US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You are really underestimating the capabilities of a bog standard surface warships to do everything from close in defense to, to electronics warfare to just being to able to take hits and keep fighting anyway.

That entire drone swarm could easily be shredded by one of the Sea Wizards, incidentally.

ron-swanson-america.gif
 
The only way out I can see is to segrigate the kids from accessing content. Personally, I think we should just block anyone from under 18 from the internet, but, that would require parents actually take responsibility and good luck with that.
Actually, we could do this on a device level instead of an internet level.
There are already things like bark phones (I think the brand is called), which allows monitoring of everything by the parent, contacts can't be added without the parent approving it, apps can't be installed without the parent approving it, browsers can't be installed, etc.
It's not only much more extensive than parental controls on typical phones, but the controls are the default.

Yes there are tablets people buy for their kids, but it doesn't go far enough and parental controls are sometimes obtuse and confusing and it still allows things like kids youtube which is full of slop.
I'd personally love to see an actual PC (with keyboard and monitor and all so it isn't portable), with these settings defaulted.

Browsers can't be installed. No internet access unless it's granted for specific uses (like one website that the parent approves specifically), applications are kid friendly only (no games or applications with interaction with mixed groups like roblox, unless it's on a private server with approved contacts like Minecraft, nothing with paid content, install with parental approval only, etc), keylogger that alerts the parent if anything concerning is typed, no webcam can be installed.

If you had kid friendly machines ready out of the box like this I think it would go a long way. Often kids use their parents phone or computer if they don't have their own and that means open access. If the answer is "no, use your own" and theirs is locked down there would be no need for IDs or anything like that.

The big thing would be making these locked down options easy to set up, most options already set up out of the box, and easy to understand like the kid phones.

Once the bark phones came out (and similar options) I've seen bigger and bigger social pressure from moms not to let your kid have a regular phone, especially not a smartphone because they're "unsafe", "full of predators", "more trouble than they're worth" but they still want their kid to have a way to contact them if there's an emergency away from home.

I think similar might happen with computers. "You let your kid on your computer? There's no way I would do that! There's so many predators online. My kid used the Pluto computer for his school.".

Rate me optimistic but I think consumer friendly kid safe options plus societal pressure/shaming and education could go a hell of a long way toward this problem.
A lot of parents are already realizing social media isn't safe for kids, even normies.
 

worst case worst you end up in a situation like with UKR/RUS where EW is so prolific that all drones have fiber optic cables connecting them to their operator and the entire battlefield looks like this

View attachment 7341230
seen it, that video is AI, a mockup of what it might be able to do. Anduril is competing for the "golden dome" contract and have had reason to make themselves look good.

One way suicide drones are starting to be the new meta, no controller, no networking, no frequency. Just pre programed killing machine that will loiter in the area until its battery gets low enough it will turn around automatically or find a new target. It unironically better than an Ai controlled swarm cause some smart people know how to use their networking and frequency against them.

These new suicide drones are insane, only way to disable it is kinetic force either bullet or missile, you cant jam them, cant pick most up on radar, and worst of all you cant stop the 2nd one even if by some miracle you thwarted the first.

Its a race to figure out how to stop electricity working at range
 
China is a paper tiger. Their power is mainly based off of appearances. The People's Liberation Army hasn't fought a war since 1979. Who knows how drone warfare would work against Taiwan or any of China's neighbors.

China's Achilles Heel is the 3 Gorges Dam. I've already mention that one bad rainy season could cause it to self destruct. A powerful explosive could take it out. With it, a lot of china.
Shenzen,Guanzhou, Shanghai are all within strike distance of Taiwan. China is centralized around it's 4 Tier 1s.
 
You are really underestimating the capabilities of a bog standard surface warships to do everything from close in defense to, to electronics warfare to just being to able to take hits and keep fighting anyway.

That entire drone swarm could easily be shredded by one of the Sea Wizards, incidentally.

