US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

You guys remember when we fought World War 2 the Germans started and ended the war with may more advanced tech and fancy military toys but at kinda low volume and America beat them by just Mcdonaldsing their ass and bringing 11 Shermans to fight every 1 tiger, basically we destroyed them with production and logistics

some know me one here, im a retard but I know a little history, I ask all willing to engage with this point seriously, if china started, tommorow making these with bombs on them and tells us

"we are going to start sinking ever single navy vessel under a US flag we find within our territorial waters, This includes the Island of Taiwan, any use of nuclear weapons from any nation will result in a total use of all Chinese Nuclear weapons onto American citys, however we will not use a 1st strike nuclear policy"

Short of us using nuclear weapons how do we credibly go up against a never ending supply of cheap drones? Only strategic bombers could reach as far as China from US soil and we have less than 200 of those, they would be gone in a month of continuous strikes. Hell we allow the use of modern strike aircraft and it only buys us another 1,500 or so.

I think we might have been outmaneuvered on this one and its kinda just a matter of time but Im open to be shown another perspective, if you wanna ad hominem me thats fine just please have a concrete reason why my logic is wrong aswell please
 
Libertarian and Green Parties do not run on serious platforms because they know they'll never win any seats. They're not serious people because they know they're controlled opposition.
Once upon a time the Libertarians were actually trying to win the elections, Michael Badnarik (2004 Libertarian Presidential candidate) was arrested for trying to attend the 2004 Presidential debates, the Green Party candidate too. I have always strongly felt that if Badnarik had been given the same platforms that the Republican and Democrats were given he could have gotten people to vote Libertarian in 2004 especially but the people in charge would never let a 2004 era Libertarian anywhere near the national spotlight.
 
Can you people ever just jerk off in private? Why do you always have to try to force other people to witness your fucking fantasies
I noticed that leftist humor often focuses on "shock" humor. But, in this post-internet world, very little is actually "shocking" compared to the perversion and gore we've already seen, so leftist "humor" just comes off as pointless vulgarity and isn't funny. I started noticing around the time that Sausage Party 1 came out. It wasn't funny, it was just crass. Since leftists aren't allowed to make jokes about people, but any and every sexual perversion is fair game, leftist comedy leans into vulgarity but still manages to miss being funny.
I’m so conflicted- does Thanedar look more like a burn victim that survived a car fire? Or an acid attack victim from London?
View attachment 7339911View attachment 7339914View attachment 7339921
View attachment 7339924
He has the worst dentures I've ever seen. They're ill-fitting and the bottoms look like they're ready to fly out at any second when he talks. They're also badly matched to his remaining teeth. You can see in the back, the natural, yellowish-gray snaggleteeth that remain in his head. The only way that those white teeth in the front are his teeth is the fact that he paid for them in full (and he didn't pay nearly enough).
At this point, I wonder how many of the anti-boomer posters just really hate their parents. Maybe I’m sheltered, but most of the boomers I associate with are nothing like the descriptions that constantly get posted here.
Intergenerational hate is a manufactured anti-white psyop. I include millennial and zoomer hate into this mix.

I've also noticed that a lot of (((people))) on this site have a strawman view of other groups they don't belong to, and spend endless hours beating those strawmen into dust. I don't think it's a coincidence that these (((people))) are the fiercest about essential members of healthy families, such as mothers, fathers, and grandparents. Imagine what a power grab if white families could be separated and turned against each other; why, we're already halfway there! A little more pressure and the American family will be gone, along with the middle class.
 

You guys remember when we fought World War 2 the Germans started and ended the war with may more advanced tech and fancy military toys but at kinda low volume and America beat them by just Mcdonaldsing their ass and bringing 11 Shermans to fight every 1 tiger, basically we destroyed them with production and logistics

some know me one here, im a retard but I know a little history, I ask all willing to engage with this point seriously, if china started, tommorow making these with bombs on them and tells us

"we are going to start sinking ever single navy vessel under a US flag we find within our territorial waters, This includes the Island of Taiwan, any use of nuclear weapons from any nation will result in a total use of all Chinese Nuclear weapons onto American citys, however we will not use a 1st strike nuclear policy"

Short of us using nuclear weapons how do we credibly go up against a never ending supply of cheap drones? Only strategic bombers could reach as far as China from US soil and we have less than 200 of those, they would be gone in a month of continuous strikes. Hell we allow the use of modern strike aircraft and it only buys us another 1,500 or so.

I think we might have been outmaneuvered on this one and its kinda just a matter of time but Im open to be shown another perspective, if you wanna ad hominem me thats fine just please have a concrete reason why my logic is wrong aswell please
Every time I come into this thread you're in freakout mode. Calm the fuck down already.
 
Since leftists aren't allowed to make jokes about people, but any and every sexual perversion is fair game, leftist comedy leans into vulgarity but still manages to miss being funny.
Its very schizo

There is that korean american comedian margot cho. Who basically tells jokes about being a fag hag, gay sex, mocks her mother.

She got the first sitcom as an asian woman and it was built on her comedy.

