There is an unwritten rule in media that "every single anti-war piece of art is eventually doomed to become used for pro-war messaging". I believe there is something very similar for sci-fi as well. Doesn't matter how many fucking times you show the terminator stomping on a human skull in an irradiated wasteland, the only takeaway people in power will have is "wow, this looks so cool, we need to do that IRL, except avoid the thing that causes these robots to go rogue".
The inherent issue with entertainment is that it has to be, well... entertaining. All the messages and warnings are completely null and void to a person that simply doesn't value human life and only cares to be entertained. There are so many people that dream off there being a zombie apocalypse, for no other reason than them being bored at office work and having delusions of grandeur of them becoming the main character that would get to do all the cool shit. What's that, billions of people have died? Who fucking cares, check out this fucking chainsaw I got dude!
The only effective cyberpunk media, that manages to encapsulate the idea on the dangers of new technology to make even Elon Musk shutter, are those Chinese construction work liveleak videos. It is piece of media that doesn't exist to entertain, you just get to see somebody brutally die a preventable death. And it's not fun, it's not cool, it's just very gruesome and icky. And even then, people like Musk after seeing it would feel bad not out of empathy, but default to thinking "god damn, that explosion caused by a poorly maintained smelter must've cost thousands in damages. And think of how long it would take to clean all the blood, how the news media would use this to damage the company name. What a wasteful loss to the stock market".