Ok heard, how much ammo does it have? how much ammo is on board? that swarm in the video is like 1 day of production at 1 factory.

you know what losing 1 aircraft carrier would do to us on morale level? a whole city of men and equipment lost to a few hundred thousand dollars of plastic?

its an unwinnable fight without a force multiplier, you have to knock out the swarms at an electric level, kinetic projectiles are unironically to expensive to sustain cover, not on a production level but a weight level.
 
Actually, we could do this on a device level instead of an internet level.
If you had kid friendly machines ready out of the box like this I think it would go a long way. Often kids use their parents phone or computer if they don't have their own and that means open access. If the answer is "no, use your own" and theirs is locked down there would be no need for IDs or anything like that.
the pornhub ethicist rabbi essentially had the same take, creating devices that are kid friendly by default and have to be flagged as adult owned
 
Ok heard, how much ammo does it have? how much ammo is on board? that swarm in the video is like 1 day of production at 1 factory.

you know what losing 1 aircraft carrier would do to us on morale level? a whole city of men and equipment lost to a few hundred thousand dollars of plastic?

its an unwinnable fight without a force multiplier, you have to knock out the swarms at an electric level, kinetic projectiles are unironically to expensive to sustain cover, not on a production level but a weight level.
Just ignoring that A carrier group doesn't need to be near China to strike China. We can hit targets a thousand miles away if we wanted too and just endlessly sortie aircraft to bomb the Chinese mainland into submission. Even if we didn't somehow have a way to deal with those drones, which again we could just shoot them down, those Drones aren't getting to a carrier. The carrier would just stay outside their effective range and we'd sink any naval vessels coming towards the group, even though the Chinese, again, don't really have a blue water navy.
 
i bet that nigger doesnt call mexicans southern usonians or unitedstatetiansmexicanis
mexico is actually the United States of Mexico. USM, if you will
I've been living in this country my entire life and I've never fucking heard of "Usonian"
South Americans, who no one actually calls Americans, seethe when people call Americans Americans. Keep in mind, Brazil is also the United States of Brazil, Mexico is the United States of Mexico, and so on and so forth.


A Most Sensitive Subject in the White House: Where Is Melania?​

nyt accidentally confirms trump as first gay president

View attachment 7340305
She's clearly on a world tour with the trench coat and hat outfit she likes. Your goal is to find her.

I'll do you one better.

5.56 is good enough for hordes of TEMU drones.
 
Ok heard, how much ammo does it have? how much ammo is on board? that swarm in the video is like 1 day of production at 1 factory.

you know what losing 1 aircraft carrier would do to us on morale level? a whole city of men and equipment lost to a few hundred thousand dollars of plastic?

its an unwinnable fight without a force multiplier, you have to knock out the swarms at an electric level, kinetic projectiles are unironically to expensive to sustain cover, not on a production level but a weight level.
The phalanx holds 1500 rounds. A carrier usually has 4 of them. On select fire it can operate for 20 seconds if doing precision targeting. A full discharge of the magazine costs 3,000 dollars. As for how much ammo is carried on the ship, the answer is how much do they expect to use.

Slow moving drones would have no hope against it. For that matter, neither would cruise missiles either.

You could of course try and send more drones then ammo, but keep in mind US Warships are FAST. The top speed of an Aircraft Carrier is classified, but do keep in mind it's propellers are driven by a nuclear reactor. Sailors have said that at max speed, the front of the ship starts hydroplaning and rooster tail appears behind it. Just like on speed boats. Most drones would not be able to close the distance.
 
Last edited:
I still believe the option of "The internet is 18+ and if you allow your child access to the internet you are doing so at your and your child's own risk" is superior. You can make the same argument about other "harmful material" (political speech, slurs etc) that would similarly need regulation and some kind of system to verify age.
I agree.

I think the ideal way to raise your kids with the internet is to be open and honest about your monitoring. don't be cruel with it, but help them understand why it's a bad thing for them at this age. Especially for pre-teens and younger, you really should limit what they watch to YouTube kids (not the weird elsagate shit), education videos and.. sports I guess. same with tv shows. get old SpongeBob dvds, get old Disney channel shows on PLEX or whatever. but don't feed them the fag slop coming out now.
 