All the shit she did in 1990s and her stand up material would be grounds for cancleation. But she gets a pass.

Fuck I still rememebr Patt Oswalt's angry bit about black angus and has the line "doors lock from the outside faggot!"

I ve seen parents try to push their view of sexuality on their kids, kids being stupid and not IMO sexual creatures nod and go along with the bullshit. Then purberty hits and it turns out most kids are straight if you dont molest them.

Also the messyness with dealing with hormal children...fuck they get ferral, I would question why any person would want to interact with them. Now I m picturing a trans person of color showing a jr classroom 2 girls 1 cup. when we both know swap.avi was the king of shock shit.

On the topic of porn I was hooked up to my schools DC++ server and I had anime, I had movies, I had whole seasons of the simpsons. You know what everyone took from me?

Porn...and the classical music section of my mp3 folder.

That was it i would look at the log and it would be

porn
porn
porn
porn
classical music
porn
classical music

made me think people were watching porn and setting it to classical music.
 

You guys remember when we fought World War 2 the Germans started and ended the war with may more advanced tech and fancy military toys but at kinda low volume and America beat them by just Mcdonaldsing their ass and bringing 11 Shermans to fight every 1 tiger, basically we destroyed them with production and logistics

some know me one here, im a retard but I know a little history, I ask all willing to engage with this point seriously, if china started, tommorow making these with bombs on them and tells us

"we are going to start sinking ever single navy vessel under a US flag we find within our territorial waters, This includes the Island of Taiwan, any use of nuclear weapons from any nation will result in a total use of all Chinese Nuclear weapons onto American citys, however we will not use a 1st strike nuclear policy"

Short of us using nuclear weapons how do we credibly go up against a never ending supply of cheap drones? Only strategic bombers could reach as far as China from US soil and we have less than 200 of those, they would be gone in a month of continuous strikes. Hell we allow the use of modern strike aircraft and it only buys us another 1,500 or so.

I think we might have been outmaneuvered on this one and its kinda just a matter of time but Im open to be shown another perspective, if you wanna ad hominem me thats fine just please have a concrete reason why my logic is wrong aswell please
China is a paper tiger. Their power is mainly based off of appearances. The People's Liberation Army hasn't fought a war since 1979. Who knows how drone warfare would work against Taiwan or any of China's neighbors.

China's Achilles Heel is the 3 Gorges Dam. I've already mention that one bad rainy season could cause it to self destruct. A powerful explosive could take it out. With it, a lot of china.
 
China is a paper tiger. Their power is mainly based off of appearances. The People's Liberation Army hasn't fought a war since 1979. Who knows how drone warfare would work against Taiwan or any of China's neighbors.

China's Achilles Heel is the 3 Gorges Dam. I've already mention that one bad rainy season could cause it to self destruct. A powerful explosive could take it out. With it, a lot of china.
They also don't have a blue water navy of any significant size. Their airforce is outdated even though they've been trying to upgrade it to modern standards. Their nukes are probably at least half filled with Water. If the Soviets/Russians are any indication, they have corruption all throughout the military and most of their soldiers are probably not up to Western standards in terms of fitness, training or overall skill.
 

You guys remember when we fought World War 2 the Germans started and ended the war with may more advanced tech and fancy military toys but at kinda low volume and America beat them by just Mcdonaldsing their ass and bringing 11 Shermans to fight every 1 tiger, basically we destroyed them with production and logistics

some know me one here, im a retard but I know a little history, I ask all willing to engage with this point seriously, if china started, tommorow making these with bombs on them and tells us

"we are going to start sinking ever single navy vessel under a US flag we find within our territorial waters, This includes the Island of Taiwan, any use of nuclear weapons from any nation will result in a total use of all Chinese Nuclear weapons onto American citys, however we will not use a 1st strike nuclear policy"

Short of us using nuclear weapons how do we credibly go up against a never ending supply of cheap drones? Only strategic bombers could reach as far as China from US soil and we have less than 200 of those, they would be gone in a month of continuous strikes. Hell we allow the use of modern strike aircraft and it only buys us another 1,500 or so.

I think we might have been outmaneuvered on this one and its kinda just a matter of time but Im open to be shown another perspective, if you wanna ad hominem me thats fine just please have a concrete reason why my logic is wrong aswell please
You are really underestimating the capabilities of a bog standard surface warships to do everything from close in defense to, to electronics warfare to just being to able to take hits and keep fighting anyway.

That entire drone swarm could easily be shredded by one of the Sea Wizards, incidentally.

 

You guys remember when we fought World War 2 the Germans started and ended the war with may more advanced tech and fancy military toys but at kinda low volume and America beat them by just Mcdonaldsing their ass and bringing 11 Shermans to fight every 1 tiger, basically we destroyed them with production and logistics

some know me one here, im a retard but I know a little history, I ask all willing to engage with this point seriously, if china started, tommorow making these with bombs on them and tells us

"we are going to start sinking ever single navy vessel under a US flag we find within our territorial waters, This includes the Island of Taiwan, any use of nuclear weapons from any nation will result in a total use of all Chinese Nuclear weapons onto American citys, however we will not use a 1st strike nuclear policy"

Short of us using nuclear weapons how do we credibly go up against a never ending supply of cheap drones? Only strategic bombers could reach as far as China from US soil and we have less than 200 of those, they would be gone in a month of continuous strikes. Hell we allow the use of modern strike aircraft and it only buys us another 1,500 or so.

