fucking basic biology and science, how are we going to trust you in some of our more complicated tasks? I sure as fuck wouldn't trust someone who doesn't understand biology to understand nuclear fucking physics and safely operate a nuclear reactor. Hard NOPE from me after 20+ years in that field.

And you sure as shit are untrustworthy when it comes to berthings, you sick motherfuckers. I would never trust one of these trans-women in a female-only space onboard a ship. Actually, I would - but I'd ensure all my girls are armed to the gills with fucking red duct-tape and assure them that any write-ups would come to me and be properly disposed of.
 
Tranny Tony Reed fan doesn;t understand the difference between physical advantage and mental unfitness.
This is a particularly baffling position to take (though I'm not surprised it's being taken). People like Mr. Reed I'm sure have vomited out countless tweets about how the military are pigdogs of the fascist state, and the 'good ones' were tricked into enlisting by predatory financial promises.

To suddenly turn around and demand pooners be allowed to be in the big nasty fascist military is a head-spinner. Are they suddenly less evil or somehow of more genuine noble intentions in joining?
 
Big Al, Pooner Vanessa, and this wacky troon "lawyer" have this completely backwards.

The "free speech" right at issue belongs to the government, not the trannies.

"The information contained in a passport is unquestionably government speech. The United States – not the passport holder – controls every aspect of the issuance and appearance of a U.S. passport. A U.S. passport is a government-issued document. See 22 U.S.C. § 211(a). The function of a passport is to serve as a “letter of introduction in which the issuing sovereign vouches for the bearer and requests other sovereigns to aid the bearer” and as a “travel control document” representing “proof of identify and proof of allegiance to the U.S.

Doe v. Kerry (N.D. Cal., Sept. 23, 2016, No. 16-CV-0654-PJH) 2016 WL 5339804, at *16

"Passports remain government property even when held by individuals, and must be surrendered to the U.S. government upon demand. See 22 C.F.R. §§ 51.7(a), 51.66. Individuals have no editorial control over the information in a passport; only the U.S. government may amend a passport. See 22 C.F.R. § 51.9. Indeed, criminal penalties are imposed on individuals who mutilate or alter their passports. See 18 U.S.C. § 1543."

Doe v. Kerry (N.D. Cal., Sept. 23, 2016, No. 16-CV-0654-PJH) 2016 WL 5339804, at *17

Once you identify the correct speaker, the "compelled speech" bullshit completely falls apart,

Capture.webp

Hopefully we are seeing the end of taxpayer funded troonery.

Capture.webp

We have even more winning to report on........


"NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Tennessee Governor Bill Lee signed a bill into law to protect educators who misgender transgender students, transgender staff or any other person in their school district.
Lee signed the bill on May 9. The new law could also open schools up to lawsuits if they use students' preferred names or pronouns, effectively requiring educators to misgender transgender students. HB 1270 was introduced by Representative Mark Cochran (R-Englewood). It was originally around 12 pages long and specifically says educators, contractors or students would not be required to use other people's preferred names or pronouns. The law protects them from lawsuits if they use another person's legal name or pronouns that match their assigned sex at birth."

Gov. Lee signs bill opening schools up to lawsuits for using trans students' preferred names or pronouns


"A federal appeals court has placed a hold on a suit challenging President Donald Trump’s executive orders that prohibit agencies from funding programs related to gender-affirming health care. In a brief order Monday, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit put the case into abeyance pending a decision in United States v. Skrmetti, which is currently under consideration by the US Supreme Court. The nation’s top court heard oral arguments in Skrmetti in December and is expected to rule by late June. The issue in Skrmetti is whether Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors violates the fourteenth aemndment."

Challenge to Trump Transgender Orders Paused for SCOTUS Case


"Dozens of trans people and their allies gathered in the outdoor Capitol rotunda Friday, chanting at the top of their lungs. They will not erase us.

The next day, the Texas House of Representatives preliminarily passed a bill that aims to do just that. House Bill 229 strictly defines men and women based on the reproductive organs they were born with, and orders state records to reflect this binary. The bill, titled the “Women’s Bill of Rights,” lays out the “biological truth for anybody who is confused,” said author Rep. Ellen Troxclair, an Austin Republican."

Texas House votes to strictly define man and woman, excluding trans people from state records

"The Texas Legislature has passed legislation requiring insurance companies covering gender mutilation procedures to also cover medical care related to any adverse effects or reversals, sending the bill to Gov. Greg Abbott for final approval.

Senate Bill 1257, authored by State Sen. Bryan Hughes (R–Mineola) and carried in the House by State Rep. Jeff Leach (R–Plano), passed the Senate in April and was approved by the House on Monday. The legislation applies to almost all health benefit plans regulated by the state, including private insurance, Medicaid, and CHIP.

Under the bill, insurance providers must cover any adverse medical effects or complications related to a gender mutilation procedure and care for those who seek to detransition. The bill also mandates annual follow-up health screenings and care to manage, reverse, or recover from gender transition procedures."

Detransition Coverage Bill Clears Texas House, Heads to Governor’s Desk
 
Last edited:
Back