Lmao the retard mayor of Newark, NJ tried to force his way into an ICE facility and got arrested.
I knew the Democrats were going to have their own "muh Jan 6" and I guess this would probably be the closest thing to it yet. It's insane seeing these faggots act like they are being black bagged and sent to Auschwitz when they clearly look like fucking cringe theater kids pretending. And they have no self awareness for the fact that the Jan 6 protesters were in prison for 4 years.
 
Chinese nationals can now buy land in Texas. GG no re Republicans
Texas is beyond fucked. Massive Muslim complex, Greg Abbott cozying up to India in his January 2024 Twitter posts, and that TAMU signed away all intellectual property rights to Qatar - it's just fucked.

Allegedly, Texans have a hard time with South Asian scammers calling from Texas numbers.
 
The phalanx holds 1500 rounds. A carrier usually has 4 of them. On select fire it can operate for 20 seconds if doing precision targeting. A full discharge of the magazine costs 3,000 dollars. As for how much ammo is carried on the ship, the answer is how much do they expect to use.

Slow moving drones would have no hope against it. For that matter, neither would cruise missiles either.

You could of course try and send more drones then ammo, but keep in mind US Warships are FAST. The top speed of an Aircraft Carrier is classified, but do keep in mind it's propellers are driven by a nuclear reactor. Sailors have said that at max speed, the front of the ship starts hydroplaning and rooster tail appears behind it. Just like on speed boats. Most drones would not be able to close the distance.
1746829342844.webp1746829434647.webp
I dont think they go faster than 115 MPH, in russia they call this bad boy the Geran-2
 
People are debating whether porn should be illegal or not, meanwhile I'm asking the same question I've been asking for almost the last two decades: how is it even still such a large industry, and why?

Before you just blow me off as being blatantly retarded, just think about the business model for a second, especially nowadays. It's accessable via so many websites, and the cost to access clips is zero. Absolutely free. "lol who pays for porn," isn't a one-off statement, rather it's a consistent mantra. I'm willing to believe the vast majority aren't paying for this shit, choosing to use the free clips or pirate scenes if they're looking for something specific, and they're all probably using ad-blocking extensions on their browsers so I can't see the porn hosts generating any kind of quantifiable income from that either.

I know there's Only fans and other shit with live shows and you can point to the codependent simps that throw their money at those whores, but I'd put that into it's own category for discussion. I'm just talking pure, no interaction wank material. There's just so much of it everywhere that the supply is endless. The abundance is so vast that it's comical. If anything, it should have negative worth, there's just so much of it, and it's not like niggers looking to nut are even that picky when it comes down to it, so how the hell is it such a gigantic industry?

Honestly, I'm convinced it's not about the money at this point. I really do believe it's just about spreading degeneracy and corrupting susceptible minds. I've seen it time and time again with the incel-to-troon pipeline, nigger after nigger getting exposed to this shit at a young age, the vanilla exposure always quickly advancing to more and more degrading, fetish shit, sexual desire being warped into sadistic rage, self-deprecation, female-loathing behavior. It's an observable, repeating phenomenon that happens far too often to be coincidental.

"Fuck you boomer I'm allowed to like whatever degen shit I want," you might say, but have you dumb niggers ever questioned how and why you got into watching other niggers choke bitches out after prolapsing their assholes just so they'll projectile piss everywhere so you can pretend it's some magical "squirt" mechanic that activates because women secretly love being abused during coitus? I'm willing to bet you never used to like that shit, so what the fuck happened? Is it possible, during your coom quest, your eagerness to splooge gradually made you lazier and more complacent on what constituted as satisfactory spank material until you unknowingly started getting off to sit you would have otherwise found repugnant before?

Fuck it, this is going on way too long. My point is the legality discussion is a distraction from the real issue of whether or not the porn industry exists solely as a machine focused on destabilizing the mental health of the youth of America, ranging from 17 and under literal children to the 18 and up young adults. Rant over.
 
Back