Yes, but we all saw what happened when women were allowed to express their true nature.
Any group of people allowed to engage in unfettered niggertry will do so, white brown black yellow red green or purple; male or female. The key distinction here is how insidious gossip, backbiting, social sabotage and tree-shaking is. Women evolved to endure hardship while men were out hunting mammoths and shit; men evolved to hunt mammoths. There's a size mismatch and a certain kind of battlefield at the tribe while the men were out.
That's about it. Incubator with legs. Almost similar behavior to virus that needs to find a suitable host to reproduce.
No, and not just "kids are fucked up without moms." Come on. Tribal survival for women was different than for men, like I said above. This doesn't mean they have nothing to offer, they certainly do. The issue is they have a nigger event horizon, same as anyone else, and "Society blows up my ego, and accountability doesn't exist for me" definitely let the weak and badly raised fall through it.
Well that's just another way for sacrificing someone for someone else's benefit. Like those fainting goats.
Does the gene care? If the same gene is present in a family's children, and the first born is the one that goes off to marry and reproduce, would *the gene* be more likely to be passed on (and perhaps the tribe more successful) if you had homos not competing for other women but still doing man stuff? Doesn't mean I like it, or it's applicable now, but it's a theory that matches what genes are doing instead of what individuals do.
Likewise, the same gene can make dominant people murderous and conniving, while making those who are losing self defeating. The same gene can make Jezebels swing leg and have kids, die, and be raised by the siblings of the Jezebel. etc.
My point is more "just like I had to moderate my desire to smash people for being irritating and carry women off over a shoulder, bitches can moderate their gossip bullshit." I'd point to every single old religion from Abraham's big three to Buddhism talking about how dangerous bitch gossip is.
Homosexuality is a modern invention. It's not even genetic or inherited. Genes that would promote homosexuality weed themselves out by default.
Modern "gay", yes. Gay? No, that's old as dirt, for better or worse. My point I didn't make very well was at least there's precedent for it in humans. Lesbianism is exceptionally rare, probably because it didn't improve survival odds back in the day, but wasn't selected against enough to quash it entirely.
Men can, because being violent all the time costs energy and violence and dominance is an option.
Women can't because that's their actual nature. Islam ironically resolved the woman issue by removing all rights they have.
You can use incentives instead of coercion. Indeed, women with families and social status tend to understand how shitty women act and police them, while guarding their families against them.
Fight of the genes is as old as dirt really.
Yes. Genes, not individuals.
Yes, I was warned by my parents and grandparents about evil women before and what people to avoid.
I had to learn the hard way, which is why I'm here.
The issue is that people have rights to do stupid shit that harms everyone. Liberalism thought that people would "self-control" but that's just nonsense but for few top % of intelligent people.
Reality is, the human behavior is the same nature as pack of wolves. Instinctual, just you don't feel it.
We agree here. Only the top really control themselves, most follow incentives, and niggers (of any color sex creed or whatnot) need to be coerced.
Where we don't agree is thinking women don't follow a similar distribution, I think. That, and bluntly, women can smell how unstable society is, and are leaning on their survival instincts, because we're only a few shocks away from being tribal Grug time. Even if we're not to blame, we inherited it, so it's on us.