I think we might have been outmaneuvered on this one and its kinda just a matter of time but Im open to be shown another perspective, if you wanna ad hominem me thats fine just please have a concrete reason why my logic is wrong aswell please
Those drones won't even be able to reach a ship before running out of battery.

Also, that's literally a CCP propaganda video of a light show.
 
I noticed that leftist humor often focuses on "shock" humor. But, in this post-internet world, very little is actually "shocking" compared to the perversion and gore we've already seen, so leftist "humor" just comes off as pointless vulgarity and isn't funny.
I think about this a lot, but not in just a "leftist comedy" way but for all of modern comedy as a whole. It's harder than ever to write any funny comedy these days not because of censorship or anything, instead it's because reality around us is so insane that any fake humor people write up pales in comparison to the real deal. Reality being filmed 24/7 means people have more access to this insanity than ever.

Most people would get far more laughs watching videos of retards getting arrested or following lolcows instead of watching a modern comedy movie or tv show, I'd much rather just keep up with King Cobra instead of following any modern comedy tv show. I don't know how they do Weekend Update on SNL anymore because I can't imagine writing anything more insane than the actual headlines we get in the news. We no longer really have need for any satirical magazines or the likes because you would probably laugh more just reading normal news, although Babylon Bee is pretty funny most of the times you could easily mistake those fake headlines for a real one.
 
You are really underestimating the capabilities of a bog standard surface warships to do everything from close in defense to, to electronics warfare to just being to able to take hits and keep fighting anyway.
The way you defeat those tiny little swarm drones is by being more than five miles away.
 
You are really underestimating the capabilities of a bog standard surface warships to do everything from close in defense to, to electronics warfare to just being to able to take hits and keep fighting anyway.

That entire drone swarm could easily be shredded by one of the Sea Wizards, incidentally.

ron-swanson-america.gif
 
The only way out I can see is to segrigate the kids from accessing content. Personally, I think we should just block anyone from under 18 from the internet, but, that would require parents actually take responsibility and good luck with that.
Actually, we could do this on a device level instead of an internet level.
There are already things like bark phones (I think the brand is called), which allows monitoring of everything by the parent, contacts can't be added without the parent approving it, apps can't be installed without the parent approving it, browsers can't be installed, etc.
It's not only much more extensive than parental controls on typical phones, but the controls are the default.

Yes there are tablets people buy for their kids, but it doesn't go far enough and parental controls are sometimes obtuse and confusing and it still allows things like kids youtube which is full of slop.
I'd personally love to see an actual PC (with keyboard and monitor and all so it isn't portable), with these settings defaulted.

Browsers can't be installed. No internet access unless it's granted for specific uses (like one website that the parent approves specifically), applications are kid friendly only (no games or applications with interaction with mixed groups like roblox, unless it's on a private server with approved contacts like Minecraft, nothing with paid content, install with parental approval only, etc), keylogger that alerts the parent if anything concerning is typed, no webcam can be installed.

If you had kid friendly machines ready out of the box like this I think it would go a long way. Often kids use their parents phone or computer if they don't have their own and that means open access. If the answer is "no, use your own" and theirs is locked down there would be no need for IDs or anything like that.

The big thing would be making these locked down options easy to set up, most options already set up out of the box, and easy to understand like the kid phones.

Once the bark phones came out (and similar options) I've seen bigger and bigger social pressure from moms not to let your kid have a regular phone, especially not a smartphone because they're "unsafe", "full of predators", "more trouble than they're worth" but they still want their kid to have a way to contact them if there's an emergency away from home.

I think similar might happen with computers. "You let your kid on your computer? There's no way I would do that! There's so many predators online. My kid used the Pluto computer for his school.".

Rate me optimistic but I think consumer friendly kid safe options plus societal pressure/shaming and education could go a hell of a long way toward this problem.
A lot of parents are already realizing social media isn't safe for kids, even normies.
 

worst case worst you end up in a situation like with UKR/RUS where EW is so prolific that all drones have fiber optic cables connecting them to their operator and the entire battlefield looks like this

View attachment 7341230
seen it, that video is AI, a mockup of what it might be able to do. Anduril is competing for the "golden dome" contract and have had reason to make themselves look good.

One way suicide drones are starting to be the new meta, no controller, no networking, no frequency. Just pre programed killing machine that will loiter in the area until its battery gets low enough it will turn around automatically or find a new target. It unironically better than an Ai controlled swarm cause some smart people know how to use their networking and frequency against them.

These new suicide drones are insane, only way to disable it is kinetic force either bullet or missile, you cant jam them, cant pick most up on radar, and worst of all you cant stop the 2nd one even if by some miracle you thwarted the first.

Its a race to figure out how to stop electricity working at range
 
Back